Search

Purpose— To critically review and evaluate the science behind individual eligibility criteria (indication/inclusion and contraindications/exclusion criteria) for intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase) treatment in acute ischemic stroke. This will allow us to better inform stroke providers of quantitative and qualitative risks associated with alteplase administration under selected commonly and uncommonly encountered clinical circumstances and to identify future research priorities concerning these eligibility criteria, which could potentially expand the safe and judicious use of alteplase and improve outcomes after stroke. Methods— Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association Stroke Council’s Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the American Heart Association’s Manuscript Oversight Committee. The writers used systematic literature reviews, references to published clinical and epidemiology studies, morbidity and mortality reports, clinical and public health guidelines, authoritative statements, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence and to indicate gaps in current knowledge and, when appropriate, formulated recommendations using standard American Heart Association criteria. All members of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on and approved the final version of this document. The document underwent extensive American Heart Association internal peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Results— After a review of the current literature, it was clearly evident that the levels of evidence supporting individual exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase vary widely. Several exclusionary criteria have already undergone extensive scientific study such as the clear benefit of alteplase treatment in elderly stroke patients, those with severe stroke, those with diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia, and those with minor early ischemic changes evident on computed tomography. Some exclusions such as recent intracranial surgery are likely based on common sense and sound judgment and are unlikely to ever be subjected to a randomized, clinical trial to evaluate safety. Most other contraindications or warnings range somewhere in between. However, the differential impact of each exclusion criterion varies not only with the evidence base behind it but also with the frequency of the exclusion within the stroke population, the probability of coexistence of multiple exclusion factors in a single patient, and the variation in practice among treating clinicians.

Introduction: The selection of acute ischemic stroke patients relies on the interpretation of radiological studies, commonly including noncontrast CT (ASPECTS score), CTA, and in some circumstances, CT perfusion (CTP) scans. Hypothesis: The interrater reliability between readers of noncontrast head CT will be moderate and not as good as that between readers of CT perfusion scans. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who were considered for endovascular stroke therapy at an academic medical center from April 2010 - November 2014. All patients underwent CT, CTA, and CTP. Images were independently reviewed by four readers (A, B, C, D) in total (2 experienced neuroradiologists, one experienced neurointensivist, and one neuroradiology fellow). Each rated half of the cohort. All readers performed online training in ASPECTS. Moderate-to-good collateral circulation was defined as filling of 50% or more of the middle cerebral artery pial arterial territory on CTA, as in ESCAPE trial. An “acceptable core” on CTP was defined as in EXTEND-IA trial with core volume < 70 mL, mismatch ratio >1.2, and absolute mismatch volume >10 mL but was qualitatively estimated. Interrater agreement was assessed for total ASPECTS, dichotomized ASPECTS (≥6 vs Results: Our cohort included 119 patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion. Interrater agreement for total ASPECTS was very good between readers C and D (' 0.70) and good between A and B (' 0.55). For dichotomized ASPECTS, agreement was fair-to-good (' 0.30 for C/D; ' 0.41 for A/B). Agreement for grading collaterals on CTA was good to very good (' 0.64 for C /D; ' 0.54 for A/B). Agreement for rating core on CTP was very good (' 0.78 for C/D; ' 0.62 for A/D). Conclusions: Interrater reliability is good to very good for total ASPECTS score, dichotomous grading of collaterals on CTA, and subjective estimation of core size on CTP. Agreement is only fair to good for dichotomized ASPECTS.

Introduction: Small case series have suggested that cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) are the most common causes of non-traumatic convexal SAH (cSAH). Our objective was to describe the spectrum of clinical and imaging features in a large series of non-traumatic cSAH patients. Methods: A retrospective observational study of consecutive patients with non-traumatic cSAH was performed. The Mayo Clinic Medical Records Linkage system was used to identify all patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic in Rochester with potential non-traumatic cSAH between January 1, 1996 and October 1, 2014. Clinical and radiologic data were abstracted from the comprehensive medical record. Results: We identified 88 patients [median age, 64 years (range: 25-85)] with non-traumatic cSAH. The most common causes were reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (26, 29.5%), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (23, 26.1%), indeterminate (14, 15.9%), and endocarditis (9, 10.2%). Other causes include posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, cerebral vein thrombosis, vasculitis, carotid occlusive disease, thrombosed developmental venous anomaly, and hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid revascularization. CAA patients commonly presented at an older age than RCVS patients (75 years vs 51 years, p Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the clinical diversity of cSAH. Older age, sensorimotor dysfunctions suggest CAA as the underlying cause. Younger age and thunderclap headache predict RCVS. Various other causes also need to be considered in the differential diagnosis. CAA patients have high rates of subsequent lobar ICH, development of superficial siderosis, and recurrent cSAH.

Introduction: Five randomized trials proving the efficacy and safety of mechanical embolectomy for ischemic stroke patients used differing radiological methods to select patients for treatment. Hypothesis: The percentage of patients evaluated in a non-clinical trial setting that would meet radiological criteria to be included in the five trials will differ substantially. Methods: Retrospective study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients who were considered for endovascular stroke therapy based on confirmed intracranial large vessel occlusion (M1, M2, or carotid terminus) at an academic medical center from April 2010 - November 2014. All patients underwent CT perfusion and CT angiogram. Results: The table shows baseline characteristics of 119 patients. Median age was 69 years (IQR 57-79) and median NIHSS 18 (IQR 14-21). Most patients had ASPECTS score ≥ 6 (n=105, 88.2%). The M1 segment of MCA was the most common vessel occluded (n=81, 68%). All 119 patients (100%) met radiological criteria for MR CLEAN while 105 (88.2%) met criteria for SWIFT-PRIME, 96 (80.7%) for REVASCAT, 80/116 (69.0%) for EXTEND IA, and 74 (62.2%) for ESCAPE. IV TPA was given to 58 patients (48.7%) and acute endovascular stroke therapy attempted in 66 (55.5%). Any intracranial hemorrhage was more common in the patients treated with endovascular therapy than in those who were not (36% vs. 17%, p=0.025). The frequency of symptomatic ICH did not significantly differ between these two groups (6.1% vs 3.8%, p=0.691). Conclusions: The percentage of patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion that would qualify for endovascular stroke trials based on radiological criteria varies considerably (62%-100%) in a non-clinical trial cohort from an academic comprehensive stroke center. Additional individual patient characteristics influence treatment decisions in non-clinical trial settings.

Background and Purpose— Postpartum angiopathy (PPA), a rare cause of stroke in the puerperium, is heralded by severe headaches within 1–2 weeks after delivery. Angiography demonstrates segmental vasoconstriction that often resolves spontaneously. PPA is generally regarded as benign. We aimed to define clinical presentations, radiological findings, and outcomes of patients with PPA. Methods— We retrospectively reviewed patients from 3 centers with acute neurological symptoms and angiography showing vasoconstriction in the postpartum period. Patients without neuroimaging and with diagnoses of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and aneurysmal hemorrhage were excluded. Patient characteristics, clinical symptoms, neuroimaging findings, and clinical condition at hospital discharge were collected. Results— Eighteen patients (mean age, 31 years; range, 15–41) were identified. Median gestation was 38 weeks. Twelve (67%) had a history of prior uneventful pregnancy. Neurological symptoms began on median day 5 postpartum and included headache (n=16, 89%), focal deficit (n=9, 50%), visual disturbance (n=8, 44%), encephalopathy (n=6, 33%), and seizure (n=5, 28%), often in combination. Brain imaging was abnormal in most (n=13, 72%). The most common abnormalities were intracranial hemorrhage (n=7, 39%), vasogenic edema (n=6, 35%), and infarction (n=6, 35%). Clinical outcomes were markedly variable with full recovery seen in 9 (50%), death after a fulminant course in 4 (22%), and residual deficits in 5 (28%). Conclusions— In contrast to prior reports, this group of patients with PPA had a higher proportion of nonbenign outcomes. Most patients who undergo neuroimaging have parenchymal abnormalities, which are most often stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) or reversible vasogenic edema.

INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest 8%-28% of ischemic strokes present as wake-up strokes (WUS). The unknown time of symptom onset precludes these patients from approved treatments for acute ischemic stroke, but a substantial proportion of patients may be deemed candidates for treatment if other factors are considered. The aim of this study was to identify characteristics associated with clinical outcomes of WUS patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of patients with ischemic stroke admitted to a large academic medical center between January 2011 and May 2012. We identified patients with stroke symptoms upon awakening or those who were found with stroke symptoms with an unknown time of onset. Baseline demographics, stroke mechanism, presenting NIHSS, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores on discharge and at 3-month follow-up were obtained. A good outcome was defined as mRS 0-2. RESULTS: WUS patients comprised 22% (162/731) of all patients with ischemic stroke at our institution during this time period. Median age was 74 years (range 15-100), median presenting NIHSS was 5 (range 0-28), and median initial ASPECTS 10 (range 0-10). A cardioembolic mechanism was identified in 68 patients (42%). Predictors of good outcome at hospital discharge were lower initial NIHSS (3.5 versus 12.0, p CONCLUSIONS: Few patients with strokes of unknown onset and severe deficits have good outcomes without acute stroke treatment. Patients with NIHSS≥10 and ASPECTS 10 may be candidates for acute recanalization therapy.

Background and Purpose: Strict maintenance of normovolemia is standard of care in treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and induced hypervolemia is used to treat delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) from vasospasm. Fluid-related complications are not uncommon. We tested the hypothesis that fluid balance affected clinical outcomes in aSAH. Methods: We reviewed 307 patients with aSAH admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (NICU) from October 2001 to June 2011. We collected data on fluid balance during NICU stay, clinical and radiographic evidence of vasospasm, cardiopulmonary complications, and functional outcomes by modified Rankin scale (mRS) upon follow-up (mean 8 ± 8 months). Poor functional outcome was defined as mRS 3-6. Associations of variables of interest with outcome were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Propensity scores were estimated to account for imbalances between patients with positive versus negative fluid balance and were included in multivariable models. Results: Average net fluid balance was 1153 ± 5586 mL. Results of univariate analysis are shown on the Table. On multivariate analysis, WFNS grade at nadir (p Conclusions: Greater positive net fluid balance is independently associated with poorer functional outcome in patients with aSAH. This association does not appear to be solely explained by an excess of cardiopulmonary complications.

Background and Purpose— Although thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b/3 has been regarded as a successful angiographic outcome, the definition or subclassification of TICI 2 has differed between the original (o-TICI) and modified TICI (m-TICI). We sought to compare interobserver variability for both scores and analyze the subgroups of the TICI 2. Methods— Five readers interpreted angiographies independently using a 6-point scale as follows: grade 0, no antegrade flow; grade 1, flow past the initial occlusion without tissue reperfusion; grade 2, partial reperfusion in Results— Interobserver agreement was good for the o-TICI and m-TICI scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73 and 0.67, respectively). Our grade 3 (partial perfusion with 50% to 66%) occupied 19% of total readings, which would have been classified as grade 2a in o-TICI, but as 2b in m-TICI. The m-TICI was more likely to predict good clinical outcome than o-TICI (odds ratio, 2.01 versus 1.63, in reads with TICI 2b/3 versus 0/2a). Conclusions— Both TICI scales showed good agreement among readers. However, the variability in partial perfusion thresholds leads to different grading in ≈20% of cases and may result in significantly different rates of accurate outcome prediction.

Background: Tissue reperfusion is a critical determinant of outcomes after intra-arterial therapy (IAT). However, there is no standardized method for grading angiographic reperfusion. We sought to compare the two most commonly used reperfusion scales, TIMI and modified TICI (m-TICI), for predicting good long-term outcome following IAT. Methods: From a multicenter database, we evaluated acute stroke patients presenting with middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions who underwent IAT. Clinical and angiographic data were collected. Reperfusion for each case was graded using the TIMI and m-TICI scales. The primary distinction between these scales is that partial reperfusion (TIMI 2) is sub-divided into minor (m-TICI 2A: Results: There were 313 acute stroke patients with MCA M1 segment occlusions who underwent IAT at 6 academic centers; 171 (54.6%) were female. Mean age was 65.3±16.5 years. There were 157 (50.2%) right-sided strokes. Median baseline NIHSS score was 17 (IQR 15-20). Good outcome at 90 days was achieved in 32.5%. For predicting good outcome, the c-statistic was significantly higher for m-TICI (0.74 vs. 0.68; p Conclusions: The modified TICI scale is superior to the TIMI scale for predicting clinical outcome after IAT, and should be the standard tool for grading angiographic reperfusion. An m-TICI score ≥2B (≥50% reperfusion) is the optimal biomarker for successful reperfusion.

Response: We thank Dr Martinez-Martinez and colleagues for their interest in our article.1 We agree that transcranial Doppler may be useful as an adjunct monitoring technique in patients with postpartum angiopathy. If we can extrapolate what we know from …