Search

Background: Prior studies have investigated the clinical and imaging factors for hemorrhagic transformation (HT), especially symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH); however, whether alteplase increases the risk of HT after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is unknown. This study aimed to assess clinical and imaging features associated with HT, sICH, and parenchymal hematoma (PH) in patients with acute ischemic stroke after EVT, with and without intravenous alteplase in DIRECT-MT (Direct Intraarterial Thrombectomy to Revascularize Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals: a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial)., Methods: The DIRECT-MT trial is a randomized trial of EVT alone versus intravenous thrombolysis combined with EVT. HT, sICH, and PH was evaluated on follow-up computed tomography. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to test the association of stepwise selected determinants with HT, sICH, and PH., Results: In total, 633 patients were analyzed; 261 (41.2%) had HT; 34 (5.4%) had sICH; and 85 (13.4%) had PH. The median age was 69, and 56.7% were men. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 18, and 320 patients were in combination-therapy group. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was associated with higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.06 [95% CI, 1.10-1.12]) and higher glucose level at hospital arrival (adjusted OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.00-1.29]). No association was found between alteplase treatment and HT, sICH, or PH. The independent predictor of sICH was higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (adjusted OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18]) in EVT alone group, and history of anticoagulant drugs (adjusted OR, 3.75 [95% CI, 1.07-13.06]), higher glucose level at hospital arrival (adjusted OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.03-1.38]), >3 passes of device (adjusted OR, 4.42 [95% CI, 1.36-14.32]) in combination-therapy group., Conclusions: In DIRECT-MT, independent predictors of sICH were baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and glucose level at hospital arrival. Alteplase treatment did not increase the risk of HT, sICH, or PH after EVT. The independent predictor of sICH was different in EVT alone group and combination-therapy group., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03469206.

Background and Purpose: Recent trials showed thrombectomy alone was comparable to bridging therapy in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion eligible for both intravenous alteplase and endovascular thrombectomy. We performed this study to examine whether occlusion site modifies the effect of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy., Methods: This is a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized trial evaluating risk and benefit of intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy (DIRECT-MT [Direct Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy in Order to Revascularize AIS Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary Hospitals]). Among 658 randomized patients, 640 with baseline occlusion site information were included. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis with an interaction term was used to estimate treatment effect modification by occlusion location (internal carotid artery versus M1 versus M2). We report the adjusted common odds ratio for a shift toward better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale after thrombectomy alone compared with combination treatment adjusted for age, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, the time from stroke onset to randomization, the modified Rankin Scale score before stroke onset, and collateral score per the DIRECT-MT statistical analysis plan., Results: The overall adjusted common odds ratio was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.82-1.43) with thrombectomy alone compared with combination treatment, and there was no significant treatment-by-occlusion site interaction ( P =0.47). In subgroups based on occlusion location, we found the following adjusted common odds ratios: 0.99 (95% CI, 0.62-1.59) for internal carotid artery occlusions, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.77-1.64) for M1 occlusions, and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.53-2.79) for M2 occlusions. No treatment-by-occlusion site interactions were observed for dichotomized modified Rankin Scale distributions and successful reperfusion (extended thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b) before thrombectomy. Differences in symptomatic hemorrhage rate were not significant between occlusion locations (internal carotid artery occlusion: 7.02% in bridging therapy versus 7.14% for thrombectomy alone, P =0.97; M1 occlusion: 5.06% versus 2.48%, P =0.22; M2 occlusion: 9.09% versus 4.76%; P =0.78)., Conclusions: In this prespecified subgroup of a randomized trial, we found no evidence that occlusion location can inform intravenous alteplase decisions in endovascular treatment eligible patients directly presenting at endovascular treatment capable centers. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03469206.