Search

Competing Interests: None declared.

Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Sequencing of the gene encoding for von Willebrand factor (VWF) has brought new insight into the physiology of VWF as well as its pathophysiology in the context of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Molecular testing in VWD patients has shown high variability in the overall genetic background of this condition. Almost 600 mutations and many disease-causing mechanisms have been described in the 35 years since the VWF gene was identified. Genetic testing in VWD patients is now available in many centers as a part of the VWD diagnostic algorithm. Molecular mechanisms leading to types 2 and 3 VWD are well characterized; thus, information from genetic analysis in these VWD types may be beneficial for their correct classification. However, the molecular basis of type 1 VWD is still not fully elucidated and most likely represents a multifactorial disorder reflecting a combined impact of environmental and genetic factors within and outside of VWF . Regarding sequencing methods, the previous gold-standard Sanger sequencing is gradually being replaced with next-generation sequencing methods that are more cost- and time-effective. Instead of gene-by-gene approaches, gene panels of genes for coagulation factors and related proteins have recently become a center of attention in patients with inherited bleeding disorders, especially because a high proportion of VWD patients, mainly those with low VWF plasma levels (type 1), appear to be free of mutations in VWF. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) are accessible in a very limited number of laboratories. Results from these studies have presented several genes other than VWF or ABO possibly affecting VWF levels, and such findings will need further validation studies., Competing Interests: Dr. Sokol reports grants from VEGA during the conduct of the study. Dr. Stasko reports grants from APVV and VEGA during the conduct of the study., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Since the identification of antithrombin deficiency by Egeberg in 1956, ongoing research in prothrombotic defects continues to progress. Interestingly, past research has predominantly focused on coagulation factors and not on other components of the hemostatic system. The possible role of platelet function defects in the development of thrombotic events was suggested for the first time in the late 1970s, when an increased platelet adhesiveness and aggregation after epinephrine (EPI) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was found in a group of patients with unexplained transient ischemic attack. Clinical evidence for other types of thrombotic events (e. g. myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, optic neuropathy, and pregnancy-related complications) with similar laboratory findings was provided by several authors in the 1980s and 1990s, with Drs. Mammen and Bick undertaking key research. The familial occurrence was noted as well, and the term sticky platelet syndrome was introduced by Holliday in 1983 to describe the defect. The term in our present understanding describes a thrombophilic qualitative platelet disorder characterized by increased in vitro platelet aggregation after the addition of very low concentrations of ADP and/or EPI and an increased risk of thromboembolic (predominantly arterial) events. Although now recognized for 35 years, significant issues, namely its etiology, inheritance, epidemiology, and diagnostics, remain a matter of vigorous debate. The aim of this review is to summarize the history, key works, and present understanding of the syndrome and to outline present-day diagnostic and clinical problems and controversies., Competing Interests: The authors state that they have no conflict of interest to declare with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Physiological prothrombotic changes during pregnancy and the postpartum period, along with other preexisting maternal risk factors, increase the risk of both venous thromboembolism (VTE) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pregnancy complications that develop due to placental insufficiency as a result of inappropriate activation of coagulation are present in more than 5% of pregnancies and can contribute to significant maternal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, anticoagulant prophylaxis in women with congenital and acquired thrombophilic conditions should be actively considered. According to the Guidelines of American College of Chest Physicians, the use of low-molecular-weight heparin is suggested for prophylaxis of VTE and pregnancy complications in high-risk pregnant women. However, personalized refinements of such thromboprophylaxis remains unspecified, despite the necessity of better targeted recommendations for life-threatening conditions. We, therefore, review the possibilities of longitudinal monitoring and comprehensive assessment of changes in hemostasis in the group of high-risk pregnant women, which can then be used for early prediction and individualization of the optimal anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis of pregnancy complications. Simultaneously, we present our single-center experience with such monitoring and our first series of results., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)