Search

In this paper, we study the following Minimum Cost Multicovering (MCMC) problem: Given a set of n client points C and a set of m server points S in a fixed dimensional Rd space, determine a set of disks centered at these server points so that each client point c is covered by at least k(c) disks and the total cost of these disks is minimized, where k(·) is a function that maps every client point to some nonnegative integer no more than m and the cost of each disk is measured by the \alpha th power of its radius for some constant α >0. MCMC is a fundamental optimization problem with applications in many areas such as wireless/sensor networking. Despite extensive research on this problem for about two decades, only constant approximations were known for general k. It has been a long standing open problem to determine whether a PTAS is possible. In this paper, we give an affirmative answer to this question by presenting the first PTAS for it. Our approach is based on a number of novel techniques, such as balanced recursive realization and bubble charging, and new counterintuitive insights to the problem. Particularly, we approximate each disk with a set of sub-boxes and optimize them at the subdisk level. This allows us to first compute an approximate disk cover through dynamic programming, and then obtain the desired disk cover through a balanced recursive realization procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Branchwidth determines how graphs, and more generally, arbitrary connectivity (basically symmetric and submodular) functions could be decomposed into a tree-like structure by specific cuts. We develop a general framework for designing fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) 2-approximation algorithms for branchwidth of connectivity functions. The first ingredient of our framework is combinatorial. We prove a structural theorem establishing that either a sequence of particular refinement operations could decrease the width of a branch decomposition or that the width of the decomposition is already within a factor of 2 from the optimum. The second ingredient is an efficient implementation of the refinement operations for branch decompositions that support efficient dynamic programming. We present two concrete applications of our general framework. ∙ An algorithm that for a given n-vertex graph G and integer k in time 22O(k)n2 either constructs a rank decomposition of G of width at most 2k or concludes that the rankwidth of G is more than k. It also yields a (22k+1-1)-approximation algorithm for cliquewidth within the same time complexity, which in turn, improves to f(k)n2 the running times of various algorithms on graphs of cliquewidth k. Breaking the "cubic barrier" for rankwidth and cliquewidth was an open problem in the area. ∙ An algorithm that for a given n-vertex graph G and integer k in time 2O(k)n either constructs a branch decomposition of G of width at most 2k or concludes that the branchwidth of G is more than k. This improves over the 3-approximation that follows from the recent treewidth 2-approximation of Korhonen [FOCS 2021]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coverings of convex bodies have emerged as a central component in the design of efficient solutions to approximation problems involving convex bodies. Intuitively, given a convex body K and ϵ>0, a covering is a collection of convex bodies whose union covers K such that a constant factor expansion of each body lies within an ϵ expansion of K. Coverings have been employed in many applications, such as approximations for diameter, width, and ϵ-kernels of point sets, approximate nearest neighbor searching, polytope approximations, and approximations to the Closest Vector Problem (CVP). It is known how to construct coverings of size nO(n)/ϵ(n-1)/2 for general convex bodies in Rn. In special cases, such as when the convex body is the ℓp unit ball, this bound has been improved to 2O(n)/ϵ(n-1)/2. This raises the question of whether such a bound generally holds. In this paper we answer the question in the affirmative. We demonstrate the power and versatility of our coverings by applying them to the problem of approximating a convex body by a polytope, under the Banach-Mazur metric. Given a well-centered convex body K and an approximation parameter ϵ>0, we show that there exists a polytope P consisting of 2O(n)/ϵ(n-1)/2 vertices (facets) such that K⊂P⊂K(1+ϵ). This bound is optimal in the worst case up to factors of 2O(n). As an additional consequence, we obtain the fastest (1+ϵ)-approximate CVP algorithm that works in any norm, with a running time of 2O(n)/ϵ(n-1)/2 up to polynomial factors in the input size, and we obtain the fastest (1+ϵ)-approximation algorithm for integer programming. We also present a framework for constructing coverings of optimal size for any convex body (up to factors of 2O(n)). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider the following node-capacitated network design problem. The input is an undirected graph, a set of demands, uniform node capacity, and arbitrary node costs. The goal is to find a minimum node-cost subgraph that supports all demands concurrently subject to the node capacities. We consider both single- and multicommodity demands and provide the first polylogarithmic approximation guarantees. For single-commodity demands (i.e., all request pairs have the same sink node), we obtain an O(log²n) approximation to the cost with an O(log³n) factor violation in node capacities. For multicommodity demands, we obtain an O(log4n) approximation to the cost with an O(log10n) factor violation in node capacities. We use a variety of techniques, including single-sink confluent flows, low-load set cover, random sampling, and cut-sparsification. We also develop new techniques for clustering multicommodity demands into (nearly) node-disjoint clusters, which may be of independent interest. Moreover, this network design problem has applications to energy-efficient virtual circuit routing. In this setting, there is a network of routers that are speed scalable and that may be shut down when idle. We assume the standard model for power: the power consumed by a router with load (speed) s is \sigma + s\alpha, where \sigma is the static power and the exponent \alpha > 1. We obtain the first polylogarithmic approximation algorithms for this problem when speed-scaling occurs on nodes of a network. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We abstract and study reachability preservers, a graph-theoretic primitive that has been implicit in prior work on network design. Given a directed graph G=(V,E) and a set of demand pairs P⊆VxV, a reachability preserver is a sparse subgraph H that preserves reachability between all demand pairs. Our first contribution is a series of extremal bounds on the size of reachability preservers. Our main result states that, for an n-node graph and demand pairs of the form P⊆SxV for a small node subset S, there is always a reachability preserver on O(n+√n/P//S/) edges. We additionally give a lower bound construction demonstrating that this upper bound characterizes the settings in which O(n) size reachability preservers are generally possible, in a large range of parameters. The second contribution of this paper is a new connection between extremal graph sparsification results and classical Steiner Network Design problems. Surprisingly, prior to this work, the osmosis of techniques between these two fields had been superficial. This allows us to improve the state of the art approximation algorithms for the most basic Steiner-type problem in directed graphs from the O(n0.6+ε) of Chlamatac, et al. [Approximating spanners and directed steiner forest: Upper and lower bounds, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2017, pp. 534-443] (n4/7+ε). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the weighted flow-time problem on a single machine, we are given a set of n jobs, where each job has a processing requirement pj, release date rj, and weight wj. The goal is to find a preemptive schedule which minimizes the sum of weighted flow-time of jobs, where the flow-time of a job is the difference between its completion time and its released date. We give the first pseudopolynomial time constant approximation algorithm for this problem. The algorithm also extends directly to the problem of minimizing the lp norm of weighted flow-times. The running time of our algorithm is polynomial in n, the number of jobs, and P, which is the ratio of the largest to the smallest processing requirement of a job. Our algorithm relies on a novel reduction of this problem to a generalization of the multicut problem on trees, which we call the Demand MultiCut problem. Even though we do not give a constant factor approximation algorithm for the Demand MultiCut problem on trees, we show that the specific instances of Demand MultiCut obtained by reduction from weighted flow-time problem instances have more structure in them, and we are able to employ techniques based on dynamic programming. Our dynamic programming algorithm relies on showing that there are near optimal solutions which have nice smoothness properties, and we exploit these properties to reduce the size of the dynamic programming table. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Among various variants of the traveling salesman problem (TSP), the s-t-path graph TSP has the special feature that we know the exact integrality ratio, 3 2, and an approximation algorithm matching this ratio. In this paper, we go below this threshold: we devise a polynomialtime algorithm for the s-t-path graph TSP with approximation ratio 1.497. Our algorithm can be viewed as a refinement of the 3 2 -approximation algorithm in [A. SebH o and J. Vygen, Combinatorica, 34 (2014), pp. 597--629], but we introduce several completely new techniques. These include a new type of ear-decomposition, an enhanced ear induction that reveals a novel connection to matroid union, a stronger lower bound, and a reduction of general instances to instances in which s and t have small distance (which works for general metrics). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the dynamic minimum set cover problem, the challenge is to minimize the update time while guaranteeing a close-to-optimal min\{ O(log n), f\} approximation factor. (Throughout, n, m, f, and C are parameters denoting the maximum number of elements, the number of sets, the frequency, and the cost range.) In the high-frequency range, when f = \Omega (log n), this was achieved by a deterministic O(log n)-approximation algorithm with O(f log n) amortized update time by Gupta et al. [Online and dynamic algorithms for set cover, in Proceedings STOC 2017, ACM, pp. 537--550]. In this paper we consider the low-frequency range, when f =O(log n), and obtain deterministic algorithms with a (1 + \epsilon)f-approximation ratio and the following guarantees on the update time. (1) O((f/\epsilon) \cdot log(Cn)) amortized update time: Prior to our work, the best approximation ratio guaranteed by deterministic algorithms was O(f2) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Italiano [Design of dynamic algorithms via primal-dual method, in Proceedings ICALP 2015, Springer, pp. 206--218]. In contrast, the only result with O(f)-approximation was that of Abboud et al. [Dynamic set cover: Improved algorithms and lower bounds, in Proceedings STOC 2019, ACM, pp. 114--125], who designed a randomized (1+\epsilon)f-approximation algorithm with O((f2/\epsilon) \cdot log n) amortized update time. (2) O \bigl(f2/\epsilon 3 + (f/\epsilon 2) \cdot logC \bigr) amortized update time: This result improves the above update time bound for most values of f in the low-frequency range, i.e., f =o(log n). It is also the first result that is independent of m and n. It subsumes the constant amortized update time of Bhattacharya and Kulkarni [Deterministically maintaining a (2 + \epsilon)-approximate minimum vertex cover in O(1/\epsilon 2) amortized update time, in Proceedings SODA 2019, SIAM, pp. 1872--1885] for unweighted dynamic vertex cover (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1). (3) O((f/\epsilon 3) \cdot log2(Cn)) worst-case update time: No nontrivial worst-case update time was previously known for the dynamic set cover problem. Our bound subsumes and improves by a logarithmic factor the O(log3 n/\sansp \sanso \sansl \sansy (\epsilon)) worst-case update time for the unweighted dynamic vertex cover problem (i.e., when f = 2 and C = 1) of Bhattacharya, Henzinger, and Nanongkai [Fully dynamic approximate maximum matching and minimum vertex cover in O(log3)n worst case update time, in Proceedings SODA 2017, SIAM, pp. 470--489]. We achieve our results via the primal-dual approach, by maintaining a fractional packing solution as a dual certificate. Prior work in dynamic algorithms that employs the primal-dual approach uses a local update scheme that maintains relaxed complementary slackness conditions for every set. For our first result we use instead a global update scheme that does not always maintain complementary slackness conditions. For our second result we combine the global and the local update schema. To achieve our third result we use a hierarchy of background schedulers. It is an interesting open question whether this background scheduler technique can also be used to transform algorithms with amortized running time bounds into algorithms with worst-case running time bounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern applications of graph algorithms often involve the use of the output sets (usually, a subset of edges or vertices of the input graph) as inputs to other algorithms. Since the input graphs of interest are large and dynamic, it is desirable for an algorithm's output to not change drastically when a few random edges are removed from the input graph, so as to prevent issues in postprocessing. Alternately, having such a guarantee also means that one can revise the solution obtained by running the algorithm on the original graph in just a few places in order to obtain a solution for the new graph. We formalize this feature by introducing the notion of average sensitivity of graph algorithms, which is the average earth mover's distance between the output distributions of an algorithm on a graph and its subgraph obtained by removing an edge, where the average is over the edges removed and the distance between two outputs is the Hamming distance. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of average sensitivity of graph algorithms. After deriving basic properties of average sensitivity such as composition, we provide efficient approximation algorithms with low average sensitivities for concrete graph problems, including the minimum spanning forest problem, the global minimum cut problem, the minimum s-t cut problem, and the maximum matching problem. In addition, we prove that the average sensitivity of our global minimum cut algorithm is almost optimal, by showing a nearly matching lower bound. We also show that every algorithm for the 2-coloring problem has average sensitivity linear in the number of vertices. One of the main ideas involved in designing our algorithms with low average sensitivity is the following fact: if the presence of a vertex or an edge in the solution output by an algorithm can be decided locally, then the algorithm has a low average sensitivity, allowing us to reuse the analyses of known subline artime algorithms and local computation algorithms. Using this fact in conjunction with our average sensitivity lower bound for 2-coloring, we show that every local computation algorithm for 2-coloring has query complexity linear in the number of vertices, thereby answering an open question. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The basic goal of survivable network design is to build a cheap network that maintains the connectivity between given sets of nodes despite the failure of a few edges/nodes. The connectivity augmentation problem (CAP) is arguably one of the most basic problems in this area: given a k(-edge)-connected graph G and a set of extra edges (links), select a minimum cardinality subset A of links such that adding A to G increases its edge connectivity to k+1. Intuitively, one wants to make an existing network more reliable by augmenting it with extra edges. The best known approximation factor for this NP-hard problem is 2, and this can be achieved with multiple approaches (the first such result is in [G. N. Frederickson and J\'aj\'a, SIAM J. Comput., 10 (1981), pp. 270--283]. It is known [E. A. Dinitz, A. V. Karzanov, and M. V. Lomonosov, Studies in Discrete Optimization, Nauka, Moscow, 1976, pp. 290--306] that CAP can be reduced to the case k = 1, also known as the tree augmentation problem (TAP) for odd k, and to the case k = 2, also known as the cactus augmentation problem (CacAP) for even k. Prior to the conference version of this paper [J. Byrka, F. Grandoni, and A. Jabal Ameli, STOC'20, ACM, New York, 2020, pp. 815--825], several better than 2 approximation algorithms were known for TAP, culminating with a recent 1.458 approximation [F. Grandoni, C. Kalaitzis, and R. Zenklusen, STOC'18, ACM, New York, 1918, pp. 632--645]. However, for CacAP the best known approximation was 2. In this paper we breach the 2 approximation barrier for CacAP, hence, for CAP, by presenting a polynomial-time 2 ln(4) 967 1120 + \varepsilon < 1.91 approximation. From a technical point of view, our approach deviates quite substantially from previous work. In particular, the better-than-2 approximation algorithms for TAP either exploit greedy-style algorithms or are based on rounding carefully designed LPs. We instead use a reduction to the Steiner tree problem which was previously used in parameterized algorithms [Basavaraju et al., ICALP'14, Springer, Berlin, 2014, pp. 800--811]. This reduction is not approximation preserving, and using the current best approximation factor for a Steiner tree [Byrka et al., J. ACM, 60 (2013), 6] as a black box would not be good enough to improve on 2. To achieve the latter goal, we "open the box" and exploit the specific properties of the instances of a Steiner tree arising from CacAP. In our opinion this connection between approximation algorithms for survivable network design and Steiner-type problems is interesting, and might lead to other results in the area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the Generalized Min Sum Set Cover (GMSSC) problem, wherein given a collection of hyperedges E with arbitrary covering requirements { ke Z + : e Ⲉ E}, the goal is to find an ordering of the vertices to minimize the total cover time of the hyperedges; a hyperedge e is considered covered by the first time when ke and many of its vertices appear in the ordering. We give a 4.642 approximation algorithm for GMSSC, coming close to the best possible bound of 4, already for the classical special case (with all ke = 1) of Min Sum Set Cover (MSSC) studied by Feige, Lovász, and Tetali, and improving upon the previous best known bound of 12.4 due to Im, Sviridenko, and van der Zwaan. Our algorithm is based on transforming the LP solution by a suitable kernel and applying randomized rounding. As part of the analysis of our algorithm, we also derive an inequality on the lower tail of a sum of independent Bernoulli random variables, which might be of independent interest and broader utility. Min Sum Vertex Cover (MSVC) is a well-known special case of MSSC in which the input hypergraph is a graph (i.e., | e| = 2) and ke = 1 for every edge e E. We give a 16/9 ≃ 1.778 approximation for MSVC and show a matching integrality gap for the natural LP relaxation. This improves upon the previous best 1.999946 approximation of Barenholz, Feige, and Peleg. Finally, we revisit MSSC and consider the lp norm of cover-time of the hyperedges. Using a dual fitting argument, we show that the natural greedy algorithm achieves tight, up to NP-hardness, approximation guarantees of (p + 1)1+1/p for all p ≥ 1, giving another proof of the result of Golovin, Gupta, Kumar, and Tangwongsan, and showing its tightness up to NP-hardness. For p = 1, this gives yet another proof of the 4 approximation for MSSC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the directed Steiner tree (DST) problem, we are given an n-vertex directed edgeweighted graph, a root r, and a collection of k terminal nodes. Our goal is to find a minimum-cost subgraph that contains a directed path from r to every terminal. We present an O(log² k/ log log k)- approximation algorithm for DST that runs in quasi-polynomial time, i.e., in time n poly log(k) . By assuming the projection game conjecture and NP ¢n0<ε<1 ZPTIME(2nε ) and adjusting the parameters in the hardness result of [Halperin and Krauthgamer, Polylogarithmic inapproximability, in Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2003, pp. 585--594], we show the matching lower bound of Ω (log² k/ log log k) for the class of quasi-polynomial time algorithms, meaning that our approximation ratio is asymptotically the best possible. Our algorithm is proceeded by reducing DST to an intermediate problem, namely, the group Steiner tree on trees with dependency constraint problem, which we approximate using the framework developed by [Rothvo{\ss}, Directed Steiner Tree and the Lasserre Hierarchy, preprint, arxiv:1111.5473, 2011] and [Friggstad et al., Linear programming hierarchies suffice for directed Steiner tree, in Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, 2014, pp. 285--296]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract. In the distributed all-pairs shortest paths problem, every node in the weighted undirected distributed network (the CONGEST model) needs to know the distance from every other node using least number of communication rounds (typically called time complexity). The problem admits a (1 + (1))-approximation 9(n)-time algorithm and a nearly tight 12(n) lower bound [D. Nanongkai, STOC'14, ACM, New York, 2014, pp. 565-573; C. Lenzen and B. Patt-Shamir, PODC'15, ACM, New York, 2015, pp. 153-162]. (9, 0 and n hide polylogarithmic factors. Note that the lower bounds also hold even in the unweighted case and in the weighted case with polynomial approximation ratios (C. Lenzen and D. Peleg, PODC, ACM, New York, 2013, pp. 375-382; S. Holzer and R. Wattenofer, PODC, ACM, New York, 2012, pp. 355-364; D. Peleg, L. Roditty, and E. Tal, ICALP, Springer, Berlin, 2012, pp. 660-672; D. Nanongkai, STOC, ACM, New York, 2014, pp. 565-573-672). For the exact case, Elkin [STOC'17, ACM, New York, 2017, pp. 757-790] presented an 0(n5/3 log2/3 n) time bound, which was later improved to O(n5/4) [C.-C. Huang, D. Nanongkai, T. Saranurak, FOCS'17, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2017, pp. 168-179]. It was shown that any superlinear lower bound (in n) requires a new technique [K. Censor-Hillel, S. Khoury, A. Paz, DISC'17, LIPIcs Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform., Vol. 91, Schloss-Dagstuhl, Wadern, Germany, 2017, 10], but otherwise it remained widely open whether there exists a O(n)-time algorithm for the exact case, which would match the best possible approximation algorithm. This paper resolves this question positively: we present a randomized (Las Vegas) 0(n)-time algorithm, matching the lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors. Like the previous 0(n5/4) bound, our result works for directed graphs with zero (and even negative) edge weights. In addition to the improved running time, our algorithm works in a more general setting than that required by the previous 0(n5/4) bound; in our setting (i) the communication is only along edge directions (as opposed to bidirectional), and (ii) edge weights are arbitrary (as opposed to integers in {1, 2, ..., poly(n)}). As far as we know, ours is the first o(n²) algorithm that only requires unidirectional communication. For arbitrary weights, the previous state-of-the-art required 0(n4/3) time [U. Agarwal and V. Ramachandran, IPDPS 2019, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 2019, and SPAA 2020, ACM, New York, 2020, pp. 11-21]. Our algorithm is extremely simple and relies on a new technique called random filtered broadcast. Given any sets of nodes A, B C V and assuming that every b E B knows all distances from nodes in A, and every node v E V knows all distances from nodes in B, we want every v E V to know DistThroughB (a, v) = minbEB dist(a, b) + dist(b, v) for every a E A. Previous works typically solve this problem by broadcasting all knowledge of every b E B, causing superlinear edge congestion and time. We show a randomized algorithm that can reduce edge congestions and thus solve this problem in 0(n) expected time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the problem of computing the p q norm of a matrix A ∈ Rm×n, defined as ∣∣j4∣∣p-g = maxx∈Rn{0}'.||Ax|q/||x|p This problem generalizes the spectral norm of a matrix (p = q = 2) and the Grothendieck problem (p = ∞, q = 1) and has been widely studied in various regimes. When p ≥ q, the problem exhibits a dichotomy: constant factor approximation algorithms are known if 2 ∈ [g,p], and the problem is hard to approximate within almost polynomial factors when 2 [g,p]. The regime when p < q, known as Hypercontractive norms, is particularly significant for various applications but much less well understood. The case with p = 2 and q > 2 was studied by Barak et al. [Proceedings of the 4Ath Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2012, pp. 307--326], who gave subexponential algorithms for a promise version of the problem (which captures small-set expansion) and also proved hardness of approximation results based on the exponential time hypothesis. However, no NP-hardness of approximation is known for these problems for any p < q. We prove the first NP-hardness result (under randomized reductions) for approximating hypercontractive norms. We show that for any 1 < p < q < ∞ with 2 [p, g], ∣∣√4∣∣p--q is hard to approximate within 2°(log n)1-x) assuming NP g BPTIME(21log n A-). En rθute to the above result, we also prove almost tight results for the case when p > q with 2 ∈ [q, p]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Graph sparsification underlies a large number of algorithms, ranging from approximation algorithms for cut problems to solvers for linear systems in the graph Laplacian. In its strongest form, "spectral sparsification" reduces the number of edges to near-linear in the number of nodes, while approximately preserving the cut and spectral structure of the graph. In this work we demonstrate a polynomial quantum speedup for spectral sparsification and many of its applications. In particular, we give a quantum algorithm that, given a weighted graph with n nodes and m edges, outputs a classical description of an ϵ-spectral sparsifier in sublinear time Õ(√mn/ϵ). This contrasts with the optimal classical complexity Õ(m). We also prove that our quantum algorithm is optimal up to polylog-factors. The algorithm builds on a string of existing results on sparsification, graph spanners, quantum algorithms for shortest paths, and efficient constructions for k-wise independent random strings. Our algorithm implies a quantum speedup for solving Laplacian systems and for approximating a range of cut problems such as min cut and sparsest cut. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Longest common subsequence (LCS) is one of the most fundamental problems in combinatorial optimization. Apart from theoretical importance, LCS has enormous applications in bioinformatics, revision control systems, and data comparison programs. Although a simple dynamic program computes LCS in quadratic time, it has been recently proven that the problem admits a conditional lower bound and may not be solved in truly subquadratic time [2, 18]. In addition to this, LCS is notoriously hard with respect to approximation algorithms. Apart from a trivial sampling technique that obtains an nx approximation solution in time O(n2-2x) nothing else is known for LCS. This is in sharp contrast to its dual problem edit distance, for which several linear time solutions were obtained in the past two decades [5, 6, 10, 11, 19]. In this work, we present the first nontrivial algorithm for approximating LCS in linear time. Our main result is a linear time algorithm for the LCS which has an approximation factor of O(n0.4991319) in expectation. This beats the √n barrier for approximating LCS in linear time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider two generalizations of the classical weighted paging problem that incorporate the notion of delayed service of page requests. The first is the (weighted) paging with time windows (PageTW) problem, which is like the classical weighted paging problem except that each page request only needs to be served before a given deadline. This problem arises in many practical applications of online caching, such as the "deadline"" I/O scheduler in the Linux kernel and video-on-demand streaming. The second, and more general, problem is the (weighted) paging with delay (PageD) problem, where the delay in serving a page request results in a penalty being added to the objective. This problem generalizes the caching problem to allow delayed service, a line of work that has recently gained traction in online algorithms (e.g., [Y. Emek, S. Kutten, and R. Wattenhofer, Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2016, pp. 333--344; Y. Azar et al., Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2017, pp. 551--563; Y. Azar and N. Touitou, Proceedings of the 60th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2019, pp. 60--71]). We give O(log k log n)-competitive algorithms for both the PageTW and PageD problems on n pages with a cache of size k. This significantly improves on the previous best bounds of O(k) for both problems [Y. Azar et al., Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2017, pp. 551--563]. We also consider the offline PageTW and PageD problems, for which we give O(1)-approximation algorithms and prove APX-hardness. These are the first results for the offline problems; even NP-hardness was not known before our work. At the heart of our algorithms is a novel "hitting-set"" LP relaxation of the PageTW problem that overcomes the\Omega (k) integrality gap of the natural LP for the problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of an LP-based algorithm for an online problem with delays/deadlines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Horn functions form an important subclass of Boolean functions and appear in many different areas of computer science and mathematics as a general tool to describe implications and dependencies. Finding minimum sized representations for such functions with respect to most commonly used measures is a computationally hard problem admitting a 2log1-o(1) n inapproximability bound. In this paper we consider the natural class of key Horn functions representing keys of relational databases. For this class, the minimization problems for most measures remain NP-hard. In this paper we provide logarithmic factor approximation algorithms for key Horn functions with respect to all such measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We revisit the constant-factor approximation algorithm for the asymmetric traveling salesman problem by Svensson, Tarnawski, and V\'egh [J. ACM, 67 (2020), 37]. We improve on each part of this algorithm. We avoid the reduction to irreducible instances and thus obtain a simpler and much better reduction to vertebrate pairs. We also show that a slight variant of their algorithm for vertebrate pairs has a much smaller approximation ratio. Overall we improve the approximation ratio from 506 to 22 + ε for any ε > 0. This also improves the upper bound on the integrality ratio from 319 to 22. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We give a polynomial time approximation scheme for the weighted traveling re- pairman problem (TRP) in the Euclidean plane, on trees, and on planar graphs. This improves upon the quasi-polynomial time approximation schemes for the unweighted TRP in the Euclidean plane and trees and on the 3.59-approximation for planar graphs. The algorithms are based on a new decomposition technique that reduces the approximation of weighted TRP to instances for which we may restrict ourselves to solutions that are the concatenation of only a constant number of traveling salesman problem paths. A similar reduction applies to many other problems with an average completion time objective. To illustrate the strength of this approach, we apply the same technique to the well-studied scheduling problem of minimizing total weighted completion time under precedence constraints, 1/prec/∑wjCj, and present a polynomial time approximation scheme for the case of interval order precedence constraints. This improves on the known 3/2-approximation for this problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The characterization of all the constraint satisfaction problems solvable by local consistency checking (also known as CSPs of bounded width) was proposed by Feder and Vardi [SIAM J. Comput., 28 (1998), pp. 57104]. It was confirmed by two independent proofs by Bulatov [Bounded Relational Width, manuscript, 2009] and Barto and Kozik [L. Barto and M. Kozik, 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2009, pp. 595 603], [L. Barto and M. Kozik, J. ACM, 61 (2014), 3]. Later Barto [J. Logic Comput., 26 (2014), pp. 923 943] proved a collapse of the hierarchy of local consistency notions by showing that (2; 3) minimality solves all the CSPs of bounded width. In this paper we present a new consistency notion, jpq consistency, which also solves all the CSPs of bounded width. Our notion is strictly weaker than (2; 3) consistency, (2; 3) minimality, path consistency, and singleton arc consistency (SAC). This last fact allows us to answer the question of Chen, Dalmau, and Gruien [J. Logic Comput., 23 (2013), pp. 87 108] by confirming that SAC solves all the CSPs of bounded width. Moreover, as known algorithms work faster for SAC, the result implies that CSPs of bounded width can be, in practice, solved more efficiently. The definition of jpq consistency is closely related to a consistency condition obtained from the rounding of an SDP relaxation of a CSP instance. In fact, the main result of this paper is used by Dalmau et al. [Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, ACM, New York, 2017, pp. 340{357] to show that CSPs with near unanimity polymorphisms admit robust approximation algorithms with polynomial loss. Finally, an algebraic characterization of some term conditions satisfied in algebras associated with templates of bounded width, first proved by Brady, is a direct consequence of our result. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Among the most important graph parameters is the diameter, the largest distance between any two vertices. There are no known very efficient algorithms for computing the diameter exactly. Thus, much research has been devoted to how fast this parameter can be approximated. Chechik et al. [Proceedings of SODA 2014, Portland, OR, 2014, pp. 1041-1052] showed that the diameter can be approximated within a multiplicative factor of 3/2 in ~(m3/2) time. Furthermore, Roditty and Vassilevska W. [Proceedings of STOC '13, New York, ACM, 2013, pp. 515-524] showed that unless the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH) fails, no O(n2\varepsilon) time algorithm can achieve an approximation factor better than 3/2 in sparse graphs. Thus the above algorithm is essentially optimal for sparse graphs for approximation factors less than 3/2. It was, however, completely plausible that a 3/2-approximation is possible in linear time. In this work we conditionally rule out such a possibility by showing that unless SETH fails no O(m3/2\varepsilon) time algorithm can achieve an approximation factor better than 5/3. Another fundamental set of graph parameters is the eccentricities. The eccentricity of a vertex v is the distance between v and the farthest vertex from v. Chechik et al. [Proceedings of SODA 2014, Portland, OR, 2014, pp. 1041-1052] showed that the eccentricities of all vertices can be approximated within a factor of 5/3 in ~ (m3/2) time and Abboud, Vassilevska W., and Wang [Proceedings of SODA 2016, Arlington, VA, 2016, pp. 377-391] showed that no O(n2\varepsilon) algorithm can achieve better than 5/3 approximation in sparse graphs. We show that the runtime of the 5/3 approximation algorithm is also optimal by proving that under SETH, there is no O(m3/2\varepsilon) algorithm that achieves a better than 9/5 approximation. We also show that no near-linear time algorithm can achieve a better than 2 approximation for the eccentricities. This is the first lower bound in fine-grained complexity that addresses near-linear time computation. We show that our lower bound for near-linear time algorithms is essentially tight by giving an algorithm that approximates eccentricities within a 2 + \delta factor in ~(m/\delta) time for any 0 < \delta < 1. This beats all eccentricity algorithms in Cairo, Grossi, and Rizzi [Proceedings of SODA 2016, Arlington, VA, 2016, pp. 363-376] and is the first constant factor approximation for eccentricities in directed graphs. To establish the above lower bounds we study the S-T diameter problem: Given a graph and two subsets S and T of vertices, output the largest distance between a vertex in S and a vertex in T. We give new algorithms and show tight lower bounds that serve as a starting point for all other hardness results. Our lower bounds apply only to sparse graphs. We show that for dense graphs, there are near-linear time algorithms for S-T diameter, diameter, and eccentricities, with almost the same approximation guarantees as their ~(m3/2) counterparts, improving upon the best known algorithms for dense graphs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We address the fundamental network design problem of constructing approximate minimum spanners. Our contributions are for the distributed setting, providing both algorithmic and hardness results. Our main hardness result shows that an ∝-approximation for the minimum directed k-spanner problem for k ≥ 5 requires Ω(n/√∝ logn) rounds using deterministic algorithms or Ω(√n/√∝ logn) rounds using randomized ones, in the Congest model of distributed computing. Combined with the constant-round O(nε)-approximation algorithm in the Local model of [L. Barenboim, M. Elkin, and C. Gavoille, Theoret. Comput. Sci., 751 (2016), pp. 2-23], as well as a polylog-round (1 + ε)-approximation algorithm in the Local model that we show here, our lower bounds for the Congest model imply a strict separation between the Local and Congest models. Notably, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first separation between these models for a local approximation problem. Similarly, a separation between the directed and undirected cases is implied. We also prove hardness results for weighted k-spanners and for unweighted undirected k-spanners for k ≥ 4 in the Congest model. In addition, we show lower bounds for the minimum weighted 2-spanner problem in the Congest and Local models. On the algorithmic side, apart from the aforementioned (1+ε)-approximation algorithm for minimum k-spanners, our main contribution is a new distributed construction of minimum 2-spanners that uses only polynomial local computations. Our algorithm has a guaranteed approximation ratio of O(log(m/n)) for a graph with n vertices and m edges, which matches the best known ratio for polynomial-time sequential algorithms [G. Kortsarz and D. Peleg, J. Algorithms, 17 (1994), pp. 222-236], and is tight if we restrict ourselves to polynomial local computations. An algorithm with this approximation factor was not previously known for the distributed setting. The number of rounds required for our algorithm is O(log n log Δ) with high probability, where Δ is the maximum degree in the graph. Our approach allows us to extend our algorithm to work also for the directed, weighted, and client-server variants of the problem. It also provides a Congest algorithm for the minimum dominating set problem, with a guaranteed O(log Δ) approximation ratio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We resolve the space complexity of single-pass streaming algorithms for approximating the classic set cover problem. For finding an α-approximate set cover (for any α = o(√n/log n)) using a single-pass streaming algorithm, we show that Θ(mn/α) space is both sufficient and necessary (up to an O(log n) factor); here m denotes the number of sets and n denotes the size of the universe. This provides a strong negative answer to the open question posed by Har-Peled et al. [Towards tight bounds for the streaming set cover problem, in Proceedings of the 35th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS '16), pp. 371-383] regarding the possibility of having a single-pass algorithm with a small approximation factor that uses sublinear space. We further study the problem of estimating the size of a minimum set cover (as opposed to finding the actual sets) and establish that an additional factor of α savings in the space is achievable in this case and is the best possible. In other words, we show that Θ(mn/α²) space is both sufficient and necessary (up to logarithmic factors) for estimating the size of a minimum set cover to within a factor of α. Our algorithm, in fact, works for the more general problem of estimating the optimal value of a covering integer program. On the other hand, our lower bound holds even for set cover instances, where the sets are presented in a random order. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a classical problem in scheduling, one has n unit size jobs with a precedence order and the goal is to find a schedule of those jobs on m identical machines as to minimize the makespan. It is one of the remaining four open problems from the book of Garey & Johnson whether or not this problem is NP-hard for m=3. We prove that for any fixed ε and m, an LP-hierarchy lift of the time-index LP with a slightly super poly-logarithmic number of r = (log(n))Θ(loglogn) rounds provides a (1 + ε)-approximation. For example Sherali-Adams suffices as hierarchy. This implies an algorithm that yields a (1+ε)-approximation in time nO(r). The previously best approximation algorithms guarantee a 2 - 7/3m+1-approximation in polynomial time for m ≥ 4 and 4/3 for m=3. Our algorithm is based on a recursive scheduling approach where in each step we reduce the correlation in form of long chains. Our method adds to the rather short list of examples where hierarchies are actually useful to obtain better approximation algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider the problem of scheduling jobs on unrelated machines so as to minimize the sum of weighted completion times. Our main result is a (3/2 c)-approximation algorithm for some fixed c > 0, improving upon the long-standing bound of 3/2. To do this, we first introduce a new lift-and-project-based SDP relaxation for the problem. This is necessary, as the previous convex programming relaxations have an integrality gap of 3/2. Second, we give a new general bipartiterounding procedure that produces an assignment with certain strong negative correlation properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Persuasion, defined as the act of exploiting an informational advantage in order to inuence the decisions of others, is ubiquitous. Indeed, persuasive communication has been estimated to account for almost a third of all economic activity in the U.S. This paper examines persuasion through a computational lens, focusing on what is perhaps the most basic and fundamental model in this space: the celebrated Bayesian persuasion model of Kamenica and Gentzkow [Am. Econ. Rev., 101 (2011), pp. 2590-2615]. Here there are two players, a sender and a receiver. The receiver must take one of a number of actions with an a priori unknown payoff, and the sender has access to additional information regarding the payoffs of the various actions for both players. The sender can commit to revealing a noisy signal regarding the realization of the payoffs of various actions, and would like to do so to maximize her own payoff in expectation assuming that the receiver rationally acts to maximize his own payoff. When the payoffs of various actions follow a joint distribution (the common prior), the sender's problem is nontrivial, and its computational complexity depends on the representation of this prior. We examine the sender's optimization task in three of the most natural input models for this problem, and essentially pin down its computational complexity in each. When the payoff distributions of the different actions are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) and given explicitly, we exhibit a polynomial-time (exact) algorithmic solution, and a "simple" (1-1=e)-approximation algorithm. Our optimal scheme for the i.i.d. setting involves an analogy to auction theory, and makes use of Border's characterization of the space of reduced-forms for single-item auctions. When action payoffs are independent but nonidentical with marginal distributions given explicitly, we show that it is #P-hard to compute the optimal expected sender utility. In doing so, we rule out a generalized Border's theorem, in the sense of Gopalan, Nisan, and Roughgarden [Public projects, boolean functions, and the borders of Border's theorem, in Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC '15, ACM, New York, 2015, p. 395], for this setting. Finally, we consider a general (possibly correlated) joint distribution of action payoffs presented by a black box sampling oracle, and exhibit a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) with a bicriteria guarantee. Our FPTAS is based on Monte Carlo sampling, and its analysis relies on the principle of deferred decisions. Moreover, we show that this result is the best possible in the black-box model for information-theoretic reasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study a central problem in algorithmic mechanism design: constructing truthful mechanisms for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. Dobzinski, Nisan, and Schapira provided the first mechanism that guarantees a nontrivial approximation ratio of O(log²m) [STOC'06, ACM, New York, 2006, pp. 644-652], where m is the number of items. This approximation ratio was subsequently improved to O(logmlog logm) [S. Dobzinski, APPROX'07, Springer, Berlin, 2007, pp. 89-103] and then to O(logm) [P. Krysta and B. Vöcking, ICALP'12, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 636-647]. In this paper we develop the first mechanism that breaks the logarithmic barrier. Specifically, the mechanism provides an approximation ratio of O(√logm). Similarly to previous constructions, our mechanism uses polynomially many value and demand queries and, in fact, provides the same approximation ratio for the larger class of XOS (also known as fractionally subadditive) valuations. We also develop a computationally efficient implementation of the mechanism for combinatorial auctions with budget additive bidders. Although, in general, computing a demand query is NP-hard for budget additive valuations, we observe that the specific form of demand queries that our mechanism uses can be efficiently computed when bidders are budget additive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An overarching issue in resource management of wireless networks is assessing their capacity: How much communication can be achieved in a network, utilizing all the tools available: power control, scheduling, routing, channel assignment, and rate adjustment? We propose the first framework for approximation algorithms in the physical model of wireless interference that addresses these questions in full in interference-limited networks. The approximations obtained are at most doubly logarithmic in the link length and rate diversity. Where previous bounds are known, this gives an exponential improvement or better. The key insight is the discovery that a properly chosen power assignment infers a form of locality, or tolerance to the interference of both shorter and longer communication links. This allows us to simplify the complex interference relationship of the physical model into a new form of conflict graphs, at a small cost. We also show that the approximation obtained is provably the best possible for any conflict graph formulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For an undirected edge-weighted graph G and a set R of pairs of vertices called pairs of terminals, a multicut is a set of edges such that removing these edges from G disconnects each pair in R. We provide an algorithm computing a (1 + ε)-approximation of the minimum multicut of a graph G in time (g + t)(O(g+t)3) · (1/ε)ο(g=+t) ·n log n, where g is the genus of G and t is the number of terminals. This is tight in several aspects, as the minimum multicut problem is both APX-hard and W[1]-hard (parameterized by the number of terminals), even on planar graphs (equivalently, when g = 0). Our result, in the field of fixed-parameter approximation algorithms, mostly relies on concepts borrowed from computational topology of graphs on surfaces. In particular, we use and extend various recent techniques concerning homotopy, homology, and covering spaces. Interestingly, such topological techniques seem necessary even for the planar case. We also exploit classical ideas stemming from approximation schemes for planar graphs and low-dimensional geometric inputs. A key insight toward our result is a novel characterization of a minimum multicut as the union of some Steiner trees in the universal cover of the surface in which G is embedded. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several fundamental problems that arise in optimization and computer science can be cast as follows: Given vectors v1, . . ., vm È Rd and a constraint family B \subseteq 2[m], find a set S ÈB that maximizes the squared volume of the simplex spanned by the vectors in S. A motivating example is the ubiquitous data-summarization problem in machine learning and information retrieval where one is given a collection of feature vectors that represent data such as documents or images. The volume of a collection of vectors is used as a measure of their diversity, and partition or matroid constraints over [m] are imposed in order to ensure resource or fairness constraints. Even with a simple cardinality constraint (B = ([m] r), the problem becomes NP-hard and has received much attention starting with a result by Khachiyan [J. Complexity, 11 (1995) pp. 138--153] who gave an rO(r) approximation algorithm for a special case of this problem. Recently, Nikolov and Singh [Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2016, pp. 192-- 201] presented a convex program and showed how it can be used to estimate the value of the most diverse set when there are multiple cardinality constraints (i.e., when \scrB corresponds to a partition matroid). Their proof of the integrality gap of the convex program relied on an inequality by Gurvits [Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, 2006, pp. 417--426], and was recently extended to regular matroids [Straszak and Vishnoi, Proceedings of the Forty-ninth ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2017, pp. 370--383] and [Anaris and Gharan, Proceedings of the Forty-ninth Annual SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2017, pp. 384--396] and general matroids [Anari, Gharan, and Vinzant, Proceedings of the Fifty-ninth IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2018, pp. 35-- 46]. The question of whether these estimation algorithms can be converted into the more useful approximation algorithms--that also output a set--remained open. The main contribution of this paper is to give the first approximation algorithms for both partition and regular matroids. We present novel formulations for the subdeterminant maximization problem, for these matroids; this reduces them to the problem of finding a point that maximizes the absolute value of a nonconvex function over a Cartesian product of probability simplices. The technical core of our results is a new anti-concentration inequality for dependent random variables that arise from these functions, which allows us to relate the optimal value of these nonconvex functions to their value at a random point. Unlike prior work on the constrained subdeterminant maximization problem, our proofs do not rely on real-stability or convexity and could be of independent interest both in algorithms and complexity where anti-concentration phenomena have recently been deployed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study approximation algorithms for problems of scheduling precedence constrained jobs with the objective of minimizing total weighted completion time, in identical and related machine models. We give algorithms that improve upon many previous 15- to 20-year-old state-of-the-art results. A major theme in these results is the use of time-indexed linear programming relaxations, which are quite natural for their respective problems. We also consider the scheduling problem of minimizing total weighted completion time on unrelated machines. The recent breakthrough result of [N. Bansal, A. Srinivasan, and O. Svensson, in Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM, 2016, pp. 156-167] gave a (1.5 c)-approximation for the problem, based on a two-round lift-and-project of the SDP relaxation for the problem. Our main result is that a (1.5 c)-approximation can also be achieved using a natural and considerably simpler time-indexed linear programming relaxation for the problem. We hope this relaxation can provide new insights into the problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe approximation algorithms in Linial's classic LOCAL model of distributed computing to find maximum-weight matchings in a hypergraph of rank r. Our main result is a deterministic algorithm to generate a matching which is an O(r)-approximation to the maximum weight matching, running in Õ(r log Δ + log² Δ + log* n) rounds. (Here, the Õ() notations hides polyloglog Δ and polylog r factors). This is based on a number of new derandomization techniques extending methods of Ghaffari, Harris & Kuhn (2017). The first main application is to nearly-optimal algorithms for the long-studied problem of maximum-weight graph matching. Specifically, we get a (1+ε) approximation algorithm using Õ(log Δ/ε³ + polylog(1/ε, log log n)) randomized time and Õ(log² Δ/ε 4 + log*n/ε) deterministic time. The second application is a faster algorithm for hypergraph maximal matching, a versatile subroutine introduced in Ghaffari et al. (2017) for a variety of local graph algorithms. This gives an algorithm for (2Δ - 1) -edge-list coloring in Õ(log² Δ log n) rounds deterministically or Õ((log log n)³) rounds randomly. Another consequence (with additional optimizations) is an algorithm which generates an edge-orientation with out-degree at most ⌈(1+ε)λ⌉ for a graph of arboricity λ; for fixed ε this runs in Õ(log 6 n) rounds deterministically or Õ(log³ n) rounds randomly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clustering is a classic topic in optimization with k-means being one of the most fundamental such problems. In the absence of any restrictions on the input, the best known algorithm for k-means with a provable guarantee is a simple local search heuristic yielding an approximation guarantee of 9+ϵ, a ratio that is known to be tight with respect to such methods. We overcome this barrier by presenting a new primal-dual approach that allows us to (1) exploit the geometric structure of k-means and (2) to satisfy the hard constraint that at most k clusters are selected without deteriorating the approximation guarantee. Our main result is a 6.357-approximation algorithm with respect to the standard LP relaxation. Our techniques are quite general and we also show improved guarantees for the general version of k-means where the underlying metric is not required to be Euclidean and for k-median in Euclidean metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms. The questions, which have been asked several times, are whether there is a nontrivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the optimal solution. In particular, letting OPT be the optimum and N be the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in t(OPT)poly(N) time and outputs a solution of size f(OPT) for any computable functions t and f that are independent of N (for Clique, we want f (OPT) = omega(1))? In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no nontrivial FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no o(OPT)-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no f (OPT)-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet for any function f. In fact, our results imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis [I. Dinur. ECCC, TR16-128, 2016; P. Manurangsi and P. Raghavendra, preprint, arXiv:1607.02986, 2016], which states that no 2(o(n))-time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable 3 SAT formula and one which is not even (1 - epsilon)-satisfiable for some constant epsilon > 0. Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out nontrivial FPT-approximation for the Maximum Biclique problem, the problem of finding maximum subgraphs with hereditary properties (e.g., Maximum Induced Planar Subgraph), and Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs, and we rule out the k(o(1))-FPT-approximation algorithm for the Densest k-Subgraph problem. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the problem of approximating the number of k-cliques in a graph when given query access to the graph. We consider the standard query model for general graphs via (1) degree queries, (2) neighbor queries and (3) pair queries. Let n denote the number of vertices in the graph, m the number of edges, and Ck the number of k-cliques. We design an algorithm that outputs a (1+ε)-approximation (with high probability) for Ck, whose expected query complexity and running time are .... Hence, the complexity of the algorithm is sublinear in the size of the graph for Ck=ω(mk/2-1). Furthermore, we prove a lower bound showing that the query complexity of our algorithm is essentially optimal (up to the dependence on logn, 1/ε and k). The previous results in this vein are by Feige (SICOMP 06) and by Goldreich and Ron (RSA 08) for edge counting (k=2) and by Eden et al. (FOCS 2015) for triangle counting (k=3). Our result matches the complexities of these results. The previous result by Eden et al. hinges on a certain amortization technique that works only for triangle counting, and does not generalize for larger cliques. We obtain a general algorithm that works for any k≥3 by designing a procedure that samples each k-clique incident to a given set S of vertices with approximately equal probability. The primary difficulty is in finding cliques incident to purely high-degree vertices, since random sampling within neighbors has a low success probability. This is achieved by an algorithm that samples uniform random high degree vertices and a careful tradeoff between estimating cliques incident purely to high-degree vertices and those that include a low-degree vertex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper considers minimizing the lk-norms of flow time on a single machine offline using a preemptive scheduler for k ≥ 1. The objective is ideal for optimizing jobs' overall waiting times while simultaneously being fair to individual jobs. This work gives the first O(1)-approximation for the problem, improving upon the previous best O(log log P)-approximation by Bansal and Pruhs (FOCS 09 and SICOMP 14) where P is the ratio of the maximum job size to the minimum. The main technical ingredient used in this work is a novel combination of quasi-uniform sampling and iterative rounding, which is of interest in its own right. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For any constant d and parameter ε ∈(0, 1/2], we show the existence of (roughly) 1/ εd orderings on the unit cube [0, 1)d such that for any two points p, q ∈ [0, 1)d close together under the Euclidean metric, there is a linear ordering in which all points between p and q in the ordering are ``close"" to p or q. More precisely, the only points that could lie between p and q in the ordering are points with Euclidean distance at most ε ||p - q|| from either p or q. These orderings are extensions of the Z-order, and they can be efficiently computed. Functionally, the orderings can be thought of as a replacement to quadtrees and related structures (like well-separated pair decompositions). We use such orderings to obtain surprisingly simple algorithms for a number of basic problems in lowdimensional computational geometry, including (i) dynamic approximate bichromatic closest pair, (ii) dynamic spanners, (iii) dynamic approximate minimum spanning trees, (iv) static and dynamic fault-tolerant spanners, and (v) approximate nearest neighbor search. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An instance of the constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) is given by a family of constraints on overlapping sets of variables, and the goal is to assign values from a fixed domain to the variables so that all constraints are satisfied. In the optimization version, the goal is to maximize the number of satisfied constraints. An approximation algorithm for a CSP is called robust if it outputs an assignment satisfying an (1 - g(ε))-fraction of constraints on any (1 - ε )- satisfiable instance, where the loss function g is such that g(ε ) \rightarrow 0 as ε \rightarrow 0. We study how the robust approximability of CSPs depends on the set of constraint relations allowed in instances, the so-called constraint language. All constraint languages admitting a robust polynomial-time algorithm (with some g) have been characterized by Barto and Kozik, with the general bound on the loss g being doubly exponential, specifically g(ε ) = O((log log(1/ε ))/ log(1/ε)). It is natural to ask when a better loss can be achieved, in particular polynomial loss g(ε ) = O(ε 1/k) for some constant k. In this paper, we consider CSPs with a constraint language having a near-unanimity polymorphism. This general condition almost matches a known necessary condition for having a robust algorithm with polynomial loss. We give two randomized robust algorithms with polynomial loss for such CSPs: one works for any near-unanimity polymorphism and the parameter k in the loss depends on the size of the domain and the arity of the relations in Γ, while the other works for a special ternary near-unanimity operation called the dual discriminator with k = 2 for any domain size. In the latter case, the CSP is a common generalization of Unique Games with a fixed domain and 2-Sat. In the former case, we use the algebraic approach to the CSP. Both cases use the standard semidefinite programming relaxation for the CSP [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We develop constant-factor approximation algorithms for minimizing the execution time of a coordinated parallel motion plan for a relatively dense swarm of homogeneous robots in the absence of obstacles. In our first model, each robot has a specified start and destination on the square grid, and in each round of coordinated parallel motion, every robot can move to any adjacent position that is either empty or simultaneously being vacated by another robot. In this model, our algorithm achieves constant stretch factor: if every robot starts at distance at most d from its destination, then the total duration of the overall schedule is O(d), which is optimal up to constant factors. Our result holds for distinguished robots (each robot has a specific destination), identical (unlabeled) robots, and most generally, classes of different robot types (where each destination specifies a required type of robot). We also show that finding the optimal coordinated parallel motion plan is NP-hard, justifying approximation algorithms. In our second model, each robot is a unit-radius disk in the plane, and robots can translate continuously in parallel subject to not intersecting, i.e., having disk centers at L2-distance at least 2. We prove the same result--constant-factor approximation algorithm to minimizing execution time via constant stretch factor---when the pairwise L∞ -distance between disk centers is at least 2√ 2 = 2.8284 . . . . On the other hand, for N densely packed disks at distance at most 2 + δ for a sufficiently small δ > 0, we prove that a stretch factor of Ω(N1/4) is sometimes necessary (when densely packed), while a stretch factor of O (N1/2) is always possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Let S be a set of n points on a polyhedral terrain T in R³, and let ε > 0 be a fixed constant. We prove that S admits a (2 + ε)-spanner with O(n log n) edges with respect to the geodesic distance. This is the first spanner with constant spanning ratio and a near-linear number of edges for points on a terrain. On our way to this result, we prove that any set of n weighted points in \BbbR d admits an additively weighted (2 + ε)-spanner with O(n) edges; this improves the previously best known bound on the spanning ratio (which was 5 + ε) and almost matches the lower bound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the restricted case of Scheduling on Unrelated Parallel Machines. In this problem, we are given a set of jobs J with processing times pj and each job may be scheduled only on some subset of machines Sj⊆ M. The goal is to find an assignment of jobs to machines to minimize the time within which all jobs can be processed. In a seminal paper, Lenstra, Shmoys, and Tardos [Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, 1987, pp. 217--224] designed an elegant 2-approximation for the problem. The question of whether approximation algorithms with better guarantees exist for this classic scheduling problem has since remained a source of mystery. In recent years, with the improvement of our understanding of configuration linear programs, it now appears an attainable goal to design such an algorithm. Our main contribution in this paper is to make progress towards this goal. For the so-called (1, ε)-case, when the processing times of jobs are either 1 or ε ∊ (0, 1), we design an approximation algorithm whose guarantee tends to 1+√3/2 ≈ 1.866025 as ε tends to zero. This improves on the 2 ε0 guarantee recently obtained by Chakrabarty, Khanna, and Li [Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2015, pp. 1087--1101] for some constant ε0 > 0. Further, the ideas presented in this paper do not crucially depend on the fact that the instances contain exactly two different job sizes; i.e., they extend also to families of instances more general than the (1, ε)-case. In a certain precise sense, we fall slightly short of improving on the 30-year-old classic algorithm of Lenstra, Shmoys, and Tardos [Proceedings of the 28th Annual IEEE Conference on Foundations of Computer Science, 1987, pp. 217--224] for the restricted case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given n points in the plane, the degree-K spanning-tree problem asks for a spanning tree of minimum weight in which the degree of each vertex is at most K. This paper addresses the problem of computing low-weight degree-K spanning trees for K > 2. It is shown that for an arbitrary collection of n points in the plane, there exists a spanning tree of degree 3 whose weight is at most 1.5 times the weight of a minimum spanning tree. It is shown that there exists a spanning tree of degree 4 whose weight is at most 1.25 times the weight of a minimum spanning tree. These results solve open problems posed by Papadimitriou and Vazirani. Moreover, if a minimum spanning tree is given as part of the input, the trees can be computed in O(n) time. The results are generalized to points in higher dimensions. It is shown that for any d ≥ 3, an arbitrary collection of points in ℛd contains a spanning tree of degree 3 whose weight is at most 5/3 times the weight of a minimum spanning tree. This is the first paper that achieves factors better than 2 for these problems.

The Euler genus of a graph is a fundamental and well-studied parameter in graph theory and topology. Computing it has been shown to be NP-hard by Thomassen [J. Algorithms, 10 (1989), pp. 568{576; J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B, 57 (1993), pp. 196{206], and it is known to be fixed-parameter tractable. However, the approximability of the Euler genus is wide open. While the existence of an O(1)-approximation is not ruled out, only an O( p n)-approximation [J. Chen, S. P. Kanchi, and A. Kanevsky, Inform. Process. Lett., 61 (1997), pp. 317{322] is known even in bounded-degree graphs. In this paper we give a polynomial-time algorithm which, given a boundeddegree graph of Euler genus g, computes a drawing in a surface of Euler genus gO(1) · logO(1) n. Combined with the upper bound from [J. Chen, S. P. Kanchi, and A. Kanevsky, Inform. Process. Lett., 61 (1997), pp. 317{322], our result also implies a O(n1/2-α)-approximation for some constant α > 0. Using our algorithm for approximating the Euler genus as a subroutine, we obtain, in a uniform fashion, algorithms with approximation ratios of the form OPTO(1) · logO(1) n for several related problems on bounded-degree graphs. These include the problems of orientable genus, crossing number, and planar edge and vertex deletion. Our algorithm and proof of correctness for the crossing number problem are simpler compared to the long and difficult proof in the recent breakthrough by Chuzhoy [Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2011, pp. 303{312], while essentially obtaining a qualitatively similar result. For planar edge and vertex deletion problems our results are the first to obtain a bound of the form poly(OPT; log n). We also highlight some further applications of our results in the design of algorithms for graphs with small genus. Many such algorithms require that a drawing of the graph is given as part of the input. Our results imply that in several interesting cases, we can implement such algorithms even when the drawing is unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We achieve a (randomized) polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the Steiner forest problem in doubling metrics. Before our work, a PTAS was given only for the Euclidean plane in [G. Borradaile, P. N. Klein, and C. Mathieu, in FOCS, IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 115--124]. Our PTAS also shares similarities with the dynamic programming for sparse instances used in [Y. Bartal, L. Gottlieb, and R. Krauthgamer, in STOC, ACM, 2012, pp. 663--672] and [T-H. H. Chan and S.-H. Jiang, in SODA, SIAM, 2016, pp. 754--765]. However, extending previous approaches requires overcoming several nontrivial hurdles, and we make the following technical contributions. (1) We prove a technical lemma showing that Steiner points have to be ''near"" the terminals in an optimal Steiner tree. This enables us to define a heuristic to estimate the local behavior of the optimal solution, even though the Steiner points are unknown in advance. This lemma also generalizes previous results in the Euclidean plane and may be of independent interest for related problems involving Steiner points. (2) We develop a novel algorithmic technique known as ''adaptive cells"" to overcome the difficulty of keeping track of multiple components in a solution. Our idea is based on but significantly different from the previously proposed ''uniform cells"" in [G. Borradaile, P. N. Klein, and C. Mathieu, in FOCS, IEEE Computer Society, 2008, pp. 115--124], where techniques cannot be readily applied to doubling metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present the first online algorithms for the nonuniform, multicommodity buy-atbulk (MC-BB) network design problem. Our competitive ratios qualitatively match the best known approximation factors for the corresponding offline problems. In particular, we show (a) a polynomial time online algorithm with a polylogarithmic competitive ratio for the MC-BB problem in undirected edge-weighted graphs, (b) a quasi-polynomial time online algorithm with a polylogarithmic competitive ratio for the MC-BB problem in undirected node-weighted graphs, (c) for any fixed ε > 0, a polynomial time online algorithm with a competitive ratio of Õ(k1/2+ε) (where k is the number ofdemands, and the tilde hides polylog factors) for MC-BB in directed graphs, and (d) algorithmswith matching competitive ratios for the prize-collecting variant of all the preceding problems. Priorto our work, a logarithmic competitive ratio was known for undirected, edge-weighted graphs onlyfor the special case of uniform costs [B. Awerbuch and Y. Azar, FOCS, 1997, pp. 542{547], anda polylogarithmic-competitive algorithm was known for the edge-weighted single-sink problem [A.Meyerson, Procedings of SPAA, 2004, pp. 275{280]. We believe no online algorithm was known in thenode-weighted and directed settings, even for uniform costs. Our main technical contribution is anonline reduction theorem of MC-BB problems to their single-sink counterparts. We use the conceptof junction-tree solutions from [C. Chekuri, M. T. Hajiaghayi, G. Kortsarz, and M. R. Salavatipour, Proceedings of FOCS, 2006, pp. 677{686], which play an important role in solving the offline versionsof the problem via a greedy subroutine-an inherently offline procedure. We use just the existence of good junction-trees for our reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Moss and Rabani study constrained node-weighted Steiner tree problems with two independent weight values associated with each node, namely, cost and prize (or penalty). They give an O(log n)-approximation algorithm for the node-weighted prize-collecting Steiner tree problem (PCST) where the goal is to minimize the cost of a tree plus the penalty of vertices not covered by the tree. They use the algorithm for PCST to obtain a bicriteria (2;O(log n))-approximation algorithm for the budgeted node-weighted Steiner tree problem where the goal is to maximize the prize of a tree with a given budget for its cost. Their solution may cost up to twice the budget, but collects a factor ( 1 log n ) of the optimal prize. We improve these results from at least two aspects. Our rst main result is a primal-dual O(log h)-approximation algorithm for a more general problem, node-weighted prize-collecting Steiner forest (PCSF), where we have h demands each requesting the connectivity of a pair of vertices. Our algorithm can be seen as a greedy algorithm which reduces the number of demands by choosing a structure with minimum cost-to-reduction ratio. This natural style of argument leads to a much simpler algorithm than that of Moss and Rabani for PCST. Our second main contribution is for the budgeted node-weighted Steiner tree problem, which is also an improvement to the work of Moss and Rabani. In the unrooted case, we improve upon an existing O(log2 n)-approximation by Guha et al., and present an O(log n)-approximation algorithm without any budget violation. For the rooted case, where a speci ed vertex has to appear in the solution tree, we improve the bicriteria result of Moss and Rabani to the bicriteria approximation ratio of (1 + ;O(log n)=2) for any positive (possibly subconstant) ∈. That is, for any permissible budget violation 1 + ∈, we present an algorithm achieving a trade o in the guarantee for the prize. Indeed, we show that this is almost tight for the natural linear-programming relaxation used by us as well as in the previous works. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Multiway-Cut problem is a fundamental graph partitioning problem in which the objective is to find a minimum weight set of edges disconnecting a given set of special vertices called terminals. This problem is NP-hard and there is a well-known geometric relaxation in which the graph is embedded into a high dimensional simplex. Rounding a solution to the geometric relaxation is equivalent to partitioning the simplex. We present a novel simplex partitioning algorithm which is based on two ingredients: competing exponential clocks and distortion. Unlike previous methods, it utilizes cuts that are not parallel to the faces of the simplex. Applying this partitioning algorithm to the multiway cut problem, we obtain a simple (4/3)-approximation algorithm, thus, improving upon the current best-known result. This bound is further pushed to obtain an approximation factor of 1.32388. It is known that under the assumption of the unique games conjecture, the best possible approximation for the Multiway-Cut problem can be attained via the geometric relaxation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible items among agents with additive valuations, with the goal of maximizing the geometric mean of the agents' valuations, i.e., the Nash social welfare. This problem is known to be NP-hard, and our main result is the first efficient constant-factor approximation algorithm for this objective. We first observe that the integrality gap of the natural fractional relaxation is exponential, so we propose a different fractional allocation which implies a tighter upper bound and, after appropriate rounding, yields a good integral allocation. An interesting contribution of this work is the fractional allocation that we use. The relaxation of our problem can be solved efficiently using the Eisenberg--Gale program, whose optimal solution can be interpreted as a market equilibrium with the dual variables playing the role of item prices. Using this market-based interpretation, we define an alternative equilibrium allocation where the amount of spending that can go into any given item is bounded, thus keeping the highly priced items underallocated and forcing the agents to spend on lower priced items. The resulting equilibrium prices reveal more information regarding how to assign items so as to obtain a good integral allocation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the submodular welfare maximization (SWM) problem, the input consists of a set of n items, each of which must be allocated to one of m agents. Each agent l has a valuation function vl, where vl(S) denotes the welfare obtained by this agent if she receives the set of items S. The functions vl are all submodular; as is standard, we assume that they are monotone and vl(Φ) = 0. The goal is to partition the items into m disjoint subsets S1; S2, ..., Sm in order to maximize the so-cial welfare, defined as .... A simple greedy algorithm gives a 1/2-approximation to SWM in the offline setting, and this was the best known until Vondrák's recent (1 - 1/e)-approximation algorithm [Optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model, in Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '08), ACM, 2008, pp. 67-74]. In this paper, we consider the online version of SWM. Here, items arrive one at a time in an online manner; when an item arrives, the algorithm must make an irrevocable decision about which agent to assign it to before seeing any subsequent items. This problem is motivated by applications to Internet advertising, where user ad impressions must be allocated to advertisers whose value is a submodular function of the set of users/impressions they receive. There are two natural models that differ in the order in which items arrive. In the fully adversarial setting, an adversary can construct an arbitrary/worst-case instance, as well as pick the order in which items arrive in order to minimize the algorithm's performance. In this setting, the 1/2-competitive greedy algorithm is the best possible. To improve on this, one must weaken the adversary slightly: In the random order model, the adversary can construct a worst-case set of items and valuations but does not control the order in which the items arrive; instead, they are assumed to arrive in a random order. The random order model has been well studied for online SWM and various special cases, but the best known competitive ratio (even for several special cases) is 1/2+1=n, which is barely better than the ratio for the adversarial order [S. Dobzinski, N. Nisan, and M. Schapira, Math. Oper. Res., 35 (2010), pp. 1-13; S. Dobzinski and M. Schapira, An improved approximation algorithm for com-binatorial auctions with submodular bidders, in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA '06), ACM; SIAM, 2006, pp. 1064-1073]. Obtaining a competitive ratio of 1/2 + Ω(1) for the random order model has been an important open problem for several years. We solve this open problem by demonstrating that the greedy algorithm has a competitive ratio of at least 0:505 for online SWM in the random order model. This is the first result showing a competitive ratio bounded above 1/2 in the random order model, even for special cases such as the weighted matching or budgeted allocation problem (without the so-called large capac-ity assumptions). For special cases of submodular functions including weighted matching, weighted coverage functions, and a broader class of "second-order supermodular" functions, we provide a different analysis that gives a competitive ratio of 0.51. We analyze the greedy algorithm using a factor-revealing linear program, bounding how the assignment of one item can decrease potential welfare from assigning future items. In addition to our new competitive ratios for online SWM, we make two further contributions: First, we define the classes of second-order modular, supermodular, and submodular functions, which are likely to be of independent interest in submodular optimiza-tion. Second, we obtain an improved competitive ratio via a technique we refer to as gain linearizing, which may be useful in other contexts (see [V. S. Mirrokni and M. Zadimoghaddam, Randomized composable core-sets for distributed submodular maximization, in Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '15), ACM, 2015, pp. 153-162]): Essen-tially, we linearize the submodular function by dividing the gain of an optimal solution into gain from individual elements, compare the algorithm's gain when it assigns an element to the optimal solution's gain from the element, and, crucially, bound the extent to which assigning elements can affect the potential gain of other elements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]