Search

In this paper, novel green HPLC and HPTLC chromatographic methods were developed for the concurrent determination of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gemifloxacin in bulk and pharmaceutical products. The green HPLC method was used on Thermo C18 (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm). By mixing ethanol and 20 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate (pH 5) in a ratio of 25:75, v/v, the mobile phase was created using isocratic elution. The flow rate was 1 mLmin−1. The studied antibiotics were separated well within 9.5 min. The green HPTLC method was used on coated HPTLC aluminum sheets with Silica gel 60 F254 using a mobile phase mixture of water: acetone: ammonia (8:1:1, v/v/v). Compact and well-resolved peaks were obtained under chamber-saturation circumstances for the standard fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Both methods were optimized individually, validated by ICH, and assessed using the Green analytical procedure index (GAPI). The methods were applied to pharmaceutical products and compared with the published methods for the determination of each of these antibiotics individually, using Student’s t-test. They can be used by quality-control laboratories in pharmaceutical factories as sensitive eco-friendly methods for the analysis of these drugs and for the detection of cross-contamination during manufacturing processes.

Antipsychotics are widely used to treat various mental disorders. Combination therapies were approved by the FDA to treat manic states. Quetiapine fumarate, aripiprazole, asenapine maleate, and chlorpromazine HCl are frequently used for treatment of these disorders. Green analytical chemistry is primarily concerned with reducing waste generated during sample preparation or analysis. Green solvents, such as ethanol, are being used in HPLC as an alternative to acetonitrile. To this purpose, two new chromatographic methods were developed to determine these four drugs simultaneously in their bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. The greenness of both methods was assessed by the green analytical procedure index (GAPI)—one of them was found to be green ecofriendly, and the other had some environmental hazards (conventional)—and this helps laboratories to choose a method that suits their capabilities. The chromatographic separation for both methods was carried out on a Thermo® C18 column. The total separation times were about 11 min and 9 min for the green and the conventional methods, respectively. Using the Student’s t-test and the F-ratio, there was no significant difference between the results of the two methods. These methods have been validated and successfully applied to the analysis of commercial pharmaceutical formulations. Our study could successfully be used in central quality control laboratories, which need a single analytical method to separate more than one compound with similar pharmacological action.