1. Neuropsychological change and S-100 protein release in 130 unselected patients undergoing cardiac surgery
- Author
-
Tom Treasure, Tom M. McMillan, David W. Holt, and Shaun Kilminster
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Aging ,Time Factors ,Cmax ,Context (language use) ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Verbal learning ,Nervous System ,law.invention ,Intraoperative Period ,Cognition ,law ,Cardiopulmonary bypass ,Medicine ,Humans ,Postoperative Period ,Cardiac Surgical Procedures ,Coronary Artery Bypass ,Aged ,Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Surrogate endpoint ,S100 Proteins ,Area under the curve ,Neuropsychological test ,Middle Aged ,Cardiac surgery ,Affect ,Mental Health ,Anesthesia ,Neurology (clinical) ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Background and Purpose —S-100 protein promises to be a valuable surrogate end point for cerebral injury. This is of particular interest within the context of cardiac surgery. We sought to explore the relationship between change in neurospychological performance attributable to cardiopulmonary bypass and the release of brain-specific S-100 protein. Methods —In an observational comparative study in a University Hospital Cardiac Surgical Unit, S-100 protein release during and 5 hours after the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass was compared with change (from preoperative to 6 to 8 weeks postoperative) in neuropsychological tests in 130 patients undergoing the full range of cardiac surgical procedures. Results —Neuropsychological performance usually improved, being significantly so in 10 of 25 parameters. S-100 area under the curve (AUC) protein release correlated with age ( r =0.24, P r =0.17, P r =0.29, P r =−0.21, P r =0.2. Multiple regression models showed that neuropsychological tests accounted for 23% of the variance associated with S-100 AUC release, after partialing out the effects of age and bypass time. Conclusions —The correlation between S-100 protein release and neuropsychological function supports the belief that it is a measure of brain injury, which may be useful in future studies of mechanisms and prevention.
- Published
- 1999