Search

Propensity score methods are commonly used in statistical analyses of observational data to reduce the impact of confounding bias in estimations of average treatment effect. While the propensity score is defined as the conditional probability of a subject being in the treatment group given that subject's covariates, the most precise estimation of average treatment effect results from specifying the propensity score as a function of true confounders and predictors only. This property has been demonstrated via simulation in multiple prior research articles. However, we have seen no theoretical explanation as to why this should be so. This paper provides that theoretical proof. Furthermore, this paper presents a method for performing the necessary variable selection by means of elastic net regression, and then estimating the propensity scores so as to obtain optimal estimates of average treatment effect. The proposed method is compared against two other recently introduced methods, outcome-adaptive lasso and covariate balancing propensity score. Extensive simulation analyses are employed to determine the circumstances under which each method appears most effective. We applied the proposed methods to examine the effect of pre-cardiac surgery coagulation indicator on mortality based on a linked dataset from a retrospective review of 1390 patient medical records at Jewish Hospital (Louisville, KY) with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estimating the medical costs from disease diagnosis to a terminal event is of immense interest to researchers. However, most of existing literature on such research focused on the estimation of cumulative mean function (CMF) for history process. In this paper, the combined scheme of both inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) technique and longitudinal quantile regression model is used to develop a novel procedure to the estimation of cumulative quantile function (CQF) based on history process with time-dependent covariates and right censored time-to-event variable. The consistency of proposed estimator is derived. The extensive simulation study is conducted to investigate the performance of the estimator given in this paper. A medical cost data from a multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial (MADIT) is analyzed to illustrate the application of developed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Late-onset toxicities often occur in phase I trials investigating novel immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapies. For trials with cohort based designs (such as modified toxicity probability interval, Bayesian optimal interval, and i3+3), patients are often turned away since the current cohort are still being followed without definite dose-limiting toxicities, which results in prolonged trial duration and waste of patient resources. In this paper, we incorporate a probability-of-decision framework into the i3+3 design and allow real-time dosing inference when the next patient becomes available. Both follow-up time for the pending patients and time to dose-limiting toxicities for the observed patients are used in calculating the posterior probability of each possible dosing decision. An intensive simulation study is conducted to evaluate the operating characteristics of the newly proposed probability-of-decision-i3+3 design under various dosing scenarios and patient accrual settings. Results show that the probability-of-decision-i3+3 design achieves comparable safety and reliability performances but much shorter trial duration compared to the complete designs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Joint modeling of zero-inflated count and time-to-event data is usually performed by applying the shared random effect model. This kind of joint modeling can be considered as a latent Gaussian model. In this paper, the approach of integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) is used to perform approximate Bayesian approach for the joint modeling. We propose a zero-inflated hurdle model under Poisson or negative binomial distributional assumption as sub-model for count data. Also, a Weibull model is used as survival time sub-model. In addition to the usual joint linear model, a joint partially linear model is also considered to take into account the non-linear effect of time on the longitudinal count response. The performance of the method is investigated using some simulation studies and its achievement is compared with the usual approach via the Bayesian paradigm of Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC). Also, we apply the proposed method to analyze two real data sets. The first one is the data about a longitudinal study of pregnancy and the second one is a data set obtained of a HIV study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The quantile regression model has increasingly become a useful approach for analyzing survival data due to its easy interpretation and flexibility in exploring the dynamic relationship between a time-to-event outcome and the covariates. In this paper, we consider the quantile regression model for survival data with missing censoring indicators. Based on the augmented inverse probability weighting technique, two weighted estimating equations are developed and corresponding easily implemented algorithms are suggested to solve the estimating equations. Asymptotic properties of the resultant estimators and the resampling-based inference procedures are established. Finally, the finite sample performances of the proposed approaches are investigated in simulation studies and a real data application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bivariate responses with mixed continuous and binary variables arise commonly in applications such as clinical trials and genetic studies. Statistical methods based on jointly modeling continuous and binary variables have been available. However, such methods ignore the effects of response mismeasurement, a ubiquitous feature in applications. It has been well studied that in many settings, ignorance of mismeasurement in variables usually results in biased estimation. In this paper, we consider the setting with a bivariate outcome vector which contains a continuous component and a binary component both subject to mismeasurement. We propose estimating equation approaches to handle measurement error in the continuous response and misclassification in the binary response simultaneously. The proposed estimators are consistent and robust to certain model misspecification, provided regularity conditions. Extensive simulation studies confirm that the proposed methods successfully correct the biases resulting from the error-in-variables under various settings. The proposed methods are applied to analyze the outbred Carworth Farms White mice data arising from a genome-wide association study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Causal mediation analysis seeks to decompose the effect of a treatment or exposure among multiple possible paths and provide casually interpretable path-specific effect estimates. Recent advances have extended causal mediation analysis to situations with a sequence of mediators or multiple contemporaneous mediators. However, available methods still have limitations, and computational and other challenges remain. The present paper provides an extended causal mediation and path analysis methodology. The new method, implemented in the new R package, gmediation (described in a companion paper), accommodates both a sequence (two stages) of mediators and multiple mediators at each stage, and allows for multiple types of outcomes following generalized linear models. The methodology can also handle unsaturated models and clustered data. Addressing other practical issues, we provide new guidelines for the choice of a decomposition, and for the choice of a reference group multiplier for the reduction of Monte Carlo error in mediation formula computations. The new method is applied to data from a cohort study to illuminate the contribution of alternative biological and behavioral paths in the effect of socioeconomic status on dental caries in adolescence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical trials often evaluate multiple outcome variables to form a comprehensive picture of the effects of a new treatment. The resulting multidimensional insight contributes to clinically relevant and efficient decision-making about treatment superiority. Common statistical procedures to make these superiority decisions with multiple outcomes have two important shortcomings, however: (1) Outcome variables are often modeled individually, and consequently fail to consider the relation between outcomes; and (2) superiority is often defined as a relevant difference on a single, on any, or on all outcome(s); and lacks a compensatory mechanism that allows large positive effects on one or multiple outcome(s) to outweigh small negative effects on other outcomes. To address these shortcomings, this paper proposes (1) a Bayesian model for the analysis of correlated binary outcomes based on the multivariate Bernoulli distribution; and (2) a flexible decision criterion with a compensatory mechanism that captures the relative importance of the outcomes. A simulation study demonstrates that efficient and unbiased decisions can be made while Type I error rates are properly controlled. The performance of the framework is illustrated for (1) fixed, group sequential, and adaptive designs; and (2) non-informative and informative prior distributions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is a dearth of robust methods to estimate the causal effects of multiple treatments when the outcome is binary. This paper uses two unique sets of simulations to propose and evaluate the use of Bayesian additive regression trees in such settings. First, we compare Bayesian additive regression trees to several approaches that have been proposed for continuous outcomes, including inverse probability of treatment weighting, targeted maximum likelihood estimator, vector matching, and regression adjustment. Results suggest that under conditions of non-linearity and non-additivity of both the treatment assignment and outcome generating mechanisms, Bayesian additive regression trees, targeted maximum likelihood estimator, and inverse probability of treatment weighting using generalized boosted models provide better bias reduction and smaller root mean squared error. Bayesian additive regression trees and targeted maximum likelihood estimator provide more consistent 95% confidence interval coverage and better large-sample convergence property. Second, we supply Bayesian additive regression trees with a strategy to identify a common support region for retaining inferential units and for avoiding extrapolating over areas of the covariate space where common support does not exist. Bayesian additive regression trees retain more inferential units than the generalized propensity score-based strategy, and shows lower bias, compared to targeted maximum likelihood estimator or generalized boosted model, in a variety of scenarios differing by the degree of covariate overlap. A case study examining the effects of three surgical approaches for non-small cell lung cancer demonstrates the methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a new model-based generalized functional clustering method for discrete longitudinal data, such as multivariate binomial and Poisson distributed data. For this purpose, we propose a multivariate functional principal component analysis (MFPCA)-based clustering procedure for a latent multivariate Gaussian process instead of the original functional data directly. The main contribution of this study is two-fold: modeling of discrete longitudinal data with the latent multivariate Gaussian process and developing of a clustering algorithm based on MFPCA coupled with the latent multivariate Gaussian process. Numerical experiments, including real data analysis and a simulation study, demonstrate the promising empirical properties of the proposed approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In clustering problems, to model the intrinsic structure of unlabeled data, the latent variable models are frequently used. These model-based clustering methods often provide a clustering rule minimizing the total false assignment error. However, in many clustering applications, it is desirable to treat false assignment errors for a certain cluster differently. In this paper, we introduce the false assignment rate for clustering and estimate it by using the extended likelihood approach. We propose VRclust, a novel clustering rule that controls various errors differently across clusters. Real data examples illustrate the usage of estimation of false assignment rate and a simulation study shows that error controls are consistent as the sample size increases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Controversy over the validity of significance tests in the analysis of contingency tables is motivated by the disagreement between asymptotic and exact p values and its dependence on the magnitude of expected frequencies. Variants of Pearson's X2 statistic and their asymptotic distributions were proposed to overcome the difficulties, but several approaches also exist to conduct exact tests. This paper shows that discrepant asymptotic and exact results may or may not occur whether expected frequencies are large or small: Eventual inaccuracy of asymptotic p values is instead caused by idiosyncrasies of the discrete distribution of X2. More importantly, discrepancies are also artificially created by the hypergeometric sampling model used to perform exact tests. Exact computations under the alternative full-multinomial or product-multinomial models require eliminating nuisance parameters and we propose a novel method that integrates them out. The resultant exact distributions are very accurately approximated by the asymptotic distribution, which eliminates concerns about the accuracy of the latter. We also discuss that the two-stage approach that tests for significance of residuals conditional on a significant X2 test is inadvisable and that an alternative single-stage test preserves Type-I error rates and further eliminates concerns about asymptotic accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Constructing causal inference methods to handle longitudinal data in observational studies is of high interest. In an observational setting, treatment assignment at each clinical visit follows a decision strategy where the treating clinician selects treatment based on current and past clinical measurements as well as treatment histories. These time-dependent structures, coupled with inherent correlations between and within each visit, add on to the data complexity. Despite recent interest in Bayesian causal methods, only a limited literature has explored approaches to handle longitudinal data and no method handles repeatedly measured outcomes. In this paper, we extended two Bayesian approaches: Bayesian estimation of marginal structural models and two-stage Bayesian propensity score analysis to handle a repeatedly measured outcome. Our proposed methods permit causal estimation of treatment effects at each visit. Time-dependent inverse probability of treatment weights are obtained from the Markov chain Monte Carlo samples of the posterior treatment assignment model for each follow-up visit. We use a simulation study to validate and compare the proposed methods and illustrate our approaches through a study of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in treating newly diagnosed juvenile dermatomyositis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When establishing an effective treatment with binary data in a two-stage design, one-sided tests for a proportion p are employed. Researchers use the parameter configuration at the boundary of the null hypothesis space to determine a rejection region and an optimal design. However, it is unclear whether the (maximum) Type I error rate is achieved at the boundary especially when the sample size in stage 2 varies. In this paper, we first prove that this is true for a large family of tests in adaptive two-stage designs by showing that any test in the family has a nondecreasing power in p and then derive optimal designs. Second, similar results are established for m-stage designs with m > 2. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the analysis of competing risks data, three different types of hazard functions have been considered in the literature, namely the cause-specific hazard, the sub-distribution hazard, and the marginal hazard function. Accordingly, medical researchers can fit three different types of the Cox model to estimate the effect of covariates on each of the hazard function. While the relationship between the cause-specific hazard and the sub-distribution hazard has been extensively studied, the relationship to the marginal hazard function has not yet been analyzed due to the difficulties related to non-identifiability. In this paper, we adopt an assumed copula model to deal with the model identifiability issue, making it possible to establish a relationship between the sub-distribution hazard and the marginal hazard function. We then compare the two methods of fitting the Cox model to competing risks data. We also extend our comparative analysis to clustered competing risks data that are frequently used in medical studies. To facilitate the numerical comparison, we implement the computing algorithm for marginal Cox regression with clustered competing risks data in the R joint.Cox package and check its performance via simulations. For illustration, we analyze two survival datasets from lung cancer and bladder cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

QTL mapping is an important tool for identifying regions in chromosomes which are relevant to explain a response of interest. It is a special case of the regression model where an unknown number of missing (non-observable) covariates is involved leading to a complex variable selection procedure. Although several methods have been proposed to identify QTLs and to estimate parameters in the associated model, minimum attention has been devoted to the estimated model adequacy. In this paper, we present an overview of a few methods for residual and diagnostic analysis in the context of Bayesian regression modeling and adapt them to work with QTL mapping. The motivation of this study is to identify QTLs associated with the blood pressure of F2 rats and check the fitted model adequacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we propose a generalization of the power series cure rate model for the number of competing causes related to the occurrence of the event of interest. The model includes distributions not yet used in the cure rate models context, such as the Borel, Haight and Restricted Generalized Poisson distributions. The model is conveniently parameterized in terms of the cure rate. Maximum likelihood estimation based on the Expectation Maximization algorithm is discussed. A simulation study designed to assess some properties of the estimators is carried out, showing the good performance of the proposed estimation procedure in finite samples. Finally, an application to a bone marrow transplant data set is presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug combination trials are often motivated by the fact that individual drugs target the same disease but via different routes. A combination of such drugs may then have an overall better effect than the individual treatments which has to be verified by clinical trials. Several statistical methods have been explored that discuss the problem of comparing a fixed-dose combination therapy to each of its components. But an extension of these approaches to multiple dose combinations can be difficult and is not yet fully investigated. In this paper, we propose two approaches by which one can provide confirmatory assurance with familywise error rate control, that the combination of two drugs at differing doses is more effective than either component doses alone. These approaches involve multiple comparisons in multilevel factorial designs where the type 1 error can be controlled first, by bootstrapping tests, and second, by considering the least favorable null configurations for a family of union intersection tests. The main advantage of the new approaches is that their implementation is simple. The implementation of these new approaches is illustrated with a real data example from a blood pressure reduction trial. Extensive simulations are also conducted to evaluate the new approaches and benchmark them with existing ones. We also present an illustration of the relationship between the different approaches. We observed that the bootstrap provided some power advantages over the other approaches with the disadvantage that there may be some error rate inflation for small sample sizes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents two new model-based goodness-of-fit tests for the ordered stereotype model applied to an ordinal response variable. The proposed tests are based on the Lipsitz test, which partitions the subjects into G groups following the popular Hosmer-Lemeshow test for binary data. The tests construct an alternative model where group effects are added into the null model. If the model fits the data well then the null model is correct, and there should be no group effects. One of the main advantages of the ordered stereotype model is that it allows us to determine a new uneven spacing of the ordinal response categories, dictated by the data. The two proposed tests use this new adjusted spacing. One test uses the form of the original ordered stereotype model, and the other uses an ordinary linear model. We demonstrate the performance of both tests under a variety of scenarios. Finally, the results of the application in three examples are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Matching estimators for average treatment effects are widely used in the binary treatment setting, in which missing potential outcomes are imputed as the average of observed outcomes of all matches for each unit. With more than two treatment groups, however, estimation using matching requires additional techniques. In this paper, we propose a nearest-neighbors matching estimator for use with multiple, nominal treatments, and use simulations to show that this method is precise and has coverage levels that are close to nominal. In addition, we implement the proposed inference methods to examine the effects of different medication regimens on long-term pain for patients experiencing motor vehicle collision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of genetic variants as instrumental variables - an approach known as Mendelian randomization - is a popular epidemiological method for estimating the causal effect of an exposure (phenotype, biomarker, risk factor) on a disease or health-related outcome from observational data. Instrumental variables must satisfy strong, often untestable assumptions, which means that finding good genetic instruments among a large list of potential candidates is challenging. This difficulty is compounded by the fact that many genetic variants influence more than one phenotype through different causal pathways, a phenomenon called horizontal pleiotropy. This leads to errors not only in estimating the magnitude of the causal effect but also in inferring the direction of the putative causal link. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian approach called BayesMR that is a generalization of the Mendelian randomization technique in which we allow for pleiotropic effects and, crucially, for the possibility of reverse causation. The output of the method is a posterior distribution over the target causal effect, which provides an immediate and easily interpretable measure of the uncertainty in the estimation. More importantly, we use Bayesian model averaging to determine how much more likely the inferred direction is relative to the reverse direction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The problem of how to best select variables for confounding adjustment forms one of the key challenges in the evaluation of exposure or treatment effects in observational studies. Routine practice is often based on stepwise selection procedures that use hypothesis testing, change-in-estimate assessments or the lasso, which have all been criticised for - amongst other things - not giving sufficient priority to the selection of confounders. This has prompted vigorous recent activity in developing procedures that prioritise the selection of confounders, while preventing the selection of so-called instrumental variables that are associated with exposure, but not outcome (after adjustment for the exposure). A major drawback of all these procedures is that there is no finite sample size at which they are guaranteed to deliver treatment effect estimators and associated confidence intervals with adequate performance. This is the result of the estimator jumping back and forth between different selected models, and standard confidence intervals ignoring the resulting model selection uncertainty. In this paper, we will develop insight into this by evaluating the finite-sample distribution of the exposure effect estimator in linear regression, under a number of the aforementioned confounder selection procedures. We will show that by making clever use of propensity scores, a simple and generic solution is obtained in the context of generalized linear models, which overcomes this concern (under weaker conditions than competing proposals). Specifically, we propose to use separate regularized regressions for the outcome and propensity score models in order to construct a doubly robust 'g-estimator'; when these models are sufficiently sparse and correctly specified, standard confidence intervals for the g-estimator implicitly incorporate the uncertainty induced by the variable selection procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-adherence to assigned treatment is a common issue in cluster randomised trials. In these settings, the efficacy estimand may also be of interest. Many methodological contributions in recent years have advocated using instrumental variables to identify and estimate the local average treatment effect. However, the clustered nature of randomisation in cluster randomised trials adds to the complexity of such analyses. In this paper, we show that the local average treatment effect can be estimated via two-stage least squares regression using cluster-level summaries of the outcome and treatment received under certain assumptions. We propose the use of baseline variables to adjust the cluster-level summaries before performing two-stage least squares in order to improve efficiency. Implementation needs to account for the reduced sample size, as well as the possible heteroscedasticity, to obtain valid inferences. Simulations are used to assess the performance of two-stage least squares of cluster-level summaries under cluster-level or individual-level non-adherence, with and without weighting and robust standard errors. The impact of adjusting for baseline covariates and of appropriate degrees of freedom correction for inference is also explored. The methods are then illustrated by re-analysing a cluster randomised trial carried out in a specific UK primary care setting. Two-stage least squares estimation using cluster-level summaries provides estimates with small to negligible bias and coverage close to nominal level, provided the appropriate small sample degrees of freedom correction and robust standard errors are used for inference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In epidemiology cohort studies, exposure data are collected in sub-studies based on a primary outcome (PO) of interest, as with the extreme-value sampling design (EVSD), to investigate their correlation. Secondary outcomes (SOs) data are also readily available, enabling researchers to assess the correlations between the exposure and the SOs. However, when the EVSD is used, the data for SOs are not representative samples of a general population; thus, many commonly used statistical methods, such as the generalized linear model (GLM), are not valid. A prospective likelihood method has been developed to associate SOs with single-nucleotide polymorphisms under an extreme phenotype sequencing design. In this paper, we describe the application of the prospective likelihood method (STEVSD) to exposure-SO association analysis under an EVSD. We undertook extensive simulations to assess the performance of the STEVSD method in associating binary and continuous exposures with SOs, comparing it to the simple GLM method that ignores the EVSD. To demonstrate the cost-benefit of the STEVSD method, we also mimicked the design of two new retrospective studies, as would be done in actual practice, based on the PO of interest, which was the same as the SO in the EVSD study. We then analyzed these data by using the GLM method and compared its power to that of the STEVSD method. We demonstrated the usefulness of the STEVSD method by applying it to a benign ethnic neutropenia dataset. Our results indicate that the STEVSD method can control type I error well, whereas the GLM method cannot do so owing to its ignorance of EVSD, and that the STEVSD method is cost-effective because it has statistical power similar to that of two new retrospective studies that require collecting new exposure data for selected individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ordinal responses are common in clinical studies. Although the proportional odds model is a popular option for analyzing ordered-categorical data, it cannot control the type I error rate when the proportional odds assumption fails to hold. The latent Weibull model was recently shown to be a superior candidate for modeling ordinal data, with remarkably better performance than the latent normal model when the data are highly skewed. In clinical trials with ordinal responses, a balanced design is common, with equal sample allocation for each treatment. However, a more ethical approach is to adopt a response-adaptive allocation scheme in which more patients receive the better treatment. In this paper, we propose the use of the doubly adaptive biased coin design to generate treatment allocations that benefit the trial participants. The proposed treatment allocation scheme not only allows more patients to receive the better treatment, it also maintains compatible test power for the comparison of treatment efficiencies. A clinical example is used to illustrate the proposed procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comparisons of survival times between screen-detected and symptomatically detected breast cancer cases are subject to lead time and length biases. Whilst the existence of these biases is well known, correction procedures for these are not always clear, as are not the interpretation of these biases. In this paper we derive, based on a recently developed continuous tumour growth model, conditional lead time distributions, using information on each individual's tumour size, screening history and percent mammographic density. We show how these distributions can be used to obtain an individual-based (conditional) procedure for correcting survival comparisons. In stratified analyses, our correction procedure works markedly better than a previously used unconditional lead time correction, based on multi-state Markov modelling. In a study of postmenopausal invasive breast cancer patients, we estimate that, in large (>12 mm) tumours, the multi-state Markov model correction over-corrects five-year survival by 2-3 percentage points. The traditional view of length bias is that tumours being present in a woman's breast for a long time, due to being slow-growing, have a greater chance of being screen-detected. This gives a survival advantage for screening cases which is not due to the earlier detection by screening. We use simulated data to share the new insight that, not only the tumour growth rate but also the symptomatic tumour size will affect the sampling procedure, and thus be a part of the length bias through any link between tumour size and survival. We explain how this has a bearing on how observable breast cancer-specific survival curves should be interpreted. We also propose an approach for correcting survival comparisons for the length bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is well known that the standard F test is severely affected by heteroskedasticity in unbalanced analysis of covariance models. Currently available potential remedies for such a scenario are based on heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimation (HCCME). However, the HCCME approach tends to be liberal in small samples. Therefore, in the present paper, we propose a combination of HCCME and a wild bootstrap technique, with the aim of improving the small-sample performance. We precisely state a set of assumptions for the general analysis of covariance model and discuss their practical interpretation in detail, since this issue may have been somewhat neglected in applied research so far. We prove that these assumptions are sufficient to ensure the asymptotic validity of the combined HCCME-wild bootstrap analysis of covariance. The results of our simulation study indicate that our proposed test remedies the problems of the analysis of covariance F test and its heteroskedasticity-consistent alternatives in small to moderate sample size scenarios. Our test only requires very mild conditions, thus being applicable in a broad range of real-life settings, as illustrated by the detailed discussion of a dataset from preclinical research on spinal cord injury. Our proposed method is ready-to-use and allows for valid hypothesis testing in frequently encountered settings (e.g., comparing group means while adjusting for baseline measurements in a randomized controlled clinical trial). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After the diagnosis of a disease, one major objective is to predict cumulative probabilities of events such as clinical relapse or death from the individual information collected up to a prediction time, usually including biomarker repeated measurements. Several competing estimators have been proposed, mainly from two approaches: joint modelling and landmarking. These approaches differ by the information used, the model assumptions and the complexity of the computational procedures. This paper aims to review the two approaches, precisely define the derived estimators of dynamic predictions and compare their performances notably in case of misspecification. The ultimate goal is to provide key elements for the use of individual dynamic predictions in clinical practice. Prediction of two competing causes of prostate cancer progression from the history of prostate-specific antigen is used as a motivated example. We formally define the quantity to estimate and its estimators, propose techniques to assess the uncertainty around predictions and validate them. We then conduct an in-depth simulation study compare the estimators in terms of prediction error, discriminatory power, efficiency and robustness to model assumptions. We show that prediction tools should be handled with care, in particular by properly specifying models and estimators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real phenomena often leads to challenges in data. One of these is outliers or influential values. Especially in a small sample, these values can have a major influence on the modeling process. In the beta regression framework, this issue has been addressed mainly in two ways: the assumption of a different response model and the application of a minimum density power divergence estimation (MDPDE) procedure. In this paper, however, we propose a simple hierarchical Bayesian methodology in the context of a varying dispersion beta response model that is robust to outliers, as shown through an extensive simulation study and analysis of two real data sets. To robustify Bayesian modeling, a heavy-tailed Student's t prior with uniform degrees of freedom is adopted for the regression coefficients. This proposal results in a wieldy implementation procedure which avails practical use of the approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Count outcomes with excessive zeros are common in behavioral and social studies, and zero-inflated count models such as zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero-inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) can be applied when such zero-inflated count data are used as response variable. However, when the zero-inflated count data are used as predictors, ignoring the difference of structural and random zeros can result in biased estimates. In this paper, a generalized estimating equation (GEE)-type mixture model is proposed to jointly model the response of interest and the zero-inflated count predictors. Simulation studies show that the proposed method performs well for practical settings and is more robust for model misspecification than the likelihood-based approach. A case study is also provided for illustration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is often necessary to differentiate subjects from multiple categories using medical tests. We may then adopt statistical measures to characterize the performance of these tests. The three-way ROC analysis has been proposed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of medical tests with three categories, reflecting the correct classification probabilities across all possible decision thresholds. The geometry of the ROC surface is carefully studied, leading to numerical summary measures such as the volume under the surface. This paper generalizes the global volume under the surface of three-way ROC analysis to the weighted volume under the surface (WVUS) by introducing a weight function emphasizing particular regions of correct classification probabilities. This generalization practically allows researchers to calculate the diagnostic accuracy for a medical or clinical biomarker while satisfactorily high probabilities of correct classification for one or two classes are conditionally ensured. We provide the asymptotic properties of the proposed nonparametric and parametric estimators of WVUS, which could easily lend support to statistical inferences. Some simulations have been conducted to assess the proposed estimators and also to demonstrate the necessity of WVUS. A real data analysis about liver cancer illustrates our methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data has received much attention recently. Increasingly, extensions to standard joint modelling approaches are being proposed to handle complex data structures commonly encountered in applied research. In this paper, we propose a joint model for hierarchical longitudinal and time-to-event data. Our motivating application explores the association between tumor burden and progression-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients. We define tumor burden as a function of the sizes of target lesions clustered within a patient. Since a patient may have more than one lesion, and each lesion is tracked over time, the data have a three-level hierarchical structure: repeated measurements taken at time points (level 1) clustered within lesions (level 2) within patients (level 3). We jointly model the lesion-specific longitudinal trajectories and patient-specific risk of death or disease progression by specifying novel association structures that combine information across lower level clusters (e.g. lesions) into patient-level summaries (e.g. tumor burden). We provide user-friendly software for fitting the model under a Bayesian framework. Lastly, we discuss alternative situations in which additional clustering factor(s) occur at a level higher in the hierarchy than the patient-level, since this has implications for the model formulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Agreement studies are of paramount importance in various scientific domains. When several observers classify objects on categorical scales, agreement can be quantified through multirater kappa coefficients. In most statistical packages, the standard error of these coefficients is only available under the null hypothesis that the coefficient is equal to zero, preventing the construction of confidence intervals in the general case. The aim of this paper is triple. First, simple analytic formulae for the standard error of multirater kappa coefficients will be given in the general case. Second, these formulae will be extended to the case of multilevel data structures. The formulae are based on simple matrix algebra and are implemented in the R package "multiagree". Third, guidelines on the choice between the different mulitrater kappa coefficients will be provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, there has been a prominent discussion in the literature about the potential for overestimation of the treatment effect when a clinical trial stops at an interim analysis due to the experimental treatment showing a benefit over the control. However, there has been much less attention paid to the converse issue, namely, that sequentially monitored clinical trials which did not stop early for benefit tend to underestimate the treatment effect. In meta-analyses of many studies, these two sources of bias will tend to balance each other to produce an unbiased estimate of the treatment effect. However, for the interpretation of a single study in isolation, underestimation due to interim analysis may be an important consideration. In this paper, we discuss the nature of this underestimation, including theoretical and simulation results demonstrating that it can be substantial in some contexts. Furthermore, we show how a conditional approach to estimation, in which we condition on the study reaching its final analysis, may be used to validly inflate the observed treatment difference from a sequentially monitored clinical trial. Expressions for the conditional bias and information are derived, and these are used in supplied R code that computes the bias-adjusted estimate and an associated confidence interval. As well as simulation results demonstrating the validity of the methods, we present a data analysis example from a pivotal clinical trial in cardiovascular disease. The methods will be most useful when an unbiased treatment effect estimate is critical, such as in cost-effectiveness analysis or risk prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Correct classification of breast cancer subtypes is of high importance as it directly affects the therapeutic options. We focus on triple-negative breast cancer which has the worst prognosis among breast cancer types. Using cutting edge methods from the field of robust statistics, we analyze Breast Invasive Carcinoma transcriptomic data publicly available from The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal. Our analysis identifies statistical outliers that may correspond to misdiagnosed patients. Furthermore, it is illustrated that classical statistical methods may fail to identify outliers due to their heavy influence, prompting the need for robust statistics. Using robust sparse logistic regression we obtain 36 relevant genes, of which ca. 60% have been previously reported as biologically relevant to triple-negative breast cancer, reinforcing the validity of the method. The remaining 14 genes identified are new potential biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancer. Out of these, JAM3, SFT2D2, and PAPSS1 were previously associated to breast tumors or other types of cancer. The relevance of these genes is confirmed by the new DetectDeviatingCells outlier detection technique. A comparison of gene networks on the selected genes showed significant differences between triple-negative breast cancer and non-triple-negative breast cancer data. The individual role of FOXA1 in triple-negative breast cancer and non-triple-negative breast cancer, and the strong FOXA1-AGR2 connection in triple-negative breast cancer stand out. The goal of our paper is to contribute to the breast cancer/triple-negative breast cancer understanding and management. At the same time it demonstrates that robust regression and outlier detection constitute key strategies to cope with high-dimensional clinical data such as omics data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The accuracy of a diagnostic test, which is often quantified by a pair of measures such as sensitivity and specificity, is critical for medical decision making. Separate studies of an investigational diagnostic test can be combined through meta-analysis; however, such an analysis can be threatened by publication bias. To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing method that accounts for publication bias in the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests involving bivariate outcomes. In this paper, we extend the Copas selection model from univariate outcomes to bivariate outcomes for the correction of publication bias when the probability of a study being published can depend on its sensitivity, specificity, and the associated standard errors. We develop an expectation-maximization algorithm for the maximum likelihood estimation under the proposed selection model. We investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed method through simulation studies and illustrate the method by assessing a meta-analysis of 17 published studies of a rapid diagnostic test for influenza. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With rapid aging of world population, Alzheimer's disease is becoming a leading cause of death after cardiovascular disease and cancer. Nearly 10% of people who are over 65 years old are affected by Alzheimer's disease. The causes have been studied intensively, but no definitive answer has been found. Genetic predisposition, abnormal protein deposits in brain, and environmental factors are suspected to play a role in the development of this disease. In this paper, we model progression of Alzheimer's disease using a multi-state Markov model to investigate the significance of known risk factors such as age, apolipoprotein E4, and some brain structural volumetric variables from magnetic resonance imaging scans (e.g., hippocampus, etc.) while predicting transitions between different clinical diagnosis states. With the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative data, we found that the model with age is not significant (p = 0.1733) according to the likelihood ratio test, but the apolipoprotein E4 is a significant risk factor, and the examination of apolipoprotein E4-by-sex interaction suggests that the apolipoprotein E4 link to Alzheimer's disease is stronger in women. Given the estimated transition probabilities, the prediction accuracy is as high as 0.7849. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate estimates of the under-five mortality rate in a developing world context are a key barometer of the health of a nation. This paper describes a new model to analyze survey data on mortality in this context. We are interested in both spatial and temporal description, that is wishing to estimate under-five mortality rate across regions and years and to investigate the association between the under-five mortality rate and spatially varying covariate surfaces. We illustrate the methodology by producing yearly estimates for subnational areas in Kenya over the period 1980-2014 using data from the Demographic and Health Surveys, which use stratified cluster sampling. We use a binomial likelihood with fixed effects for the urban/rural strata and random effects for the clustering to account for the complex survey design. Smoothing is carried out using Bayesian hierarchical models with continuous spatial and temporally discrete components. A key component of the model is an offset to adjust for bias due to the effects of HIV epidemics. Substantively, there has been a sharp decline in Kenya in the under-five mortality rate in the period 1980-2014, but large variability in estimated subnational rates remains. A priority for future research is understanding this variability. In exploratory work, we examine whether a variety of spatial covariate surfaces can explain the variability in under-five mortality rate. Temperature, precipitation, a measure of malaria infection prevalence, and a measure of nearness to cities were candidates for inclusion in the covariate model, but the interplay between space, time, and covariates is complex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phase II clinical trials are concerned with making decision of whether a treatment is sufficiently efficacious to be worth further investigations in late large scale Phase III trials. In oncology Phase II trials, frequentist single-arm two-stage group-sequential designs with a binary endpoint are commonly used. To allow for more flexibility, adaptive versions of these designs have been proposed. In this paper, we propose point and interval estimation for adaptive designs in which the second stage sample size is a pre-specified function of first stage's number of responses. Our approach is based on sample space orderings, from which we derive p-values, and point and interval estimates. Simulation studies show that our proposed methods perform better, in terms of bias and root mean square error, than the fixed-sample maximum likelihood estimator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Marginal structural models are causal models designed to adjust for time-dependent confounders in observational studies with dynamically adjusted treatments. They are robust tools to assess causality in complex longitudinal data. In this paper, a marginal structural model is proposed with an innovative dose-delay joint-exposure model for Inverse-Probability-of-Treatment Weighted estimation of the causal effect of alterations to the therapy intensity. The model is motivated by a precise clinical question concerning the possibility of reducing dosages in a regimen. It is applied to data from a randomised trial of chemotherapy in osteosarcoma, an aggressive primary bone-tumour. Chemotherapy data are complex because their longitudinal nature encompasses many clinical details like composition and organisation of multi-drug regimens, or dynamical therapy adjustments. This manuscript focuses on the clinical dynamical process of adjusting the therapy according to the patient's toxicity history, and the causal effect on the outcome of interest of such therapy modifications. Depending on patients' toxicity levels, variations to therapy intensity may be achieved by physicians through the allocation of either a reduction or a delay of the next planned dose. Thus, a negative feedback is present between exposure to cytotoxic agents and toxicity levels, which acts as time-dependent confounders. The construction of the model is illustrated highlighting the high complexity and entanglement of chemotherapy data. Built to address dosage reductions, the model also shows that delays in therapy administration should be avoided. The last aspect makes sense from the cytological point of view, but it is seldom addressed in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Random effects two-part models have been applied to longitudinal studies for zero-inflated (or semi-continuous) data, characterized by a large portion of zero values and continuous non-zero (positive) values. Examples include monthly medical costs, daily alcohol drinks, relative abundance of microbiome, etc. With the advance of information technology for data collection and storage, the number of variables available to researchers can be rather large in such studies. To avoid curse of dimensionality and facilitate decision making, it is critically important to select covariates that are truly related to the outcome. However, owing to its intricate nature, there is not yet a satisfactory variable selection method available for such sophisticated models. In this paper, we seek a feasible way of conducting variable selection for random effects two-part models on the basis of the recently proposed "minimum information criterion" (MIC) method. We demonstrate that the MIC formulation leads to a reasonable formulation of sparse estimation, which can be conveniently solved with SAS Proc NLMIXED. The performance of our approach is evaluated through simulation, and an application to a longitudinal alcohol dependence study is provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extreme learning machines have gained a lot of attention by the machine learning community because of its interesting properties and computational advantages. With the increase in collection of information nowadays, many sources of data have missing information making statistical analysis harder or unfeasible. In this paper, we present a new model, coined spatial extreme learning machine, that combine spatial modeling with extreme learning machines keeping the nice properties of both methodologies and making it very flexible and robust. As explained throughout the text, the spatial extreme learning machines have many advantages in comparison with the traditional extreme learning machines. By a simulation study and a real data analysis we present how the spatial extreme learning machine can be used to improve imputation of missing data and uncertainty prediction estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To enable targeted therapies and enhance medical decision-making, biomarkers are increasingly used as screening and diagnostic tests. When using quantitative biomarkers for classification purposes, this often implies that an appropriate cutoff for the biomarker has to be determined and its clinical utility must be assessed. In the context of drug development, it is of interest how the probability of response changes with increasing values of the biomarker. Unlike sensitivity and specificity, predictive values are functions of the accuracy of the test, depend on the prevalence of the disease and therefore are a useful tool in this setting. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian method to not only estimate the cutoff value using the negative and positive predictive values, but also estimate the uncertainty around this estimate. Using Bayesian inference allows us to incorporate prior information, and obtain posterior estimates and credible intervals for the cut-off and associated predictive values. The performance of the Bayesian approach is compared with alternative methods via simulation studies of bias, interval coverage and width and illustrations on real data with binary and time-to-event outcomes are provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnostic procedures are mostly used to detect a particular disease, and each procedure indicates the presence or absence of the disease in an individual. Sensitivity and positive predictive value, which are measures of the effectiveness of a diagnostic procedure, are simply calculated as the proportion of the individuals diagnosed with the disease by the test among the patients with the disease, and of the diseased persons among the individuals in whom the disease was detected by the test, respectively. For a diagnosis with such a binary result, sensitivity and the positive predictive value of diagnostic procedures can be compared using the chi-square statistic. However, in the treatment of cancer patients, it is important not only to diagnose the disease status of an individual patient but also to detect the correct location of the cancer. The tumor location may be incorrectly identified in some subjects diagnosed with cancer. It is therefore of interest whether a procedure that diagnoses cancer also correctly indicates the tumor location. In this paper, we re-define the sensitivity and the positive predictive value of tumor detection as the ratio of the number of cases with a correct diagnosis of the tumor location by the test to the number of cases of cancer, and as the ratio of patients with a correct diagnosis of the tumor location to the number of individuals diagnosed with cancer by the test, respectively. We refer to these parameters as 'semi-sensitivity' and 'semi-positive predictive value'. To compare these ratios between diagnostic procedures, test statistics are developed from binary diagnostic results. Simulation studies conducted to evaluate the nominal level and power are presented, and two sets of example data are also analyzed using the new test statistic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on rates, percentages, or proportions arise frequently in many different applied disciplines like medical biology, health care, psychology, and several others. In this paper, we develop a robust inference procedure for the beta regression model, which is used to describe such response variables taking values in (0, 1) through some related explanatory variables. In relation to the beta regression model, the issue of robustness has been largely ignored in the literature so far. The existing maximum likelihood-based inference has serious lack of robustness against outliers in data and generate drastically different (erroneous) inference in the presence of data contamination. Here, we develop the robust minimum density power divergence estimator and a class of robust Wald-type tests for the beta regression model along with several applications. We derive their asymptotic properties and describe their robustness theoretically through the influence function analyses. Finite sample performances of the proposed estimators and tests are examined through suitable simulation studies and real data applications in the context of health care and psychology. Although we primarily focus on the beta regression models with a fixed dispersion parameter, some indications are also provided for extension to the variable dispersion beta regression models with an application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper looks at permutation methods used to deal with hypothesis testing within the survival analysis framework. In the literature, several attempts have been made to deal with the comparison of survival curves and, depending on the survival and hazard functions of two groups, they can be more or less efficient in detecting differences. Furthermore, in some situations, censoring can be informative in that it depends on treatment effect. Our proposal is based on the nonparametric combination approach and has proven to be very effective under different configurations of survival and hazard functions. It allows the practitioner to test jointly on primary and censoring events and, by using multiple testing methods, to assess the significance of the treatment effect separately on the survival and the censoring process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Publication bias can significantly limit the validity of meta-analysis when trying to draw conclusion about a research question from independent studies. Most research on detection and correction for publication bias in meta-analysis focus mainly on funnel plot-based methodologies or selection models. In this paper, we formulate publication bias as a truncated distribution problem, and propose new parametric solutions. We develop methodologies of estimating the underlying overall effect size and the severity of publication bias. We distinguish the two major situations, in which publication bias may be induced by: (1) small effect size or (2) large p-value. We consider both fixed and random effects models, and derive estimators for the overall mean and the truncation proportion. These estimators will be obtained using maximum likelihood estimation and method of moments under fixed- and random-effects models, respectively. We carried out extensive simulation studies to evaluate the performance of our methodology, and to compare with the non-parametric Trim and Fill method based on funnel plot. We find that our methods based on truncated normal distribution perform consistently well, both in detecting and correcting publication bias under various situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we consider variable selection in rank regression models for longitudinal data. To obtain both robustness and effective selection of important covariates, we propose incorporating shrinkage by adaptive lasso or SCAD in the Wilcoxon dispersion function and establishing the oracle properties of the new method. The new method can be conveniently implemented with the statistical software R. The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated via simulation studies. Finally, two datasets are analyzed for illustration. Some interesting findings are reported and discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long-term survivor models have been extensively used for modelling time-to-event data with a significant proportion of patients who do not experience poor outcome. In this paper, we propose a new long-term survivor hazard model, which accommodates comprehensive families of cure rate models as particular cases, including modified Weibull, exponentiated Weibull, Weibull, exponential and Rayleigh distribution, among others. The maximum likelihood estimation procedure is presented. A simulation study evaluates bias and mean square error of the considered estimation procedure as well as the coverage probabilities of the parameters asymptotic and bootstrap confidence intervals. A real Brazilian dataset on breast cancer illustrates the methodology. From the practical point of view, under our modelling, we provide a parameter that works as a metric to quantify and compare the risk between different stages of the disease. We emphasize that, we developed an online platform for oncologists to calculate the probability of survival of patients diagnosed with breast cancer according to the stage of the disease in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Age-dependent dynamics is an important characteristic of many infectious diseases. Age-group epidemic models describe the infection dynamics in different age-groups by allowing to set distinct parameter values for each. However, such models are highly nonlinear and may have a large number of unknown parameters. Thus, parameter estimation of age-group models, while becoming a fundamental issue for both the scientific study and policy making in infectious diseases, is not a trivial task in practice. In this paper, we examine the estimation of the so-called next-generation matrix using incidence data of a single entire outbreak, and extend the approach to deal with recurring outbreaks. Unlike previous studies, we do not assume any constraints regarding the structure of the matrix. A novel two-stage approach is developed, which allows for efficient parameter estimation from both statistical and computational perspectives. Simulation studies corroborate the ability to estimate accurately the parameters of the model for several realistic scenarios. The model and estimation method are applied to real data of influenza-like-illness in Israel. The parameter estimates of the key relevant epidemiological parameters and the recovered structure of the estimated next-generation matrix are in line with results obtained in previous studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]