1. Development and Validation of a Bilingual Stroke Preparedness Assessment Instrument
- Author
-
Brisa N. Sánchez, José Biller, Lewis B. Morgenstern, Mackenzie Dome, Lesli E. Skolarus, and Kathleen M. Mazor
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Psychometrics ,Video Recording ,Psychological intervention ,Multilingualism ,Health Promotion ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cronbach's alpha ,medicine ,Humans ,Stroke ,Aged ,Advanced and Specialized Nursing ,business.industry ,Public health ,Reproducibility of Results ,Hispanic or Latino ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Test (assessment) ,Black or African American ,Vignette ,Preparedness ,Community health ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background and Purpose— Stroke preparedness interventions are limited by the lack of psychometrically sound intermediate end points. We sought to develop and assess the reliability and validity of the video-Stroke Action Test (video-STAT) an English and a Spanish video-based test to assess people’s ability to recognize and react to stroke signs. Methods— Video-STAT development and testing was divided into 4 phases: (1) video development and community-generated response options, (2) pilot testing in community health centers, (3) administration in a national sample, bilingual sample, and neurologist sample, and (4) administration before and after a stroke preparedness intervention. Results— The final version of the video-STAT included 8 videos: 4 acute stroke/emergency, 2 prior stroke/nonemergency, 1 nonstroke/emergency, and 1 nonstroke/nonemergency. Acute stroke recognition and action response were queried after each vignette. Video-STAT scoring was based on the acute stroke vignettes only (score range 0–12 best). The national sample consisted of 598 participants, 438 who took the video-STAT in English and 160 who took the video-STAT in Spanish. There was adequate internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.72). The average video-STAT score was 5.6 (SD=3.6), whereas the average neurologist score was 11.4 (SD=1.3). There was no difference in video-STAT scores between the 116 bilingual video-STAT participants who took the video-STAT in English or Spanish. Compared with baseline scores, the video-STAT scores increased after a stroke preparedness intervention (6.2 versus 8.9, P Conclusions— The video-STAT yields reliable scores that seem to be valid measures of stroke preparedness.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF