Search

Background and Objective: Nocturnal groaning (catathrenia) is a chronic sleep disorder classified as parasomnia with unclear effects on sleep and life quality. It is characterized by repeated episodes of monotonous vocalization in prolonged expiration (episodes of bradypnea) occurring mostly in REM sleep. We sought to assess its impact on sleep microstructure, i.e., the frequency of arousals relative to the groaning episodes. The frequency, duration and sleep-stage distribution of the groaning episodes were also studied., Methods: Eight patients with nocturnal groaning (5 male, 3 female, age range 11-32 years, mean age 23+/-7.1) were evaluated. All underwent standard neurologic examination and nocturnal videopolysomnography for two consecutive nights. The second night polysomnography data were used to evaluate sleep parameters. The groaning episodes (bradypneic events) were counted separately, not as clusters., Results: Sleep macrostructure revealed no specific changes. The number of groaning episodes/bradypneic events during the night varied from 40 to 182 (total number 725). The duration of bradypnea was from 2 to 46s (mean duration 12.5s). Groaning episodes prevailed in REM sleep (76.5%). The rate for NREM 2 was 21.5%, and only sporadic episodes were noted in delta sleep (1.9%); 63.3% of the events were associated with arousals, and in 94% of them an arousal occurred before or together with the onset of bradypnea. The arousal index was increased in 5 patients (mean 20.4). Bruxism was present in 4 cases, in 1 patient appearing in close association with groaning episodes. Ronchopathy was noted in 4 cases., Conclusion: Almost two-thirds of the groaning episodes were connected with arousals. Hypothetically, nocturnal groaning may well be a source of sleep disruption (mainly REM) in some cases. Because an arousal mostly preceded or coincided with groaning we believe that arousal mechanisms may be involved in the pathogenesis of nocturnal groaning.

Background: The best method for titration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome has not yet been established. The 90th or 95th percentiles of the pressure titrated over time by automatic CPAP (A-CPAP) have been recommended as reference for prescribing therapeutic fixed CPAP (F-CPAP). We compared A-CPAP to F-CPAP, which was determined by a common prediction formula., Methods: Forty-five patients who were habituated to F-CPAP underwent titration polysomnography. In a double-blind, randomized order, each patient used an A-CPAP device in the autotitration and in the fixed pressure mode during one half of the night. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and pressure profiles were primary outcomes. Bias and precision were additionally assessed for both CPAP modes., Results: No significant differences in various sleep parameters or in subjective sleep quality evaluation were found. The AHI was effectively lowered in both CPAP modes (A-CPAP 7.7 [10.8]events/h versus F-CPAP 5.4 [9.0]events/h, p=0.061). Comparison of group means showed that F-CPAP closely paralleled mean (Pmean) and median (P50), but not the 95th percentile (P95) pressure, of A-CPAP. While bias was lowest for Pmean and P50, there was a lack of precision in all A-CPAP pressure categories., Conclusions: We confirm that F-CPAP set by prediction formula is not worse in terms of AHI control than A-CPAP. On average, F-CPAP parallels Pmean and P50 but not P95. However, due to imprecise matching, individual F-CPAP values cannot be derived from Pmean or P50.