Search

Surface-electromyography (sEMG) allows investigators to detect differences in muscle activation due to hand pathologies. However, its use as a functional indicator and the challenges related to the required normalization have not been fully addressed. This study aimed to use forearm muscle sEMG signals to distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with hand osteoarthritis (HOA). sEMG data were collected from seven sensors on the forearms of twenty-one healthy women and twenty women with HOA during the Sollerman test. Amplitude-based parameters (median and range) were normalized using three methods: maximum signals during Sollerman tasks (MAX), during maximum voluntary contraction tasks (MVC), and during maximum effort grasping (GRASP). Waveform parameters (new-zero-crossing and enhanced-wavelength) were also considered. MVC and GRASP resulted in higher values in patients. Discriminant analysis showed the worst success rates in predicting HOA for amplitude-based parameters, requiring extra tasks for normalization (MVC or GRASP), while when using both amplitude (MAX) and waveform parameters and only Sollerman tasks, the success rate reached 90.2% Results show the importance of normalization methods, highlight the potential of waveform parameters as reliable pathology indicators, and suggest sEMG as a diagnostic tool. Additionally, the comparison of sEMG parameters allows the functional impact of suffering from HOA to be inferred.

In-shoe models are required to extend the clinical application of current multisegment kinetic models of the bare foot to study the effect of foot orthoses. Work to date has only addressed marker placement for reliable kinematic analyses. The purpose of this study is to address the difficulties of recording contact forces with available sensors. Ten participants walked 5 times wearing two different types of footwear by stepping on a pressure platform (ground contact forces) while wearing in-shoe pressure sensors (foot sole contact forces). Pressure data were segmented by considering contact cells’ anteroposterior location, and were used to compute 3D moments at foot joints. The mean values and 95% confidence intervals were plotted for each device per shoe condition. The peak values and times of forces and moments were computed per participant and trial under each condition, and were compared using mixed-effect tests. Test–retest reliability was analyzed by means of intraclass correlation coefficients. The curve profiles from both devices were similar, with higher joint moments for the instrumented insoles at the metatarsophalangeal joint (~26%), which were lower at the ankle (~8%) and midtarsal (~15%) joints, although the differences were nonsignificant. Not considering frictional forces resulted in ~20% lower peaks at the ankle moments compared to previous studies, which employed force plates. The device affected both shoe conditions in the same way, which suggests the interchangeability of measuring joint moments with one or the other device. This hypothesis was reinforced by the intraclass correlation coefficients, which were higher for the peak values, although only moderate-to-good. In short, both considered alternatives have drawbacks. Only the instrumented in-soles provided direct information about foot contact forces, but it was incomplete (evidenced by the difference in ankle moments between devices). However, recording ground reaction forces offers the advantage of enabling the consideration of contact friction forces (using force plates in series, or combining a pressure platform and a force plate to estimate friction forces and torque), which are less invasive than instrumented insoles (which may affect subjects’ gait).

The early and objective detection of hand pathologies is a field that still requires more research. One of the main signs of hand osteoarthritis (HOA) is joint degeneration, which causes loss of strength, among other symptoms. HOA is usually diagnosed with imaging and radiography, but the disease is in an advanced stage when HOA is observable by these methods. Some authors suggest that muscle tissue changes seem to occur before joint degeneration. We propose recording muscular activity to look for indicators of these changes that might help in early diagnosis. Muscular activity is often measured using electromyography (EMG), which consists of recording electrical muscle activity. The aim of this study is to study whether different EMG characteristics (zero crossing, wavelength, mean absolute value, muscle activity) via collection of forearm and hand EMG signals are feasible alternatives to the existing methods of detecting HOA patients’ hand function. We used surface EMG to measure the electrical activity of the dominant hand’s forearm muscles with 22 healthy subjects and 20 HOA patients performing maximum force during six representative grasp types (the most commonly used in ADLs). The EMG characteristics were used to identify discriminant functions to detect HOA. The results show that forearm muscles are significantly affected by HOA in EMG terms, with very high success rates (between 93.3% and 100%) in the discriminant analyses, which suggest that EMG can be used as a preliminary step towards confirmation with current HOA diagnostic techniques. Digit flexors during cylindrical grasp, thumb muscles during oblique palmar grasp, and wrist extensors and radial deviators during the intermediate power–precision grasp are good candidates to help detect HOA.

Data gloves with strain gauges are a widely used technology to record hand kinematics. Several researchers have experienced problems when using data glove models to record distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, mainly in relation to bad glove fitting. The aim of this work is to report the problems that arise when using one of these gloves (CyberGlove) and to determine an appropriate hand size to avoid these problems. First, static controlled postures of DIP joints and dynamic recordings while closing/opening the fist were taken using the data gloves on participants with different hand sizes, in order to establish the minimum hand length that does not pose recording problems. The minimum obtained hand length that allowed proper recording was 184 mm. Then, validation was performed, which consisted of recording the functional range of motion of the DIP joints in a sample of eight healthy participants with hand lengths longer than the minimum obtained one. These results were then compared to the results found in the literature. Although the glove fit properly, some problems remained: difficulty to record small flexion angles or a diminished touch sensitivity. Its usability would improve if two or three different glove sizes were commercially available.

Sensorized gloves allow the measurement of all hand kinematics that are essential for daily functionality. However, they are scarcely used by clinicians, mainly because of the difficulty of analyzing all joint angles simultaneously. This study aims to render this analysis easier in order to enable the applicability of the early detection of hand osteoarthritis (HOA) and the identification of indicators of dysfunction. Dimensional reduction was used to compare kinematics (16 angles) of HOA patients and healthy subjects while performing the tasks of the Sollerman hand function test (SHFT). Five synergies were identified by using principal component (PC) analyses, patients using less fingers arch, higher palm arching, and a more independent thumb abduction. The healthy PCs, explaining 70% of patients’ data variance, were used to transform the set of angles of both samples into five reduced variables (RVs): fingers arch, hand closure, thumb-index pinch, forced thumb opposition, and palmar arching. Significant differences between samples were identified in the ranges of movement of most of the RVs and in the median values of hand closure and thumb opposition. A discriminant function for the detection of HOA, based in RVs, is provided, with a success rate of detection higher than that of the SHFT. The temporal profiles of the RVs in two tasks were also compared, showing their potentiality as dysfunction indicators. Finally, reducing the number of sensors to only one sensor per synergy was explored through a linear regression, resulting in a mean error of 7.0°.

The role of the hand is crucial for the performance of activities of daily living, thereby ensuring a full and autonomous life. Its motion is controlled by a complex musculoskeletal system of approximately 38 muscles. Therefore, measuring and interpreting the muscle activation signals that drive hand motion is of great importance in many scientific domains, such as neuroscience, rehabilitation, physiotherapy, robotics, prosthetics, and biomechanics. Electromyography (EMG) can be used to carry out the neuromuscular characterization, but it is cumbersome because of the complexity of the musculoskeletal system of the forearm and hand. This paper reviews the main studies in which EMG has been applied to characterize the muscle activity of the forearm and hand during activities of daily living, with special attention to muscle synergies, which are thought to be used by the nervous system to simplify the control of the numerous muscles by actuating them in task-relevant subgroups. The state of the art of the current results are presented, which may help to guide and foster progress in many scientific domains. Furthermore, the most important challenges and open issues are identified in order to achieve a better understanding of human hand behavior, improve rehabilitation protocols, more intuitive control of prostheses, and more realistic biomechanical models.

Simultaneous measurement of the kinematics of all hand segments is cumbersome due to sensor placement constraints, occlusions, and environmental disturbances. The aim of this study is to reduce the number of sensors required by using kinematic synergies, which are considered the basic building blocks underlying hand motions. Synergies were identified from the public KIN-MUS UJI database (22 subjects, 26 representative daily activities). Ten synergies per subject were extracted as the principal components explaining at least 95% of the total variance of the angles recorded across all tasks. The 220 resulting synergies were clustered, and candidate angles for estimating the remaining angles were obtained from these groups. Different combinations of candidates were tested and the one providing the lowest error was selected, its goodness being evaluated against kinematic data from another dataset (KINE-ADL BE-UJI). Consequently, the original 16 joint angles were reduced to eight: carpometacarpal flexion and abduction of thumb, metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal flexion of thumb, proximal interphalangeal flexion of index and ring fingers, metacarpophalangeal flexion of ring finger, and palmar arch. Average estimation errors across joints were below 10% of the range of motion of each joint angle for all the activities. Across activities, errors ranged between 3.1% and 16.8%.