Search

Measurement of force on a micro- or nano-Newton scale is important when exploring the mechanical properties of materials in the biophysics and nanomechanical fields. The atomic force microscope (AFM) is widely used in microforce measurement. The cantilever probe works as an AFM force sensor, and the spring constant of the cantilever is of great significance to the accuracy of the measurement results. This paper presents a normal spring constant calibration method with the combined use of an electromagnetic balance and a homemade AFM head. When the cantilever presses the balance, its deflection is detected through an optical lever integrated in the AFM head. Meanwhile, the corresponding bending force is recorded by the balance. Then the spring constant can be simply calculated using Hooke’s law. During the calibration, a feedback loop is applied to control the deflection of the cantilever. Errors that may affect the stability of the cantilever could be compensated rapidly. Five types of commercial cantilevers with different shapes, stiffness, and operating modes were chosen to evaluate the performance of our system. Based on the uncertainty analysis, the expanded relative standard uncertainties of the normal spring constant of most measured cantilevers are believed to be better than 2%.

Precision measurements of a nanoscale sample surface using an atomic force microscope (AFM) require a precise quantitative knowledge of the 3D tip shape. Blind tip reconstruction (BTR), established by Villarrubia, gives an outer bound with larger errors if the tip characterizer is not appropriate. In order to explore the errors of BTR, a series of simulation experiments based on a conical model were carried out. The results show that, to reconstruct the tip precisely, the cone angle of the tip characterizer must be smaller than that of the tip. Furthermore, the errors decrease as a function of the tip cone angle and increase linearly with the sample radius of curvature, irrespective of the tip radius of curvature. In particular, for sharp (20 nm radius) and blunt (80 nm radius) tips, the radius of curvature of the tip characterizer must be smaller than 5 nm. Based on these simulation results, a local error model of BTR was established. The maximum deviation between the errors derived from the model and the simulated experiments is 1.22 nm. Compared with the lateral resolution used in the above simulated experiments (4 nm/pixel), it is valid to ignore the deviations and consider the local error model of BTR is indeed in quantitative agreement with the simulation results. Finally, two simulated ideal structures are proposed here, together with their corresponding real samples. The simulation results show they are suitable for BTR.