1. Comparison of Provision of Stroke Care in Younger and Older Patients: Findings from the South London Stroke Register.
- Author
-
Crichton, Siobhan L., Wolfe, Charles D. A., Rudd, Anthony G., and McKevitt, Christopher
- Subjects
STROKE risk factors ,STROKE treatment ,AGE distribution ,CHI-squared test ,CLINICAL medicine ,COMPARATIVE studies ,CRITICAL care medicine ,REPORTING of diseases ,EPIDEMIOLOGY ,FAMILY medicine ,FISHER exact test ,HEALTH services accessibility ,PATIENT aftercare ,MEDICAL care ,PATIENTS ,PROBABILITY theory ,RESEARCH funding ,SCALES (Weighing instruments) ,STATISTICAL hypothesis testing ,COMORBIDITY ,DATA analysis ,MULTIPLE regression analysis ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors ,KEY performance indicators (Management) ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,DATA analysis software ,GLASGOW Coma Scale - Abstract
Background. Evidence-based stroke care should be available to all patients. However, evidence exists of inequalities according to age. This study compared access to care for younger adults to that for over 65s. Methods. Using population-based data from 4229 patients with first-ever stroke between 1995 and 2010, associations between age and 21 care indicators were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Results. Age was not associated with stroke unit admission for ischaemic stroke (P = 0.666). Younger PICH patients were least likely to be admitted to stroke units (P = 0.001), instead treated on neurosurgical or ICU wards. Younger age was also associated with admission to neurosurgery or ICU after SAH (P = 0.006), increased occupational or physiotherapy at 1 year (P = 0.043), and contact with a GP 3 months after stroke (P < 0.001). Conclusion. Younger patients have equal or greater access to evidence-based care. However, there is a need to ensure that services meet the needs of this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF