Search

Background: There is evidence that male neonates have higher incidences of ischemic stroke and associated limitations in brain repair compared to female neonates. We used data from the International Maternal Newborn Stroke Registry (IMNSR) to further explore neonatal sex differences in demographics, birth characteristics, stroke onset, and maternal factors. Methods: Eleven international sites participated; 8 entered data for this analysis. Eligible participants with newborn (28 weeks gestation to 28 postnatal days) ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or cerebral venous thrombosis were identified prospectively and retrospectively and enrolled. Preterm infants born before 28 weeks and neonates with germinal matrix intraventricular hemorrhage were excluded. We collected APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes, resuscitation status, demographics, stroke type, maternal and gestational age at birth, and mother’s health conditions at birth. Descriptive statistics were performed to identify differences in female versus male neonate cases related to demographics, pregnancy-related factors, and birth-related factors. Results: We analyzed 68 cases, 38 males and 30 females. Median maternal age for all cases was 31 y (IQR 29-34). Compared to females, males were more likely to have a lower APGAR 1 score and receive resuscitation, and more likely to have a stroke onset within the first week of life. This data set did not show significant gender-related differences in stroke type, or maternal health concerns during pregnancy (Table). Conclusions: We found that males with newborn strokes had more complications at birth and were more likely to have strokes present in the first week of life than females. Further research on the reasons for these sex differences is needed.

As a broad and heterogeneous diagnosis, stroke stands at the intersection of many related specialties. Thus, stroke researchers have a unique opportunity to collaborate across a wide range of clinical and basic science disciplines. In addition to the more obvious collaboration opportunities (eg working with cardiologists on clinical trials with composite cardiovascular outcomes), stroke researchers may work in fields as diverse as primary care, oncology, obstetrics, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, biomedical engineering, environmental science, and health disparities. Cross-disciplinary biomedical research synthesizes expertise from diverse contributing disciplines and develops new scientific approaches to address complex problems in health.1 Cross-disciplinary approaches can be as simple as research collaborations involving several medical subspecialties. More complex endeavors, such as collaborations between clinical researchers and scientists from widely different disciplines (eg engineers or social scientists), may be termed transdisciplinary research; however, similar principles apply. For the purposes of this discussion, we refer to the entire spectrum of multidisciplinary collaborative research as cross-disciplinary research. Collaborating with investigators outside your own field requires more than just adding a coauthor to a paper or proposal. True collaborations will not always be without conflict. Navigating the challenges of cross-disciplinary research successfully can lead to significant rewards in terms of job satisfaction and career development, and most importantly, to the advancement of scientific understanding. Early career vascular neurologists interested in growing robust cross-disciplinary research collaborations might consider the following approaches. A good research question identifies a gap in knowledge about a specific problem, which, in turn, may require expertise from multiple scientific disciplines to answer. For example, a stroke neurologist investigating intracranial atherosclerosis might collaborate with a vascular surgeon studying peripheral vascular disease, a radiologist studying vessel wall imaging, or a biomedical engineer measuring arterial compliance. Alternatively, a stroke neurologist might be interested in rare causes of stroke affecting a …

Background: Mortality rates as high as 20% have been reported for pregnant patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The aim of this study is to describe the risk factors, management and outcomes of pregnant compared to non-pregnant patients with ICH in the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) Stroke Registry. Methods: Using medical history or ICD-9 codes, we identified 178 pregnant and 4817 non-pregnant female patients aged 18-44 with ICH in GWTG from 2008-2013. Differences in patient and care characteristics were compared by Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests for continuous variables. Stratified logistic regression assessed the effect of pregnancy on outcomes conditional on age and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Results: Pregnant ICH patients were younger, had fewer preexisting stroke risk factors and used fewer associated medications. Median initial blood pressures, initial neurologic exam findings and measures of guideline-based care were similar between groups (Table). Stroke onset did not occur in a healthcare setting for >85% of all patients, but pregnant patients took longer to arrive (median 268 vs. 186 min), used EMS less often (29% vs. 39%) and went to larger hospitals with higher annual ICH admissions than non-pregnant patients. Risk adjusted odds of in-hospital death in pregnant women were about half that of non-pregnant women (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.94), but length of stay >6 days (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 0.86-2.27), independent ambulation at discharge (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 0.81-1.54) and discharge to home (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81-1.51) outcomes were similar. Conclusions: Pregnant women with ICH are younger and healthier than their non-pregnant counterparts but have similar presenting symptoms. Despite later arrival times, in-hospital mortality is lower, suggesting differences in underlying disease pathophysiology.

Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) accounts for up to 4.1% of all pregnancy-related in-hospital deaths, but is less often aneurysmal and is associated with better short term outcomes than in non-pregnant patients. We sought to describe the risk factors, management and outcomes of pregnant vs. non-pregnant patients with SAH in the Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) Stroke Registry. Methods: Using medical history or ICD-9 codes, we identified 152 pregnant and 5745 non-pregnant SAH female patients aged 18-44 with SAH in GWTG from 2008-2013. Differences in characteristics were compared by Chi-square tests for categorical and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests for continuous variables. Stratified logistic regression assessed the effect of pregnancy on outcomes conditional on age and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Results: Pregnant SAH patients were younger, more often black and insured with Medicaid. They had higher initial blood pressure (BP) and were less likely to report prior hypertension. Arrival delays from stroke onset were common in both groups (median 340 vs. 277 min), but pregnant SAH patients were more often already hospitalized at stroke onset (16% vs. 10%). Fewer pregnant vs. non-pregnant SAH patients had initial neurologic exam findings recorded (Table). Pregnant SAH patients had lower in-hospital death than non-pregnant patients (aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.45) and were more likely at discharge to ambulate independently (aOR 2.40, 95% CI 1.56-3.69) and return home (aOR 2.60, 95% CI 1.67-4.06). Conclusions: Several differences exist between pregnant and non-pregnant women with SAH. Many present with BP well below the threshold for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, making prompt recognition and prevention of brain hemorrhage challenging. Overall, pregnancy-related SAH is associated with less morbidity and mortality than non-pregnancy related disease.

Background: Ischemic Stroke (IS) is a rare but serious event during pregnancy or the postpartum period. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of pregnant vs. non-pregnant women diagnosed with IS in the Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry. Methods: We identified 24641 female patients aged 18-44 with IS, based on medical history or ICD-9 codes, from 2008-2013. Patient and hospital categorical variables were compared by Chi-square and continuous variables by Wilcoxon Rank-Sum. Stratified logistic regression assessed the effect of pregnancy on outcomes conditional on age and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Results: There were 338 (1.4%) pregnant IS patients. Compared to non-pregnant patients, pregnant patients had fewer traditional stroke risk factors, were less often black, and were more likely to be insured by Medicaid, in a healthcare setting at stroke onset, and admitted to a stroke center. Both groups had similar initial mild stroke severity and exam findings most notable for weakness (Table). Discharge outcomes of in-hospital death (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.33-1.50), discharge to home (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.81-1.34), independent ambulation (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79-1.34) or length of stay >4 days (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 0.96-1.68) did not differ between groups. Of the 145 cases where pregnancy stage was coded, 76 (52.4%) occurred postpartum and 65 (44.8%) antepartum, with no difference in discharge outcomes. Women with postpartum compared with antepartum IS were more likely to have hypertension, use antihypertensives pre-stroke, and have higher median initial post-stroke blood pressure. Conclusions: Pregnancy-related IS is uncommon and occurs in women with few traditional stroke risk factors, often within 6 weeks postpartum. Despite these differences, short term outcomes after stroke are similar to non-pregnant women. Further research is needed to determine if pregnancy, itself, independently contributes to stroke risk.

Background: Pregnancy and recent cesarean delivery are thought to pose unacceptable complication risks from IV thrombolysis (tPA), and most pregnant or recently postpartum women with ischemic stroke (IS) do not receive IV tPA. We sought to determine the frequency of IV tPA use and short term outcomes among pregnant vs. non-pregnant women with IS in the Get With the Guidelines Stroke Registry. Methods: Pregnant or recently postpartum ( Results: Pregnant patients were less likely to receive IV tPA than non-pregnant patients (15/338 (4.4%) vs. 1913/24303 (7.9%), p = 0.03). The primary reasons documented for non-treatment in the 0-3 hour timeframe were pregnancy itself (58% vs. 0%) and recent surgery (47% vs. 12%). Other less commonly noted reasons were stroke symptoms too mild (16% vs. 31%) or rapid improvement (13% vs. 32%). There were no differences in major complications between groups (Table). Discharge outcomes between groups were comparable, with low rates of in-hospital mortality (0-2%) and high rates of home discharge (60-72%). Only the proportion with length of stay > 4 days differed, and was more frequent among pregnant patients (Table). Conclusions: Pregnant patients with IS undergo IV thrombolysis infrequently; less often than non-pregnant patients of childbearing age. Despite the rare use, the short term outcomes and complication rates in these pregnant patients generally appear to be favorable and similar to non-pregnant women. As the data are underpowered to show true differences between the groups, larger studies are warranted to study the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis in pregnancy.

Background: Stroke accounts for 14% of maternal deaths. Our knowledge of the risk factors and etiologies of pregnancy-related stroke (PRS) is limited, as most data are derived from small, single center series or large, administrative datasets lacking clinical detail. We sought to describe the patient and hospital characteristics of PRS by analyzing the Get with the Guidelines (GWTG) Stroke Registry. Methods: All female patients aged 18-44 entered into GWTG from 2008-2013 with PRS were ascertained by medical history of pregnancy (i.e. pregnant or Results: We identified 46043 patients with stroke from 1554 sites, of whom 668 (1.5%) had PRS. Ischemic stroke (IS) occurred in 338 (51%), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in 178 (27%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in 152 (23%). Many patient and hospital characteristics differed significantly by stroke subtype (Table). Hypertension, smoking and pre-stroke therapy with antithrombotics or antihypertensives were common; 7.4% of IS were recurrent. About 86% of all strokes did not occur in a healthcare setting and only 27% of patients arrived by EMS. Median initial blood pressure (BP) was higher in HS (ICH and SAH) than in IS, and half of all patients had initial BP below the threshold for pre-eclampsia (140/90 mmHg). HS patients were more often treated at larger, academic hospitals. Conclusions: PRS constituted 1.5% of all strokes aged 18-44 in a large contemporary stroke registry and 50% were HS. Most PRS occurred out of hospital, and half of all cases presented with normal BP levels. Further research is needed to better define PRS etiology.