Search

This article addresses the need to grasp the actual processing of health ethical issues in ethics organisations by analysing the work of the Finnish National Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics (ETENE). ETENE's ethics is approached ethigraphically: the advisory board enacts ethics in its social life, through its own norms and values. It is asked how this internal ethics is performed in the board practice and how ethical debate eventually becomes bounded in this practice. Based on the analysis of the board members' textual reflections and on-site observations of board meetings, ETENE's ethics appears as a tandem of a particular discussion culture and multi-perspectivity: mutual recognition and respect among board members are nurtured in the meetings, and a tactful mode of reflection is established throughout all terms of office. This shared discussion culture enables ETENE's forte-weighing multiple perspectives-by preventing asymmetries and avoiding merely technical decision-making procedures. Consequently, ETENE's ethics is not threatened by being externally bounded and formalised but is at risk of watering down endogenously, through the notable tactfulness of its discussion mode, which threatens to attenuate both substantial debate and the social shaping of board members' values in the discussion., (© 2023 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.)

In the present study, we examine socio-cultural and practical aspects of human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVV) through a multi-sited study of framings. We ask how HPVV is framed in the daily lives of vaccination-aged Finnish girls and in school nurses' everyday work. We then mirror these framings against both each other and Finland's official vaccination campaign. Based on analysis of interviews with 24 nurses and 12 girls and the campaign materials, we argue first that the campaign frames vaccination as an individual, knowledge-based decision reflecting the informed consent principle. Second, however, the vaccination is framed in the everyday lives of eligible girls through gendered social ties and as a gendered and cohort-specific event pivoting around the needle prick. Third, HPVV is not primarily framed in the school nurses' work as preparing the girls for the vaccination decision by sharing official information but through trust-based social relationships with the girls and their parents. We conclude that, as the vaccination is not an issue of individually reflected and knowledge-based decision-making for the two interviewed key groups, the official Finnish HPVV campaign and the undergirding informed consent principle drift into problems in their practical implementation., (© 2021 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL (SHIL).)

This article focuses on two different ways of framing and taming the uncertainties of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in the context of the Finnish welfare state: the bio-medical rationale of population-level cancer reduction based on epidemiological assessments, and the meaning formation of Finnish vaccination-aged girls. Epidemiologists run analyses estimating the cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of vaccinations, while the adolescent girls face the burdensome choice of whether to undergo vaccination. The processes of framing the complexities and actively taming them are analysed utilising a cultural-sociological framework. Firstly, the taming work of the epidemiologists is examined by focusing on the creation of the vaccination campaign. The aetiological complexities between some HPV types and cervical cancer are tamed into a clear campaign message of vaccination as a scientifically proven protection against deadly cancer. Secondly, the girls' own ways of framing the complexities of the HPV vaccine and taming the decision whether to undergo vaccination or not are analysed based on their comments in an Internet discussion forum. Finally, the framings and tamings of both sites are discussed together, and some interesting continuities and disjunctions between the two are revealed., (© 2019 The Author. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL.)