Search

Thrombolytic therapies for acute ischemic stroke are widely available but only result in recanalization early enough, to be therapeutically useful, in 10% to 30% of cases. This large gap in treatment effectiveness could be filled by novel therapies that can increase the effectiveness of thrombus clearance without significantly increasing the risk of harm. This focused update will describe the current state of emerging adjuvant treatments for acute ischemic stroke reperfusion. We focus on new treatments that are designed to (1) target different components that make up a stroke thrombus, (2) enhance endogenous fibrinolytic systems, (3) reduce stagnant blood flow, and (4) improve recanalization of distal thrombi and postendovascular thrombectomy., Competing Interests: Dr Mistry reports compensation from American Heart Association, AbbVie, RAPID AI, and American Heart Association for consultant services; compensation from Silver Creek Pharmaceuticals Inc and Translational Sciences for other services; employment by University of Cincinnati; and grants from National Institutes of Health, Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and National Institutes of Health. Dr Hill reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medtronic, and NoNO Inc; employment by University of Calgary; stock options in Basking Bioscience LLC; and compensation from Brainsgate Ltd for consultant services. Dr Coutts reports employment by Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary. Dr Nogueira reports compensation from Anaconda Biomed, Medtronic USA Inc, Cerenovus, Genentech, Viz-AI, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Perfuze, Biogen Inc, Shanghai Wallaby, Brainomix, Hybernia, RapidPulse, Imperative Care, Corindus Inc, NeuroVasc Technologies Inc, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Cerebrotech, Astrocyte, Ceretrieve, Phenox Inc, Philips, Anaconda, and Stryker Corporation for consultant services; compensation from Synchron for data and safety monitoring services; stock options in Ceretrieve, Brainomix, Corindus Inc, Perfuze, Truvic, Viz-AI, Reist/Q?Apel Medical, Vesalio, Cerebrotech, and Viseon Inc; stock holdings in Piraeus Medical, Brain4Care, and Quantanosis AI; and grants from Stryker and Cerenovus. Dr Nguyen reports compensation from Brainomix and Aruna for consultant services; and compensation from American Stroke Association for other services. Dr Medcalf reports grants from National Health and Medical Research Council. Dr Broderick reports grants from Genentech to other; compensation from Brainsgate, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basking Bioscience, and Kroger Prescription Plans Inc for consultant services; and grants from Novo Nordisk to other. Dr De Meyer reports grants from KU Leuven and Research Foundation Flanders. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: A recent review of randomization methods used in large multicenter clinical trials within the National Institutes of Health Stroke Trials Network identified preservation of treatment allocation randomness, achievement of the desired group size balance between treatment groups, achievement of baseline covariate balance, and ease of implementation in practice as critical properties required for optimal randomization designs. Common-scale minimal sufficient balance (CS-MSB) adaptive randomization effectively controls for covariate imbalance between treatment groups while preserving allocation randomness but does not balance group sizes. This study extends the CS-MSB adaptive randomization method to achieve both group size and covariate balance while preserving allocation randomness in hyperacute stroke trials., Methods: A full factorial in silico simulation study evaluated the performance of the proposed new CSSize-MSB adaptive randomization method in achieving group size balance, covariate balance, and allocation randomness compared with the original CS-MSB method. Data from 4 existing hyperacute stroke trials were used to investigate the performance of CSSize-MSB for a range of sample sizes and covariate numbers and types. A discrete-event simulation model created with AnyLogic was used to dynamically visualize the decision logic of the CSSize-MSB randomization process for communication with clinicians., Results: The proposed new CSSize-MSB algorithm uniformly outperformed the CS-MSB algorithm in controlling for group size imbalance while maintaining comparable levels of covariate balance and allocation randomness in hyperacute stroke trials. This improvement was consistent across a distribution of simulated trials with varying levels of imbalance but was increasingly pronounced for trials with extreme cases of imbalance. The results were consistent across a range of trial data sets of different sizes and covariate numbers and types., Conclusions: The proposed adaptive CSSize-MSB algorithm successfully controls for group size imbalance in hyperacute stroke trials under various settings, and its logic can be readily explained to clinicians using dynamic visualization., Competing Interests: Dr Hill reports grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, and NoNO Inc; employment by University of Calgary. The other authors report no conflicts.

Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Background: The topography of arterial territories has been defined using digital maps of supratentorial infarcts. Regions with a high probability of infarction (Pi) exist in the deep compartment due to a paucity of collaterals. However, less attention has been given to regions with a low Pi., Methods: Using published digital maps, patients with cortical stroke and documented vessel occlusion were included. Infarcts from T 2 -weighted magnetic resonance images were segmented and registered onto a standard brain template (Montreal Neurological Institute 152). Segmented magnetic resonance images were averaged to yield the Pi at a voxel level. The overall Pi for the combined arterial territories was calculated to ensure that Pi was in the range of 0 to 1. Sanctuary sites were identified as regions with Pi <0.1., Results: There were 154 patients (63% men; median age, 69 years; and interquartile range, 57-78 years). The magnetic resonance imaging scan used for segmentation was performed at a median interval of 35 (interquartile range, 3-66) days after stroke onset. Sanctuary sites were present in the frontal (gyrus rectus, the paracentral lobule, and orbitofrontal and precentral gyrus), parietal (postcentral, supramarginal, and angular gyrus, superior and inferior parietal lobule, and precuneus and posterior cingulate), and occipital cortex (cuneus, middle, and superior occipital gyrus)., Conclusions: We propose that following vessel occlusion, there are cortical regions with a low Pi, which we termed sanctuary sites. The anatomic basis for this observation is the compensatory capacity of leptomeningeal collaterals., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Ma reports compensation from Independent Sector for consultant services. Dr Phan reports compensation from Bristol Myers Squibb for other services. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non-wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups., Methods: Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A favorable outcome was prespecified as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality. The IVT effect was compared between the treatment groups in the WUS and non-WUS with multivariable logistic regression analysis., Results: Six hundred thirty-four patients from 2 trials were analyzed; 542 had WUS (191 women, 272 receiving alteplase), and 92 had non-WUS (42 women, 43 receiving alteplase). Overall, no significant interaction was noted between the mode of onset and treatment effect ( P value for interaction=0.796). In patients with WUS, the frequencies of favorable outcomes were 54.8% and 45.5% in the IVT and control groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.16]). Death occurred in 4.0% and 1.9%, respectively ( P =0.162), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively ( P =0.194). In patients with non-WUS, no significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes relative to the control (37.2% versus 29.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [0.58-5.37]). One death and one symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were reported in the IVT group, but none in the control., Conclusions: There was no difference in the effect of IVT between patients with WUS and non-WUS. IVT showed a significant benefit in patients with WUS, while there was insufficient statistical power to detect a substantial benefit in the non-WUS subgroup., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: CRD42020166903., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Ma has consulted for Independent Sector. Dr Ringleb has consulted for Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi Sankyo Company and reports personal fees from Bayer Healthcare and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr Wu reports grants from National Institutes of Health. Dr Schwamm serves as a scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct to Genentech (late-window thrombolysis) and as a member of steering committee (TIMELESS [A Phase III, Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thrombolysis in Imaging-Eligible, Late-Window Patients to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase] NCT03785678); stroke systems of care consultant to the Massachusetts Dept of Public Health; member of a Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMB) for Penumbra (MIND NCT03342664) and for Diffusion Pharma PHAST-TSC (Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of Efficacy and Safety of Trans Sodium Crocetinate [TSC] Administered Onboard Emergency Vehicles for Treatment of Suspected Stroke; NCT03763929); and delivering continuing medical education lectures for Boehringer Ingelheim and Prime Education: stroke systems of care and improving time to thrombolysis. Dr Warach has consulted for Genentech. Dr Davis reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Donnan has consulted for Amgen. Dr Gerloff has consulted for Abbott Canada, Allergan, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer Healthcare, and Boehringer Ingelheim and reports grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, European Union, Gemeinnützige Hertie-Stiftung, Merz Farmaceutica Comercial LTDA, and Schilling-Stiftung. Dr Thomalla has consulted for Acandis, Bayer, PORTOLA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, and Stryker and reports personal fees from Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Amarin Pharma Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH. Dr Kitazono reports grant from Daiichi Sankyo Company LTD. Dr Toyoda has consulted for Otsuka Pharmaceutical and reports personal fees from Abbott Japan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novartis. Dr Koga has consulted for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation and Pfizer, and reports grants from Daiichi Sankyo Company LTD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co Ltd. The other authors report no conflicts.

Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Background: Exploratory analysis of the phase 2 PACIFIC-Stroke (Program of Anticoagulation via Inhibition of FXIa by the Oral Compound BAY 2433334-Non-Cardioembolic Stroke) randomized trial suggested that asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, prevents recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attacks in patients with atherosclerotic stroke. In this post hoc exploratory analysis, we hypothesized that asundexian would be more effective in patients enrolled with large, multiple, or cortical acute infarcts on magnetic resonance imaging than in patients enrolled with a single small subcortical acute infarct, and asundexian would prevent incident cortical covert infarcts., Methods: In this placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized controlled trial, patients with mild-to-moderate noncardioembolic ischemic stroke were assigned to asundexian (10, 20, or 50 mg once daily) or placebo, in addition to antiplatelet therapy. Brain magnetic resonance imagings were required within 72 hours of randomization and repeated at 26 weeks or at discontinuation of the study drug., Results: Of 1808 randomized patients, 1780 (98.5%) had interpretable baseline magnetic resonance imagings, of which 1628 (91.5%) had ≥1 diffusion-weighted imaging positive acute infarcts. Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up was obtained in 1439 patients, of whom 1358 had no symptomatic stroke during the trial period. Compared with placebo, asundexian 50 mg daily conferred a trend toward reduced risk of recurrent ischemic stroke or incident covert infarcts (hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.45-1.11]) and recurrent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (secondary outcome; hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.33-1.06]) that was not evident in patients with single small subcortical infarcts (hazard ratios, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.62-2.10] and 0.93 [95% CI, 0.28-3.06]). Incident cortical covert infarcts were reduced in patients taking asundexian 50 mg, but the difference was not statistically significant (crude incidence ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.28-1.12])., Conclusions: These exploratory, unconfirmed results suggest that asundexian may prevent new embolic infarcts but not small artery occlusion. The hypothesis that subtypes of covert brain infarcts respond differently to anticoagulant prevention should be tested in future trials., Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04304508., Competing Interests: Disclosures Except for Dr Chen, all authors reported financial support from Bayer AG for participation in the PACIFIC-Stroke trial (Program of Anticoagulation via Inhibition of FXIa by the Oral Compound BAY 2433334—Non-Cardioembolic Stroke), paid either to them or their institution. Drs Mundl and Colorado are employees of Bayer AG. Dr Caso additionally reports honoraria and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and EVER Pharma and participated in a Data Safety Board, Steering Committee of Pacific AF and Stroke, paid to ARS Umbria. Dr Connolly additionally reports research grants and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi Aventis, and Boston Scientific; consulting fees from Portola; and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol Myers Squibb. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Reteplase is a more affordable new-generation thrombolytic with a prolonged half-life. We aimed to determine the safety dose range of reteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset., Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, blinded-end point phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with acute ischemic stroke aged between 18 and 80 years who were eligible for standard intravenous thrombolysis were enrolled from 17 centers in China and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous reteplase 12+12 mg, intravenous reteplase 18+18 mg, or intravenous alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SITS definition) within 36 hours. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of no more than 1 or a decrease of at least 4 points from the baseline at 14 days after thrombolysis., Results: Between August 2019 and May 2021, 180 patients were randomly assigned to reteplase 12+12 mg (n=61), reteplase 18+18 mg (n=67), or alteplase (n=52). Four patients did not receive the study agent. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 of 60 (5.0%) in the reteplase 12+12 mg group, 1 of 66 (1.5%) in the reteplase 18+18 mg group, and 1 of 50 (2.0%) in the alteplase group ( P =0.53). The primary efficacy outcome in the modified intention-to-treat population occurred in 45 of 60 (75.0%) in the reteplase 12+12 mg group (odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.35-2.06]), 48 of 66 (72.7%) in the reteplase 18+18 mg group (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.32-1.78]), and 39 of 50 (78.0%) in alteplase group., Conclusions: Reteplase was well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset in China with a similar efficacy profile to alteplase. The efficacy and appropriate dosage of reteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke need prospective validation., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04028518., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Campbell is employed by The University of Melbourne. Dr Fisher is a consultant for Simcere and Lumosa and is employed by the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The other authors report no conflicts.

Stroke is a leading cause of paralysis, most frequently affecting the upper limbs and vocal folds. Despite recent advances in care, stroke recovery invariably reaches a plateau, after which there are permanent neurological impairments. Implantable brain-computer interface devices offer the potential to bypass permanent neurological lesions. They function by (1) recording neural activity, (2) decoding the neural signal occurring in response to volitional motor intentions, and (3) generating digital control signals that may be used to control external devices. While brain-computer interface technology has the potential to revolutionize neurological care, clinical translation has been limited. Endovascular arrays present a novel form of minimally invasive brain-computer interface devices that have been deployed in human subjects during early feasibility studies. This article provides an overview of endovascular brain-computer interface devices and critically evaluates the patient with stroke as an implant candidate. Future opportunities are mapped, along with the challenges arising when decoding neural activity following infarction. Limitations arise when considering intracerebral hemorrhage and motor cortex lesions; however, future directions are outlined that aim to address these challenges., Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs Fry, Opie, and Oxley are employees of Synchron. Drs Fry, Opie, and Oxley report stock options from Synchron. Dr Brannigan reports consulting fees from Synchron. Drs Opie and Oxley report issued and pending patents for sensing or stimulating activity of neural tissue. P. Mitchell reports compensation from Stryker Corporation for consultant services; compensation from Medtronic USA, Inc, and Stryker Corporation for other services. The other author reports no conflicts.

Background: Several methods for conducting power analysis of studies with outcomes across the full ordinal modified Rankin Scale are proposed in the literature. No systematic comparison of accuracy, agreement, and sensitivity to small changes in hypothesized effect sizes for these methods is available. Our aim is to conduct such a systematic comparative analysis and to introduce a comprehensive freely available online tool to facilitate appropriate power analyses for ordinal outcomes., Methods: We performed simulation studies utilizing the control arm modified Rankin Scale distributions from the AVERT (A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial), EXTEND (Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits), and HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials) studies, as well as a uniform distribution, in combination with hypothetical treatment effects. We systematically evaluated published power formulas for Ordinal Logistic Regression and Tournament Methods (generalized odds ratio; Win Probability; Win Ratio; and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test). We also developed an online and downloadable Shiny R app facilitating sample size calculation for, and ordinal analysis of, modified Rankin Scale data., Results: Power formulas for Tournament Methods performed well, while the formula for ordinal logistic regression was inaccurate. Tang's Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test sample size formula exhibited the highest accuracy. All methods, including ordinal logistic regression, had almost identical empirical power for a given sample size. All power methods exhibited sensitivity to small changes in hypothesized effect size. The developed freely available online app supports analytical and visualization requirements for all investigated methods for power and statistical analyses of ordinal modified Rankin Scale outcomes., Conclusions: As Tournament Method sample size formulas are assumption-free and accurately calculate power, stroke researchers should use these methods when designing studies with outcomes measured on the full or partially collapsed modified Rankin Scale as well as other ordinal scales, even if they intend to use ordinal logistic regression for analysis. Conducting sensitivity analyses of the effect size assumptions are essential for appropriate sample size estimation. Our developed tool supports both of these recommendations (https://www.thembc.com.au/tournamentmethods)., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Background: Infarct in a new territory (INT) is a known complication of endovascular stroke therapy. We assessed the incidence of INT, outcomes after INT, and the impact of concurrent treatments with intravenous thrombolysis and nerinetide., Methods: Data are from ESCAPE-NA1 trial (Safety and Efficacy of Nerinetide [NA-1] in Subjects Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke), a multicenter, international randomized study that assessed the efficacy of intravenous nerinetide in subjects with acute ischemic stroke who underwent endovascular thrombectomy within 12 hours from onset. Concurrent treatment and outcomes were collected as part of the trial protocol. INTs were identified on core lab imaging review of follow-up brain imaging and defined by the presence of infarct in a new vascular territory, outside the baseline target occlusion(s) on follow-up brain imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). INTs were classified by maximum diameter (<2, 2-20, and >20 mm), number, and location. The association between INT and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale and death) was assessed using standard descriptive techniques and adjusted estimates of effect were derived from Poisson regression models., Results: Among 1092 patients, 103 had INT (9.3%, median age 69.5 years, 49.5% females). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between those with versus without INT. Most INTs (91/103, 88.3%) were not associated with visible occlusions on angiography and 39 out of 103 (37.8%) were >20 mm in maximal diameter. The most common INT territory was the anterior cerebral artery (27.8%). Almost half of the INTs were multiple (46 subjects, 43.5%, range, 2-12). INT was associated with poorer outcomes as compared to no INT on the primary outcome of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (adjusted risk ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57-0.89]). Infarct volume in those with INT was greater by a median of 21 cc compared with those without, and there was a greater risk of death as compared to patients with no INT (adjusted risk ratio, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.48-3.13])., Conclusions: Infarcts in a new territory are common in individuals undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke and are associated with poorer outcomes. Optimal therapeutic approaches, including technical strategies, to reduce INT represent a new target for incremental quality improvement of endovascular thrombectomy., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02930018., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Demchuk reports receiving grant support and personal fees from Medtronic and has a patent with Circle Cardiovascular Imaging on stroke imaging software. Dr Hill reports unrestricted grant funding for the ESCAPE trial to University of Calgary from Covidien/Medtronic and active/in-kind support consortium of public/charitable sources (Heart and Stroke Foundation, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, Alberta Health Services) and the University of Calgary (Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, and Calgary Stroke Program); grant funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, NoNo Inc, and Stryker; personal fees from Merck, nonfinancial support from Hoffmann-La Roche Canada. In addition, Dr Hill has a submitted patent for triaging systems in ischemic stroke and owns stock in Calgary Scientific, a company that focuses on medical imaging software. Dr Goyal reports receiving an unrestricted institutional grant from Medtronic; he received a grant from Stryker and consulting fees from Stryker, Microvention, Mentice; and he holds patent rights in systems and methods for acute stroke diagnosis with GE Healthcare. Dr Field is PI for the SECRET trial (Study of Rivaroxaban for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis) and receives in-kind study medication from Bayer Canada for the study. She is supported by the Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Dr Nogueira reports consulting fees for advisory roles with Stryker Neurovascular, Cerenovus, Medtronic, Phenox, RapidPulse, Anaconda, Perfuze, Genentech, Biogen, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Imperative Care and stock options for advisory roles with Brainomix, Viz-AI, Corindus Vascular Robotics, Vesalio, Ceretrieve, Astrocyte, and Cerebrotec. Dr Swartz reports Grants/Contracts from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, National Institutes of Health, Ontario Brain Institute, and Sunnybrook Research Institute. Dr Ospel receives consulting fees from NICOLAB. Dr Poppe received research grant from Stryker for EASI-TOC study. Dr Tymianski is CEO of NoNO; patents owned by NoNO. Dr Hill received grants from Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Alberta Innovates, NoNO, Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Covidien, Boehringer-Ingleheim, Stryker, and Medtronic; fees from Merck; patent for systems of acute stroke diagnosis; a patent issued and licensed to US Patent Office Number: 62/086,077; stock in Calgary Scientific. Dr Goyal received personal fees from Mentice, Medtronic, Microvention, Stryker; patent to systems of acute stroke diagnosis. Nonfinancial interests: Dr Poppe is PI of EASI-TOC study. Dr Demchuk is a member of the editorial board at International Journal of Stroke (Editor). Dr Nogueira is a member of the Physician Advisory Board for Cerenovus/Neuravi. Dr Hill is Director, Board of Circle Neurovascular, Director, Board of the Canadian Neuroscience Federation, and Director, Board of the Canadian Stroke Consortium. Dr Goyal is a member of the editorial board at Stroke (Consulting Editor). The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) access in remote areas is limited. Preliminary data suggest that long distance transfers for EVT may be beneficial; however, the magnitude and best imaging strategy at the referring center remains uncertain. We hypothesized that patients transferred >300 miles would benefit from EVT, achieving rates of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-2) at 3 months similar to those patients treated at the comprehensive stroke center in the randomized EVT extended window trials and that the selection of patients with computed tomography perfusion (CTP) at the referring site would be associated with ordinal shift toward better outcomes on the mRS., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients transferred from 31 referring hospitals >300 miles (measured by the most direct road distance) to 9 comprehensive stroke centers in Australia and New Zealand for EVT consideration (April 2016 through May 2021)., Results: There were 131 patients; the median age was 64 [53-74] years and the median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 16 [12-22]. At baseline, 79 patients (60.3%) had noncontrast CT+CT angiography, 52 (39.7%) also had CTP. At the comprehensive stroke center, 114 (87%) patients underwent cerebral angiography, and 96 (73.3%) proceeded to EVT. At 3 months, 62 patients (48.4%) had an mRS score of 0 to 2 and 81 (63.3%) mRS score of 0 to 3. CTP selection at the referring site was not associated with better ordinal scores on the mRS at 3 months (mRS median of 2 [1-3] versus 3 [1-6] in the patients selected with noncontrast CT+CT angiography, P =0.1). Nevertheless, patients selected with CTP were less likely to have an mRS score of 5 to 6 (odds ratio 0.03 [0.01-0.19]; P <0.01)., Conclusions: In selected patients transferred >300 miles, there was a benefit for EVT, with outcomes similar to those treated in the comprehensive stroke center in the EVT extended window trials. Remote hospital CTP selection was not associated with ordinal mRS improvement, but was associated with fewer very poor 3-month outcomes.

Background: Leptomeningeal collateral status on baseline computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is associated with clinical outcome after acute ischemic stroke treatment. However, assessment of collateral status is not uniform. To compare 3 different CTA collateral scores (CS) and imaging techniques about their association with clinical outcome., Methods: Pooled analysis of patient-level data from the Highly Effective Reperfusion Using Multiple Endovascular Devices collaboration. Patients with large vessel occlusion from 7 randomized controlled trials that compared endovascular thrombectomy with standard medical care were included. Three different CS (Tan CS, regional CS [rCS], and regional Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score CS) and 2 imaging techniques (single-phase [sCTA] and multiphase/dynamic CTA) were evaluated. Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 3 months poststroke was the primary outcome. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of sCTA image acquisition time on collateral status assessment using an adjusted ordinal logistic regression model to obtain predicted values for the trichotomized rCS., Results: Among 1147 pooled patients, 948 (82.7%) had sCTA and 199 (17.3%) multiphase/dynamic CTA as baseline angiography. With all 3 collateral scales, better CSs were associated with better 3-month functional outcome. With sCTA images, the rCS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.63) and regional Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score CS (AUC 0.62) better predicted functional outcome than the Tan CS (AUC 0.60, respectively; P <0.001 and P =0.02). With multiphase/dynamic CTA images, all collateral scales performed similarly in predicting functional outcome (rCS [AUC 0.61]; regional Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score CS [AUC 0.61] versus Tan CS [AUC 0.61], respectively; P =0.93 and P =0.91). Overall, no endovascular thrombectomy treatment effect modification by collateral status (rCS) was demonstrated ( P =0.41). sCTA timing independently influenced CS assessment. On earlier timed sCTA, the predicted proportions of scans with poor collaterals was higher and vice versa., Conclusions: In this data set of highly selected patients with stroke, using a regional CS on sCTA likely allows for the most accurate prediction of functional outcome while on time-resolved CTA, the type of CS did not matter. Patients across all collateral grades benefit from endovascular thrombectomy. sCTA timing independently influenced CS assessment.

Background: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse stroke outcomes, data regarding the influence of CKD on intravenous thrombolysis outcomes are scarce. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with unknown onset time in patients with CKD., Methods: Patients with an acute stroke of unknown onset time from the EOS trials (Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis) collaboration were evaluated using an individual patient-level database of randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous thrombolysis with placebo/standard treatment. CKD was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 Mixed-effect logistic-regression analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality., Results: Baseline data on renal function were available for 688 of 843 patients. Of these, CKD was present in 146 (21%), including 69 of 351 patients receiving alteplase and 77 of 337 patients receiving placebo/standard treatment. Overall, treatment with alteplase was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome, and CKD did not modify the treatment effect ( P =0.834). A favorable outcome was observed in 31 of 69 (46%) patients with CKD in the alteplase group and in 28 of 77 (36%) patients with CKD in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.55-2.58]). Among patients with CKD, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2 patients (3%) in the alteplase group but in none of the controls ( interaction =0.133). At 90 days, death was reported in 3 patients (4%) in the alteplase group compared with 2 patients (3%) in the controls ( P =0.133). At 90 days, death was reported in 3 patients (4%) in the alteplase group compared with 2 patients (3%) in the controls ( P =0.539)., Conclusions: The present analysis indicates that the benefit of alteplase does not differ between stroke patients with unknown onset time with and without CKD, although the statistical power was lacking to confirm the efficacy in subgroups. This study only applies to mild-to-moderate or predialysis CKD.

Background: Recent reports raise the possibility of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) leading to intracerebral hemorrhage in young adults following childhood neurosurgery, suggesting transmission of amyloid-β (Aβ) through neurosurgical procedures including dura mater grafting. Parenchymal Aβ deposition, and to a lesser extent tau aggregation, similar to that seen in Alzheimer disease, have also been described., Methods: We conducted a database review of 634 consecutive intracerebral hemorrhage patients aged <65 years at a tertiary stroke center over 20 years to identify such patients., Results: We identified 3 patients aged in their thirties who presented with spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage, with imaging or neuropathology consistent with CAA, and a history of childhood neurosurgery. Two of these patients had undergone a dural repair using cadaveric dura mater (Lyodura). In addition to CAA, both patients had neuropathologically confirmed parenchymal Aβ and tau deposits, characteristic of Alzheimer disease., Conclusions: Our findings support the concept of neurosurgical Aβ transmission but suggest that such cases are rare in standard clinical practice.

Intravenous thrombolytics and endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke have evolved in parallel. However, the best approach to combine these reperfusion therapies in patients eligible for both strategies remains uncertain. Initial randomized trials of endovascular thrombectomy included administration of intravenous thrombolytics to all eligible patients. However, whether that is of net benefit has been questioned and parallels drawn with treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, where intravenous thrombolytics are only given if first medical contact to percutaneous intervention is expected to be >90 minutes. Six randomized trials of a direct thrombectomy approach versus intravenous thrombolytics followed by endovascular thrombectomy have now reported their results. With exception of a minority of patients in one trial, the trials all used alteplase rather than potentially more effective tenecteplase. This review examines the current state of evidence and implications for clinical practice. Importantly, these trials only apply to patients who present to a hospital with immediate access to endovascular thrombectomy and are not relevant to patients who receive thrombolytic and are then transferred to an endovascular-capable hospital. Although 2 of the 6 randomized trials met their prespecified noninferiority margin, these margins were large compared with the absolute benefit of alteplase. Overall, functional outcome was similar, with slight trends favoring bridging thrombolytics and a significant increase in final reperfusion. Symptomatic hemorrhage was increased by ≈1.8% in the bridging group but death was nonsignificantly lower. The workflow in direct thrombectomy trials involved delaying thrombolytic administration until eligibility for thrombectomy and the trials was established and randomization completed. This reduced the time available for thrombolytics to occur prethrombectomy compared with standard practice. We conclude that, pending individual-patient data meta-analyses, intravenous thrombolytics retain an important role alongside endovascular thrombectomy. Further efforts to accelerate and enhance reperfusion with thrombolytics and perform individual patient-level pooled subgroup analyses are warranted.

Background: Emerging data suggest tissue within the infarct lesion is not homogenously damaged following ischemic stroke but has a gradient of injury. Using blood-brain-barrier (BBB) disruption as a marker of tissue injury, we tested whether therapeutic reperfusion improves clinical outcome by reducing the severity of tissue injury within the infarct in patients with ischemic stroke., Methods: In a pooled analysis of patients treated for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the EXTEND-IA TNK (Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke) and EXTEND-IA part-2 (Determining the Optimal Dose of Tenecteplase Before Endovascular Therapy for Ischaemic Stroke) trials, post-treatment BBB permeability at 24 hours was calculated based on the extent of T1-brightening by extravascular gadolinium on T2* perfusion-weighted imaging and measured within the diffusion-weighted-imaging lesion. First, to determine the clinical significance of BBB disruption as a marker of severity of tissue injury, we examined the association between post-treatment BBB permeability and functional outcome. Second, we performed an exploratory (reperfusion, BBB permeability, functional outcome) mediation analysis to estimate the proportion of the reperfusion-outcome relationship that is mediated by change in BBB permeability., Results: In the 238 patients analyzed, an increased BBB permeability measured within the infarct at 24 hours was associated with a reduced likelihood of favorable outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2) after adjusting for age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, premorbid modified Rankin Scale, infarct topography, laterality, thrombolytic agent, sex, parenchymal hematoma, and follow-up infarct volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]; P =0.023). Mediation analysis suggested reducing the severity of tissue injury (as estimated by BBB permeability) accounts for 18.2% of the association between reperfusion and favorable outcome, as indicated by a reduction in the regression coefficient of reperfusion after addition of BBB permeability as a covariate., Conclusions: In patients with ischemic stroke, reduced severity of tissue injury within the infarct, as determined by assessing the integrity of the BBB, is independently associated with improved functional outcome. In addition to reducing diffusion-weighted imaging-defined infarct volume, reperfusion may also improve clinical outcome by reducing tissue injury severity within the infarct.

Background: Factors contributing to cerebral edema in the post-hyperacute period of ischemic stroke (first 24-72 hours) are poorly understood. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption and postischemic hyperperfusion reflect microvascular dysfunction and are associated with hemorrhagic transformation. We investigated the relationships between BBB integrity, cerebral blood flow, and space-occupying cerebral edema in patients who received acute reperfusion therapy., Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of patients treated for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the EXTEND-IA TNK and EXTEND-IA TNK part 2 trials who had MRI with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging 24 hours after treatment. We investigated the associations between BBB disruption and cerebral blood flow within the infarct with cerebral edema assessed using 2 metrics: first midline shift (MLS) trichotomized as an ordinal scale of negligible (<1 mm), mild (≥1 to <5 mm), or severe (≥5 mm), and second relative hemispheric volume (rHV), defined as the ratio of the 3-dimensional volume of the ischemic hemisphere relative to the contralateral hemisphere., Results: Of 238 patients analyzed, 133 (55.9%) had negligible, 93 (39.1%) mild, and 12 (5.0%) severe MLS at 24 hours. The associated median rHV was 1.01 (IQR, 1.00-1.028), 1.03 (IQR, 1.01-1.077), and 1.15 (IQR, 1.08-1.22), respectively. MLS and rHV were associated with poor functional outcome at 90 days ( P<0 .002). Increased BBB permeability was independently associated with more edema after adjusting for age, occlusion location, reperfusion, parenchymal hematoma, and thrombolytic agent used (MLS cOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.03-1.20], P =0.005; rHV β, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.24-0.55], P <0.0001), as was reduced cerebral blood flow (MLS cOR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.58], P =0.001; rHV β, -2.95 [95% CI, -4.61 to -11.29], P =0.0006). In subgroup analysis of patients with successful reperfusion (extended Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia 2b-3, n=200), reduced cerebral blood flow remained significantly associated with edema (MLS cOR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14-0.98], P =0.045; rHV β, -2.59 [95% CI, -4.32 to -0.86], P =0.004)., Conclusions: BBB disruption and persistent hypoperfusion in the infarct after reperfusion treatment is associated with space-occupying cerebral edema. Further studies evaluating microvascular dysfunction during the post-hyperacute period as biomarkers of poststroke edema and potential therapeutic targets are warranted.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented unique challenges to stroke care and research internationally. In particular, clinical trials in stroke are vulnerable to the impacts of the pandemic at multiple stages, including design, recruitment, intervention, follow-up, and interpretation of outcomes. A carefully considered approach is required to ensure the appropriate conduct of stroke trials during the pandemic and to maintain patient and participant safety. This has been recently addressed by the International Council for Harmonisation which, in November 2019, released an addendum to the Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials guidelines entitled Estimands and Sensitivity Analysis in Clinical Trials. In this article, we present the International Council for Harmonisation estimand framework for the design and conduct of clinical trials, with a specific focus on its application to stroke clinical trials. This framework aims to align the clinical and scientific objectives of a trial with its design and end points. It also encourages the prospective consideration of potential postrandomization intercurrent events which may occur during a trial and either impact the ability to measure an end point or its interpretation. We describe the different categories of such events and the proposed strategies for dealing with them, specifically focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic as a source of intercurrent events. We also describe potential practical impacts posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on trials, health systems, study groups, and participants, all of which should be carefully reviewed by investigators to ensure an adequate practical and statistical strategy is in place to protect trial integrity. We provide examples of the implementation of the estimand framework within hypothetical stroke trials in intracerebral hemorrhage and stroke recovery. While the focus of this article is on COVID-19 impacts, the strategies and principles proposed are well suited for other potential events or issues, which may impact clinical trials in the field of stroke.

Background and Purpose: Recent studies using automated perfusion imaging software have identified adults most likely to benefit from reperfusion therapies in extended time windows. The time course of penumbral tissue is poorly characterized in childhood arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). We explore the feasibility of using automated perfusion-diffusion imaging software to characterize penumbra in childhood AIS., Methods: An observational cohort study of children with acute unilateral AIS presenting to our institution. Diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging performed within 72 hours of symptom onset were necessary for inclusion. Perfusion-diffusion mismatch was estimated using RAPID software. Ischemic core was defined as apparent diffusion coefficient <620×10−6 mm2/s and hypoperfusion as Tmax >6 seconds. Favorable mismatch profile was defined as core volume <70 mL, mismatch volume ≥15 mL, and a mismatch ratio ≥1.8., Results: Twenty-nine children (median 8 years old, interquartile range, 4.4–14.6) were included (26 unilateral middle cerebral artery and 3 unilateral cerebellar infarcts). Median Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 4 (interquartile range, 3–11). Most cases had cryptogenic (n=11) or focal cerebral arteriopathy (n=9) causes. Median time-to-imaging =13.7 hours (interquartile range, 7.5–25.3). RAPID detected an ischemic core in 19 (66%) patients. In the remaining cases, the mean apparent diffusion coefficient values were mostly higher than the threshold as the majority of these presentations were delayed (median >21 hours) and infarct volumes were small (<3.5 mL). Overall, 3 children, imaged at 3.75, 11, and 23.5 hours had favorable mismatch profiles., Conclusions: This study demonstrates it is feasible to rapidly assess perfusion-diffusion mismatch in childhood AIS using automated software. Favorable mismatch profiles, using adult-based parameters, persisted beyond the standard 4.5 hours window for thrombolysis, suggesting potential therapeutic benefit of RAPID use. Further work is required to determine the utility of perfusion-based imaging to guide clinical decision making, whether adult thresholds require modification in childhood AIS, and to investigate the effect of time-delay and cause on mismatch characteristics.

Background and Purpose: Mobile stroke units (MSUs) improve reperfusion therapy times in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, prehospital management options for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are less established. We describe the initial Melbourne MSU experience in ICH., Methods: Consecutive patients with ICH and AIS treated by the Melbourne MSU were included. We describe demographics, proportions of patients receiving specific therapies, and bypass to comprehensive/neurosurgical centers. We also compare operational time metrics between patients with MSU-ICH and MSU-AIS., Results: During a 2-year period, the Melbourne MSU managed 49 patients with ICH, mean (SD) age 74 (12) years, median (interquartile range) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 17 (12–20). Intravenous antihypertensives were the commonest treatment provided (46.9%). Bypass of a primary center to a comprehensive center with neurosurgical expertise occurred in 32.7% of patients with MSU-ICH compared with 20.5% of patients with MSU-AIS. Compared with patients with MSU-AIS, patients with MSU-ICH had faster onset-to-emergency-call, and onset-to-scene-arrival times at the median and 75th percentiles., Conclusions: MSUs can facilitate ultra-early ICH diagnosis, management, and triage.

Background and Purpose: Distal medium vessel occlusions (DMVOs) are increasingly considered for endovascular thrombectomy but are difficult to detect on computed tomography angiography (CTA). We aimed to determine whether time-to-maximum of tissue residue function (Tmax) maps, derived from CT perfusion, can be used as a triage screening tool to accurately and rapidly identify patients with DMVOs., Methods: Consecutive code stroke patients who underwent multimodal CT were screened retrospectively. Two experienced readers evaluated all patients’ Tmax maps in consensus for presence of delay in an arterial territory (territorial Tmax delay). The diagnostic accuracy of this surrogate for identifying DMVOs was determined using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. CTA, interpreted by 2 experienced neuroradiologists with access to all imaging data, served as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance of 4 other readers with different levels of experience for identifying DMVOs on Tmax versus CTA was also assessed. These readers independently assessed patients’ Tmax maps and CTAs in 2 separate timed sessions, and areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were compared using the DeLong algorithm. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to comparatively assess diagnostic speed., Results: Three hundred seventy-three code stroke patients (median age, 70 years; 56% male, 70 with a DMVO) were included. Territorial Tmax delay had a sensitivity of 100% (CI95, 94.9%–100%) and specificity of 87.8% (CI95, 83.6%–91.3%) for presence of a DMVO, yielding an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of 0.939 (CI95, 0.920–0.957). All 4 readers achieved sensitivity >95% and specificity >84% for detecting DMVOs using Tmax maps, with diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves) and speed that were significantly (P<0.001) higher than on CTA., Conclusions: Territorial Tmax delay had perfect sensitivity and high specificity for a DMVO. Tmax maps were accurately and rapidly interpreted by even inexperienced readers, and causes of false positives are easy to recognize and dismiss. These findings encourage the use of Tmax to identify patients with DMVOs.

Background and Purpose: The Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) sponsored an imaging session and workshop during the Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable XI via webinar on October 1 to 2, 2020, to develop consensus recommendations, particularly regarding optimal imaging at primary stroke centers., Methods: This forum brought together stroke neurologists, neuroradiologists, neuroimaging research scientists, members of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, industry representatives, and members of the US Food and Drug Administration to discuss imaging priorities in the light of developments in reperfusion therapies, particularly in an extended time window, and reinvigorated interest in brain cytoprotection trials., Results: The imaging session summarized and compared the imaging components of recent acute stroke trials and debated the optimal imaging strategy at primary stroke centers. The imaging workshop developed consensus recommendations for optimizing the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of computed tomography and magnetic resonance acute stroke imaging, and also recommendations on imaging strategies for primary stroke centers., Conclusions: Recent positive acute stroke clinical trials have extended the treatment window for reperfusion therapies using imaging selection. Achieving rapid and high-quality stroke imaging is therefore critical at both primary and comprehensive stroke centers. Recommendations for enhancing stroke imaging research are provided.

[Figure: see text].

Background and Purpose: Distal clot migration is a recognized event following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in the setting of acute ischemic stroke. Of note, clots that were initially retrievable by endovascular thrombectomy may migrate to a distal nonretrievable location and compromise clinical outcome. We investigated the incidence of clot migration leading to clot inaccessibility following IVT in the time window of 4.5 to 9 hours., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the EXTEND trial (Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits) data. Baseline and 12- to 24-hour follow-up clot location was determined on computed tomography angiogram or magnetic resonance angiogram. The incidence of clot migration leading to a change from retrievable to nonretrievable location was identified and compared between the two treatment groups (IVT versus placebo)., Results: Two hundred twenty patients were assessed. Clot migration from a retrievable to nonretrievable location occurred in 37 patients: 21 patients (19.3%) in the placebo group and 16 patients (14.4%) in the IVT group. No significant difference was identified in the incidence of clot migration leading to inaccessibility between groups ( P =0.336)., Conclusions: Our results did not show increased clot migration leading to clot inaccessibility in patients treated with IVT.

Background and Purpose: In ischemic stroke, intravenous tenecteplase is noninferior to alteplase in selected patients and has some practical advantages. Several stroke centers in New Zealand changed to routine off-label intravenous tenecteplase due to improved early recanalization in large vessel occlusion, inconsistent access to thrombectomy within stroke networks, and for consistency in treatment protocols between patients with and without large vessel occlusion. We report the feasibility and safety outcomes in tenecteplase-treated patients., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients thrombolyzed with intravenous tenecteplase at 1 comprehensive and 2 regional stroke centers from July 14, 2018, to February 29, 2020. We report the baseline clinical characteristics, rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and angioedema. These were then compared with patient outcomes with those treated with intravenous alteplase at 2 other comprehensive stroke centers. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models were performed assessing the association of tenecteplase with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and independent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) at day 90., Results: There were 165 patients treated with tenecteplase and 254 with alteplase. Age (75 versus 74 years), sex (56% versus 60% male), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (8 versus 10), median door-to-needle times (47 versus 48 minutes), or onset-to-needle time (129 versus 130 minutes) were similar between the groups. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 (1.8% [95% CI, 0.4-5.3]) tenecteplase patients compared with 7 (2.7% [95% CI, 1.1-5.7]) alteplase patients ( P =0.75). There were no differences between tenecteplase and alteplase in the rates of angioedema (4 [2.4%; 95% CI, 0.7-6.2] versus 1 [0.4%; 95% CI, 0.01-2.2], P =0.08) or 90-day functional independence (100 [61%] versus 140 [57%], P =0.47), respectively. In mixed-effects logistic regression models, there was no significant association between thrombolytic choice and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio tenecteplase, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.14-2.80], P =0.53) or functional independence (odds ratio tenecteplase, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.74-1.95], P =0.46)., Conclusions: Routine use of tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis was feasible and had comparable safety profile and outcome to alteplase.

Background and Purpose: Lacunar syndromes correlate with a lacunar stroke on imaging in 50% to 60% of cases. Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is becoming the preferred imaging modality for acute stroke triage. We aimed to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for noncontrast computed tomography and CTP in lacunar syndromes, and for cortical, subcortical, and posterior fossa regions., Methods: A retrospective analysis of confirmed ischemic stroke patients who underwent acute CTP and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging between 2010 and 2018 was performed. Brain noncontrast computed tomography and CTP were assessed independently by 2 stroke neurologists. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for the detection of strokes in patients with lacunar syndromes using different CTP maps., Results: We found 106 clinical lacunar syndromes, but on diffusion-weighted imaging, these consisted of 59 lacunar, 33 cortical, and 14 posterior fossa strokes. The discrimination of ischemia identification was very poor using noncontrast computed tomography in all 3 regions, but good for cortical (AUC, 0.82) and poor for subcortical and posterior regions (AUCs, 0.55 and 0.66) using automated core-penumbra maps. The addition of delay time and mean transient time maps substantially increased subcortical (AUC, 0.80) and slightly posterior stroke detection (AUC, 0.69)., Conclusions: Analysis of mean transient time and delay time maps in combination with core-penumbra maps improves detection of subcortical and posterior strokes.

Background and Purpose: Severity-based assessment tools may assist in prehospital triage of patients to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs) for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), but criticisms regarding diagnostic inaccuracy have not been adequately addressed. This study aimed to quantify the benefits and disadvantages of severity-based triage in a large real-world paramedic validation of the Ambulance Clinical Triage for Acute Stroke Treatment (ACT-FAST) algorithm., Methods: Ambulance Victoria paramedics assessed the prehospital ACT-FAST algorithm in patients with suspected stroke from November 2017 to July 2019 following an 8-minute training video. All patients were transported to the nearest stroke center as per current guidelines. ACT-FAST diagnostic accuracy was compared with hospital imaging for the presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) and need for CSC-level care (LVO, intracranial hemorrhage, and tumor). Patient-level time saving to EVT was modeled using a validated Google Maps algorithm. Disadvantages of CSC bypass examined potential thrombolysis delays in non-LVO infarcts, proportion of patients with false-negative EVT, and CSC overburdening., Results: Of 517 prehospital assessments, 168/517 (32.5%) were ACT-FAST positive and 132/517 (25.5%) had LVO. ACT-FAST sensitivity and specificity for LVO was 75.8% and 81.8%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 58.8% for LVO and 80.0% when intracranial hemorrhage and tumor (CSC-level care) were included. Within the metropolitan region, 29/55 (52.7%) of ACT-FAST-positive patients requiring EVT underwent a secondary interhospital transfer. Prehospital bypass with avoidance of secondary transfers was modeled to save 52 minutes (95% CI, 40.0-61.5) to EVT commencement. ACT-FAST was false-positive in 8 patients receiving thrombolysis (8.1% of 99 non-LVO infarcts) and false-negative in 4 patients with EVT requiring secondary transfer (5.4% of 74 EVT cases). CSC bypass was estimated to over-triage 1.1 patients-per-CSC-per-week in our region., Conclusions: The overall benefits of an ACT-FAST algorithm bypass strategy in expediting EVT and avoiding secondary transfers are estimated to substantially outweigh the disadvantages of potentially delayed thrombolysis and over-triage, with only a small proportion of EVT patients missed.

Background and Purpose: Tenecteplase improved functional outcomes and reduced the requirement for endovascular thrombectomy in ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion in the EXTEND-IA TNK randomized trial. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of tenecteplase versus alteplase in this trial., Methods: Post hoc within-trial economic analysis included costs of index emergency department and inpatient stroke hospitalization, rehabilitation/subacute care, and rehospitalization due to stroke within 90 days. Sources for cost included key study site complemented by published literature and government websites. Quality-adjusted life-years were estimated using utility scores derived from the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Long-term modeled cost-effectiveness analysis used a Markov model with 7 health states corresponding to 7 modified Rankin Scale scores. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed., Results: Within the 202 patients in the randomized controlled trial, total cost was nonsignificantly lower in the tenecteplase-treated patients (40 997 Australian dollars [AUD]) compared with alteplase-treated patients (46 188 AUD) for the first 90 days( P =0.125). Tenecteplase was the dominant treatment strategy in the short term, with similar cost (5412 AUD [95% CI, -13 348 to 2523]; P =0.181) and higher benefits (0.099 quality-adjusted life-years [95% CI, 0.001-0.1967]; P =0.048), with a 97.4% probability of being cost-effective. In the long-term, tenecteplase was associated with less additional lifetime cost (96 357 versus 106 304 AUD) and greater benefits (quality-adjusted life-years, 7.77 versus 6.48), and had a 100% probability of being cost-effective. Both deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analyses yielded similar results., Conclusions: Both within-trial and long-term economic analyses showed that tenecteplase was highly likely to be cost-effective for patients with acute stroke before thrombectomy. Recommending the use of tenecteplase over alteplase could lead to a cost saving to the healthcare system both in the short and long term. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02388061.

In patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, achieving complete (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3) rather than incomplete successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b) is associated with better functional outcome. Despite technical improvements, incomplete reperfusion remains the final angiographic result in 40% of patients according to recent trials. As most incomplete reperfusions are caused by distal vessel occlusions, they are potentially amenable to rescue strategies. While observational data suggest a net benefit of up to 20% in functional independence of incomplete versus complete reperfusions, the net benefit of secondary improvement from Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b to 3 reperfusion might differ due to lengthier procedures and delayed reperfusion. Current strategies to tackle distal vessel occlusions consist of distal (microcatheter) aspiration, small adjustable stent retrievers, and administration of intra-arterial thrombolytics. While there are promising reports evaluating those techniques, all available studies show relevant limitations in terms of selection bias, single-center design, or nonconsecutive patient inclusion. Besides an assessment of risks associated with rescue maneuvers, we advocate that the decision-making process should also include a consideration of potential outcomes if complete reperfusion would successfully be achieved. These include (1) a futile angiographic improvement (hypoperfused territory is already infarcted), (2) an unnecessary angiographic improvement (the patient would not have developed infarction if no rescue maneuver was performed), and (3) a successful rescue maneuver with clinical benefit. Currently there is paucity of data on how these scenarios can be predicted and the decision whether to treat or to stop in a patient with incomplete reperfusion involves many unknowns. To advance the status quo, we outline current knowledge gaps and avenues of potential research regarding this clinically important question.

Background and Purpose- Reversal of dabigatran before intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been well described using alteplase but experience with intravenous tenecteplase is limited. Tenecteplase seems at least noninferior to alteplase in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. We report on the experience of dabigatran reversal before tenecteplase thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Methods- We included consecutive patients with ischemic stroke receiving dabigatran prestroke treated with intravenous tenecteplase after receiving idarucizumab. Patients were from 2 centers in New Zealand and Australia. We reported the clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and their functional outcome. Results- We identified 13 patients receiving intravenous tenecteplase after dabigatran reversal. Nine (69%) were male, median age was 79 (interquartile range, 69-85) and median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 6 (interquartile range, 4-21). Atrial fibrillation was the indication for dabigatran therapy in all patients. All patients had a prolonged thrombin clotting time (median, 80 seconds [interquartile range, 57-113]). Seven patients with large vessel occlusion were referred for endovascular thrombectomy, 2 of these patients (29%) had early recanalization with tenecteplase abrogating thrombectomy. No patients had parenchymal hemorrhage or symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. Favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) occurred in 8 (62%) patients. Two deaths occurred from large territory infarction. Conclusions- Our experience suggests intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase following dabigatran reversal using idarucizumab may be safe in selected patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further studies are required to more precisely estimate the efficacy and risk of clinically significant hemorrhage.

Background and Purpose- This study aimed to derive and validate an optimal collateral measurement on computed tomographic perfusion imaging for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods- In step 1 analysis of 22 patients, the parasagittal region of the ischemic hemisphere was divided into 6 pial arterial zones to derive the optimal collateral threshold by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The collateral threshold was then used to define the collateral index in step 2. In step 2 analysis of 156 patients, the computed tomographic perfusion collateral index was compared with collateral scores on dynamic computed tomographic angiography in predicting good clinical outcome by simple regression. Results- The optimal collateral threshold was delay time >6 s (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 92%). The computed tomographic perfusion collateral index, defined by the ratio of delay time >6 s/delay time >2 s volume, showed a significant correlation with dynamic computed tomographic angiography collateral scores (correlation coefficient, 0.62; P <0.001), with an optimal cut point of 31.8% in predicting good collateral status (sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 86%). When predicting good clinical outcome, the delay time collateral index showed a similar predictive power to dynamic computed tomographic angiography collaterals (area under the curve, 0.78 [0.67-0.83] and 0.77 [0.69-0.84], respectively; P <0.001). Conclusions- Computed tomographic perfusion can accurately quantify collateral flow after acute ischemic stroke.

Background and Purpose- Low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) leads to worse outcomes after stroke. We hypothesized that the arterial input function (AIF) variability on perfusion computed tomography, especially the time between scan onset and end of AIF (SO-EndAIF), would reflect reduction of cardiac output. Methods- Retrospective analysis of consecutive stroke patients, who underwent computed tomography between January 2013 and September 2018, was performed in 2 parts. (1) To determine the correlation between SO-EndAIF and LVEF, all patients with a transthoracic echocardiogram performed ±6 months from the time of stroke were included. LVEF was dichotomized as either normal (≥50%) or decreased (<50%). (2) AIF was compared with hypoperfusion volume, defined as delay time >3 seconds and with clinical outcome measured using 3-month modified Rankin Scale. Results- A total of 732 ischemic stroke patients underwent computed tomography, 231 with transthoracic echocardiogram were included in part (1), 393 with outcome data were included in part (2). In part (1), 193/231 (83.5%) had normal LVEF (median 61%) and 38/231 (16.5%) decreased LVEF (median 39%). The low-LVEF group had significantly prolonged SO-EndAIF compared with normal-LVEF group (mean of 39.7 versus 26 second; P <0.001), and larger hypoperfusion lesions (94.9 versus 37.6 mL; P <0.001). SO-EndAIF time was strongly associated with EF, with an area under the curve of 0.86. Twenty nine seconds was the best threshold to distinguish between normal and impaired EF (area under the curve, 0.77). In part (2), the SO-EndAIF ≥29 second group had larger hypoperfusion volumes (21.8 versus 89.7 mL; P <0.001) and infarct core (12.2 versus 2.3 mL; P <0.0001) and patients with SO-EndAIF ≥29 seconds had fewer excellent or good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1; 40% versus 22%; OR, 2.79; P <0.001, modified Rankin Scale score 0-2; 65% versus 35%; OR, 1.41; P =0.033). Conclusions- AIF width correlates with ejection fraction in acute ischemic stroke. A 29-second threshold from scan onset to end of AIF accurately predicts reduced LVEF and identifies patients more likely to have worse outcomes after stroke.

Background and Purpose- There is contradictory evidence on the impact of the stroke side (hemisphere) on outcomes. We investigated any effect modification by laterality on stroke patients' outcomes in recent endovascular trials. Methods- Individual patient-level data were combined in this meta-analysis of all patients included in randomized trials comparing endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischemic patients with stroke (HERMES [Highly Effective Reperfusion Using Multiple Endovascular Devices] Collaboration). We stratified the 90-day functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale according to the stroke side of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus standard care, adjusted for important prognostic variables. Results- The meta-analysis included 1737 patients (871 right hemispheric strokes and 866 left hemispheric) from 7 trials. Baseline median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were significantly higher in left (20) versus right (16) hemispheric strokes (P<0.001). Other clinical and radiological baseline characteristics were similar. The beneficial response to endovascular therapy assessed by 90-day modified Rankin Scale shift was not modified by the side of the stroke. There were no significant differences between right and left hemispheric stroke in the 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2; 40.7% [95% CI, 37.4%-44.1%] versus 37.6% [95% CI, 37.4%-44.1%]; P=0.19), median final infarct volumes (45 versus 39.5 mL, P=0.51), nor 90-day mortality (15.1% vs 16.8%, P=0.31). Conclusions- Stroke side was not a prognostic factor and did not modify the treatment effect among patients treated in the endovascular or control groups in recent endovascular thrombectomy trials.

Background and Purpose- At acute phase and neurointensive care, patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may become agitated or delirious. We found no previous studies on psychotic disorders or antipsychotic drug (APD) use by long-term aSAH survivors. We defined the APD use and its risk factors among 12-month survivors of aSAH in an Eastern Finnish population-based cohort with long-term follow-up. Methods- We analyzed APD use in 1144 consecutive patients with aSAH alive at 12 months of the Kuopio intracranial aneurysm patient and family database and their age, sex, and birth municipality matched controls (3:1; n=3432) from 1995 to 2013 and median follow-up of 9 years. Using the Finish nationwide health registries, we obtained drug purchase and hospital discharge data. Results- In total, 140 (12%) of the 1144 patients started APD use first time after aSAH (index date), in contrast to 145 (4%) of the 3432 matched population controls. The cumulative rate of starting APD was 6% at 1 year and 9% at 5 years, in contrast to 1% and 2% in the controls, respectively. The rates at 1 and 5 years were only 1% and 2% in the 489 patients with a good condition (modified Rankin Scale score, 0 or 1 at 12 months; no shunt, intracerebral hemorrhage, or intraventricular hemorrhage). Instead, the highest rate of APD use, 23% at 5 years was among the 192 patients shunted for hydrocephalus after aSAH. Eighty-eight (63%) of the 140 aSAH patients with APD use had also concomitant antidepressant or antiepileptic drug use. Conclusions- The 12-month survivors of aSAH were significantly more likely to be started on APD after aSAH than their matched population controls. These patients often used antidepressant and antiepileptic drugs concomitantly. The use of APDs strongly correlated with signs of brain injury after aSAH, with low use if no signs of significant brain injury were present.

Background and Purpose- Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is a useful tool in the evaluation of acute ischemic stroke, where it can provide an estimate of the ischemic core and the ischemic penumbra. The optimal CTP parameters to identify the ischemic core remain undetermined. Methods- We used artificial neural networks (ANNs) to optimally predict the ischemic core in acute stroke patients, using diffusion-weighted imaging as the gold standard. We first designed an ANN based on CTP data alone and next designed an ANN based on clinical and CTP data. Results- The ANN based on CTP data predicted the ischemic core with a mean absolute error of 13.8 mL (SD, 13.6 mL) compared with diffusion-weighted imaging. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.85. At the optimal threshold, the sensitivity for predicting the ischemic core was 0.90 and the specificity was 0.62. Combining CTP data with clinical data available at time of presentation resulted in the same mean absolute error (13.8 mL) but lower SD (12.4 mL). The area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.87, 0.91, and 0.65, respectively. The maximal Dice coefficient was 0.48 in the ANN based on CTP data exclusively. Conclusions- An ANN that integrates clinical and CTP data predicts the ischemic core with accuracy.

Background and Purpose- Hyperglycemia is a negative prognostic factor after acute ischemic stroke but is not known whether glucose is associated with the effects of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with large-vessel stroke. In a pooled-data meta-analysis, we analyzed whether serum glucose is a treatment modifier of the efficacy of EVT in acute stroke. Methods- Seven randomized trials compared EVT with standard care between 2010 and 2017 (HERMES Collaboration [highly effective reperfusion using multiple endovascular devices]). One thousand seven hundred and sixty-four patients with large-vessel stroke were allocated to EVT (n=871) or standard care (n=893). Measurements included blood glucose on admission and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale range, 0-6; lower scores indicating less disability) at 3 months. The primary analysis evaluated whether glucose modified the effect of EVT over standard care on functional outcome, using ordinal logistic regression to test the interaction between treatment and glucose level. Results- Median (interquartile range) serum glucose on admission was 120 (104-140) mg/dL (6.6 mmol/L [5.7-7.7] mmol/L). EVT was better than standard care in the overall pooled-data analysis adjusted common odds ratio (acOR), 2.00 (95% CI, 1.69-2.38); however, lower glucose levels were associated with greater effects of EVT over standard care. The interaction was nonlinear such that significant interactions were found in subgroups of patients split at glucose < or >90 mg/dL (5.0 mmol/L; P=0.019 for interaction; acOR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.73-8.41 for patients < 90 mg/dL versus 1.83; 95% CI, 1.53-2.19 for patients >90 mg/dL), and glucose < or >100 mg/dL (5.5 mmol/L; P=0.004 for interaction; acOR, 3.17; 95% CI, 2.04-4.93 versus acOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.42-2.08) but not between subgroups above these levels of glucose. Conclusions- EVT improved stroke outcomes compared with standard treatment regardless of glucose levels, but the treatment effects were larger at lower glucose levels, with significant interaction effects persisting up to 90 to 100 mg/dL (5.0-5.5 mmol/L). Whether tight control of glucose improves the efficacy of EVT after large-vessel stroke warrants appropriate testing.

Background and Purpose- The volume of estimated ischemic core using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging can identify ischemic stroke patients who are likely to benefit from reperfusion, particularly beyond standard time windows. We assessed the accuracy of pretreatment CTP estimated ischemic core in patients with successful endovascular reperfusion. Methods- Patients from the HERMES (Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Endovascular Stroke Trials) and EXTEND-IA TNK (Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke) databases who had pretreatment CTP, >50% angiographic reperfusion, and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours were included. Ischemic core volume on baseline CTP data was estimated using relative cerebral blood flow <30% (RAPID, iSchemaView). Follow-up diffusion magnetic resonance imaging was registered to CTP, and the diffusion lesion was outlined using a semiautomated algorithm. Volumetric and spatial agreement (using Dice similarity coefficient, average Hausdorff distance, and precision) was assessed, and expert visual assessment of quality was performed. Results- In 120 patients, median CTP estimated ischemic core volume was 7.8 mL (IQR, 1.8-19.9 mL), and median diffusion lesion volume at 24 hours was 30.8 mL (IQR, 14.9-67.6 mL). Median volumetric difference was 4.4 mL (IQR, 1.2-12.0 mL). Dice similarity coefficient was low (median, 0.24; IQR, 0.15-0.37). The median precision (positive predictive value) of 0.68 (IQR, 0.40-0.88) and average Hausdorff distance (median, 3.1; IQR, 1.8-5.7 mm) indicated reasonable spatial agreement for regions estimated as ischemic core at baseline. Overestimation of total ischemic core volume by CTP was uncommon. Expert visual review revealed overestimation predominantly in white matter regions. Conclusions- CTP estimated ischemic core volumes were substantially smaller than follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging lesions at 24 hours despite endovascular reperfusion within 2 hours of imaging. This may be partly because of infarct growth. Volumetric CTP core overestimation was uncommon and not related to imaging-to-reperfusion time. Core overestimation in white matter should be a focus of future efforts to improve CTP accuracy.

Background and Purpose: Edema may worsen outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We assessed its natural history, factors influencing growth, and association with outcome., Methods: We estimated edema volumes in ICH patients from the Helsinki ICH study using semiautomated planimetry. We assessed the correlation between edema extension distance (EED) and time from ICH onset, creating an edema growth trajectory model up to 3 weeks. We interpolated expected EED at 72 hours and identified clinical and imaging characteristics associated with faster edema growth. Association of EED and mortality was assessed using logistic regression adjusting for predictors of ICH outcome., Results: From 1013 consecutive patients, 861 were included. There was a strong inverse correlation between EED growth rate (cm/d) and time from onset (days): EED growth=0.162*days exp(-0.927), R 2 =0.002), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (14 versus 8; P =0.002), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (14 versus 8; P <0.001), and lower Glasgow Coma scale score (13 versus 15; P <0.001), larger ICH volume (19.7 versus 12.7 mL; P <0.001), larger initial EED (0.42 versus 0.30; P <0.001), irregularly shaped hematoma (55% versus 42%; P <0.001), and higher glucose (7.6 versus 6.9 mmol/L; P =0.001). Patients with faster edema growth had more midline shift (50% versus 31%; P <0.001), herniation (12% versus 4%; P <0.001) mortality. In the logistic regression model, higher-than-expected EED was associated with 6-month mortality (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.46; P <0.001) mortality. In the logistic regression model, higher-than-expected EED was associated with 6-month mortality (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.46; P =0.032)., Conclusions: Edema growth can be readily monitored and is an independent determinant of mortality after ICH, providing an important treatment target for strategies to improve patient outcome., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: Simultaneous multiple intracerebral hemorrhages (SMICHs) are uncommon. Few single-center studies have analyzed characteristics and outcome of SMICH. We analyzed clinical characteristics and outcome of SMICH patients from 2 comprehensive stroke centers., Methods: Baseline imaging from consecutive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients (n=1552) from Helsinki ICH study and Royal Melbourne Hospital ICH study was screened for SMICH. ICH pathogenesis was classified according to the structural lesion, medication, amyloid angiopathy, systemic/other disease, hypertension, undetermined classification system (SMASH-U). ICH caused by trauma, tumor, and aneurysmal rupture was excluded. Baseline clinical and radiological characteristics and 90-day mortality were compared between SMICH and single ICH patients. Association of SMICH with 90-day mortality was assessed in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for predictors of ICH outcome., Results: Of 1452 patients, 85 (5.9%) were classified as SMICH. SMICH were more often female (58% versus 42%; P =0.004), had lower baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (12 versus 14; P =0.008), and more frequent lobar location (59% versus 34%; P <0.001) compared with single ICH. The SMASH-U pathogenesis of SMICH patients was less often hypertensive (20% versus 37%; P =0.001), more often systemic coagulopathy (12% versus 3%; P <0.001), and trended toward more cerebral amyloid angiopathy (32% versus 23%; P =0.071). SMICH was not associated with 90-day mortality on univariate (37% versus 35%; P =0.610), multivariable (odds ratio, 0.783; 95% confidence interval, 0.401-1.529; P =0.473), or propensity score-matched analyses (odds ratio, 0.760; 95% confidence interval, 0.352-1.638; P =0.484)., Conclusions: SMICH occurs in ≈1 in 20 ICH, more commonly with lobar located hematomas and systemic coagulopathy with less hypertensive angiopathy. The associated mortality is similar to single ICH. Given varied etiologies, SMICH management should target the underlying pathology., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)