Search

Introduction: Rats subjected to polytrauma and hemorrhage develop a coagulopathy that is similar to acute coagulopathy of trauma in humans, and is associated with a rise in prothrombin time and a fall in clot strength. Because platelet aggregation accounts for a major proportion of clot strength, we set out to characterize the effects of polytrauma on platelet function., Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with isoflurane. Polytrauma included laparotomy and damage to 10 cm of the small intestines, right and medial liver lobes, right leg skeletal muscle, femur fracture, and hemorrhage (40% of blood volume). No resuscitation was given. Blood samples were taken before and after trauma for the measurement of impedance electrode aggregometry, and intracellular levels of cyclic adenosine and guanosine monophosphate (cAMP, cGMP), inositol trisphosphate (IP3), and adenosine and guanosine triphosphates (ATP, GTP)., Results: Polytrauma significantly increased the response of collagen (24%) and thrombin (12%) to stimulate platelet aggregation. However, aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) or arachidonic acid (AA) was significantly decreased at 2 (52% and 46%, respectively) and 4 h (45% and 39%). Polytrauma and hemorrhage also led to a significant early rise in cAMP (101 ± 11 to 202 ± 29 pg/mL per 1,000 platelets), mirrored by a decrease in cGMP (7.8 ± 0.9 to 0.6 ± 0.5). In addition, there was a late fall in ATP (8.1 ± 0.7 to 2.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL per 1,000 platelets) and GTP (1.5 ± 0.2 to 0.3 ± 0.1). IP3 rose initially, and then fell back to baseline., Conclusions: Polytrauma and hemorrhage led to a deficit in the platelet aggregation response to ADP and AA after trauma, likely due to the early rise in cAMP, and a later fall in energy substrates, and may explain the decrease in clot strength and impaired hemostasis observed after severe trauma.

Background: Altered postinjury platelet behavior is recognized in the pathophysiology of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC), but the mechanisms remain largely undefined. Studies suggest that soluble factors released by injury may inhibit signaling pathways and induce structural changes in circulating platelets. Given this, we sought to examine the impact of treating healthy platelets with plasma from injured patients. We hypothesized that healthy platelets treated ex-vivo with plasma from injured patients with shock would impair platelet aggregation, while treatment with plasma from injured patients with significant injury burden, but without shock, would enhance platelet aggregation., Methods: Plasma samples were isolated from injured patients (pretransfusion) and healthy donors at a Level I trauma center and stored at -80°C. Plasma samples from four separate patients in each of the following stratified clinical groups were used: mild injury/no shock (injury severity score [ISS] 2-15, base excess [BE]>-6), mild injury/with shock (ISS 2-15, BE≤-6), severe injury/no shock (ISS>25, BE>-6), severe injury/with shock (ISS>25, BE≤-6), minimal injury (ISS 0/1, BE>-6), and healthy. Platelets were isolated from three healthy adult males and were treated with plasma for 30 min. Aggregation was stimulated with a thrombin receptor agonist and measured via multiple-electrode platelet aggregometry. Data were normalized to HEPES Tyrode's (HT) buffer-only treated platelets. Associations of plasma treatment groups with platelet aggregation measures were tested with Mann-Whitney U tests., Results: Platelets treated with plasma from patients with shock (regardless of degree of injury) had significantly impaired thrombin-stimulated aggregation compared with platelets treated with plasma from patients without shock (P = 0.002). Conversely, platelets treated with plasma from patients with severe injury, but without shock, had amplified thrombin-stimulated aggregation (P = 0.030)., Conclusion: Shock-mediated soluble factors impair platelet aggregation, and tissue injury-mediated soluble factors amplify platelet aggregation. Future characterization of these soluble factors will support development of novel treatments of TIC., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by the Shock Society.)