1. On the relation between the mean compressive strength and the characteristic one
- Author
-
Jean-Michel Torrenti, Frank Dehn, Département Matériaux et Structures (MAST), Université Gustave Eiffel, and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
- Subjects
Characteristic strength ,EUROPE ,Relation (database) ,RESISTANCE A LA COMPRESSION ,FATIGUE (MATER) ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,020101 civil engineering ,02 engineering and technology ,Eurocode ,[SPI.MAT]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Materials ,0201 civil engineering ,CONCRETE ,REGLEMENTATION ,021105 building & construction ,Range (statistics) ,EUROCODE ,General Materials Science ,Civil and Structural Engineering ,Mathematics ,CHARACTERISTIC STRENGTH ,business.industry ,MEAN STRENGTH ,Building and Construction ,Structural engineering ,ESSAI DE COMPRESSION ,Reinforced concrete ,BETON RENFORCE ,BETON ARME DE FIBRES ,Compressive strength ,Mechanics of Materials ,business ,NORME - Abstract
Since the beginning of the construction of structures with reinforced concrete, it has been known that concrete presents a variability that should be taken into account. In modern codes, this variability implies the use of a characteristic strength corresponding to a 5% fractile of the distribution of strength. The actual relation in Eurocode 2 between the characteristic and the mean strength fck = fcm ? 8 MPa was introduced several years ago by Rusch and is integrated in CEB or fib model codes since 1978. In this article, it is presented how the relation was obtained and it is discussed if this relation is still valid considering the fact that the range of concrete strengths is now larger. Considering the scatter of the SD, the relation proposed by Rusch could still be used but engineers should keep in mind that the SD on site could be very different from the one predicted by means of the relation between fck and fcm.
- Published
- 2019