Search

Background Context: Total removal of spinal schwannomas is ideal but it sometimes requires tumor-involved root resection, which increases the risk of postoperative motor deterioration (PMD). Therefore, it is important for clinicians to predict the impact of tumor-involved root resection on motor function in spinal schwannomas.Purpose: To investigate the role of intraoperative electromyographic (EMG) techniques in decision-making of tumor-involved root resection for treating spinal schwannomas.Study Design: A retrospective analysis PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty-eight patients with spinal schwannomas arising from C5-T1 or L3-S1 roots underwent total resection of schwannoma, including tumoral root.Outcome Measures: Nerve root activation threshold, free-running EMG signals, visual analogue scale, and American Spinal Injury Association scale.Methods: During evoked EMG, nerve root activation threshold for tumoral root stimulation was recorded from muscles anatomically corresponding to tumoral root. During free-running EMG, abnormal EMG signals were identified as irregularly recurrent, monomorphic signals, low frequency (<5 Hz) or absent discharges recorded from muscles innervated by tumoral root. Clinical assessments were performed before, 3 to 5 day's and six months' after operation.Results: Sixteen (16 of 68, 23.5%) patients showed PMD, and muscle strength improved or was not affected in the other 52 patients. Absent myogenic responses were observed in 19 patients with non-PMD, and nerve root activation threshold in non-PMD group was higher than that in PMD group (p<.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that cut-off value of nerve root activation threshold for distinguishing functional and nonfunctional roots was 11.8 mA. A larger number of patients without PMD than with PMD showed abnormal free-running EMG signals (p<.05). At postoperative 6-months' follow-up, ten patients with muscle weakness after tumor-involved root resection showed functional recovery (full vs. partial recovery: 5 vs. 5), and intraoperative nerve root activation threshold in these patients was higher than that in the other patients without functional recovery (p<.05). Furthermore, there is negative relationship between the duration for full recovery and nerve root activation threshold (p<.05).Conclusions: Both evoked and free-running EMG can be used as supplementary tests for differentiating functional and nonfunctional tumoral roots in spinal schwannomas, and nerve root activation threshold may be also related to prognosis of patients with muscle weakness caused by tumor-involved root resection. Therefore, intraoperative EMG techniques may provide additional references in decision-making of tumor-involved root resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Both open surgical resection (OSR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been reported for spinal osteoid osteoma (OO).Purpose: To verify the clinical safety and efficiency of RFA with OSR in treating spinal OO.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Patient Sample: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with spinal OO who underwent either RFA or OSR in our institute between September 2006 and December 2016.Outcome Measures: The age, gender, lesion distribution, surgical time, estimated blood loss, complications, local recurrence, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the modified Frankel grade were documented.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients with spinal OO who had been treated in our hospital from September 2006 to December 2016. Patients were followed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the index surgery. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. This study was funded by Peking University Third Hospital (Y71508-01) (¥ 400,000).Results: Twelve and 16 patients were treated with CT-guided percutaneous RFA and OSR, respectively. Spinal OO locations were cervical in 4, thoracic in 4, lumbar in 3, and sacral vertebra in 1 in the RFA group and cervical in 12, thoracic in 1, and lumber in 3 in the OSR group. RFA showed shorter operating time, less blood loss, and less in-hospital stay than open surgery [105.0 ± 33.8 minutes vs. 186.4 ± 53.5 minutes (p < .001), 1 (0 to 5) ml vs. 125 (30-1200) ml (p < .001) and 1 (1-3) days vs. 6 (3-10) days (p < .001), respectively]. At last follow-up, one patient underwent a secondary RFA for recurrence. VAS improvement was 7.5 (3-10) and 6.5 (4-9) (p = .945) in the RFA and OSR groups, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (1/12) and 18.8% (3/16) in the RFA and OSR groups, respectively.Conclusions: If there is sufficient cerebrospinal fluid between the spinal OO lesion and spinal cord/nerve root (more than 1 mm), RFA is effective and safe for treatment of well-selected spinal OO, showing reduced operating time, blood loss, in-hospital stay, and complications compared to OSR. However, OSR is still recommended in cases with spinal cord/nerve root compression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background context The posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) may be performed using an open or minimally-invasive (MIS) approach using a tubular retractor. Although there are theoretical advantages such as less blood loss and shorter hospitalizations, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the best approach for treatment. Purpose To assess clinical outcomes of PCF treated with either an open or an MIS approach using a tubular retractor. Study design Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of English language studies for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy treated with foraminotomy. Patient sample Pooled patient results from Level I studies and Level IV retrospective studies. Outcome measures Meta-analysis for clinical success as determined by Odom and Prolo criteria, and visual analog scale scores for arm and neck pain. Methods A literature search of three databases was performed to identify investigations performed in the treatment of PCF with an open or MIS approach. The pooled results were performed by calculating the effect size based on the logit event rate. Studies were weighted by the inverse of the variance, which included both within and between-study errors. Confidence intervals (CIs) were reported at 95%. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I-squared, where I-squared is the estimate of the percentage of error due to between-study variation. Results The initial literature search resulted in 195 articles, of which, 20 were determined as relevant on abstract review. An open foraminotomy approach was performed in six; similarly, an MIS approach was performed in three studies. The pooled clinical success rate was 92.7% (CI: 88.9, 95.3) for open foraminotomy and 94.9% (CI: 90.5, 97.4) for MIS foraminotomy, which was not statistically significant (p=.418). The open group demonstrated relative homogeneity with Q value of 7.6 and I 2 value of 34.3%; similarly, the MIS group demonstrated moderate study heterogeneity with Q value of 4.44 and I 2 value of 54.94%. Conclusions Patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy from foraminal stenosis can be effectively managed with either a traditional open or an MIS foraminotomy. There is no significant difference in the pooled outcomes between the two groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background context: Decompressive procedures such as laminectomy, facetectomy, and costotransversectomy are routinely performed for various pathologies in the thoracic spine. The thoracic spine is unique, in part, because of the sternocostovertebral articulations that provide additional strength to the region relative to the cervical and lumbar spines. During decompressive surgeries, stability is compromised at a presently unknown point. Purpose: To evaluate thoracic spinal stability after common surgical decompressive procedures in thoracic spines with intact sternocostovertebral articulations. Study design: Biomechanical cadaveric study. Methods: Fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine specimens with intact rib cages, C7–L1 (n=9), were used. An industrial robot tested all spines in axial rotation (AR), lateral bending (LB), and flexion-extension (FE) by applying pure moments (±5 Nm). The specimens were first tested in their intact state and then tested after each of the following sequential surgical decompressive procedures at T4–T5 consisting of laminectomy; unilateral facetectomy; unilateral costotransversectomy, and subsequently instrumented fusion from T3–T7. Results: We found that in all three planes of motion, the sequential decompressive procedures caused no statistically significant change in motion between T3–T7 or T1–T12 when compared with intact. In comparing between intact and instrumented specimens, our study found that instrumentation reduced global range of motion (ROM) between T1–T12 by 16.3% (p=.001), 12% (p=.002), and 18.4% (p=.0004) for AR, FE, and LB, respectively. Age showed a negative correlation with motion in FE (r=−0.78, p=.01) and AR (r=−0.7, p=.04). Conclusions: Thoracic spine stability was not significantly affected by sequential decompressive procedures in thoracic segments at the level of the true ribs in all three planes of motion in intact thoracic specimens. Age appeared to negatively correlate with ROM of the specimen. Our study suggests that thoracic spinal stability is maintained immediately after unilateral decompression at the level of the true ribs. These preliminary observations, however, do not depict the long-term sequelae of such procedures and warrant further investigation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Commentary On: Klement MR, Kleeman LT, Blizzard DJ, Gallizzi MA, Eure M, Brown CR. C5 palsy after cervical laminectomy and fusion: does width of laminectomy matter? Spine J 2016:16:462-7 (in this issue). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]