Search

Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data., Objective: This study aimed to accurately map the lower extremity muscles innervated by the lumbar spinal roots by directly stimulating the spinal roots during surgery., Summary of Background Data: Innervation of the spinal roots in the lower extremities has been estimated by clinical studies, anatomic studies, and animal experiments. However, there have been discrepancies between studies. Moreover, there are no studies that have studied the laterality of lower limb innervation., Materials and Methods: In 73 patients with lumbar degenerative disease, a total of 147 spinal roots were electrically stimulated and the electromyographic response was recorded at the vastus medialis (VM), gluteus medius (GM), tibialis anterior (TA), biceps femoris (BF), and gastrocnemius (GC). The asymmetry index (AI) was obtained using the following equation to represent the left-right asymmetry in the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude. Paired t tests were used to compare CMAP amplitudes on the right and left sides. Differences in the AI among the same spinal root groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance., Results: The frequency of CMAP elicitation in VM, GM, TA, BF, and GC were 100%, 75.0%, 50.0%, 83.3%, and 33.3% in L3 spinal root stimulation, 90.4%, 78.8%, 59.6%, 73.1%, and 59.6% in L4 spinal root stimulation, 32.2%, 78.0%, 93.2%, 69.5%, and 83.1% in L5 spinal root stimulation, and 40.0%, 100%, 80.0%, 70.0%, and 80.0% in S1 spinal root stimulation, respectively. The most frequent muscle with maximum amplitude of the CMAP in L3, L4, L5, and S1 spinal root stimulation was the VM, GM, TA, and GM, respectively. Unilateral innervation occurred at high rates in the TA in L4 root stimulation and the VM in L5 root stimulation in 37.5% and 42.3% of patients, respectively. Even in patients with bilateral innervation, a 20% to 38% AI of CMAP amplitude was observed., Conclusions: The spinal roots innervated a much larger range of muscles than what is indicated in general textbooks. Furthermore, a non-negligible number of patients showed asymmetric innervation of lower limb by the lumbar spinal roots., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Electrophysiological recordings were obtained from proprioceptors in deep lumbar paraspinal muscles of anesthetized cats during high-velocity low-amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM)., Objective: To determine how thrust direction of an HVLA-SM affects neural input from back musculature., Summary of Background Data: A clinician's ability to apply the thrust of an HVLA-SM in a specified direction is considered an important component of its optimal delivery. However, previous biomechanical studies indicate that the shear force component of the thrust vector is not actually transmitted to paraspinal tissues deep to the thoracolumbar fascia because the skin-fascia interface is frictionless., Methods: Neural activity from muscle spindles in the multifidus and longissimus muscles was recorded from L6 dorsal rootlets in 18 anesthetized cats. After preload to the spinal tissues, HVLA-SMs (100-ms thrust duration) were applied through the intact skin overlying the L6 lamina. Thrusts were applied at angles oriented perpendicularly to the back and obliquely at 15° and 30° medialward or cranialward using a 6 × 6 Latin square design with three replicates. The normal force component was kept constant at 21.3 N. HVLA-SMs were preceded and followed by simulated spinal movement applied to the L6 vertebra. Changes in mean instantaneous discharge frequency (ΔMIF) of muscle spindles were determined both during the thrust and spinal movement., Results: ΔMIFs during the HVLA-SM thrust were significantly greater in response to all thrust directions compared with the preload alone, but there was no difference in ΔMIF for any of the thrust directions during the HVLA-SM. HVLA-SM decreased some of the responses to simulated spinal movement but thrust direction had no effect on these changes., Conclusion: The shear force component of an HVLA-SM's thrust vector is not transmitted to the underlying vertebra sufficient to activate muscle spindles of the attached muscles. Implications for clinical practice and clinical research are discussed., Level of Evidence: N/A.

Study Design: Retrospective., Objective: The purpose was to categorize and evaluate intraoperative monitoring (IOM) failure to detect neurologic deficits occurring during spinal surgery., Summary of Background Data: The efficacy of spinal cord/nerve root monitoring regarding undetected neurologic deficits is examined in a large, single institution series involving all levels of the spinal column and all spinal surgical procedures., Methods: Multimodality IOM included somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), descending neurogenic-evoked potentials (DNEPs), transcranial motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials (DSEPs), and spontaneous and triggered electromyography (spEMG, trgEMG). We reviewed 12,375 patients who underwent surgery for spinal pathology from 1985 to 2010. There were 7178 females (59.3%) and 5197 males (40.7%); 9633 (77.8%) primary surgeries and 2742 (22.2%) revisions. Procedures by spinal level were cervical 29.7% (3671), thoracic/thoracolumbar 45.4% (5624), and lumbosacral 24.9% (3080). Age at surgery was > 18 years - 72.7% (8993) and < 18 years - 27.3% (3382)., Results: Forty-five of the 12,375 patients (0.36%) had false negative outcomes. False negative results by modality were as follows: spEMG (n = 22, 48.8%), trgEMG (n = 8, 17.7%), DSEP (n = 4, 8.8%), DNEP (n = 4, 8.8%), SSEP (n = 3, 6.6%), DSEP/spEMG (n = 3, 6.6%), and trgEMG/spEMG (n = 1, 2.2%). Thirty-seven patients had immediate postoperative deficits unidentified by IOM; 30 patients (81%) involved nerve root monitoring, four patients had spinal cord deficits, and three patients had peripheral sensory deficits. Eight patients had permanent neurologic deficits, six (0.048%) were nerve root and two (0.016%) were spinal cord in nature., Conclusion: Despite correct application and usage, IOM data failed to identify 45 (0.36%) patients with false negative outcomes out of 12,375 surgical patients. Eight patients (0.064%) of these 45 patients had permanent neurologic deficits, six patients had nerve root deficits in nature and two patients had spinal cord deficits. Although admittedly small, this represents the risk of undetected neurologic deficits even when properly using IOM. Deficits are at a higher risk to remain unresolved when not detected by IOM., Level of Evidence: 4.

Study Design: Part 1: A randomized, single-blind study on the effect of contralateral knee extension on sensations produced by the slump test (ST) in asymptomatic subjects. Part 2: A cadaver study simulating the nerve root behavior of part 1., Objective: Part 1: Test if contralateral knee extension consistently reduces normal stretch sensations with the ST.Part 2: Ascertain in cadavers an explanation for the results., Summary of Background Data: In asymptomatic subjects, contralateral knee extension reduces stretch sensations with the ST. In sciatica patients, contralateral SLR also can temporarily reduce sciatica. We studied this methodically in asymptomatic subjects before considering a clinical population., Methods: Part 1: Sixty-one asymptomatic subjects were tested in control (ST), sham, or intervention (contralateral ST) groups and their sensation response intensity compared.Part 2: Caudal tension was applied to the L5 nerve root of 3 cadavers and tension behavior of the contralateral neural tissue recorded visually., Results: Part 1: Reduction of stretch sensations occurred in the intervention group but not in control and sham groups (P ≤ 0.001).Part 2: Tension in the contralateral lumbar nerve roots and dura reduced in a manner consistent with the responses in the intervention (contralateral ST) group., Conclusion: Part 1: In asymptomatic subjects, normal thigh stretch sensations with the ST reduced consistently with the contralateral ST, showing that this is normal and may now be compared with patients with sciatica.Part 2: Contralateral reduction in lumbar neural tension with unilateral application of tension-producing movements also occurred in cadavers, supporting the proposed explanatory hypothesis.

Study Design: A cross-sectional cadaveric examination of the mechanical effect of foraminal ligaments on cervical nerve root displacement and strain., Objective: To determine the role of foraminal ligaments by examining differences in cervical nerve root displacement and strain during upper limb neural tension testing (ULNTT) before and after selective cutting of foraminal ligaments., Summary of Background Data: Although investigators have determined that lumbar spine foraminal ligaments limit displacement and strain of lumbosacral nerve roots, similar studies have not been conducted to prove that it is true for the cervical region. Because the size, shape, and orientation of cervical spine foraminal ligaments are similar to those in the lumbar spine, it is hypothesized that foraminal ligaments in the cervical spine will function in a similar fashion., Methods: Radiolucent markers were implanted into cervical nerve roots C5-C8 of 9 unembalmed cadavers. Posteroanterior fluoroscopic images were captured at resting and upper limb neural tension testing positioning before and after selective cutting of foraminal ligaments., Results: Selective cutting of foraminal ligaments resulted in significant increases in inferolateral displacement (average, 2.94 mm [ligaments intact]-3.87 mm [ligaments cut], P < 0.05) and strain (average, 9.33% [ligaments intact]-16.31% [ligaments cut], P < 0.03) of cervical nerve roots C5-C8 during upper limb neural tension testing., Conclusion: Foraminal ligaments in the cervical spine limited cervical nerve root displacement and strain during upper limb neural tension testing. Foraminal ligaments seem to have a protective role, reducing displacement and strain to cervical nerve roots during tension events., Level of Evidence: 2.

Study Design: A cross-sectional cadaveric examination of displacement and strain measured at the level of the cervical nerve roots during upper limb neural tension testing (ULNTT) with median nerve bias., Objective: To determine the displacement and strain of cervical nerve roots C5-C8 during ULNTT with minimal disruption of surrounding tissues., Summary of Background Data: Clinical examination of neural pathology involving cervical nerve roots is difficult because of the transient nature of pathologies, such as cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathies, and thoracic outlet syndrome. Cadaveric studies have demonstrated significant displacement and strain in lumbosacral nerve roots during neurodynamic testing of the lower extremity. Examination into the biomechanical behaviors of cervical nerve roots during ULNTT has not been performed., Methods: Eleven unembalmed cadavers were positioned supine as though undergoing ULNTT. Radiolucent markers were implanted into cervical nerve roots C5-C8. Posteroanterior fluoroscopic images were captured at resting and ULNTT positioning. Images were digitized and displacement and strain were calculated., Results: ULNTT resulted in significant inferolateral displacement (average, 2.16 mm-4.32 mm, P < 0.001) of cervical nerve roots C5-C8. There was a significant difference in inferolateral displacement between the C5 and C6 nerve roots (3.15 mm vs. 4.32 mm, P = 0.009). ULNTT resulted in significant strain (average, 6.80%-11.87%, P < 0.001) of cervical nerve roots C5-C8. There was a significant difference in strain between the C5 and C6 nerve roots (6.60% vs. 11.87%, P = 0.03)., Conclusion: ULNTT caused significant inferolateral displacement and strain in cervical nerve roots C5-C8. These results provide the mechanical foundation for the use of ULNTT in clinical evaluation of pathology in the cervical region, such as in cervical radiculopathy, entrapment neuropathies, and thoracic outlet syndrome., Level of Evidence: 2.

Study Design: Controlled radiological study., Objective: Ascertain if a difference exists in the mechanical effects on the cord between the unilateral and bilateral straight leg raise (SLR) and to verify whether the effect on the spinal cord may be cumulative between the two., Summary of Background Data: To the authors' knowledge these are the first data on noninvasive, in vivo, normative measurement of spinal cord displacement with bilateral SLR test., Methods: Sixteen asymptomatic volunteers were scanned with 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner (Siemens Avanto, Erlangen, Germany) using T2-weighted turbo spin-echo fat-saturation sequence. The displacement of the medullar cone relative to the vertebral endplate of the adjacent vertebra during the passive bilateral SLR was quantified and compared with the position of the conus in the neutral (anatomic) position and with unilateral SLR. Each movement was performed twice for evaluation of reproducibility. The measurements were repeated by 2 observers. Four practitioners performed the maneuvers in a random sequence to avoid series effects., Results: Compared with the neutral (anatomic) position, the medullar cone displaced caudally in the spinal canal by 2.33 ± 1.2 mm (μ ± SD) with unilateral (P ≤ 0.001) and 4.58 ± 1.48 mm with bilateral SLR (P ≤ 0.001). Statistical significance was also reached for bilateral versus unilateral SLR (P ≤ 0.001). Spearman correlations proved higher than 0.99 for intra and interobserver reliability, and 0.984 for results reproducibility in bilateral SLR., Conclusion: The caudal displacement of the medullar cone was significantly greater (almost double) with the bilateral SLR than the unilateral SLR. We hypothesize that this greater movement may be because more force was transmitted to the cord through a larger number nerve roots with the bilateral than unilateral SLR. The high correlation values in this study show that these movements are consistent and reproducible. This study offers baseline measurements on which further studies in diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc protrusion and radiculopathy may be developed.

Study Design: Controlled radiological study., Objective: To investigate noninvasively in vivo spinal cord displacement in the vertebral canal during the passive straight leg raise (SLR) in asymptomatic subjects. The basic assumption is that the cord follows L5 and S1 nerve roots displacement by similar magnitude and direction (principle of linear dependence)., Summary of Background Data: It is generally accepted that the SLR produces some caudal movement mainly of L5 and S1 nerve roots, but the magnitude of this displacement is still a matter of debate., Methods: Sixteen asymptomatic volunteers were scanned with 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner (Siemens Avanto, Erlangen, Germany) using T2-weighted turbo spin-echo fat-saturation sequence. The displacement of the medullar cone relative to the vertebral endplate of the adjacent vertebra during the passive SLR was quantified and compared with the position of the conus in the neutral (anatomic) position. Each movement was performed twice for evaluation of reproducibility. The measurements were repeated by 2 observers. Four practitioners performed the maneuvers in a random sequence to avoid series effects., Results: Compared with the neutral (anatomic) position, the medullar cone displaced caudally in the spinal canal by 2.31 ± 1.2 mm with right (P ≤ 0.001) and 2.35 ± 1.2 mm with left SLR (P ≤ 0.001). Spearman correlations proved higher than 0.99 for intra and interobserver reliability, as well as results reproducibility testing for each maneuver., Conclusion: The data show that the spinal cord in the thoracolumbar region slides distally in response to the clinically applied SLR test. The high correlation values in this study show that these movements are consistent and reproducible. Because of the neural continuum, the authors speculate that this movement might be directly proportional to the sliding of the L5 and S1 neural roots. This study offers baseline measurements on which further studies in diagnosis of lumbar disc protrusion and radiculopathy may be developed.

Study Design: A prospective study., Objective: To examine the diameter (mm), transverse diameter (mm), and cross-sectional area (mm²) of the C5, C6, and C7 nerve roots using ultrasonography., Summary of Background Data: Each of the cervical nerve roots affected a different motor or sensory area. Although there were several studies that performed a detailed assessment of cervical nerve root anatomy in cadavers, only a few studies on the thickness of cervical nerve roots in living specimens have been performed. We examined whether the thickness of the C5, C6, and C7 nerve roots, as well as the area supplied by each of the roots, varied., Methods: All 219 subjects (99 males and 120 females; mean age, 47 ± 15 yr) were healthy volunteers. The diameter and the transverse diameter were measured via ultrasonography, and the cross-sectional area was calculated for each of the C5-C7 nerve roots., Results: The following diameter measurements (right and left, respectively) were obtained: C5, 2.8 and 2.9 mm; C6, 3.6 and 3.8 mm; and C7, 3.3 and 3.4 mm. The following transverse diameter measurements were obtained (right and left, respectively): C5, 2.8 and 3.0 mm; C6, 3.7 and 3.8 mm; and C7, 3.5 and 3.4 mm. The following cross-sectional area measurements (right and left, respectively) were obtained: C5, 6.3 and 6.4 mm²; C6, 10.7 and 11.0 mm²; and C7, 8.8 and 8.8 mm². Based on the 3 measurement methods, the C5 nerve root was significantly thinner than the other 2 nerve roots (P < 0.001), and the C7 nerve root was smaller than the C6 nerve root (P = 0.001)., Conclusion: The C5 nerve root was significantly thinner than the C6 and C7 cervical nerve roots. The fact that the C5 nerve is thinner may render it more susceptible to damage during cervical surgery.

Study Design: Case studies of patients with cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) used compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) of deltoid and biceps brachii muscles., Objective: To discuss pathology and prognosis from the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CMAPs of deltoid and biceps brachii muscles., Summary of Background Data: CSA is a rare type of cervical spondylotic disorder. Selective lesions in ventral nerve roots (VNR) or anterior horns (AH) have been proposed to explain the pathology of CSA, but these are not well understood., Method: Conservative therapy was performed in 21 patients with the proximal-type CSA. Patients were classified into two groups: 13 with incomplete recovery of deltoid and biceps brachii muscle strength (Group 1) and 8 with complete recovery (Group 2). All underwent MRI. Erb-point-stimulated CMAPs were recorded in the deltoid and biceps. Measurements of CMAPs included negative-peak amplitude from the baseline to peak. The percentage amplitude of CMAPs was calculated in contrast to the opposite side., Results: Sagittal T2-weighted MRI showed spinal cord compression in all patients from Group 1 and in four patients from Group 2. Deltoid muscle CMAPs: Three patients from Group 1 and all eight patients from Group 2 had a CMAPs' amplitude on the normal side that was greater than 10 mV. Biceps brachii muscle CMAPs: four patients from Group 1 and four patients from Group 2 had a CMAPs' amplitude on the normal side that was greater than 10 mV., Conclusion: Patients with a CMAPs amplitude on the normal side that exceeded 10 mV had no impingement of the AH. A CMAPs' amplitude that exceeded 10 mV on the normal side and a CMAPs' amplitude of more than 50% on the affected side compared with the normal side indicated slight involvement of VNR. These patients were able to fully recover function.

Study Design: This is an animal experiment using transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEP), mechanically elicited electromyography (EMG), and evoked EMG during spinal nerve root retraction in a pig model., Objective: To compare the sensitivity of these 3 electrophysiological measures for a constant retraction force applied to an isolated lumbar nerve root for a specific duration of time., Summary of Background Data: The incidence of nerve root injury during lumbar spine surgery ranges from 0.2% to 31%. Direct retraction of spinal nerve roots may cause these injuries, but the amount and duration of force that may safely be applied is not clear. Using an established porcine model, we examined the changes occurring to multimyotomal TcMEPs, mechanically elicited EMGs, and evoked EMGs during continuous retraction of a nerve root at a constant force applied over 10 minutes., Methods: TcMEP, mechanically elicited EMG, and evoked EMG responses were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in 10 experiments. The dominant root innervating the TA was determined with evoked EMG; preretraction TcMEP and nerve root stimulation threshold (NRT) was obtained. The dominant root was retracted at 2 Newton (N) for 10 minutes. TcMEP trials were elicited every minute during retraction. NRT was measured immediately after retraction. TcMEP and NRT were measured after 10 minutes of recovery. RESULTS.: During the 10 minutes of retraction at 2 N, the amplitude of the TA muscle progressively decreased in all trials in a highly significant curvilinear fashion. The mean TcMEP amplitude decreased 59% +/- 14% from baseline values. The mean NRT after 10 minutes of retraction at 2 N rose to 1.8 +/- 0.7 mA (P < 0.01 vs. baseline). The NRT increase after retraction strongly correlated with the decrease in motor evoked potentials amplitude in the TA (R = 0.90, P < 0.001). EMG activity was variable; tonic EMG was observed in only 2 nerve roots (20%)., Conclusion: Three electrophysiologic methods were used intraoperatively to assess neural function during retraction of a single nerve root. Retraction produced consistent changes in TcMEPs and evoked EMG. These 2 methods show promise for assessing the limits on the force and duration of nerve root retraction during spine surgery. Mechanically elicited EMG was not sensitive to the amount and duration of nerve root retraction.

Study Design: This study is to investigate the changes of vasomotion of intraradicular microvessels in vivo., Objective: We have observed microvascular corrosion casts of the lumbar nerve root by scanning electron microscopy and used an immunohistochemical technique to investigate the presence and distribution of autonomic and sensory nerve in blood vessels of the nerve root., Summary of Background Data: It is generally considered that the genesis of radiculopathy associated with the degenerative conditions of the spine may result from both mechanical compression and circulatory disturbance. However, the neurogenic control of intraradicular blood flow has received little attention in the past., Methods: For three-dimensional observation of intraradicular vessels, we used scanning electron microscopic examination of microvascular corrosion casts in ten Wister rats. To investigate the mechanism of vasomotion of the nerve root, we used immunohistochemical methods. The sections were incubated overnight with antisera to tyrosine hydroxylase, choline acetyl transferase, substance P, calcitonin-gene-related peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, somatostatin, neuropeptide Y, leucine-enkephalin, cholecystokinin octapeptide, brain-nitric oxide synthase, and endothelium-nitric oxide synthase. Abidin-biotin complex method was used as the immunohistochemical procedure and the sections were observed under the light microscope., Results: The general view of whole vascular casts of the lumbar spinal cord and nerve roots showed a high density of vessels. Bifurcation or anastomoses of capillaries approximately took place at right angles in a T-shaped pattern and capillaries showed a lot of ring-like compressions. This ring-like compression on the cast may represent a vascular sphincter in the microvessels. This study also reveals the existence of perivascular adrenergic, cholinergic, peptidergic, and nitroxydergic innervation with a possible role in neurogenic regulation of nerve root circulation., Conclusion: Perivascular nerve plexuses around intraradicular microvessels suggest that the autonomic nerves play an important role in intraradicular circulation.

Study Design: Animal experiment using transcranial motor-evoked potentials (tcMEPs) in a pig model., Objective: To validate measurement of tcMEPs from multiple myotomes in a pig model and determine the capacity to detect injury to a single nerve root., Summary of Background Data: The ability of intraoperative neuromonitoring methods to give information about a single nerve root remains poorly understood. Reports suggest that tcMEPs may be a reliable and accurate method to detect nerve root injury. An animal model to study the sensitivity and specificity of this technique has yet to be validated., Methods: Transcranial stimulation was delivered through customized electrodes placed in burr holes over the motor cortex in 7 pigs. Spontaneous and evoked muscle potential activity was recorded in 5 myotomes (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius) bilaterally. After unilateral exposure of the L3-S1 nerve roots, sequential ligations were performed. The tcMEP responses from all myotomes were measured after ligation of each nerve root., Results: Robust MEP responses (range, 37-1165 mV) were achieved in all monitored myotomes. Significant decreases in tcMEP amplitudes occurred in specific myotomes after ligation of the corresponding nerve root. Consistent and substantial decreases were observed after L3 and L5 ligations in rectus femoris (48%) and tibialis anterior (67%), respectively., Discussion: Our results validate monitoring of tcMEPs in multiple myotomes to detect nerve root injury in pigs. This model may be used for further study of the use of tcMEPs to detect predictors and risk factors of nerve root injury during spinal surgery.

Study Design: The assessment of L3 and L4 pars interarticularis thickness and finite element analysis of stress distribution across L3 and L4 pars interarticularis., Objective: To quantify the morphology of the region of the L3 and L4 pars interarticularis and to assess the stress increase as a function of access size using the finite element lumbar spine model., Summary of Background Data: Inadequate decompression and traction of the nerve structures are several causes of the unsatisfactory outcomes in patients after foraminal stenosis decompression and far lateral disc herniation removal by extraforaminal exposure. Enlarging the access of the foraminal exposure by the removal of the lateral aspect of the pars interarticularis may be able to diminish the inadequate decompression and traction of the nerve structures; however, it may lead to increase stress and fracture of the neural arch., Methods: We used 15 human cadaver L3 and L4 lumbar vertebrae for measuring the thickness of the pars interarticularis. The ventral and dorsal surfaces were subdivided into 4 equal parts, and the thickness of each part was measured using a digital caliper. An experimentally validated 3-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of the intact L3-S1 segment was used to simulate the lateral removal of one fourth and one half of the L3 and L4 pars interarticularis., Results: The mean thicknesses of the pars interarticularis showed a gradual increase toward the lateral edge. Finite element model analyses predicted stresses increased to 35% and 40% after removal of one half of the lateral part of the L3 and L4 pars interarticularis, respectively, and were much closer to the intact spine after removal of one fourth of the lateral part of the pars interarticularis., Conclusion: The removal of one fourth of the lateral aspect of the pars interarticularis has minimal influence on the stresses in the remaining L3 and L4 neural arches. The lateral half of the pars has the largest thickness, and its removal leads to considerable stress increases.

Study Design: An inferential cadaveric study., Objectives: To compare the displacement and strain of the lumbosacral nerve roots during different conditions of straight leg raise (SLR) with intact foraminal ligaments., Summary of Background Data: Clinicians use sensitizing movements such as dorsiflexion during neurodynamic testing, assuming that these prepositions influence the displacement or strain to the lumbosacral nerve roots. Little is known about the effect of these prepositions on neurodynamic behavior., Methods: Lower limbs and associated nerve roots of 5 unembalmed cadavers (n = 10) were used to evaluate the displacement and strain of the L4, L5, and S1 roots during 2 different SLR conditions. Fluoroscopic images of intraneural metal markers were digitized to evaluate displacement and strain during SLR with no preposition (SLR NPP) of the ankle and SLR with dorsiflexion preposition (SLR DF) of the ankle, respectively., Results: SLR NPP produced larger distal displacement at L5 and S1, (P < 0.001) when compared with SLR DF. Displacement comparisons at L4 were nonsignificant (P = 0.051). While nonsignificant, medium to large effect sizes (0.60-0.96) suggest that SLR DF may produce more strain than the SLR NPP condition., Conclusions: Prepositions of the SLR test alter the displacement and possibly the strain of the lumbosacral nerve roots in the lateral recess.

Study Design: A descriptive cadaveric study incorporating a novel nerve root marking technique., Objectives: To describe the displacement and strain of the lumbosacral nerve roots in the lateral recess during straight leg raise (SLR) without disrupting the foraminal ligaments., Summary of Background Data: Previous studies document 2 to 8 mm of lumbosacral nerve root displacement during SLR. Prior dissection methods incorporated laminectomy and facetectomy., Methods: Lower limbs and associated nerve roots of 5 unembalmed cadavers (n = 10) were studied. Metal markers were inserted intraneurally within the lateral recess of L4, L5, and S1 with a modified spinal needle. Fluoroscopic images were digitized to evaluate displacement and strain during SLR., Results: The lumbosacral nerve roots in the lateral recess moved less and experienced less strain during SLR than described in previously published reports. Statistically significant distal displacement occurred at hip positions greater than 60 degrees of flexion at all nerve root levels (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The lumbosacral nerve roots (L4, L5, S1) moved less and underwent less strain during SLR testing than previously reported and may require hip motion greater than 60 degrees to produce substantive displacement in the lateral recess. Additional research is needed to examine the effects of prepositioning during SLR.

Study Design: Consecutive case series of patients with C6 and C7 radiculopathies., Objectives: To explore the clinical utility and reliability of manual muscle testing of forearm pronation strength in C6 and C7 radiculopathies., Summary of Background Data: EMG evidence of denervation of the pronator teres was the most common finding in C6 radiculopathies, and frequently present in C7 radiculopathies. Clinical evaluation of the pronator teres through manual muscle testing of forearm pronation has never been explored; therefore, its clinical utility is unknown as compared with the muscle groups that are traditionally evaluated., Methods: Fifty-five subjects with diagnostic imaging evidence of either C6 (n = 25) or C7 (n = 30) cervical root compression and clinical symptoms consistent with cervical radiculopathy were recruited for this study. These subjects underwent manual muscle testing of forearm pronation, wrist extension, elbow flexion, and elbow extension. The frequency of impaired strength was recorded and compared for C6 and C7 radiculopathies. A second examiner evaluated each subject, with his or her findings compared with the first examiner only for the determination of interrater reliability., Results: In C6 radiculopathy subjects, forearm pronation weakness was present in 72%, was twice as common as wrist extension weakness, was present in all cases where elbow flexion or wrist extension weakness was noted, and was found in all but 2 subjects where elbow extension weakness was present. In C7 radiculopathy subjects, forearm pronation weakness accompanies elbow extension weakness in 23% of subjects and was the only weakness in 10% of subjects. Manual muscle testing demonstrated adequate interrater reliability., Conclusions: Forearm pronation weakness is the most frequent motor finding in C6 radiculopathies and may be noted is some cases of C7 nerve root compression.

Study Design: Spinal somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), elicited by mixed nerve and dermatomal stimulation, and compound evoked muscle potentials (CMAPs), elicited by lower thoracic interspinous space stimulation, were recorded in rats that underwent single nerve root transection., Objectives: To investigate and compare the effects of single nerve root transection using various electrophysiological models and to define a monitoring strategy that can easily and accurately predict compromise caused by a single lumbosacral nerve root injury., Summary of Background Data: Neuromonitoring is an important and effective preventive measure against neurologic complications during spinal surgery, but monitoring the lumbosacral nerve roots is not well established., Methods: Rats received (Group I) a sham operation or had the (Group II) left L4, (Group III) L5, or (Group IV) L6 nerve root transected. SSEP were recorded at the thoracolumbar junction following stimulation of the sciatic nerve (M-SSEP) and the L5 dermatome (D-SSEP). CMAP was recorded at the intrinsic muscles of the foot by electrical stimulation in the lower thoracic spinal cord. Potentials recorded before and after a single nerve root transection were compared and correlated with clinical status by walking-track analysis 1 week later., Results: Relative amplitudes in Group II were 54.1% (M-SSEP), 84.6% (D-SSEP), and 85.5% (CMAP); 25.2% (M-SSEP), 66.5% (D-SSEP), and 85.8% (CMAP) in Group III; and 66.5% (M-SSEP), 95.5% (D-SSEP), and 23.2% (CMAP) in Group IV. M-SSEP is sensitive but not specific to single nerve root injury. D-SSEP and CMAP are less sensitive but more specific., Conclusions: Injury to a single lumbosacral nerve root is diagnosed more easily with M-SSEP. With D-SSEP and CMAP, it was possible to differentiate the lesioned nerve root by stimulating the primary dermatome or recording from the innervated muscle. M-SSEP is an easy-sampling and appropriate tool for screening nerve root injury; its poor specificity may be overcome by using D-SSEP and CMAP in addition. Optimal monitoring of the lumbosacral nerve roots during lumbar spinal surgery requires the administration of M-SSEP, D-SSEP, and CMAP to provide independent verification of lumbosacral nerve root integrity and to allow detection of the occasional injuries that selectively affect either the sensory or motor system.

Study Design: Biomechanical analysis of the movement of the lumbar spinal nerve roots (NRs)., Objectives: The characteristics of the movement of lumbar spinal NRs corresponding to the change of posture were three-dimensionally analyzed in nonsimulated and simulated adhesion conditions using a porcine model., Summary of Background Data: There is a paucity of data on the movement of NRs., Materials and Methods: Thirty two NRs of four pig cadavers were investigated. (study 1) Two tantalum beads were sutured on respective NRs from L3 to L6. Five beads were put into each bony structure as reference points. The porcine body was put on the cage designed for three-dimensional radiostereometric analysis. Two oblique radiographs were simultaneously taken at flexion, neutral, and extension. (study 2) After study 1, either L4 NR was ligated onto the adjacent bone to mimic monoradicular adhesion. Radiographs were taken in the same manner. The movements of the beads on NRs relative to immobile standard points in each vertebra were analyzed., Results: The movement of NRs was characterized as a combination of stretching/slackening and pendulum motion. The distance that NRs were stretched/slackened, the excursion, and the angles that NRs moved were: 0.39 +/- 0.29 mm, 1.81 +/- 0.63 mm, and 10.46 +/- 5.93 degrees (in nonadhesion), and 0.30 +/- 0.20 mm, 1.02 +/- 0.50 mm, and 7.13 +/- 3.79 degrees (in simulated adhesion), respectively., Conclusion: Adhesion might play a part in the pathogenesis of lumbar spinal disorders because mechanical irritation secondary to stretching/slackening and pendulum motion might be concentrated at the distal part of NRs, adjacent to adhesion site, which has less cerebrospinal fluid and is close to dorsal root ganglion.

Study Design: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted to investigate intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during cervical laminectomy to detect iatrogenic C5 nerve root palsy., Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of various intraoperative neuromonitoring methods for identifying C5 nerve root palsy., Summary of Background Data: One unsolved complication after laminectomy or laminoplasty for cervical compression myelopathy is C5 nerve root palsy. It can go undetected even in the presence of intraoperative neuromonitoring with conventional upper extremity mixed nerve or dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials or transcranial motor-evoked potentials, recording typically from hand muscles., Methods: The intraoperative neuromonitoring data of 200 patients who underwent cervical laminectomy for myelopathy between 1998 and 2000 were reviewed for C5 nerve root palsy. Retrospective studies were conducted for the first 132 patients, who were monitored with conventional techniques including ulnar and posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials, C5-C7 dermatomally evoked potentials, and transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials recorded from hand and leg muscles. Prospective studies then were applied to the remaining 68 patients, for whom transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography were monitored from deltoid and biceps muscles in the wake of undetected C5 nerve root palsy from conventional neurophysiologic monitoring methods., Results: In the retrospective cohort, six patients presented after surgery with C5 nerve root palsy showing unilateral deltoid muscle paralysis despite entirely unremarkable conventional somatosensory-evoked potentials, dermatomally evoked potentials, and transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials from hand and leg muscles. For the prospective cohort, two patients experienced postoperative iatrogenic C5 motor nerve root palsy. Impending C5 nerve root injuries after laminectomy were successfully identified in both patients showing significant changes in deltoid and biceps transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography, thereby averting more serious consequence. There were no false-negative and false-positive results., Conclusions: In an effort to reduce postoperative C5 nerve root palsy, the clinician should consider intraoperative deltoid and biceps transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential and spontaneous electromyography monitoring whenever there is potential for iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury.

Study Design: To analyze the effects of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, and interferon-gamma on cauda equina function and to define if any of these cytokines could induce nerve root dysfunction comparable with the situation with application of nucleus pulposus., Summary of Background Data: Proinflammatory cytokines derived from the intervertebral disc have been suggested to mediate the nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root injury following local application of nucleus pulposus. However, it is not known if such cytokines may induce similar injury if applied separately., Methods: A total of 29 pigs were used. Nucleus pulposus was harvested from lumbar discs and applied to the sacrococcygeal cauda equina following laminectomy of the first coccygeal vertebra in seven pigs. Five pigs received 1.66 microg of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, five pigs received 0.85 microg of interleukin-1beta, and five pigs received 1.66 microg of interferon-gamma. Seven pigs received autologous fat for control. Nerve conduction velocity was studied by local electrical stimulation and recordings in the tail muscles 7 days after the application., Results: Application of nucleus pulposus and fat induced similar effects as seen in previous studies, with normal nerve conduction velocity for fat and a significant reduction for nucleus pulposus. Application of both interleukin-1beta and IFN-gamma induced slight reductions of nerve conduction velocity compared with fat, but they were not statistically significant. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, however, induced a reduction of the velocity that was even more pronounced than for nucleus pulposus., Conclusion: Based on previous observations and the data of the present study, one may conclude that tumor necrosis factor-alpha from nucleus pulposus cells seems to be intimately involved with the basic pathophysiologic events leading to both nerve root dysfunction and pain after local, epidural application of nucleus pulposus. One may therefore also suspect that pharmacologic inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha may at least theoretically be considered in the clinical situation with disc herniation and sciatica.

Study Design: Retrospective review of 61 consecutive patients., Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of combining intraoperative monitoring of both spontaneous electromyographic activity and compound muscle action potential response to stimulation for detecting a perforation of the pedicle cortex irritation of nerve root during lumbar spine fusion surgery., Summary of Background Data: The complication rate from instrumentation used with lumbar spine fusion varies from 1 to 33%. To prevent neurologic complications, several monitoring techniques have been used to alert surgeons to possible neurologic damage being introduced during nerve decompression or placement of instrumentation with spine procedures. Because of different sensitivities, one monitoring technique may not be as effective for preventing complications as a combination of techniques., Methods: Sixty-one consecutive patients who underwent instrumented posterior lumbar fusions received continuous electromyographic monitoring and stimulus-evoked electromyographic monitoring. A significant neurophysiologic event was signaled by sustained neurotonic electromyographic activity, prompting an alert and a pause in the surgical manipulations that precipitated the activity. After insertion of the transpedicular screws, the integrity of the pedicle cortex was tested by stimulating each screw head and recording compound muscle action potentials. In the presence of a pedicle breach, stimulus intensities below 7 mA were sufficient to evoke compound muscle action potentials from the muscle group innervated by the adjacent spinal nerve root, prompting a surgical alert and subsequent repositioning of the screw., Results: Fourteen significant neurophysiologic events occurred in 13 of 61 patients (21%). Sustained neurotonic electromyographic discharges occurred in 5 of 40 patients during placement of interbody fusion cages, in 2 patients during placement of transpedicular screws, and in 1 patient during tightening of rods. On pedicle screw stimulation, breaches of the pedicle cortex were detected in 6 patients. After surgery, no new neurologic deficits were found in 60 of the 61 patients. One patient who experienced temporary paraparesis had sustained neurotonic electromyographic discharges during retraction of the thecal sac and distraction of the disc space before placement of the cage., Conclusion: These results suggest that intraoperative electromyographic monitoring provides a real-time measure of impending spinal nerve root injury during instrumented posterior lumbar fusion, allowing for timely intervention and minimization of negative postoperative sequela.

Study Design: Electrophysiologic recordings were obtained from a lumbar paraspinal nerve or muscle in the anesthetized cat while electrically stimulating a paraspinal nerve or facet capsule in an adjacent lumbar segment. A variety of approaches were used to demonstrate the reflex nature of both the nerve and the muscle response., Objective: The primary purpose of this study was to seek electrophysiologic evidence for the presence of intersegmental reflexes between adjacent lumbar vertebral segments. A second purpose of this study was to confirm a previous procedure used to evoke paraspinal reflexes. This previous work had shown that electrical stimulation of the L1-L2 facet joint capsule elicits electromyographic activity from multifidus muscle one to two vertebral segments caudal to the stimulated facet in a porcine preparation., Summary of Background Data: Biomechanical approaches have stressed the need for spinal stability to avoid conditions that could give rise to low back dysfunction. It seems reasonable to believe that reflex interactions between vertebral segments contribute to the sensorimotor integration of lumbar paraspinal tissues. It also seems reasonable to believe that alterations or abnormal elicitation of these reflexes could contribute to biomechanical changes associated with low back pain and paraspinal muscle spasm., Methods: Experiments were performed on 23 alpha-chloralose anesthetized adult cats. In eight cats the L3, L4, and L5 medial branch from each dorsal ramus was exposed and placed on a bipolar hook electrode. In six cats the L4 medial branch was stimulated and a compound action potential was recorded from the L3 medial branch. In three of the six cats the L5 medial branch was stimulated and a compound action potential was recorded from the L3 medial branch. In one cat the L4 medial branch was stimulated and a compound action potential was recorded from the L5 medial branch. In one cat the L3 medial branch was stimulated and a compound action potential was recorded from the L5 medial branch. At the end of each protocol the medial branch was cut just proximal to the stimulating electrode to confirm that the compound action potential was reflexive in nature and not initiated by volume conduction. In 15 cats three approaches were used to confirm that multifidus electromyographic activity evoked by electrical stimulation of a lumbar facet capsule was reflexive in nature: 1) by anesthetizing the site of the sensory endings, i.e., the facet capsule, 2) by injecting lidocaine intrathecally to block neural conduction centrally, i.e., within the spinal canal, or 3) by cutting the afferent pathway, i.e., the medial branch of the dorsal ramus., Results: Electrical stimulation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus innervating the medial-most lumbar paraspinal tissues evoked a compound action potential in the medial branch innervating the medial-most paraspinal tissues one and two segments away. Stimulating voltages between 2 and 70 V were necessary to evoke the compound action potential. Each compound action potential was reflexive in nature because cutting the lumbar medial branch proximal to its contact with the stimulating electrode abolished each compound action potential. The conduction velocity of the reflex ranged from 3.5 to 6.1 m/sec. Electrical stimulation of a lumbar facet capsule evoked lumbar multifidus muscle electromyographic activity. However, injecting lidocaine intrathecally or transecting the medial branch of the dorsal ramus had no effect on electromyographic activity. Injecting lidocaine into the facet or into the multifidus muscle around the facet joint (near the stimulating electrode) significantly decreased the magnitude of the multifidus electromyography., Conclusion: These results indicate that afferent impulses conveyed by the medial branch of the dorsal ramus reflexly altered efferent activity to an adjacent lumbar segment. This intersegmental paraspinal reflex may span at least one or two vertebral segments. The data suggest that electrical stimulation of the facet joint capsule may not have reflexly elicited multifidus activity because neither chemical interruption (intrathecal lidocaine) nor physical interruption (nerve transection) of the presumed reflex pathway diminished or abolished the electromyographic response. Volume conduction of the stimulating currents likely elicited multifidus activity during electrical stimulation of the facet capsule. When using electrical stimulation of neural paraspinal tissues to evoke reflex muscle activity, appropriate control experiments must be performed to clearly demonstrate the reflexive nature of the response.

Study Design: This study analyzed the effects of the autologous nucleus pulposus (NP) on nerve root function using electrophysiologic methods., Objectives: To investigate the chronic effects of the NP applied to nerve roots and dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) on ectopic firing and nerve conduction velocity., Summary of Background Data: It was reported that ectopic firing in DRGs is involved in abnormal sensation such as sciatica and that ectopic firing was increased shortly after application of the NP to nerve roots. It was also reported that various inflammatory reactions occur around herniated NP clinically, which may affect nerve roots. However, the chronic action of NP on ectopic firing in the stage of inflammatory reaction is unknown., Methods: Forty-six rats were divided into three groups: nucleus pulposus (NP) group, sham group, and control group. In the NP group the autologous NP was applied to L4 and L5 nerve roots. At 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after treatment, antidromically propagated ectopic firing from nerve roots was recorded from the sural nerve, and the nerve conduction velocity between the cauda equina and sciatic nerve was analyzed. The frequencies of ectopic firing in the three groups were compared. The ratios of the nerve conduction velocities on the treatment side and opposite side were compared between the NP and sham groups., Results: The frequency was significantly higher in the NP group than in the sham group at 4 weeks. There were no significant differences among the three groups at 8 weeks. There was no significant difference in the treatment side/opposite side ratio of nerve conduction velocity between the NP and sham groups at any time point., Conclusions: Increased ectopic firing in the stage of inflammatory reaction to NP may be related to abnormal sensation.

Study Design: An anatomic cadaveric study to characterize the lumbar intraforaminal nerve root attachments., Objectives: To characterize the intraforaminal nerve root attachments and describe their anatomic relationships and biomechanical properties., Summary of Background Data: Observations during foraminotomies for lateral recess stenosis as well as lateral approaches for far lateral disc herniation have shown dense attachments between the nerve root and adjacent structures. Little or no information has appeared in the literature describing intraforaminal nerve root attachments., Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spines were used to study intraforaminal ligamentous structures. Four cadavers were cut into sagittal sections for qualitative description, and eight were used for biomechanical testing. Histologic analyses were performed on samples of the foraminal attachments to assure that they were not vascular or neural structures. Biomechanical testing of the nerve roots with ligamentous attachments was performed measuring load to failure along the anatomic axis of the root., Results: The dissections showed four distinct bands extending radially from the nerve root sleeve. The most prominent nerve root attachment was to the facet capsule posteriorly. Other ligaments fanned out with attachments inferiorly and superiorly to the adjacent pedicles and anteriorly to the intervertebral disc. Biomechanical study of the L3, L4, and L5 nerve roots showed a significant increase in strength at failure with axial traction, progressing from L3 to L5., Conclusions: The results demonstrate that these foraminal ligaments are normal anatomic structures within the intervertebral foramen of the lumbar spine. In addition, they may play a role in limiting motion along the nerve root.

Study Design: Experimental investigation of the dynamics of nerve root circulation., Objectives: To study the dynamics of lumbosacral nerve root circulation by using seriography in dogs., Summary of Background Data: The vascular distribution to the nerve root has been discussed mainly from the morphologic aspects, and no adequate elucidation has been presented concerning the kinetics of the blood supply to the nerve root., Methods: To investigate the direction of blood flow in the nerve roots, a series of photographs of the cauda equina were taken using a motor-driven camera immediately after 3 mL of india ink was injected through the aortic catheter manually. The changes in the blood flow direction caused by compression of the nerve root also were observed. After the dog was killed, the nerve roots were cleared by the Spalteholz technique to identify the vessels observed during the experiment., Results: The blood flow in the radicular arteries was descending in the proximal part and ascending in the distal part of the nerve roots. This observation supports the suggestion that there is a so-called watershed of the blood flow in the radicular arteries themselves. However, when the ascending radicular artery of the nerve root was cramped, the radicular blood flow on the proximal side was downward. The microangiograms also showed that there were abundant anastomoses of intrinsic vessels in the nerve roots., Conclusions: There is no relatively hypovascular region in the nerve root that is vulnerable in the course of degenerative changes in the lumbosacral spine. Therefore, it is unlikely that the watershed represents a weak point of the blood flow in the nerve root.

Study Design: One-group, pretest-postest experimental research with repeated measures., Objective: To determine the effect of head postural modification on the flexor carpi radialis H-reflex in healthy subjects., Summary of Background Data: H-reflex testing has been reported to be useful in evaluating and treating patients with lumbosacral and cervical radiculopathy. The idea behind this technique is that postural modification can cause further H-reflex inhibition, indicating more compression of the impinged nerve root, or recovery, indicating decompression of the root. Such assumptions cannot be supported unless the influence of normal head postural modification on the H-reflex in healthy subjects is studied., Methods: Twenty-two healthy subjects participated in this study (14 men, 8 women; mean age, 39 +/- 9 years). The median nerve of the subjects at the cubital fossa was electrically stimulated (0.5 msec; 0.2 pulses per second [pps] at H-max), whereas the flexor carpi radialis muscle H-reflex was recorded by electromyography. The H-reflexes were recorded after the subject randomly maintained the end range of head-forward flexion, backward extension, rotation to the right and the left, lateral bending to the right and the left, retraction and protraction. These were compared with the H-reflex recorded during comfortable neutral positions. Data were recorded after the subject maintained the position for 30 seconds, to avoid the effect of dynamic postural modification on the H-reflex. Four traces were recorded in each position. During recording, the H-reflex was monitored by the M-response to avoid any changes in the stimulation-recording condition., Results: Repeated multivariate analysis of variance was used to evaluate the significance of the difference among the H-reflex, amplitude, and latency, in various head positions. The H-reflex amplitude showed statistically significant changes (P < 0.001) with head postural modification. All head positions, except flexion, facilitated the H-reflex. Extension, lateral bending, and rotation toward the side of the recording produced higher reflex facilitation than the other positions. These results indicate that H-reflex changes may be caused by spinal root compression-decompression mechanisms. It may also indicate that relative spinal root decompression occurs in most head-neck postures except forward flexion., Conclusions: Head postural modification significantly influences the H-reflex amplitude but not the latency. This indicates that the H-reflex is a more sensitive predictor of normal physiologic changes than are latencies. The H-reflex modulation in various head positions may be-caused by relative spinal root compression-decompression mechanisms.

Study Design: This prospective study consisted of mechanical stimulation of cervical nerve roots C4 to C8 in patients with cervical radicular symptoms undergoing diagnostic selective nerve root block., Objectives: To document the distribution of pain and paresthesias that result from stimulation of specific cervical nerve roots and compare that distribution to documented sensory dermatomal maps., Summary of Background Data: Cervical dermatomes were first studied in the late 19th century. The results of those studies underpin current clinical decision making for patients with neck and arm pain. However, it has been observed that patients with radicular symptoms may have cervical pathology by radiographic imaging that is not corroborative, or have imaging studies that suggest a lesion at a level other than the one suggested by the patient's dermatomal symptoms. These observations may suggest that cervical dermatomal mapping is inaccurate or the distribution of referred symptoms (dynatome) from cervical root irritation is different than the sensory deficit outlined by dermatomal maps., Methods: Inclusion criteria consisted of consecutive patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided diagnostic cervical selective nerve root blocks from C4 to C8. Immediately preceding contrast injection, mechanical stimulation of the root was performed. An independent observer interviewed and recorded the location of provoked symptoms on a pain diagram. Visual data was subsequently compiled using a 793 body sector bit map. Forty-three clinically relevant body regions were defined on this bit map. Frequencies of symptom provocation and likelihood of symptom location from C4 to C8 stimulation of each nerve root were generated., Results: One hundred thirty-four cervical nerve root stimulations were performed on 87 subjects. There were 4 nerve root stimulations at C4, 14 at C5, 43 at C6, 52 at C7, and 21 at C8. Analyzing the frequency of involvement of the predetermined clinically relevant body regions either individually or in various combinations yielded more than 1,000 bits of data. Although the distribution of symptom provocation resembled the classic dermatomal maps for cervical nerve roots, symptoms were frequently provoked outside of the distribution of classic dermatomal maps., Conclusion: The current study demonstrates a distinct difference between dynatomal and dermatomal maps.

Study Design: Randomized, controlled, single blinded study., Objectives: To determine the physiologic effectiveness of lumbar medial branch blocks., Summary of Background Data: Zygapophysial joint pain can be diagnosed by anesthetization of the joint or its nerve supply (the medial branch divisions of the dorsal rami). The physiologic effectiveness of lumbar medial branch blocks has been assumed but not proven., Methods: Eighteen asymptomatic individuals were randomly assigned to either L4-L5 or L5-S1 zygapophysial joint injections with contrast medium until capsular distention elicited pain without extracapsular contrast spread. One week later, 15 blinded individuals underwent two randomized saline or 2% lidocaine medial branch injections that correlated to the innervation of the previously injected joint. Medical branch injections were performed such that inadvertent venous uptake was avoided in 14 individuals. Thirty minutes after medial branch injections, these 14 individuals underwent repeat capsular distention of the same zygapophysial joint provoked the prior week in an attempt to elicit another painful response., Results: All five control individuals who received saline medial branch injections felt pain on repeat capsular distention. Nine individuals received 2% lidocaine medial branch blocks; eight felt no pain, and one felt pain on repeat capsular distention., Conclusions: There was a significant effect of 2% lidocaine (versus saline) medial branch injections on anesthetization of the zygapophysial joint when venous uptake was avoided during these injections. When properly performed, lumbar medial branch blocks successfully inhibit pain associated with capsular distention of the lumbar zygapophysial joints at a rate of 89%.

Study Design: The function of sensory nerve fibers in patients with lumbar radiculopathy and in control individuals was evaluated using quantitative sensory testing., Objectives: To investigate the effect of lumbar nerve root compression on different populations of nerve fibers and to explore the function of sensory nerve fibers in neighboring nerve roots not involved in the mechanical compression., Background Data: Results from experimental and clinical studies indicate that chronic compression of lumbar nerve roots affects the large myelinated nerve fibers. The majority of nerve fibers involved in the sensation of pain, however, are small afferent nerve fibers. It is therefore of interest to study the effect of compression on large and small sensory afferent channels. Several authors have elucidated the biochemical interaction between disc tissue and nerve roots. Chemical substances in the epidural space can reach the nerve fibers in nerve roots at the same or neighboring lumbar segments. In this way, fibers not involved in the mechanical compression may be affected., Methods: The small nerve fibers were studied using tests for thermal thresholds (thermotest), and the large myelinated fibers were studied by vibrametry. Forty-two patients were investigated in the symptomatic and the asymptomatic leg, and the results were compared with those of 21 healthy individuals., Results: The thresholds of cold, warmth, and vibration were significantly increased in the dermatome of the compressed nerve root, indicating that large and small sensory nerve fibers were affected. Further, the thresholds were significantly increased in the neighboring dermatomes in the symptomatic and the asymptomatic leg., Conclusion: Large and small sensory afferent nerve fibers are affected in lumbar radiculopathy. The increase in sensation thresholds in the ipsilateral neighboring dermatome and in the dermatomes in the asymptomatic leg indicates that adjacent nerve roots are involved in the pathophysiology of sciatica in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Study Design: Autologous nucleus pulposus was modified and applied to the cauda equina in pigs. Histology and neurophysiology were assessed after 7 days., Objectives: To assess if alterations of the nucleus pulposus would change the degree and distribution of the nerve injury induced by autologous nucleus pulposus., Summary of Background Data: It was reported recently that nucleus pulposus may induce structural and functional changes in nerve roots after epidural application. The basic mechanisms causing these changes are not fully understood., Methods: Nucleus pulposus was harvested from lumbar discs and submitted to either of three treatments; 37 C for 24 hours (n = 5), -20 C for 24 hours (n = 5), or digestion by hyaluronidase for 24 hours (n = 6). In two additional pigs, nucleus pulposus was applied just after harvest as a control to verify previous observations. After 7 days, nerve conduction velocity was recorded, and specimens were processed for blinded light microscopic assessment., Results: When nucleus pulposus was applied just after harvest, or when it had been kept at 37 C or digested by hyaluronidase for 24 hours, there was a significant reduction in nerve conduction velocity similar to previous observations. When nucleus pulposus had been kept at -20 C for 24 hours, however, there was no reduction in conduction velocity. There were no apparent differences between the groups at the histologic assessment. Staining of the nucleus pulposus showed that the cells in the nucleus pulposus exposed to -20 C were lysed, whereas the cells in the nucleus pulposus treated by the two other methods were mainly unaffected., Conclusions: Because freezing of the nucleus pulposus probably kills the cells but does not affect other components, one may assume that the biologic effects induced by the nucleus pulposus may be related to its cell population.

Study Design: A case is reported of L3-L4 far lateral disc herniation, in which the femoral stretching and crossed femoral stretching tests were positive., Objectives: To discuss the clinical usefulness and pathophysiologic mechanics of the femoral and crossed femoral nerve stretching tests., Summary of Background Data: The femoral and crossed femoral stretching tests have received little clinical and research attention. The validity of these two nerve root tension signs to evaluate upper disc herniations remains unknown., Methods: A 73-year-old woman presented with progressive low back pain and left anterolateral thigh pain of 2 months duration. The diagnosis of far lateral disc herniation at L3-L4 was initially suspected from a positive crossed femoral nerve stretch. An open discectomy was performed without complications., Results: Eight months after surgery, the patient had recovered and the femoral and crossed femoral stretching tests were negative., Conclusions: It is hypothesized that the crossed femoral stretching test may be a valid maneuver to help in the diagnosis of symptomatic disc herniation above L4.

Study Design: The authors studied the origin of nerves supplying the posterior portion of lumbar intervertebral discs in rats by resection of the sympathetic trunks., Objective: To understand discogenic low back pain from the innervation of the lumbar intervertebral discs., Summary of Background Data: The afferent pathways of discogenic low back pain have not been studied thoroughly. It has been reported that stimulation of an inflamed lower spinal nerve root elicits leg pain but not low back pain and that stimulation of the posterior portion of lumbar intervertebral discs evokes only low back pain. These facts suggest that pain sensation from the posterior portion of lumbar discs is not transmitted via the lower spinal nerve roots., Methods: Forty-five Wistar rats were used. Seven days after the resection of sympathetic trunks with ganglia at different levels, the whole lumbar spine was stained by an acetylcholinesterase histochemical method. The posterior portions of lumbar intervertebral discs were observed., Results: The dense nerve network on the posterior portion of lumbar intervertebral discs had disappeared almost completely after total resection of bilateral sympathetic trunks at L2-L6. However, there was a slight decrease in the network after bilateral single-level resection or unilateral multisegmental resection., Conclusions: The results showed that the posterior portion of lumbar intervertebral discs was innervated by the sympathetic nerves multisegmentally and bilaterally.

Study Design: Twenty-two Göttingen minipigs were trained to run on a treadmill. Two-level lumbar spinal stenosis was created in 12 pigs, 10 were unoperated control subjects. Blood flow of the spinal cord and nerve roots was determined with microspheres at rest, during exercise, and after exercise., Objectives: To study the effect of lumbar spinal stenosis and exercise on blood flow of spinal neural tissue., Summary of Background Data: Neurogenic claudication, the key symptom of lumbar spinal stenosis, may be caused by vascular impairment or mechanical distress of neural tissue during exercise. Experimental compression of the cauda equina causes reversible nerve root edema, stasis, blood flow decrease, and compromised neural function. The vascular pathophysiology of spinal stenosis during exercise has not been studied previously., Methods: Pigs were trained daily for 3 months. Two-level 25% lumbar spinal stenosis was introduced by placement of stenosing bands around the dural sac. Neurologic function was monitored before surgery by evoked potentials and after surgery by the Tarlov score. Regional blood flow in lumbosacral neural tissue was measured 3 days after chronic catheterization using microspheres at rest, during exercise at 3 km/h for 15 minutes, and at rest 30 minutes after exercise., Results: Blood flow of grey and white matter increased during exercise in both groups, with no differences between groups. slight hyperemia prevailed after exercise in white matter of the stenotic area but not in grey matter. Nerve root blood flow was largely unchanged in control subjects during exercise but was reduced in spinal stenosis at rest, further depressed during exercise, and normalized after exercise. Dural blood flow was elevated throughout., Conclusion: The study suggests that exercise-induced impairment of spinal nerve root blood flow plays a role in the pathophysiology of neurogenic claudication.

Study Design: This study analyzed the parameters needed for electrical stimulation of vertebral pedicle drill bits and screws., Objectives: The feasibility of using electrically evoked electromyography was studied., Summary of Background Data: Considerable potential for damage of adjacent nerve roots with incorrectly placed bits and screws exists with pedicular fixation of the lumbar spine., Methods: Ninety-five drill bits, one hundred forty-four screws, and thirty-four exposed nerve roots were electrically stimulated in thirty-six patients. Simultaneous evoked electromyographic activity was recorded from four muscle groups in each lower extremity during partial neuromuscular blockade., Results: A constant current threshold of 6 mA or less correlated with misplaced drill bits and screws that broached the cortex. Evoked electromyography was 93% sensitive whereas radiography was only 63% sensitive to detecting bits and screws that had broached the cortex., Conclusions: Evoked electromyography is a valuable sensitive adjunct to radiographic examination of pedicle drill bit and screw placement.

Study Design: Magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord in 14 pigs was performed, and compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from lower extremities before and after nerve root and spinal cord lesioning., Objectives: The authors determined whether magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord produced lower extremity CMAPs., Summary of Background Data: Previous studies indicated that the magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord would result in lower extremity CMAP if appropriate amounts of spinal bone were removed to expose the spinal cord., Results: Our findings demonstrated that the presence of intervening bone did not affect the reliability or presence of lower extremity CMAPs. Additionally, magnetic stimulation did not result in spinal cord activation but produced activity in nerve roots lateral to nerve root foramen. Lesioning of the spinal cord and complete rhizotomies did not affect magnetically elicited CMAPs., Conclusions: Magnetic stimulation of the spinal canal does not result in activation of spinal cord motor tracts. Lower extremity CMAPs were elicited by stimulation of nerve roots lateral to nerve root foramen and not of the spinal cord. Magnetic stimulation of the spinal cord is not appropriate for monitoring spinal cord motor tract function.

Study Design: Fresh cadavers of five baboons were used to assess lumbar spinal cord movement. Window dissection at the L3 level was performed to observe the relative displacement of the cord to bony landmark, when the neck and hip were moved., Objectives: To examine the effect of the neck and hip flexion alone and in combination on the movements of the lumbar spinal cord relative to the third lumbar vertebral body. To investigate also the effect of the sequence of flexions., Summary of Background Data: Several clinical studies claim that cervical flexion together with straight leg raise tensions the lumbar nerve root. Although previous studies describe the effect of each of these movements, there have been no measurements of the combined effect or the effect of the sequence of movements., Methods: Five fresh baboon cadavers were dissected to expose the L3 nerve root. The movement of the lumbar cord at that level was measured relative to a pin on the L3 vertebra. The neck and leg of the cadavers were moved by two operators., Results: Cervical flexion always moved the lumbar cord in a cephalad direction. The degree of displacement was more pronounced if the cervical flexion followed hip flexion rather than hip extension. Hip flexion also moved the lumbar cord in a cephalad direction. However, the difference in cord displacement attributable to different sequences in hip movements were not found to be statistically significant. Cervical flexion elicited a greater cord displacement than traction., Conclusion: These findings would advocate that a test that comprises both neck and hip movements would be more sensitive in assessing nerve root movements than one that only uses neck or hip movements. Such a test should also consider the use of various sequences of neck and hip movements.

Study Design: Sensory- and motor-evoked potentials were recorded after high thoracic (T2) epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord. Under general anesthesia, 22 cats underwent single or repetitive spinal cord stimulation., Objectives: Sensory-evoked potentials were recorded after antidromic activation of the posterior column sensory fibers at lower electrical intensities (< 5 V). Motor tract activation was accomplished by recording the ventral root and muscle action potential using single pulse stimulation (> 50 V)., Methods: Sensory-evoked potentials were recorded from the lumbar spinal cord (n = 20), dorsal root (n = 80), and peroneal nerve (n = 40). Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the ventral root (n = 40) and the hindlimb musculature (n = 10)., Results: The lumbar spinal-evoked response resisted lesioning and showed a minimal change after a spinal cord hemisection. Dorsal rhizotomy abolished the ipsilateral peroneal nerve action potential, indicating antidromic activation of afferent fibers. Motor responses did not change after the dorsal rhizotomy, suggesting involvement of nonsensory pathways., Conclusions: These findings indicate that spinal cord stimulation activates sensory and motor tracts that can be recorded at various sites along the central or the peripheral nervous system.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the somatosensory units of the lumbar intervertebral disc and adjacent muscle. A laminectomy was performed on the lumbar spine of adult male Japanese White rabbits. Receptive fields of mechanosensitive afferent units were investigated in the intervertebral disc and adjacent muscle, and electrophysiologic recordings were obtained from filaments of the dorsal root. Thirteen mechanosensitive units were identified: three units in the intervertebral disc area, and 10 units in the psoas muscle. Of the three units in the disc area, one was identified at the surface of the L5-6 anulus fibrosus and two at the insertion of the anulus fibrosus to the L5 and L6 vertebral bodies. These three units belonged to Group III and had very high mechanical thresholds, more than 160 g. The 10 units in the psoas muscle belonged to Groups II, III, and IV, and had mechanical thresholds ranging from 0.22 to 12.6 g. The units in the disc area may serve as nociceptors sensitive to strong noxious stimulation that could traumatize the tissue. The units in the psoas muscle may contribute to nociception and proprioception.

Based on the experimental and clinical results in the literatures and the author's experience, a working hypothesis for the pathomechanism of radicular pain is proposed. When the nerve root is involved, mechanical and circulatory changes are produced. Inflammatogenic materials may leak from the degenerative disc and facet into the nerve root, causing chemical radiculitis. These changes can be followed by nerve fiber and cell changes including blockage of axonal flow and demyelination, causing ectopic discharges and cross talk. Disturbed or enhanced synthesis and transport of neuropeptides can also be elicited. These multifactorial changes may finally result in sensitization of both the central and peripheral nervous systems, causing radicular pain.

Regions of sensory impairment of 71 patients in 86 lumbar spinal nerve blocks (L4 19 cases, L5 41 cases, S1 26 cases) were determined by the writing brush method. Distinctive regions included the medial side of the lower leg, the side of the first dorsal digit, and the side of the fifth digit respectively of the L4 (88%), L5 (82%) and S1 (83%) spinal nerves without 100% matching because of displacement of one spinal segment by the furcal nerve. A band-like impaired zone from the proximal to the periphery appeared in 42%, 44%, and 92%, respectively, of the L4, L5, and S1 blocks. The marked difference between L4, L5, and S1 may be caused by the diversity of the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves and double control by the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh.

Straight leg raising (SLR) is a useful clinical test to demonstrate an inflammatory compressive process across a spinal nerve root. Several previous studies have attempted to evaluate the effect of SLR on nerve root motion, but the exact direction and amount of this motion is still unclear. Components of the SLR test that have not been adequately addressed include the effect of SLR on the intact dural-nerve root system, motion of the nerve tissues as distinct from the dura, and nerve root strain. Separately, spinal fusion is occasionally used as an adjunct to discectomy to decrease instability and subsequent "nerve root irritation." The effect of a one-level fusion on in situ nerve root biomechanics, however, has not been evaluated. Ten fresh human cadavers underwent posterior lumbar laminectomies. Spinal nerve root motion was studied while a SLR maneuver was performed. Data was recorded photographically and statistically analyzed. The results were as follows: 1) SLR induced both linear motion (0.5-5 mm) and strain (2-4%) in spinal nerves L4, L5, and S1; 2) The dura moved less than the intrathecal nerve root at the pedicle and experienced more strain (P < .05). 3) The nerve roots moved laterally toward the pedicle and thus would move into a posterolaterally herniated disc. 4) Rigid anterior stabilization did not decrease nerve root motion or strain.

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded at the lumbar spine following stimulation of the tibial nerve (mixed-nerve SEP; MSEP), the sural nerve (specific nerve SEP; SSEP), and the skin corresponding to the L6 and S1 dermatomes (dermatomal field SEP; DSEP-L and DSEP-S) in the hog. To determine the sensitivity of these three SEPs to the single nerve root (S1 root) function, the effects of nerve roots lesioning were investigated. Cutting S1 nerve root reduced the peak-to-peak amplitude of MSEP by only 28% in comparison with baseline values. The relative amplitudes of SSEP, DSEP-L, and DSEP-S were decreased by 46%, 11% and 51%, respectively. When S1 nerve root was left intact and L5, L6, and S2 nerve roots were cut, the relative amplitudes of MSEP, SSEP, DSEP-L, and DSEP-S were decreased to 68%, 73%, 31%, and 74%, respectively. These results indicate that DSEP-S is as sensitive to the function of S1 nerve root as SSEP but the sensitivities of DSEP-S and SSEP are low in the hog. MSEP is shown unsuitable to monitor the single nerve root dysfunction.

Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials are used to monitor individual nerve root function during degenerative spinal surgery. However, a less than 100% agreement between level(s) of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials abnormality and nerve root involvement has been reported. The purpose of this article was to determine the possible cause of this discrepancy. Results from humans suggest that variations in peripheral innervation patterns of the dorsal nerve roots are the main reason for dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials discrepancy both for cervical and lumbar nerve roots. Because these variations cannot be controlled, the authors recommend that dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and additional neurophysiologic methods be used during degenerative surgeries to provide the surgeon with information about individual nerve root function. A patient profile for these methods was provided.

Magnetic coil stimulation applied to the spine excites the lumbosacral roots rather than the spinal cord itself. To evaluate the mechanism responsible for this phenomenon, the effects of volume conduction on the activation of neural elements were studied. In ten intact dogs compound muscle action potentials could be recorded in the soleus muscle only when the magnetic coil was placed over the cauda equina. After laminectomy and pediculotomy, compound muscle action potentials also could be elicited when the magnetic coil was placed over the spinal cord. These findings suggest that the bony structure surrounding the spinal cord interferes with the spread of magnetically induced eddy currents to the spinal cord.

Spinal cord stimulation has been advocated as an alternative to motor cortex stimulation for motor tract activation. To test this theory, evoked responses were recorded from lumbar spinal cord (L2; n = 14), spinal roots (L4-L7; n = 112), peripheral nerves (sciatics; n = 28), and hind limb muscles (n = 28) after epidural stimulation of the T1-T2 segment of the spinal cord in dogs (n = 12), cats (n = 2), and monkeys (n = 2). The spinal response evoked by spinal cord stimulation was resistant to a dorsal hemisectioning (depth, 7-8 mm) of the midthoracic spinal cord. A minimal attenuation of latency and amplitude occurred with dorsal hemisectioning, suggesting signal transmission through descending or ascending pathways in the ventrolateral and ventral quadrants of the spinal cord. The sciatic nerve response was abolished by a dorsal column transection (depth, 3-4 mm) or ipsilateral lumbar dorsal rhizotomy (four dorsal roots). This shows that the evoked response recorded from the sciatic nerve in our animals was not travelling, as we expected, through the ventral roots, but rather was conducted antidromically through sensory fibers in dorsal roots.

The relationship between clinical status and preoperative and intraoperative dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials was investigated as a function of test site. Results indicated that the specificity and sensitivity of dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials varied with level of involvement: L5 demonstrated greatest agreement with equal correlation at L3, L4, and S1. Variables that influenced correlation included history of previous surgeries, type of anesthetic used, interpretation criteria, and whether the patient was awake or asleep. It was concluded that dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials can provide the surgeon with diagnostic and intraoperative information regarding the functional integrity of single nerve root function.

The alpha-efferent component of spinal root potentials (SRPs) was recorded in the lumbar epidural space stimulating the tibial and peroneal nerves for clinical diagnosis and clinical treatment. Five normal volunteers and 15 clinical cases with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) were examined. The SRP by the tibial nerve stimulation in the normal control group consisted of two kinds of potentials with different latency. Simultaneous electromyogram (EMG) recording from the stimulated muscles indicated that the shortest latency potential (first potential) was the ascending volley, including orthodromic afferent and antidromic alpha-efferent volleys; and that the long latency potential (second potential) was the descending volley of reflexively evoked alpha-efferents by the Group Ia afferents. The component of alpha-efferent fiber potential was recorded in the following two methods by changing the intensity of stimulation: 1) identifying alpha-efferent components in the first potential and 2) recording the second potential. Conduction blockage of spinal roots in 15 clinical cases was demonstrated as abnormal positivity and prolonged duration of the potentials. New methods were introduced to estimate two parameters quantitatively. The present study showed either of these signs in all patients tested. The examination was helpful to determine the level(s) of lumbar motor radiculopathies, and the extent of pathologic neuropathy.

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after peripheral nerve stimulation and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after transcranial stimulation have been routinely used as monitors of the viability of pathways in the posterior and anterior spinal cord, respectively, in patients undergoing spinal cord surgery. To assess total spinal cord function, both of these procedures must be performed simultaneously, which is both cumbersome and technically difficult. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate both sensory and motor spinal tract activation after epidural electrical stimulation of the cat spinal cord. Thirty-seven adult mongrel cats were anesthetized with ketamine, intubated, and maintained with Ethrane and nitrous oxide. Stimulating electrodes were placed over the right dorsolateral spinal cord epidurally at T7 after a laminectomy. Recording electrodes were placed over the right L3 spinal cord epidurally, on the right L7 dorsal and ventral nerve roots, on the right and left sciatic nerves in the popliteal fossa, and in the right gastrocnemius muscle. After epidural stimulation of the spinal cord at T11, distinct reproducible potentials were recorded at each site. Activity in the L7 dorsal root implicated activation of spinal sensory tracts. Activity in the L7 ventral root and in the gastrocnemius implicated activation of spinal motoneurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This study employed selective unilateral dorsal and ventral rhizotomy to examine the contribution of both the dorsal and ventral roots of the tibial nerve in the induction of the spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) in the cat. The spinal roots of origin of the tibial nerve in the cat were determined by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Spinal roots L6, L7, and S1 were found to give rise to the cat tibial nerve. Physiologic monitoring showed that the dorsal roots at these levels primarily contribute to the induction of the SSEP, but the ventral roots also make a small contribution. Because bilateral tibial nerve stimulation was found to mask a root injury on one side, we recommend sequential unilateral peripheral nerve stimulation when using SSEP during operations on the spine.