Search

Biomechanical finite-element study.To directly compare the biomechanical effects of two different techniques for sagittal plane correction of adult spine deformity based on the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) resection and use of hyperlordotic cages, namely, the anterior column realignment (ACR) in L3-4, and ALIF in L5-S1 in terms of primary stability and rod stresses using finite-element models.A finite-element model of the thoracolumbar spine was used to perform the analysis. Starting from this "intact" model, three further models were constructed through the insertion of spinal instrumentation, i.e., pedicle screws, rods and cages: 1) posterior instrumentation between T9 and S1 (referred to as "T9-S1"); 2) posterior instrumentation T9-S1 + Hyperlordotic (26°) ALIF cage in L5-S1 ("ALIF"); 3) posterior instrumentation T9-S1 + Hyperlordotic (30°) ACR cage in L3-4 ("ACR"). These models were studied by simulations applying, alternately, a pure moment of 7.5 Nm between the three planes of motion (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and bilateral axial rotation), uniformly distributed over the upper surface of the T9 thoracic vertebra. A total of 24 simulations were performed (6 per models).All models presented a significant reduced ROM when compared to the intact model; the ROM reduction was higher both at L3-4 in the ACR model and at L5-S1 in the ALIF model. At L3-4, the ACR model had, in all cases, the lowest maximum values of Von Mises stresses on the rods, especially in flexion-extension. At L4-5, the ALIF model had the lowest stresses during flexion-extension and axial rotation, while the ACR model had the lowest stresses during lateral bending. At L5-S1, the ALIF model had, in all cases, the lowest stresses on the rods.This finite-element study showed how both ACR at L3-4 and ALIF-ACR at L5-S1 are effective in restoring lumbar lordosis (LL), stabilizing the spine and reducing stress on posterior rods at the index level when compared to a simple fixation model. Interestingly, ALIF-ACR reduces rod stress even at L4-5 in flexion-extension and axial rotation, possibly due to a better distribution of LL, especially on the lower arch, while ACR reduces the stress at L4-5 in lateral bending, possibly thanks to the larger footprint of the cage that increases the area of contact with the lateral side of the endplates.

Surgical technical note and literature review.To describe a technique that uses 4 rod constructs in cases of complex thoracolumbar spinal deformity correction or revision surgeries based on the hybrid use of two different types of purchase points by a staggered pedicle screw fixation. It utilizes two rods on either side of the spine using a lateral and medial entry point of pedicle screws in the vertebral body.Pedicle screws using extra-pedicular technique are more converging screws and are inserted alternately in the vertebral body and connected by rods. The left-out alternate vertebral bodies are fixed by a relatively straighter pedicle entry screw and connected to each other by a separate rod. So, two trajectories are independently used for a four-rod construct. This reconstruction has been named RCC (reinforced criss-cross construct). The screws in the index case were placed by free hand method, but we have increasingly utilized navigation guidance for placement of screws in recent times.We present a surgical technical note in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV-AIDS). He was diagnosed to have multi-drug-resistant (MDR) tuberculous spondylodiscitis, complicated with Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) and implant failure resulting in kyphosis and thoracic myelopathy. RCC with pharmacological management achieved healing and union, which was maintained at 4 years follow-up. Our method of four-rod construct provides a strong and lasting construct in the management of spinal deformities and three-column osteotomies. It provides good structural support to the spine till bony union is achieved.Hybrid multi-rod construct like RCC provides a rigid mechanical support to the instrumentation and reduces the chances of rod failure especially in complex thoraco-lumbar spinal deformity correction surgeries.

Study design/methods Review article. Objectives The goal of this article is to review the available evidence for computerized navigation and robotics as an accuracy improvement tool for spinal deformity surgery, as well as to consider potential complications, impact on clinical outcomes, radiation exposure, and costs. Summary of background data/results Pedicle screw and rod construct are widely utilized for posterior spinal fixation in spinal deformity correction. Freehand placement of pedicle screws has long been utilized, although there is variable potential for inaccuracy depending on surgeon skill and experience. Malpositioned pedicle screws may have significant clinical implications ranging from nerve root irritation, inadequate fixation, CSF leak, perforation of the great vessels, or spinal cord damage. Computer-based navigation and robotics systems were developed to improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy and consistency, and decrease the risk of malpositioned pedicle fixation. The available evidence suggests that computer-based navigation and robotic-assisted guidance systems for pedicle cannulation are at least equivalent, and in several reports superior, to freehand techniques in terms of accuracy. CT and robotic navigation systems do appear to decrease radiation exposure to the operative team in some reports. Published reports do indicate longer operative times with use of robotic navigation compared with traditional freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement. To date, there is no conclusive evidence that use of CT or robotic navigation has any measurable impact on patient outcomes or overall complication reduction. There are theoretical advantages with robotic and CT navigation in terms of both speed and accuracy for severe spinal deformity or complex revision cases, however, there is a need for studies to investigate this technology in these specific cases. There is no evidence to date demonstrating the cost effectiveness of CT or robotic navigation as compared with traditional pedicle cannulation techniques. Conclusions The review of available evidence suggests that computer-based navigation and robotic-assisted guidance systems for pedicle cannulation are at least equivalent, and in several reports superior, to freehand techniques in terms of radiographic accuracy. There is no current clinical evidence that the use of navigation or robotic techniques leads to improved patient outcomes or decreased overall complications or reoperation rates, and the use of these systems may substantially increase surgical costs. Level of evidence V.

The objective of this case report is to highlight occipital bone erosion as an unusual late complication of C1-C2 instrumented fixation. A 60-year-old man of a displaced Anderson type II odontoid fracture was surgically treated by C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation. Occipital bone erosions, caused by a repeat irritation of the end of rod to the occipital bone, were detected on multiplane reconstructed computed tomography at 3 months after surgery. The lesion progressed over time with increasing the C2 anteversion on radiological evaluations. Eventually, the bony shell had been reactively formed around the protruded screw-rod construct and the Oc-C1 segment had been spontaneously stabilized. Fortunately, he had experienced no symptoms caused by the lesion at 5-year follow-up. The occipital bone erosion is an unusual late complication in C1-C2 posterior fixation using C1 pedicle screw. The increasing occipital-C1 lordosis compensating for the great C2 anteversion (high C2 slope) was related to the progression of the lesion. In C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation, surgeons should recognize a possibility of this complication and realize a relation between the occurrence of the lesion and the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine to take measures to avoid the complication.

Laboratory based study. To compare reduction force and plastic deformation of cobalt–chromium (Co–Cr) spinal rods using a rigid, thoracolumbar spinal deformity model. Pre-contoured spinal rods are growing in their utilization for spinal deformity. Although there are theoretical advantages to pre-contouring rods, no previous studies have compared pre-contoured and manually contoured rods for their ability to maintain sagittal contour and resist mechanical load. A spinal deformity model was utilized, simulating a rigid, thoracolumbar spinal deformity fixated with pedicle screws. Roll-formed pre-contoured and manually contoured 5.5 mm and 6.0 mm Co–Cr rods were reduced to the model with a load cell attached to the apical screw to measure corrective force. Rods remained reduced in the model for 20 min and change in contour was assessed to characterize plastic deformation. Twenty-four rods were tested with six rods per group (Table 1). The load to reduction was significantly lower in the 5.5 mm rods compared to the 6.0 mm rods (95% CI -254.0 to -61.42; p = 0.008). Although there was no difference in the corrective forces for manual and pre-contoured 5.5 mm rods (p = 0.722), the 6.0 mm rod produced significantly less corrective force compared to the manually contoured 6.0 mm rods (95% CI -134.42 to -5.317; p = 0.039). Additionally, rod contour for the manual group showed significantly less plastic deformation than the pre-contoured group in both 5.5 mm and 6.0 mm rods (5.5 mm: 57.1% vs. 61.6%, p = 0.006; 6.0 mm: 54.3% vs. 62.28%, p = 0.003). Roll formed, pre-contoured Co–Cr rods demonstrated significantly greater plastic deformation when compared with manually contoured rods of the same diameter. Furthermore, 6.0 mm pre-contoured rods required significantly lower load for rod reduction, the equivalent of 15 lb-force. Post-manufacturing, roll-formed pre-contouring of larger diameter Co–Cr may impair the rods mechanical properties.

Retrospective cohort study.To validate whether fusions that end proximal to the sagittal stable vertebrae are at risk for developing distal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Posterior spinal fusion is routinely used for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Fusions that end in either the lower thoracic or upper lumbar spine have the advantage of preserving motion segments. However, fusions ending proximal to the sagittal stable vertebrae has been shown to be at higher risk for developing distal junctional kyphosis.A multi-center database of prospectively enrolled subjects was queried for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis that had Lenke type 1, 2 and 3 curves treated with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. PA (posterior-anterior) and lateral full-length scoliosis films were obtained on each patient. PA radiographs were viewed to determine the coronal deformity and lateral radiographs to determine the sagittal deformity. Distal junctional kyphosis was defined as a greater than 10° increase in segmental kyphosis between the LIV and the LIV + 1 vertebra.346 patients were included with 85% being female and mean age of cohort 14.2 [Formula: see text] 2.08 years. At 5 years postoperatively, there was significant difference occurrence of distal junctional kyphosis dependent on whether the LIV relative to SSV with only 2.2% of fusions below the SSV developing DJK compared to 6.5% for fusions ending at the SSV and 15% for fusions with LIV above the SSV (p 0.001). There was no statistical difference in revision rates based on the relationship of LIV to SSV.There is an increased risk for development of DJK in patients with AIS treated with posterior fusion where the LIV was chosen proximal to the SSV.Level III.

Review of a prospective multicenter registry. To report the correction of the thoracic sagittal profile in Lenke 1 curves using the bilateral vertebral coplanar alignment (BVCA) maneuver. All-pedicle-screw construtcs provide satisfactory coronal correction but fail to accurately restore the frequent thoracic hypokyphosis of Lenke 1 curves. BVCA is a recently described technique focused on restoration of the normal thoracic kyphosis alignment in AIS patients. A non-consecutive series of 49 AIS patients underwent surgical correction of the deformity by only posterior pedicle screw construct. Coronal and sagittal curve correction was assessed by conventional standing X-rays at preoperative and 2-year follow-up visits. BVCA reduction maneuvers include the correction of the deformity, while descending an implantable rod within slotted tubes attached to the convex side screws. Restoration of physiologic kyphosis is achieved by spreading the distal ends of the tubes at the thoracic spine using different-sized spacers. Mean preoperative Cobb of the MT curves was 58.4° and was corrected at 70.9%. Preoperative apical vertebral rotation was 18.6° on average and was corrected at 52.9%. T5–T12 kyphosis showed a significant improvement from a mean angle of 18.8o (95% CI 13.3–24.8) to 23.5o (95% CI 20.1–26.1) at 2-year follow-up (a 25% increase) (p = 0.040). Patients with (−) sagittal modifier gained 13.9o on average; those with ( +) modifier decreased 24.0°, and patients with N sagittal modifier remained almost unchanged (2.9°). Differences in the changes of the thoracic sagittal profile between the three groups were statistically significant (p

Case series. To describe a novel surgical strategy for severe, rigid post-tubercular cervical kyphosis with treatment outcomes in two patients. Spinal tuberculosis is a common cause of kyphotic deformity in the developing world with 3–5% of non-operatively managed patients ending up with kyphosis exceeding 60°. Ventral, dorsal and combined approaches have been described for cervical kyphosis, but there is no established surgical strategy for severe, rigid post-tubercular cervical kyphosis. We operated on two girls with severe, rigid cervical kyphosis with preoperative kyphosis measuring 98° and 62°. Our surgical strategy included a three-step approach in the same sitting—(1) An anterior approach to osteotomize the fused vertebral body mass, decompress the spinal cord ventrally and place a temporary cage to stabilize the spine, (2) A posterior approach to osteotomize the fused facets and decompress the cord dorsally. With the completion of the osteotomy, a combination of pedicle screws and lateral mass screws was used to correct the deformity via an anterior opening, posterior closing type of osteotomy. This was followed by, (3) An anterior approach to replace the corpectomy cage with a larger one supplemented with an anterior cervical plate. Our 540° approach achieved a substantial improvement in each of the clinical and radiological parameters we measured, viz. C2–C7 lordosis angle, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis, neck tilt and Neck Disability Index. For severe, rigid post-tubercular cervical spine kyphosis, a three-step, anterior–posterior–anterior procedure can be used for achieving acceptable correction, improving symptoms and avoiding further progression. IV.

Case reports and review of the literature with a proposed management algorithm. To report two cases of a potential vascular complication due to an incorrectly placed pedicle screw (PS) during spine deformity surgery. Relevant literature regarding the management of vascular complications is reviewed, and an evidence-based management algorithm is proposed. Aortic lesions represent a rare but potentially life-threatening complications with spine deformity and revision surgery, significantly increasing the risk. A management algorithm for an aortic lesion in the case of a malpositioned PS has not yet been published. Case 1: An 18-year-old female with proximal thoracic spinal non-instrumented fusion underwent a revision corrective procedure due to a progressive right-sided thoracolumbar compensatory curve. However, postoperative computed tomography (CT) performed to evaluate the position of the PS revealed malposition of the left T9 PS, which was abutting the descending aorta with CT angiography excluding the perforation of the aorta. Case 2: A 17-year-old male was scheduled for correction of Lenke 3-C-N adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Postoperative routine evaluation with low-dose CT revealed a left T9 PS paravertebral malposition, and subsequent CTA demonstrated that the thread of the PS was in contact with the descending thoracic aorta and an unlikely hemodynamically significant vessel injury. Successful removal of both malpositioned PS was performed. In the first case, a cardiovascular surgeon attended the operation if an urgent thoracotomy was needed, and in the second case, additional video-assisted thoracoscopic control of the aorta was performed during PS removal. Preoperative imaging in spinal surgery is essential to avoid major vascular and other complications when placing PS, especially in thoracic deformities. When a potential major vessel complication emerges, an interdisciplinary approach and an appropriate management algorithm are mandatory to make the best clinical decisions. 4.

Study design Quality improvement evaluation with retrospective analysis. Objectives To compare a technique to place pedicle screws (PS) using a novel detachable pedicle marker and probe (DPMP) and pulsed fluoroscopy (PF) vs. conventional technique utilizing PF with standard instruments (SI) and O-arm. Summary of background data Spinal fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation (PSI) is the mainstay in treatment of spinal deformities. Reports suggest that CT navigated (O-arm) PS placement is more accurate than fluoroscopy. However, these studies have not considered the increased radiation exposure associated with CT. Methods Thirty-six patients with spinal deformity had PSI using PF and DPMPs. Accuracy of PS placement and radiation data from 14 dosimeters placed on the patient and around the operating room was analyzed. Results were compared to published data. Results Mean fluoroscopic time was 13.4 s (range 6.0–32.4), and the mean cumulative dose was 3.1 mGy (range 0.2–16.4). Median estimated effective dose to the patient was 0.22 mSv (range 0.0–0.7). The effective dose of radiation was reduced by 80% (0.22 mSv vs. 1.11 mSv) compared to low-dose O-arm. The surgical team did not receive any detectable radiation. The seconds of PF used to assist and confirm placement of PSs was reduced to 1.2 s/level compared to previous reports of 4.49 s/level using SIs. DPMPs reduced fluoroscopy to 0.84 s/PS compared to 7.36 s/PS using SIs to assist and confirm PS placement. PSs were accurately placed in 561 of 576 (97.4%), which is comparable to O-arm and fluoroscopy with SIs. Conclusions PS placement using PF and DPMPs to assist and confirm PS placement lowers radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team without compromising accuracy compared to O-arm and fluoroscopy with SIs. Level of evidence Therapeutic, Level IV (Retrospective case series, historical control).

Retrospective monocentric study. To report radiologic outcomes of a consecutive series of AIS patients, operated with a bivertebral autostable claw for the upper instrumentation over a 5-year period. The upper fixation represents the weakest part of long constructs because of local anatomy and the high pull-out forces. Various implants have been proposed, but proximal junctional failures (PJF) and shoulder imbalance still occur with variable incidence. The autostable claw is a new implant, safe, and low profile, combining the mechanical strength of hooks with the initial stability of pedicle screws. All AIS patients operated between January 2010 and July 2015 for a Lenke 1 or 2 curve with the bivertebral autostable claw were included. A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. Full-spine biplanar stereoradiographs were performed preoperatively, within 8 weeks postoperative and at latest examination. Local and global sagittal and coronal parameters were analyzed and complications were reported. 237 patients (191 Lenke 1 and 46 Lenke 2) were included, with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 0.6 years. PJF occurred in 2 patients (0.8%), and radiologic PJKs were observed in 8.4% of the series. Shoulder balance was efficiently restored or maintained in 88.2%. The bivertebral autostable claw is a safe and robust alternative to pedicle screws for proximal fixation in AIS long constructs. Compression and/or distraction can be applied to level shoulders, and mechanical failures remain rare at 4-year follow-up. IV.

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. To determine the influence of postoperative ideal lordosis distribution and ideal sagittal harmony on mechanical complications in patients undergoing one-level lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (L-PSO). Many variables have been associated with mechanical complications after L-PSO. However, the impact of restoring the ideal inflexion point, lumbar apex, and sagittal shape is still underexplored. Analyzed risk factors were: age and patient-related variables, PSO level, interbody cages, rod material/diameter, number of rods, upper instrumented vertebra, lower instrumented vertebra, PI-LL mismatch, global tilt (GT), postoperative level of lumbar apex (LApex), postoperative level of inflexion point (InfxP), and postoperative type of Roussouly sagittal profile (R-type). These last variables were compared to ideal (based on pelvic incidence). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risks for mechanical complications with a minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 87 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 1.7 years. 40.2% of the patients suffered postoperative mechanical complications (7 PJK, 4 PJF, 18 pseudoarthrosis/rod breakage, 6 screw pullout). Mean time for complications was 584 ± 416 days from surgery. Univariate analysis showed that age (63 vs 57 years; P = 0.04), BMI (28.1 vs 25.9; P = 0.024), preoperative-GT (50.7° vs 38.7°; P

To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical scoliosis correction and posterior instrumented fusion in SMF patients.A single-center medical database was reviewed to identify MF patients who presented with scoliosis from 2000 to 2015. Patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery were included. Demographic, operative and clinical data were reviewed, and the preoperative, postoperative, and latest follow-up radiographic parameters were compared.Twelve patients were identified (2 males, 10 females) with an average age at surgery of 14.4 ± 2.6 years. Comorbidities were found in 84.6%. Most patients (90.9%) presented with a right thoracic curve. The average preoperative Cobb angle was 75.6 ± 15.5 degrees. Posterior instrumented spinal fusion was performed in all patients (1 hook/pedicular screw and 11 pedicle screws only). The average follow-up period was 6.8 ± 3.1 years. The mean postoperative Cobb angle after surgery and at the final follow-up was 33.4 ± 18.0 degrees and 35.5 ± 18.4 degrees, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference among the preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles (p 0.001), but no significant difference among the sagittal angles. Two perioperative complications including superficial wound infection and broken rods were observed.Posterior scoliosis correction and instrumented spinal fusion resulted in a satisfactory outcome in MF patients. Perioperative complications are not uncommon; however, no neurological complication or spinal decompensation was observed in this study.IV.

Retrospective study.(1) Compare outcomes of all-pedicle screws (PS) and hook-hybrid (H) constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients; and (2) investigate whether BMI, height or pedicle size may modify the effect of the type of surgical construct on the extent of curve decompensation.AIS patients who underwent surgical fixation with H or PS constructs at a single tertiary institution were reviewed. Patients with implant density of at least 70% and 2-year follow-up were included. Demographic and perioperative data collected were age, sex, height, BMI, implant density and pedicle diameter. Cobb's angles and curve correction were compared preoperatively, postoperatively and at follow-up.In total, 59 patients were included. H group had a lower pedicle size at the highest level of construct and at T4 compared to PS group. Postoperatively, H group (30.2° ± 11.7°) and PS group (32.1° ± 10.4°) had similar correction (mean diff. 2.0°, p = 0.516). At 2-year follow-up, H group (1.6° ± 3.5°) and PS group (0.1° ± 2.8°) had similar curve deterioration (mean diff. 1.5°, p = 0.079). Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed that BMI and height were not associated with curve deterioration at 2-year follow-up among the H and PS groups.H constructs provided similar maintenance of curve correction at 2-year follow-up compared to PS constructs. BMI and Stature did not modify curve deterioration between both groups at follow-up. This study supports the use of H constructs when faced with difficult pedicle morphology associated with shorter stature as it provides comparable and satisfactory long-term maintenance of curve correction.Level III, retrospective cohort study.

In contrast to infection and curve progression, return to OR for implant malposition is potentially within the surgeon's control. With increasing surgeon familiarity with freehand/fluoroscopic pedicle screw placement, rates of return to OR due to malposition may have decreased over time. We sought to document the incidence and risk factors for return to OR due to screw malposition in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.AIS patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry with minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2017 were included. Surgeries with the use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation were excluded. Return to OR due to screw malposition over time was tabulated. Lenke class, age at surgery, year of surgery, height, weight, surgeon and site were evaluated.2435 patients underwent PSF with non-navigated open pedicle screw instrumentation. Mean age was 14.6 years, mean thoracic curve magnitude was 53°, and mean lumbar was 40°. Patients did not routinely undergo intraoperative or postoperative CT evaluation. There were 10 returns to OR for screw malposition at a mean of 0.83 years postoperatively (range 0.1-3.4 years), for an overall incidence of 0.4%. Of the 14 screws, 10 were thoracic, 7 were left-sided. No association was found between screw malposition and curve size, enrolling site, surgeon, BMI, Lenke class, or age. Five patients had radiculopathy which improved after screw revision. Return to OR for screw malposition changed from 2003 to 2017 (1-0.2%) but this did not reach statistical significance.Although the incidence of asymptomatic malpositioned screws is unknown, the rate of return to the OR for implant malposition overall in this registry was 1 in 250 patients. Recent data suggest the rate has decreased to 1 in 500 patients. Further work may determine whether enabling technologies can reduce the rate, ideally to a "never event".

Detailed radiological analysis by multimodality imaging.To document anatomical changes jeopardizing instrumentation safety in Neurofibromatosis deformity correction surgeries.The apical and 3 adjacent vertebral segments above and below amounting to 70 segments in 10 NF scoliosis were studied by radiographs, CT and MRI. The changes in lamina, pedicle and vertebral body that could jeopardize pedicle screw and sublaminar wire placement were documented and changes were appropriately classified.Extensive anatomical changes were noted. These changes were more severe at the apex and independent of the curve severity. Both laminae were normal in only 36 (Type 1), rest had either gross asymmetry in length and shape (Type 2; 21) or also in sloping (Type 3; 13). Of the 140 pedicles, normal pedicles were found only in 48 (Type 1); while they were divergent (Type 2; 4) or abnormally elongated with only thinning (Type 3a; 26); or with sclerosis (3b; 34); or very curved and wavy (3c; 23) and even fractured or indistinct (Type 4; 5). It was notable that 92 of the 140 pedicles were unsuitable for pedicle screws. A unique phenomenon of body drift was identified in 29 segments which could jeopardize screw placement and rib dislocation into the canal was found in 18 segments.Gross anatomical changes jeopardizing both sublaminar wire strength and trajectory of pedicle screws were common in NF and independent of curve severity. Therefore, detailed preoperative assessment and planning by a 3D CT are essential.

Study Design Retrospective. Objectives To compare outcomes and complications of all-pedicle screw against hybrid constructs as proximal anchors in traditional growth rod technique. Summary of Background Data Traditional distraction-based growth rods, although the preferred technique in treating progressive curves in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is not free from complications. Surgical outcome and implant-related complications can be influenced by the choice of construct, but there is a paucity of evidence in literature comparing different constructs with these techniques. Methods A retrospective review was performed of 28 consecutive patients with progressive EOS treated between 2009 and 2015 with growth rod technique. Patients were divided into two groups; Standard group (SG), where all pedicle screw construct was used; and Hybrid group (HG), where proximal rib hooks and distal pedicle screws were used. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiologic parameters and complications were recorded and compared. Results There were 13 patients (8 females, 5 males) in SG and 15 patients (13 females, 2 males) in HG. There was statistically significant improvement in scoliosis correction and length gain after initial surgery in both groups, where patients in SG showed better correction than HG. However, neither the radiologic parameters nor the complication rates showed any statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Data from our study indicate that the proximal anchors, whether spine-based or rib-based, do not differ much in their outcome and complication rates, and the success of growing-rod technique depends largely on the security of cephalad and caudal foundations. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Study Design Clinical case series. Objective To assess objective outcomes of surgical correction of post–external beam radiation therapy (ERBT) kyphosis in a series of five adults. Summary of Background Data EBRT is a well-established treatment for many cancers in children and adults. One complication associated with EBRT is postirradiation spine deformity. Scoliosis is the most common deformity, but kyphosis also occurs frequently. Differences in deformity patterns are likely related to the location and intensity of radiation. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed treatment of these deformities in adults, and the most recent case series (of children) was published in 2005. Methods We present a series of five adults who underwent surgery for postirradiation kyphosis, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range, 2.5–6.2 years). Results Surgery improved the kyphotic deformity in all patients. Overall mean kyphotic deformity correction was 56° and was larger for cervical/cervicothoracic deformities (mean, 76°) than for lumbar deformities (mean, 42°) at midterm follow-up. Patients reported significant improvements in pain and self-image. Consistent with prior case series of children, we observed a high rate of complications (mean, 1.4 complications per patient) in adults. Three patients each underwent an unplanned surgical procedure because of a complication. Conclusion The surgical treatment of postirradiation kyphotic spinal deformity is challenging, with common postoperative complications such as infection, instrumentation failure, and pseudarthrosis. However, with modern surgical techniques and spinal instrumentation, excellent deformity correction can be achieved and maintained. We recommend performing a two-stage procedure for cervicothoracic deformity, with anterior release followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation. In thoracolumbar deformities, correction can be achieved through single-stage posterior fusion. Rigid spinopelvic fixation with sacral-alar-iliac screws and second-stage anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5–S1 is recommended to reduce nonunion risk. Cement augmentation of proximal and distal anchors can help prevent junctional failure. Level of Evidence Level IV.

Purpose Placement of pedicle screws can be performed using freehand/fluoroscopic technique or intraoperative computed tomography (CT)–guided navigation. We sought to compare screw malposition and return to operating room (OR) for pedicle screw malposition for screws placed with and without CT-guided navigation. Methods This study was a single-center retrospective comparative study. All patients younger than 18 years with minimum two-year follow-up who underwent pedicle screw instrumentation between 2009 and 2015 were included. Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient charts were reviewed for patient demographics and surgical outcomes. If available, incidental CTs following the index surgery were reviewed to assess screw position. Results A total of 217 patients underwent spinal instrumentation. Overall, 112 patients had pedicle screws placed using fluoroscopic guidance, whereas 105 patients had screws placed using low-dose intraoperative CT-guided navigation (O-arm; Medtronics). Of the total cohort, 107 (49.3%) patients had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and the remainder had neuromuscular, tumor, congenital, or other diagnoses. Patients in each group had a similar number of levels fused (fluoroscopic = 10.9 vs. CT navigation = 9.8, p = .06). There was no difference in total estimated blood loss (1,127 vs. 1,179 mL, p = .63) or in blood loss per level fused (133.7 vs. 146.6 mL, p = .47). Patients with screws placed using fluoroscopic guidance had a shorter total operative time (441 vs. 468 minutes, p = .04); however, there was no difference when controlling for number of levels fused (58.3 vs. 61.5 minutes/level, p = .63). Postoperative CTs were available in 51 patients representing 526 imaged screws, which showed a significantly higher rate of severely malpositioned (>4 mm) screws in the fluoroscopic group than the CT navigation group (3.3% vs. 1.0%, p = .027). There was a 3.6% rate of return to OR for pedicle screw malposition in the freehand/fluoroscopic group compared with 0% in the CT-guided navigation group (p = .048). Including patients with less than two-year follow-up (169 fluoroscopy, 220 CT guidance) also found higher rates of screw malposition (13.5% vs. 7.1%, p = .004), severe screw malposition (3.0% vs. 0.50%, p = .04), and return to OR due to screw malposition (2.4% vs. 0%, p = .02) in patients with screws placed using fluoroscopic guidance. Conclusion Patients with pedicle screws placed with CT-guided navigation had a lower rate of severely malpositioned screws and unplanned returns to the OR. There was no significant difference in blood loss or operative time when controlling for number of levels fused. Significance In the era of health care “never-events,” return to OR for screw malposition could certainly be deemed unacceptable. Use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation thus far eliminated return to OR for screw malposition in a complex cohort of pediatric spinal deformity patients, without measurable increase in operative time or blood loss.

Study design: Case-Control Study Objectives: To analyse global sagittal alignment including the cranial center of mass (CCOM) and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients treated with posterior instrumentation. Summary of background data: PJK plays an important role in the global sagittal alignment in AIS patients. Maintaining the head above the pelvis allows for a minimization of energy expense in ambulation and upright posture. Numerous studies have been performed to understand PJK phenomena in AIS patients. However, to our knowledge, no study performed on AIS patients included the head in the analysis of global sagittal alignment and PJK. Methods: This study included 85 AIS patients and 51 asymptomatic adolescents. Low-dose bi-planar X-rays were acquired for each subject preoperatively and at two years follow up. Two global sagittal alignment parameters were calculated, i.e. the angle between the vertical and the line joining the center of the bi-coxofemoral axis (HA) and either the most superior point of the dentiform apophysis of C2 (OD) or the cranial center of mass (CCOM). Results: Among normal adolescents, the average OD-HA and CCOM-HA angles were -2.3°±2° and -1.5°±1.8°, respectively. Among AIS patients the average OD-HA and CCOM-HA angles were respectively -2.3°±1.9° and -1.3°±1.8° preoperatively and -2.8°±1.7° and -1.9°±1.7° at the last follow up. 13% of the patients developed PJK postoperatively. Case-by-case analysis showed that adjusting the thoracic kyphosis and the compensations required to maintain this constant could provide explanatory elements. Conclusions: OD-HA and CCOM-HA angles remain almost constant among normal group and patients, pre- and post-operatively, whether PJK or non-PJK. Five patients without PJK and only one patient with PJK produced abnormal values relative to the asymptomatic subjects. Therefore, PJK could be a compensation mechanism, which allows for CCOM-HA and, to a lesser extent, OD-HA to remain invariant. Level of Evidence: III BiomecAM chair on musculoskeletal modeling, with the support of Cotrel and ParisTech Foundations, Société Générale, Covea and Proteor.

While there has been a great improvement in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, sagittal deformity correction has remained challenging. Increased rod stiffness has been shown to reduce thoracic flattening. We propose that the surgical technique can increase rod stiffness. A mechanical study was created to quantify the effect this has on construct stiffness.The sagittal bending stiffness of a constrained over contoured rod was measured using four different commonly used instrumentation systems. Pedicle screws were secured into custom printed blocks. One block was completely immobilized, while the other block was subject to four levels of constraint. This includes no constraint, mild constraint, moderate constraint, and maximal constraint with both blocks immobilized. The rod apex was loaded until 1 cm of displacement occurred. The stiffness was then calculated and compared between groups.All four rod types showed increased bending stiffness as the construct became more constrained. The moderately constrained and the maximally constrained groups had a significantly higher stiffness compared to the unconstrained groups in all rod types (p 0.05). The 6.0 mm titanium circular rods showed the highest increase in stiffness between maximal and no constraint, which became 3.02 × stiffer.Rod stiffness is not only determined by size, shape, and metal alloy, but also by surgical technique. Constraining the spinal instrumentation by first locking the rod to the proximal and distal anchors significantly increases the sagittal bending stiffness. In a mechanical model this technique increases rod bending stiffness regardless of the material or shape.

Pedicles on the concave side of the proximal thoracic (PT) curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Lenke II and IV deformities tend to be narrow and dysplastic, making pedicle screw (PS) insertion challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility for PS placement in these patients using pedicle chord length, diameter, and channel morphology.In this retrospective study, 56 consecutive AIS patients with Lenke II or IV curves who underwent instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were studied. The mean age at surgery was 14.8 years and the mean PT curve measured 45°. Two independent investigators evaluated all visible pedicles from TTwo hundred and sixty-eight concave and 264 convex pedicles were measured. The mean 'd' of the concave pedicles at TAlmost half of all concave pedicles have morphologic characteristics that make them too small to accommodate a PS. Though PSs could be inserted using an in-out-in technique in these patients, alternative fixation anchors may improve strength and safety.

Although pediatric spinal deformity correction using pedicle screws has a very low rate of complications, the long-term consequences of screw malposition is unknown. CT navigation has been proposed to improve screw accuracy. The aim of this study was to determine whether intraoperative navigation during pedicle screw placement in pediatric scoliosis makes screw placement more accurate. We also examined radiation exposure, operative time blood loss and complications with and without the use of CT navigation in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.A systematic review of the literature was conducted. After screening, 13 articles were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed to be used for the review. A random effects meta-analysis using REML methodology was employed to compare outcomes of screw accuracy, estimated blood loss, radiation exposure, and surgical duration.Screws placed with CT navigation surgery were three times as likely to be deemed "acceptable" compared with screws placed with freehand and 2D fluoroscopy assistance, twice as likely to be "perfect", and only 1/3 as likely to be potentially unsafe (all p value 0.01). EBL was not significantly different between groups; however, operative time was roughly thirty minutes longer on average. Random effects analysis showed no significant difference in effective dose radiation while using CT navigation (p = 0.06).This systematic review of the literature demonstrates that intraoperative navigation results in more accurate pedicle screw placement compared to non-navigated techniques. We found that blood loss was similar in navigated and non-navigated surgery. Operative time was found to be approximately a half hour longer on average in navigated compared to non-navigated surgery. Effective radiation dose trended higher in navigated cases compared to non-navigated cases but did not reach statistical significance.

Determine the efficacy of intraoperative traction (IOT) on curve correction in AIS.A prospective, multicenter, longitudinal database identified patients with major thoracic AIS (Lenke 1-4) treated with surgery using IOT and follow-up of 2 years. These cases were matched to comparable cases treated without traction (non-IOT). All patients were treated with single-stage posterior only surgery with pedicle screw constructs. Perioperative, radiographic and clinical outcome data at 2 years post-op were compared between the groups.104 cases treated with IOT were matched to 104 treated without IOT. Operating room time was significantly greater in the IOT group (339 vs. 306 min, p = 0.001). Neuromonitoring alerts were more frequent in the IOT group (23% vs. 5%, p 0.001). There were no postoperative neurological deficits in either group. The IOT group showed significantly greater MT curve correction (IOT 71% vs. non-IOT 66.7%, p 0.003), with the effect most pronounced in curves 70° (IOT 72% vs. non-IOT 64%, p = 0.04). IOT was associated with a significant reduction in 2D T5-T12 kyphosis measurements (IOT - 6.5° vs non-IOT + 0.48°, p 0.001), yet significant improvements in estimated 3D thoracic kyphosis were made in both groups, with the non-IOT group making greater improvement when compared to the IOT group (IOT + 18.1° vs. non-IOT + 22.3° vs., p = 0.008).IOT is associated with modestly enhanced coronal deformity correction. Surgeons should be aware of the increased rates of neuromonitoring alerts when using this technique and its affect on the sagittal profile. Given this IOT may be best suited to larger curves.3.

Surgical treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is challenging. Stable and robust foundations are vital. We have assessed a small cohort of patients with a rib-based proximal fixation and a pedicle screw-based distal foundation for a distraction based growing rod system. This is a single center study in a tertiary spinal deformity unit with a catchment population of over 6 million. We performed a retrospective radiographic evaluation of 15 patients with EOS treated with Vertical Expandable Titanium Prosthetic Rib (VEPTR) implant between 2007 and 2017. The review of medical records and imaging data was performed to identify growth of the spine and complications with pedicle screws. There were ten male and five female patients with an average age at index surgery of 4yrs 11 months. Mean length of follow-up was 6 yrs 9 months. Serial radiographs revealed improvements in mean Cobb angle of 12 degrees, T1–T12 height of 29 mm and T1–S1 height of 48 mm with no deterioration in distal LIV tilt angle. We report that none of these patients had any complications related to their pedicle screws including cut-out. We report a technique which is efficacious and provides a mechanically robust distal fixation for VEPTR lengthening in early onset scoliosis.

Retrospective, multicenter comparative.Our purpose was to compare early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with ultra-low, low, and high implant density constructs when undergoing conversion to definitive fusion. Larson et al. demonstrated that implant density (ID) at fusion does not correlate with outcomes in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but did not address growth-friendly graduates.EOS patients treated with growth-friendly constructs converted to fusion between 2000 and 2017 were reviewed from a multicenter database. ID was defined as number of pedicle screws, hooks, and sublaminar/bands per level fused. Patients were divided into ultra-low ID ( 1.3), low (≥ 1.3 and 1.6), and high ID (≥ 1.6). 2 years follow-up from fusion or inadequate radiographs.A total of 152 patients met inclusion criteria with 39 (26%) patients in the high ID group, 33 (22%) patients in the low ID group, and 80 (52%) in the ultra-low ID group. Groups were similar in operative time (p = 0.61), pre-fusion major curve (p = 0.71), mean number of levels fused (p = 0.58), clinical follow-up (p = 0.30), and radiographic follow-up (p = 0.90). Patients in the low ID group (11.6 ± 1.5 years) were slightly younger at the time of definitive fusion than patients in the ultra-low ID group (12.9 ± 2.2 years) and high ID group (12.5 ± 1.7 years) (p = 0.009). There was significantly more blood loss in the high ID group than the other two groups (high ID: 946.8 ± 606.0 mL vs. low ID: 733.9 ± 434.5 mL and ultra-low ID: 617.4 ± 517.2 mL; p = 0.01), but there was no significant difference with regard to percent of total blood volume lost (high ID: 59.3 ± 48.7% vs. low ID: 54.5 ± 37.5% vs. ultra-low ID: 51.7 ± 54.9%; p = 0.78). There was a difference in initial improvement in major curve between the groups (high ID: 21.6° vs. low ID: 18.0° vs. ultra-low ID: 12.6°; p = 0.01). However, during post-fusion follow-up, correction decreased 7.1° in the high ID group, 2.6 in the low ID group, and 2.8 in the ultra-low ID group (p = 0.19). At final follow-up, major curve correction from pre-fusion was similar between groups (high ID: 14.5° vs. low ID: 15.5° vs. ultra-low ID: 9.7°, p = 0.14). At final follow-up, there was no difference in T1-T12 length gain (p = 0.85), T1-S1 length gain (p = 0.68), coronal balance (p = 0.56), or sagittal balance (p = 0.71). The revision rate was significantly higher in the ultra-low ID group (13.8%; 11/80) versus the high ID group (2/39; 5.1%) and low ID group (0/33; 0%) (p = 0.04).Although an ID 1.3 in growth-friendly graduates produces similar outcomes with regard to curve correction and spinal length gain as low and high ID, this study suggests that an ID 1.3 is associated with an increased revision rate.III.

Selective thoracic fusion (STF) for double curve patterns in idiopathic scoliosis is an attractive treatment option. However, short-term coronal decompensation and truncal imbalance are known findings. Previous studies with hook constructs showed that eventually balance is achieved via an increase in lumbar curve magnitude, as the lumbosacral obliquity did not change following surgery. Our aim is to investigate patients with idiopathic curves who underwent STF using all-pedicle screw constructs to determine if the uninstrumented lumbar curve and lumbosacral obliquity responded in the same manner as was previously reported with all-hook constructs.102 consecutive patients with Lenke 1B, 1C or 3C curves who underwent STF using all-screw constructs at a single institution were included in this study. Radiographic assessment was performed, and patient reported outcomes were obtained. Subgroup analyses were performed based on preoperative thoracic: lumbar curve ratio as well as lumbar curve magnitude.Overall, the patients showed statistically significant improvement in both trunk shift and L4-pelvis obliquity at final follow-up. The uninstrumented lumbar curves trended toward improvement over time, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.107). SRS-30 scores were statistically significantly improved in multiple domains.Selective thoracic fusion is an excellent treatment option in most double curve patterns. Balance in the coronal plane is predictably achieved at 2-year follow-up. The lumbosacral obliquity improves more with screw technology than was previously found with hook constructs; therefore, the improvement in balance over time does not depend upon an increase in the uninstrumented lumbar curve.IV.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.

Three imaging techniques were compared using porcine spines.To compare image acquisition time, radiation exposure, pedicle width measurement, assessment of screw breach, and image artifact between cone-beam tomosynthesis (CBT) single mode, CBT dual mode (stereotactic CBT), and computed tomography (CT) imaging with and without spinal implants. CT is the standard for axial imaging of orthopedic procedures. CBT technology is being developed, allowing real-time intraoperative imaging and 3D surgical guidance. CBT may deliver useful axial imaging quicker with less radiation than current technologies.Six porcine spines were instrumented with bilateral pedicle screws at six levels connected with 5.5 mm rods. Dosimeters were attached to four surfaces of spines. CT, CBT single and CBT dual images were acquired pre-implant and post-implant. Image acquisition and 3D reconstruction times were recorded. Pedicle widths were measured before and after instrumentation. Screw medial breaches were graded (0: no breach, 1: 2 mm, 2: 2-4 mm, 3: 4 mm). Artifact and/or distortion of each image was ranked (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = large). Image acquisition and reconstruction times, radiation dose, pedicle width, screw breach and artifact were compared between techniques.Total image acquisition and reconstruction times of CBT was significantly less (single: 9.9 ± 0.2 s, p 0.001; dual: 60.0 ± 8.7 s, p 0.001) than CT (250.3 ± 36.7 s). CBT had significantly less radiation exposure than CT (CT: 0.7 ± 0.1 rad, single: 0.03 ± 0.02 rad, dual: 0.07 ± 0.03 rad; p 0.001). No difference in pedicle width change pre-implant to post-implant was found (CT: p = 0.449, single: p = 0.430, dual: p = 0.528). Pedicle width (pre-implant: p 0.5, post-implant: p 0.9) and pedicle width change (p 0.4) was similar amongst all techniques. Breach assessment was not different between groups (p = 0.257). CBT images had consistently lower artifact grades than CT.Although CBT axial image quality appeared subjectively inferior to CT, it enabled consistent assessment of pedicle width and screw breach, at half time and 10× lower radiation exposure. With continued refinements, CBT technology may allow for adequate intra-operative axial imaging using low radiation exposure.

Radiographic comparative study with prospectively collected data. To assess the accuracy of subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with freehand technique compared to lateral mass screws (LMS). The freehand cervical pedicle screw insertion technique guided by intraoperative lateral C-arm imaging has been shown to be both safe and effective. However, no study has performed a 100% audit of this technique using pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) to determine its true accuracy, as well as its reduction capability of CPS and LMS instrumentation. 36 consecutive patients treated surgically by a single surgeon with the exclusive practice of LMS and subsequently CPS over 2 years were included. CT and EOS slot scanner were performed pre- and post-operatively to determine the extent of pedicle screw breach and to assess sagittal alignment reduction between CPS and LMS groups. Predictors of pedicle screw breaches were also identified using multivariate analysis. CPS fixation was more effective in restoring global cervical angle and had superior reduction capability of cervical lordosis at the levels of C3/4 (5.00 ± 3.92, p = 0.008), C4/5 (6.63 ± 5.5, p = 0.010) and C5/6 (7.22 ± 6.19, p = 0.004) compared to LMS fixation. Pedicle screw breaches occurred most commonly at C4 (p = 0.003), and most commonly involved the lateral pedicle wall (p