1. Outcomes in an Interdisciplinary Diabetes Clinic in Rural Primary Care
- Author
-
Michelle O Prestoza, Greg Castelli, Frederick M Alcantara, Megan M Elavsky, Ashley B Petrone, Judy Siebart, and Dana E King
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Rural Population ,medicine.medical_specialty ,MEDLINE ,Pharmacist ,Certified diabetes educator ,Primary care ,Pharmacists ,01 natural sciences ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,medicine ,Humans ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,Nutritionists ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,Disease management (health) ,Aged ,Glycemic ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,Patient Care Team ,Case Managers ,Self-management ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring ,Health Educators ,Self-Management ,010102 general mathematics ,Disease Management ,Internship and Residency ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Treatment Outcome ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,Family medicine ,Female ,Nursing Staff ,Family Practice ,business ,Delivery of Health Care - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary diabetes team model of care in assisting patients to achieve improved glucose control in a primary care rural setting. METHODS: A family medicine clinic at a rural university medical center developed an interdisciplinary diabetes team clinic composed of a certified diabetes educator/dietitian, a case manager, a pharmacist, nursing staff, a family medicine resident, a psychologist, and a board-certified family medicine attending physician. Patients were referred if their hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was ≥9% (75 mmol/mol); patients were seen for an initial consultation and for additional visits as needed. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients attended an initial visit and at least 1 follow-up within 6 months. Mean age was 57 ± 13 years, and 54% were female. Median time from the initial intensive diabetes clinic visit to a follow-up visit was 2.8 months. There was a significant reduction in median HbA1c percentage from 10.25% (88.5 mmol/mol) ± 1.4% (range 73–104 mmol/mol) at the initial intensive diabetes clinic visit to 8.7% (72 mmol/mol) ± 1.8% (range 52–92 mmol/mol) at a 1- to 6-month follow-up (z = −7.161, P < 0.001) and a significant difference between baseline HbA1c (10.25% [88.5 mmol/mol] ± 1.4% [range 73–104 mmol/mol]) and latest HBA1c (1–18 months later) 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) ± 2.2% (range 44–92 mmol/mol; z = −7.022, P < 0.001). Overall, 86% of patients had a lower HbA1c at follow-up, and 33% had an HbA1c 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary team approach to glycemic control can achieve significant reductions in HbA1c in the rural primary care setting.
- Published
- 2019