1. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Anticoagulation versus No Anticoagulation and Shorter versus Longer duration of Anticoagulation for Treatment of Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Author
-
Alix Hall, Ming Sheng Lim, Anoop K Enjeti, Anita Ariyarajah, and Christopher Oldmeadow
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Deep vein ,MEDLINE ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,medicine ,Humans ,Thrombolytic Therapy ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Blood Coagulation ,Venous Thrombosis ,business.industry ,Anticoagulants ,Hematology ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Thrombosis ,Confidence interval ,Pulmonary embolism ,Surgery ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Meta-analysis ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) represents an important clinical problem but there is no consensus regarding its management. The aim of this review was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and shorter versus longer duration of anticoagulation in patients with isolated distal DVT. A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systemic Reviews. Studies reporting rates of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrent DVT, proximal extension, and/or major bleeding were included. Fourteen studies (six randomized controlled trials, eight cohorts) involving 2,918 patients met the eligibility criteria (with a total of 13 meeting criteria for the meta-analysis). Compared with no anticoagulation, anticoagulation was associated with a significant reduction in proximal extension (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13โ0.67; p
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF