Search

Hamstrings muscle morphology is determinant of muscle function (i.e. strength). Among individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), less cross-sectional area (CSA) and volume in the ACLR-limb are associated with muscle weakness, and may contribute to lower rates of return to preinjury activity level and an increased risk for long-term sequelae. To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of differences in hamstrings morphology following ACLR is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe the morphology of the hamstring muscle complex after ACLR. We searched five databases for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings size and architecture in individuals with ACLR. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow fixed-effect size meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. Twenty-four studies were included for final review. Eight categories of morphological outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) volume, (2) cross-sectional area (CSA), (3) muscle length, (4) muscle thickness, (5) fascicle length, (6) pennation angle, (7) fiber area, and (8) fiber type. Meta-analysis demonstrated lower hamstrings volume in the ACLR-limb in both contralateral and control group comparisons, and lower CSA, length, and thickness in the ACLR-limb in contralateral comparisons. The semitendinosus and gracilis were most profoundly impacted. Limited moderate evidence demonstrated greater biceps femoris pennation angle in the ACLR-limb. Individuals with ACLR demonstrated large deficits in semitendinosus and gracilis muscle CSA and volume in the ACLR-limb compared contralaterally, with no differences observed in the biceps femoris or semimembranosus. Clinical implications regarding assessment and treatment of individuals with ACLR are discussed.

Hamstrings neuromuscular function is a crucial component of functional movement, and changes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury contribute to risk factors for secondary injury and long-term sequelae. To effectively treat muscular impairments, an accurate understanding of hamstrings neuromuscular function in patients with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is needed. A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to describe and quantify hamstrings neuromuscular function in individuals with ACLR compared to controls. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, and EBSCOhost databases in October of 2020 for studies evaluating the difference between hamstrings electromyography (EMG) between individuals with ACLR and controls. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Means and standard deviations were extracted from each included study to allow random-effect size (ES) meta-analysis calculations for comparison of results. Thirty-four studies were included for final review. From these, 5 categories of neuromuscular outcomes were identified, and studies were grouped accordingly: (1) muscle activation levels (EMG amplitude), (2) co-activation, (3) onset timing, (4) electromechanical delay, and (5) time-to-peak activity. Moderate to strong evidence indicates that individuals with ACLR demonstrate higher hamstrings EMG amplitude (normalized to % maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during gait and stair ambulation compared to controls. In addition, there was moderate evidence of longer electromechanical delay during knee flexion and greater hamstrings-to-quadriceps co-activation during knee extension compared to controls. Greater hamstrings EMG amplitude and co-activation during gait and ambulation tasks and longer electromechanical delay of the hamstrings in individuals with ACLR align with clinical impairments following ACLR and have implications for re-injury risk and long-term joint health, thus warranting attention in rehabilitation.

Differences in the excitability of motor generating neural pathways are reported following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that is associated with quadriceps dysfunction and theorized to prevent the full recovery of muscle function. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare quadriceps neural excitability between the involved ACLR limb, the uninvolved limb, and uninjured controls, and to determine at what time intervals these differences are present after surgery. We conducted a search of PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Web of Science, and extracted measures assessing difference of quadriceps spinal-reflexive, corticospinal, and intracortical excitability from studies that compared (1) involved limb to the uninvolved limb, (2) involved limb to a control limb, or (3) uninvolved limb to a control limb. We stratified time at 24 months, since this represents a period of heightened risk for reinjury. A modified Downs and Black checklist and Egger’s test were used to determine the methodological quality of individual studies and risk of bias between studies. Fourteen studies comprising 611 participants (371 individuals with a history of ACLR; median time from surgery: 31.5 months; range 0.5–221.1 months) were included in the review. Overall, the involved (g = 0.60, 95% CI [0.24, 0.96]) and uninvolved (g = 0.49, 95% CI [0.00, 0.98]) limbs exhibited greater motor threshold (MT) in comparison to uninjured controls. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were greater in the uninvolved limb in comparison to uninjured controls (g = 0.31, 95% CI [0.03, 0.59]). Lesser intracortical inhibition was exhibited in the uninvolved limb compared to uninjured controls (g = 0.54, 95% CI [0.14, 0.93]). When stratified by time from surgery, MEP amplitudes were greater in the uninvolved limb compared to uninjured controls (g = 0.33, 95% CI [0.03, 0.63]) within the first 24 months after surgery. When evaluated more than 24 months after surgery, the involved limb exhibited greater Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) compared to uninjured controls (g = 0.38, 95% CI [0.00, 0.77]). MT were greater in the involved limb (g = 0.93, 95% CI [− 0.01, 1.88]) and uninvolved limb (g = 0.57, 95% CI [0.13, 1.02]) compared to uninjured controls. MEP amplitudes in the involved limb were lesser compared to uninjured controls when evaluated more than 24 months after ACLR (g = -1.11, 95% CI [− 2.03, − 0.20]). The available evidence supports that there are neural excitability differences within the corticospinal tract in individuals with ACLR when compared to uninjured controls. Future research should focus further on longitudinal assessments of neural excitability prior to and following ACLR. Identifying interventions aimed to facilitate corticospinal excitability after ACLR appears to be warranted to improve quadriceps function. Registered through PROSPERO CRD42020158714.