Search

• Over- and underestimation of cognition was frequent in our epilepsy surgery sample. • Objective and subjective cognition concordance is 42 % (attention) and 25 % (memory). • We found overestimation of memory performance for operated persons. • Reliable change of subjective and objective cognition over time rarley co-occurs. • Preoperative neuropsychological interventions should address cognitive discordance. Subjective and objective cognition often show weak overlap in persons with epilepsy (PWE). Over- as well as underestimation may occur. In particular after epilepsy surgery, objective memory decline is often not subjectively reported. Additionally, studies on how concordance of subjective and objective cognition changes over time are missing. Therefore, we study the extent of concordance in operated and non-operated PWE over time. Candidates for resective epilepsy surgery were assessed between 03/18 and 12/20 (T1) with self-report questionnaires and underwent a neuropsychological examination. For 21 operated as well as 27 non-operated PWE follow-up data was obtained one to three years later (T2). Concordance of attention and memory were compared between groups and time points. Moreover, reliable change was calculated and compared between groups. Of the total sample, 42 % rated their attention performance realistically and 25 % showed memory concordance. Differences in patterns of over- and underestimation between groups and over time occurred for attention, but not for memory. Overestimation of memory was more frequent in operated than non-operated PWE, especially at T2 (67% vs. 11 %). In the operated group, we mainly observed reliable improvement in subjective cognition and decline in objective memory, whereas non-operated PWE showed more frequently decline of simple attention. Reliable subjective and objective change did not co-occur. Concordance of subjective and objective cognition is low. Over- as well as underestimation may persist over time. Domain-specific perspectives are necessary. Tendencies of operated PWE to develop overestimation of memory after surgery should be considered in neuropsychological interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Focal electroclinical features at onset of generalized seizure are well-known. • In contrary, knowledge on generalized onset seizures with focal evolution is sparse. • We report detailed ictal EEG and semiological characteristics of five such patients. • As focal signs may be prominent, risk of misclassification as focal seizure is high. • In generalized onset seizures, focal electroclinical features seem to be a variant. At onset of generalized seizures, focal electroclinical features are commonly seen, while generalized onset seizures with focal evolution (GOFE) are largely unknown bearing the risk of misclassification. In two German epilepsy-centers, patients with GOFE documented by video-EEG monitoring (VEM) between 2017 and 2022 were identified retrospectively. In addition to analysis of ictal electroclinical features, detailed epilepsy and family history, response to antiseizure medication (ASM), and findings from neuroimaging were considered. We identified five patients with GOFE, three females, age 14 to 22 years. All patients developed genetic generalized epilepsy in childhood or adolescence, each presenting with two or three generalized seizure types. In each of the five patients, one GOFE was recorded by VEM. At onset, EEG seizure patterns were characterized by generalized spike-wave discharges at 2.5 to 3.5/ sec for 9 to 16 s followed by focal evolution of the discharges. Interictally, all patients presented with generalized spike-wave discharges without focal abnormalities. Semiology at onset was behavioral arrest in two patients and generalized increase in tone in one, while two onsets were clinically inapparent. Semiological signs during focal evolution were variable, comprising head and body version, figure 4 sign, unilateral arm clonic activity, and staring with oral automatisms. In one case, focality involved both hemispheres successively. Prominent focal semiological features in GOFE carry a high risk of misclassification as focal seizures and epilepsy and thus wrong choice of ASM. This calls for low-threshold VEM if any doubts of focal genesis of seizures exist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]