Search

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Lung transplantation is an increasingly utilized modality for treating advanced lung disease. However, lung transplant recipients (LTRs) experience high rates of infection-related mortality and, compared with other solid organ transplant recipients, are at increased risk of infectious complications given the intensity of immunosuppression employed, the presence of airway abnormalities after surgery and exposure of the allograft to the environment. Fungal infections, particularly mold infections, are problematic after transplantation as they are often associated with limited treatment options and poor outcomes. We describe the non- Candida fungal infections occurring in LTRs, including their epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Lung transplantation has become an established therapeutic option for a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Technical advances in graft procurement, implantation, perioperative care, immunosuppression, and posttransplant medical management have led to significant improvements in 1-year survival, but outcomes after the first year have improved minimally over the last two decades. The main limitation to better long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD manifestations, risk factors, and mechanisms is rapidly evolving. Recognition of different CLAD phenotypes (e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome) and the unique pathogenic mechanisms will be important for developing novel therapies. In addition to alloimmune-mediated rejection, we now recognize the importance of alloimmune-independent mechanisms of injury to the allograft. CLAD is the consequence of dysregulated repair of allograft injury. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, the advances in knowledge, reviewed in this manuscript, should lead to novel strategies for CLAD prevention and treatment, as well as improvement in long-term outcomes after lung transplantation. We provide an overview of the evolving terminology related to CLAD, its varying clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential treatments., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a specific form of chronic interstitial lung pneumonia associated with the histologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Although UIP is a distinct histologic lesion, this histologic pattern is not specific for IPF and can also be found in other diseases (e.g., connective tissue disease and asbestosis). Clinical features of IPF include progressive cough, dyspnea, restrictive ventilatory defect, and progressive fibrosis and destruction of the lung parenchyma. IPF is rare (13-42 cases/100,000), and primarily affects older adults (>50 years of age). The diagnosis of IPF often requires surgical lung biopsy, but the diagnosis can be affirmed with confidence in some patients provided the results of computed tomographic (CT) scans and clinical features are consistent. The clinical course is variable, but inexorable progression (typically over months to years) is typical. Mean survival from the onset of symptoms approximates 3 to 5 years. Medical treatment is only modestly effective, primarily by slowing the rate of disease progression. Lung transplantation is the best therapeutic option., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Survival in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has improved dramatically over the past 30 to 40 years, with mean survival now approximately 40 years. Nonetheless, progressive respiratory insufficiency remains the major cause of mortality in CF patients, and lung transplantation (LT) is eventually required. Timing of listing for LT is critical, because up to 25 to 41% of CF patients have died while awaiting LT. Globally, approximately 16.4% of lung transplants are performed in adults with CF. Survival rates for LT recipients with CF are superior to other indications, yet LT is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality (∼50% at 5-year survival rates). Myriad complications of LT include allograft failure (acute or chronic), opportunistic infections, and complications of chronic immunosuppressive medications (including malignancy). Determining which patients are candidates for LT is difficult, and survival benefit remains uncertain. In this review, we discuss when LT should be considered, criteria for identifying candidates, contraindications to LT, results post-LT, and specific complications that may be associated with LT. Infectious complications that may complicate CF (particularly Burkholderia cepacia spp., opportunistic fungi, and nontuberculous mycobacteria) are discussed., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

DNA viruses with potential to cause complications after lung transplantation include the human Herpesviridae family consisting of cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1, -2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), human herpesvirus 6, 7, and 8 (HHV-6, -7, -8), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV); the Polyomaviridae family consisting of BK virus and JC virus; and the Adenoviridae family consisting of more than 50 adenovirus subtypes. This is a diverse group of viruses with equally diverse immediate and long-term impacts on allograft function and clinical outcomes following lung transplantation. This article discusses the individual pathogens, their epidemiology and clinical manifestations, as well as treatment and preventive strategies in this era of antiviral treatment regimens., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disorders. Unfortunately, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), most commonly manifest as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), continues to be highly prevalent and is the major limitation to long-term survival. The pathogenesis of BOS is complex and involves alloimmune and nonalloimmune pathways. Clinically, BOS manifests as airway obstruction and dyspnea that are classically progressive and ultimately fatal; however, the course is highly variable, and distinguishable phenotypes may exist. There are few controlled studies assessing treatment efficacy, but only a minority of patients respond to current treatment modalities. Ultimately, preventive strategies may prove more effective at prolonging survival after lung transplantation, but their remains considerable debate and little data regarding the best strategies to prevent BOS. A better understanding of the risk factors and their relationship to the pathological mechanisms of chronic lung allograft rejection should lead to better pharmacological targets to prevent or treat this syndrome., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

We present a case of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) initially diagnosed 28 months after left single-lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The diagnosis was based upon the presence of periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive and surfactant immunostain-positive acellular lipoproteinaceous material within alveoli seen on transbronchial biopsy as well as in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. The patient eventually also displayed a characteristic "crazy paving" pattern on radiographic imaging. Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor antibodies were negative, consistent with secondary PAP. PAP is a rare interstitial lung disease with only a few reported cases occurring after lung transplantation. The etiology is thought to be related to a defect in macrophage function caused by immunosuppression. Reduced immunosuppression has been associated with stabilization, but not reversal, of the condition in the case reported here. PAP is an exceptionally rare cause of dyspnea and radiographic infiltrates after lung transplantation and may be related to toxicity of immune-suppressive medications., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Since the initial report in 1963 several small case series described an association between neurofibromatosis (NF) and interstitial lung disease. To date, more than 60 cases of interstitial lung disease associated with NF have been reported, but relatively few reports included high-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) scans. Typical findings on HRCT include upper lobe predominant cystic and bullous disease, ground-glass opacification, and basilar reticular abnormalities. We present the case of a 34-year-old male smoker with NF and HRCT findings of diffuse lung disease including bullous emphysema, thin-walled cysts, and diffuse ground glass. Although NF-associated diffuse lung disease (NF-DLD) is disputed as a clinical entity by some, the case presented here adds to the accumulating evidence that NF-DLD is a distinct manifestation of neurofibromatosis., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) (formerly termed bronchiolitis obliterans), is a rare fibrotic disorder involving terminal and respiratory bronchioles. The term constrictive bronchiolitis is synonymous with OB. Clinically, OB is characterized by progressive (often fatal) airflow obstruction, the absence of parenchymal infiltrates on chest radiographs, a mosaic pattern of perfusion on high-resolution computed tomographic scan, poor responsiveness to therapy, and high mortality rates. Most cases of OB occur in the context of a specific risk factor. Currently, most cases of OB occur in lung transplant recipients with chronic allograft rejection or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with graft versus host disease (GVHD). Other causes of OB include connective tissue disease (CTD) (particularly rheumatoid arthritis); lower respiratory tract infections; inhalation injury; exposure or inhalation of toxic fumes, metals, dusts, particulate matter, or pollutants; occupational exposures; drug reactions; consumption of uncooked leaves of Sauropus androgynus; chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia; diffuse neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia; miscellaneous. When no cause is identified, the term cryptogenic obliterative bronchiolitis is used. This review discusses the salient clinical, radiographic, and histological features of OB and presents a management approach., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) are common causes of mild illness in immunocompetent children and adults with rare occurrences of significant morbidity or mortality. Complications are more common in the very young, very old, and those with underlying lung diseases. However, RVIs are increasingly recognized as a cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) and solid organ transplants (SOTs). Diagnostic techniques for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza, influenza, and adenovirus have been clinically available for decades, and these infections are known to cause serious disease in transplant recipients. Modern molecular technology has now made it possible to detect other RVIs including human metapneumovirus, coronavirus, and bocavirus, and the role of these viruses in causing serious disease in transplant recipients is still being worked out. This article reviews the current information regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of these infections, as well as the aspects of clinical significance of RVIs unique to HSCT or SOT., (© Thieme Medical Publishers.)

Treatment strategies for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are evolving. Cyclophosphamide (CYC) plus corticosteroids (CSs) is the mainstay of therapy for generalized, multisystemic AAV. Historically, the combination of CYC plus CS was used for a minimum of 12 months, but concern about late toxicities associated with CYC has led to novel treatment approaches. Currently, short-course (3 to 6 months) induction treatment with CYC plus CS, followed by maintenance therapy with less toxic agents (eg, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) is recommended. Further, methotrexate combined with CS may be adequate for limited, non-life-threatening AAV. Recent studies suggest that rituximab may be useful for induction therapy or for CYC-refractory AAV. This article reviews the key agents used to treat AAV, with a focus on pharmacology, toxicities, and monitoring., (© Thieme Medical Publishers.)

Heart-lung transplantation (HLT) and lung transplantation (LT) remain important therapies for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), but recent advances in medical therapy can substantially delay or even obviate the need for transplantation, especially in certain PAH populations. By the early 1990s, the advent of epoprostenol, initially introduced as a bridge therapy to transplantation, in fact resulted in a survival advantage for IPAH. These benefits were comparable to those of HLT, and many patients who were thought to be destined for HLT were subsequently removed from active listing. Since 2005, however, the impact of the new lung allocation score (LAS) on IPAH has increased waiting list mortality. In the new millennium, the balance between the role of available medical therapies for PAH, the existing issues of the current LAS regarding the PAH patient, and the inherent morbidity associated with transplantation of PAH, will be critical to optimizing patient outcomes. The following discussion mainly focuses on adult IPAH, with some reference to congenital heart disease (CHD) and secondary PAH.

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disorders. Unfortunately, chronic lung allograft rejection, in the form of obliterative bronchiolitis and its clinical correlate bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), continues to be highly prevalent and is the major limitation to long-term survival. The pathogenesis of BOS is complex and involves alloimmune and nonalloimmune pathways. The airway obstruction involved is classically progressive and unresponsive to treatment; however, the course is highly variable, and distinguishable phenotypes may exist. A better understanding of the risk factors and their relationship to the pathological mechanisms of chronic lung allograft rejection should lead to better pharmacological targets to prevent or treat this syndrome.

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a distinct histological lesion observed in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but can be found in other etiologies. The diagnosis of UIP can be established by surgical lung biopsy or by high-resolution thin-section computed tomographic (CT) scans (provided the radiographic features are classical). Historically, patients labeled as "IPF" encompassed a group of disorders, including UIP as well as other idiopathic interstitial pneumonias that differ from UIP in prognosis and responsiveness to therapy. Current recommendations from international consensus statements restrict the term IPF to patients with idiopathic UIP. The inciting cause(s) and pathogenesis of UIP have not been elucidated, but alveolar epithelial cell injury and dysregulation or altered phenotypic expression of fibroblasts are key elements. Inflammatory cells may play minor roles in initiating or propagating the fibrotic process. The prognosis of UIP is poor. Mean survival following diagnosis approximates 3 years. Current therapies are of unproven value. Corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents have been most often used, but data affirming benefit are lacking. Lung transplantation is a viable option for patients failing medical therapy. This review discusses diagnostic criteria for UIP (both histopathological and radiographic), natural history and clinical course, and therapeutic approaches (both current and future).

Lung or heart-lung transplantation is a viable option for diverse end-stage pulmonary parenchymal or pulmonary vascular disorders. However, mortality associated with lung transplant (LT) is appreciable, with 3 and 5 year survival rates of approximately 60 and 50%, respectively. Thus LT is reserved for patients with life-threatening disease refractory to medical therapy. Four diagnoses (i.e., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; cystic fibrosis; alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency emphysema) account for approximately 80% of LT recipients; diverse interstitial and pulmonary vascular disorders account for the remaining cases. Given the potential morbidity and mortality associated with LT, the decision to refer patients for LT is difficult. Which patients are acceptable candidates for LT? What are the projected benefits of LT? What criteria should be used to estimate mortality with medical therapy alone? Given the uncertainty of waiting time, when should patients be listed for LT? Identifying appropriate candidates for LT and determining when to list for LT is determined by a risk analysis of the likelihood of mortality during the projected waiting period versus the likely mortality following LT. In this review, we discuss the major diseases treated with LT and the appropriate criteria for LT.