Search

Background The sexual and reproductive health care of people with HIV and those at risk of HIV has largely been delivered face-to-face in Australia. These services adapted to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with a commitment to continued care despite major impacts on existing models and processes. Limited attention has been paid to understanding the perspectives of the sexual and reproductive health care workforce in the research on COVID-19 adaptations. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted between June and September 2021 with 15 key informants representing a diverse range of service settings and professional roles in the Australian sexual and reproductive health sector. Inductive themes were generated through a process of reflexive thematic analysis, informed by our deductive interest in clinical adaptations. Results The major adaptations were: triage (rapidly adapting service models to protect the most essential forms of care); teamwork (working together to overcome ongoing threats to service quality and staff wellbeing), and the intwined themes of telehealth and trust (remaining connected to marginalised communities through remote care). Despite impacts on care models and client relationships, there were sustained benefits from the scaleup of remote care, and attention to service safety, teamwork and communication. Conclusions Attending to the experiences of those who worked at the frontline of the COVID-19 response provides essential insights to inform sustained, meaningful system reform over time. The coming years will provide important evidence of longer-term impacts of COVID-19 interruptions on both the users and providers of sexual and reproductive health services.

Background HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been rapidly implemented in Australia, initially through restricted access in demonstration studies, and then through prescribing across sexual health clinics and general practice settings. In 2018, PrEP was publicly subsidised for people with Medicare (universal health insurance for citizens, permanent residents and those from countries with reciprocal arrangements). There is little research examining the experiences of PrEP providers in Australia, and existing research has been primarily conducted before public subsidy. Methods: In this qualitative study, we examine the challenges that have emerged for PrEP-providing clinicians after public subsidy for PrEP was introduced. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews in 2019–20 with PrEP providers in two Australian states, and analysed data thematically. Participants included general practitioners (GPs), sexual health nurses and sexual health physicians. Results: Sexual health services have been reconfigured to meet changing patient demand, with an emphasis on ensuring equitable financial access to PrEP. Restrictions to nurse-led PrEP frustrated some participants, given that nurses had demonstrated competence during trials. GPs were believed to be less effective at prescribing PrEP, but GP participants themselves indicated that PrEP was an easy intervention, but difficult to integrate into general practice. Participants expressed discomfort with on-demand PrEP. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that supporting ways for patients without Medicare to access PrEP inexpensively, advocating for nurse-led PrEP, and developing guidelines adapted to general practice consultations could ensure that PrEP is delivered more effectively and equitably. Additionally, PrEP providers require encouragement to build confidence in providing on-demand PrEP.

Background The Indonesian response to HIV has been informed largely by quantitative evidence. This review examines what is known about the Indonesian HIV care cascade from published qualitative research. Methods: A ‘scoping review’ method was used to synthesise and interpret the findings of 17 eligible peer-reviewed publications. Results: Qualitative findings are reported in relation to two themes. Factors influencing successful engagement include a lack of HIV-related knowledge among clients, fear of stigma or lack of privacy/confidentiality at services, limited accessibility and affordability, and poor linkages between services. Factors affecting the broader response include a failure to adapt programs to specific socio-cultural settings, political issues in the distribution of donor funding, distrust and poor communication between service users and providers, the need for cultural privacy in particular community settings, and systemic experiences of gendered stigmatisation. Conclusions: Enhancing understanding of the Indonesian context would benefit from future qualitative research on HIV care in urban settings, describing the experiences of the most at-risk populations, and examining the role of clinics and providers in delivering HIV care in an increasingly decentralised health system.

Sexual and reproductive health needs are global health, development and human rights priorities, essential to the wellbeing of individuals, couples and families. Despite widespread recognition of this, young people, including those from culturally diverse backgrounds in wealthy nations such as Australia, remain largely hidden to, and underserved by, sexual and reproductive healthcare services. A scoping review was undertaken to describe the range of research on sexual and reproductive health among culturally diverse young people in Australia, in order to identify gaps in the literature. This comprised a systematic literature search and key informant consultations, followed by descriptive thematic analysis of the included literature. One hundred and twenty papers were deemed eligible for inclusion, and findings are presented as three separate analyses. The first provides an overview of four dimensions identified in the literature: (i) cultural diversity; (ii) the resettlement experiences of migrant communities; (iii) the sexual and reproductive health needs of these communities; and (iv) the practices of health services in this field. The second explores what is known from the literature about culturally diverse young people’s needs for, use of, and engagement with services for sexual and reproductive health, while the third identifies two knowledge gaps: (1) the perspectives of culturally diverse young people regarding sexual and reproductive health and health care; and (2) the engagement of culturally diverse young people with sexual and reproductive health services. New directions for a research agenda on sexual and reproductive health care for culturally diverse young people in Australia are proposed, based on the identified knowledge gaps.

Background The science of HIV prevention and treatment is evolving rapidly, resulting in renewed calls to increase rates of HIV testing and, in particular, facilitate the timely and possibly earlier initiation of treatment, as this has the potential to dramatically reduce new infections. Little is known about how to engage nonHIV specialist Australian general practitioners (GPs) with these new priorities. Methods: Content related to the engagement of nonHIV specialist GPs in the HIV response was identified within the transcripts of in-depth interviews with policy key informants (n = 24) and general practice clinicians (n = 47) engaged with HIV medicine. A qualitative analysis of the semantic meaning of this content identified three categories of ‘issues’ described by participants. Results: Educational issues referred to a lack of attention to HIV in medical curricula, a perception that HIV care is only provided by HIV-specialist GPs, a need to make HIV testing more ‘routine’ in GP education and a need to strengthen GP awareness of referral options. Organisational issues encompassed time pressures in general practice, and a need for general practice nurses and for rapid testing to become available, as well as formalised peer mentoring and comanagement opportunities. Societal issues included the changing dynamics of HIV transmission and a need to reconnect GPs with the Australian HIV response. Conclusions: To successfully engage nonHIV specialist GPs in the promotion of regular HIV testing and timely initiation of treatment, challenging issues affecting their capacity and willingness must be urgently addressed.