Search

The Missouri School of Agrifood Studies began with a focus on the power of agribusiness corporations in relation to quality of life of farmers and their related communities. The poultry industry was the first commodity studied, with later research into other commodity sectors and then the global dimensions of this process. In this paper I continue the Missouri School agenda by focusing on the entry of the poultry firm Sanderson Farms and the hog firm Seaboard Farms into Texas. This paper combines a sociology of the agrifood system conceptual framework with two case studies of agribusiness expansion in Texas to inform discussions regarding the characteristics of the globalization of the agrifood system. The results of the research indicate that the CAFO-based economic development strategies in Texas created significant controversies as local citizens organized to challenge the initiatives. This contested process of the globalization of the agrifood system was mediated by the state, mostly in favor of the agribusiness transnational corporations (TNCs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Organic agriculture has been advanced as a production system that improves environmental quality and supports rural community development. Recent developments in organics have called into question both assertions. Researchers have argued that the advent of national-level organic standards has contributed to the conventionalization and bifurcation of organics. Conventionalization refers to the process by which organic agriculture increasingly takes on the characteristics of mainstream industrial agriculture. Bifurcation refers to the process by which the organic agriculture adopts a dual-structure of smaller, lifestyle-oriented producers and larger, industrial-scale producers. This research examines the conventionalization and bifurcation theses through a comparison of certified organic and non-certified organic producers in Texas. We conclude that the case of organics in Texas provides mixed support for the conventionalization thesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper introduces the special issue of Southern Rural Sociology and lays the groundwork for the rest of the papers. The genesis of this special issue flows from the efforts of the Southern Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (S-SARE) program to bring more social science research into its portfolio of projects. Our concern is that by providing best management practices (Band-Aids) to a fundamentally unsustainable agricultural system, the sustainable agriculture movement (and SARE's granting program) favors the environmental component at the expense of economic and social "legs" of the sustainable stool. While focusing on the history and work of the SARE program, we provided a social science perspective on sustainable agriculture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents presidential address of the Southern Rural Sociological Association on the southern model and rural development from goldschmidt to globalization. The author was much more interested in intentional communities than helping rural communities develop industrial parks, compete for enterprise zone status against similarly desperate communities, court flighty corporations that demanded economic incentives, and/or create short lived Economic Development offices. The late 1980s was an interesting time in Rural Sociology. Adoption/diffusion studies were in decline. The Southern Model was developed as an innovation in the social relations of agricultural production in the Southern United States slavery, sharecropping, contracting; growing other peoples' products for them on a share system. In the Southern Model, control is exercised without ownership and liability is avoided. The state provides a business climate attractive to capital investment. Persistent poverty is a common outcome. There are socioeconomic reasons for the 400 years of persistent poverty in parts of the U.S. South. Dependistas call it "the development of underdevelopment."

The poultry industry was the first livestock commodity sector to adopt an industrial organizational model. In recent years the pouItry industry has expanded beyond national boundaries into a globalized system of production. The globalization of agriculture and food is a frequent topic of discussion for researchers interested in rural society. A common focus of these discussions is the consequences of corporate penetration on rural areas and the ways local communities respond to such corporate actions. This paper uses the case of the introduction of large-scale broiler production in East Texas combined with a sociology of agriculture and food conceptual framework to inform discussions regarding the community impacts of the globalization of the agrifood system. This paper concludes that economic development initiatives can experience legitimation crises as local social movement groups resist development strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]