Search

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of preoperative rod shape on 3D spinal deformity correction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Differential rod contouring is a surgeon-dependent process based on an estimate of 3D deformity correction sought and the flexibility of the spine. An objective measure to this otherwise subjective scoliosis correction technique is lacking. METHODS A series of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with right, thoracic major curves, preoperative rod contour tracings, and EOS imaging was evaluated. All patients underwent posterior spinal fusion with 5.5 mm steel rods contoured prior to insertion. 3D reconstructions were generated pre- and postoperatively using sterEOS software (EOS Imaging) and imported into MATLAB (Mathworks) for analysis. A new measurement of the maximum perpendicular distance from the preinsertion concave rod contour to the preoperative 3D sagittal spinal reconstruction was defined as rod to 3D spine distance (RSD). Linear regressions were used to identify relationships between pre and postoperative parameters, including RSD and 3D thoracic kyphosis. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients were included. Average preoperative concave rod angle decreased from (48 ± 10°) preoperatively to 26 ± 6° postoperatively (P

Study design Longitudinal. Objectives To evaluate whether the rate of patients who report low health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores at 2 years following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) improves by 5 years postoperatively. Summary of background data HRQOL scores are dependent upon a number of factors and even in instances of good surgical correction of a spinal deformity, are not guaranteed to be high postoperatively. Understanding how a low HRQOL score varies over the postoperative period can help surgeons more effectively counsel patients and temper expectations. Methods A multicenter database was reviewed for patients with both 2 and 5-year follow-up after spinal fusion and instrumentation for AIS. From a cohort of 916 patients, 52 patients with low HRQOL scores at their 2-year follow-up were identified and reevaluated at 5-year follow-up. A low HRQOL outcome was defined as having SRS-22 domain or total scores less than 2 standard deviations below the mean score. Reoperations were also evaluated to determine if they were associated with HRQOL scores. Results Of those patients with low SRS-22 HRQOL scores at 2 years postoperatively, improvements were seen in all SRS-22 domains and total scores at the 5-year time point. The greatest change was seen in the satisfaction category where 41 patients showed improvement. The rate of reoperations during this period did not significantly impact patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions Having a low HRQOL score 2 years after surgery for AIS does not guarantee a low score 5 years after surgery. Promisingly, most patients demonstrate some improvement in all domains for patient-reported SRS-22 scores at 5-year compared to 2-year follow-up. Understanding the longer term postoperative evolution in patient-reported outcomes may help surgeons to effectively manage and counsel patients who are dissatisfied in the short term.Level of Evidence: 3.

STUDY DESIGN A prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of sparing lumbar motion segments on spinal mobility and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores at 10 years after spinal fusion for major thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In surgical correction for major thoracic AIS, the long-term benefits of sparing lumbar motion segments remain unclear. METHODS A prospective multicenter registry was reviewed and patients with major thoracic AIS (Lenke types 1-4) and availability of both preoperative and 10-year postoperative mobility data were included. Spinal fusions ending at L1 or above were defined as thoracic fusions (T), and at L2 or below as thoracic and lumber fusions (T + L). Spinal mobility was evaluated with a measuring tape. The excursions between the starting and ending positions were measured using the distance from the spinous processes of C7 to S1 for forward flexion (FF), and the distance from the tip of the middle finger to the floor for lateral flexion (LF). Substantial reduction of mobility was defined as a reduction rate (a ratio of postoperative change divided by preoperative mobility) of 40% or more. Motion data were correlated with lowest instrumented vertebra levels and group comparisons were performed. RESULTS We identified 151 patients (average age, 25.1 years). The spinal mobility decreased with more distal lowest instrumented vertebrae (FF, rho = 0.208; right LF, 0.257; left LF, 0.371; P ≤ 0.01). Consequently, the incidence of substantial reduction of mobility was lower in the T group (n = 109) than in the T + L group (n = 42) (FF: 17.4% vs. 50%, LF: 14.8% vs. 51.2%; P

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the last substantially touched vertebra (LSTV) is a valid lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) for both Lenke 1 and 2 curve patterns with AR lumbar modifiers, and to identify preoperative risk factors of distal adding-on. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous studies have recommended selecting the LSTV as the LIV for Lenke 1AR curves (main thoracic curve with A lumbar modifier and L4 tilt to the right (thoracic overhang/King type IV curve). METHODS One-hundred sixty patients with a Lenke 1 or 2 curve pattern and AR lumbar modifier who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2008 and 2012 were reviewed. All patients had minimum 2-year follow up. Patients were identified with distal adding-on between first erect radiographs and 2-year follow up based on previously defined parameters. Factors predictive of the adding-on phenomenon were identified in a multivariate binary logistic regression model. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients (17%) were identified as having distal adding-on of their primary thoracic curve; however, only 8 of 89 patients (9%) fused to the LSTV developed adding-on (P = 0.005). Three variables were found to be significant predictors of adding-on: LIV proximal to LSTV (odds ratio, OR 3.63; P = 0.01), Risser zero (OR 4.93; P = 0.02), and C7-CSVL distance

STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospective data. OBJECTIVE To determine if surgically leveling the upper thoracic spine in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in level shoulders postoperatively. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Research has shown that preoperatively tilted proximal ribs and T1 tilt are more correlated with trapezial prominence than with clavicle angle. METHODS Prospectively collected Lenke 1 and 2 cases from a single center were reviewed. Clinical shoulder imbalance was measured from 2-year postoperative clinical photos. Lateral shoulder imbalance was assessed utilizing clavicle angle. Medial imbalance was assessed with trapezial angle (TA), and trapezial area ratio (TAR). First rib angle, T1 tilt, and upper thoracic curve were measured from 2-year radiographs. Angular measurements were considered level if ≤ 3° of zero. TAR was considered level if ≤ 1 standard deviation of the natural log of the ratio. Upper thoracic Cobb at 2-years was categorized as at or below the mean value (≤ 14°) versus above the mean. RESULTS Eighty-four patients were identified. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with a level clavicle angle or TAR based on first rib being level, T1 tilt being level, or upper thoracic Cobb being at/below versus above the mean (P

Review of a prospective database registry.To compare the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 and SRS-24 outcomes instruments in terms of scores, rate of ceiling effects, and discriminant ability in patients with pre- and postoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Despite improvements noted with the SRS-22, the SRS-24 is still occasionally used prospectively and for comparisons with previous studies reporting SRS-24 scores. Previous work has demonstrated that postoperative scores from the 2 versions are not interchangeable.A multicenter prospective registry of patients who underwent surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was queried for preoperative and 2-year postoperative SRS-22 and SRS-24 scores. Scores were compared between versions and ceiling effects were identified. Groups of deformity severity were created to evaluate discriminant ability.829 patients were identified. The SRS-22 scores for pain and general function were significantly greater than SRS-24 scores (P0.001), whereas the SRS-22 scores were significantly lower than the SRS-24 for self-image (P0.001). Preoperative ceiling effect was only noted in 1 domain each. Both versions were able to discriminate between large (80°+) and small (45°) preoperative curves in all domains and total scores (P0.05). Postoperatively, the SRS-22 scores for all shared domains and total score were significantly greater than SRS-24 scores (P0.001). Ceiling effects in 5 of 5 domain scores were noted postoperatively for SRS-22 and in 4 of 7 for SRS-24. With a smaller range of deformity postoperatively, only the SRS-22 self-image domain was able to discriminate between large (29°+) and small (≤11°) residual curves (P0.05).Scores obtained by the SRS-22 and the SRS-24 are not translatable despite shared domains. Whereas both versions demonstrated preoperative discriminant ability, postoperative discrimination of residual deformity is lacking in both. Patient-reported outcomes of treatment are crucial in advancing treatment, and improvement in the ability to assess subjective outcomes is essential.3.

Study design Multicenter review of prospectively collected data. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of distal adding-on and associated risk factors in each of the 2 Lenke 1A curve patterns. Summary of background data Previous work has demonstrated 2 distinct Lenke 1A curve patterns on the basis of the tilt of L4 (1A-L and 1A-R) that are different in form and treatment. Methods A query of a prospective multicenter adolescent idiopathic scoliosis database identified 195 patients with Lenke 1A curves. Patients were grouped on the basis of the direction of the L4 vertebral tilt: 1A-L (left) and 1A-R (right). The incidences as well as clinical and radiographical risk factors for adding-on were identified for each group. Adding-on was defined as an increase in the Cobb angle of at least 5° and distalization of the end vertebra of the thoracic curve or a change in disc angulation of 5° or greater below the lowest instrumented vertebra from the first erect to 2-year postoperative radiographs. Results Forty (21%) patients met the criteria for adding-on. The average increase in Cobb angle was 11.9° for those categorized as having adding-on compared with 3.8° in the non-adding-on group. Lenke 1A-R curves were 2.2 times more likely to experience adding-on than 1A-L curves. In the 1A-R curves, patients who added-on were fused at an average of 1.6 levels proximal to the neutral vertebra versus an average of 0.9 levels proximal to the neutral vertebra for the patients who did not add-on (P = 0.023). Patients who added-on were fused at an average of 2.5 levels above stable versus 2.1 levels above stable in those who did not (P = 0.06). Age and skeletal maturity were not identified as risk factors in the 1A-R curves. In 1A-L curves, younger (12.7 vs. 14.7 yr, P = 0.002) and less skeletally mature patients based on Risser grading (70% vs. 14% Risser 0, P = 0.004) were more likely to experience adding-on. Conclusion Understanding the difference between Lenke 1A-L and 1A-R curve types may be helpful in preventing the adding-on phenomena postoperatively. To prevent adding-on in 1A-R curves, we recommend fusing distally to 1 level above the neutral vertebra or 1 to 2 levels above the stable vertebra. In 1A-L curves, adding-on may simply be a need to balance some lumbar curve progression in a young, skeletally immature patient.

Study design Retrospective study. Objective To investigate the safety of pedicle screws and constructs for infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity. Summary of background data Few studies have examined the safety and complication rates associated with the usage of pedicle screw for children younger than 10 years. Methods Radiographical and clinical data were collected of patients treated with pedicle screws at a single institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on age (0-5 yr old, 5-10 yr) and compared with an older cohort of 10- to 15-year-old patients. Patient demographics, screw adjustment, and complication data were collected for each group. Outcomes were analyzed using analysis of variance (P Results In total, 5054 pedicle screws were analyzed: 176 in the 0- to 5-year-old group (31 patients), 659 in the 5- to 10-year-old group (68 patients), and 4219 in the 10- to 15-year-old group (234 patients). Mean follow-up was 3.1 ± 1.8 years (range, 3 mo-9 yr). There were 7 pedicle screw-associated complications (3 required revision surgery). Overall pedicle screw-associated complication rates were 2.1% per patient and 0.1% per screw. There were no neurological complications associated with misplacement of a pedicle screw. The pedicle screw-associated complication rates per patient and per screw were 3.2% and 0.6% in the 0- to 5-year-old group, 2.9% and 0.3% in the 5- to 10-year-old group, and 1.7% and 0.1% in the 10- to 15-year-old group (P > 0.05). The 5- to 10-year-old group had a significantly higher overall surgically related complication rate (34%) than the 0- to 5-year-old group (7%) and the 10- to 15-year-old group (6%) (P = 0.005), primarily due to the "growth friendly" constructs common in this age group. Conclusion Pedicle screws can be used for infantile or juvenile patients, although complication rates associated with pedicle screws tended to be slightly higher in the younger groups.