Search

Ultrafast X-ray computed tomography is an advanced imaging technique for multiphase flows. It has been used with great success for studying gas–liquid as well as gas–solid flows. Here, we apply this technique to analyze density-driven particle segregation in a rotating drum as an exemplary use case for analyzing industrial particle mixing systems. As glass particles are used as the denser of two granular species to be mixed, beam hardening artefacts occur and hamper the data analysis. In the general case of a distribution of arbitrary materials, the inverse problem of image reconstruction with energy-dependent attenuation is often ill-posed. Consequently, commonly known beam hardening correction algorithms are often quite complex. In our case, however, the number of materials is limited. We therefore propose a correction algorithm simplified by taking advantage of the known material properties, and demonstrate its ability to improve image quality and subsequent analyses significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cone-beam dental CT can provide high-precision 3D images of the teeth and surrounding bones. From the 3D CT images, 3D models, also called digital impressions, can be computed for CAD/CAM-based fabrication of dental restorations or orthodontic devices. However, the cone-beam angle-dependent artifacts, mostly caused by the incompleteness of the projection data acquired in the circular cone-beam scan geometry, can induce significant errors in the 3D models. Using a micro-CT, we acquired CT projection data of plaster cast models at several different cone-beam angles, and we investigated the dependency of the model errors on the cone-beam angle in comparison with the reference models obtained from the optical scanning of the plaster models. For the 3D CT image reconstruction, we used the conventional Feldkamp algorithm and the combined half-scan image reconstruction algorithm to investigate the dependency of the model errors on the image reconstruction algorithm. We analyzed the mean of positive deviations and the mean of negative deviations of the surface points on the CT-image-derived 3D models from the reference model, and we compared them between the two image reconstruction algorithms. It has been found that the model error increases as the cone-beam angle increases in both algorithms. However, the model errors are smaller in the combined half-scan image reconstruction when the cone-beam angle is as large as 10 degrees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]