1. Saliva is more sensitive than nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs for diagnosis of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection
- Author
-
Yukti Choudhury, Shi Hao Chew, Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng, Alvin Kuo Jing Teo, Chae Yin Cher, Lynette Oon, Min-Han Tan, Kian Sing Chan, Li Yang Hsu, Iain Beehuat Tan, and Zi Yi Wan
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Saliva ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Science ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Gastroenterology ,Asymptomatic ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,stomatognathic system ,Internal medicine ,Diagnosis ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Multidisciplinary ,business.industry ,Respiratory infection ,Amplicon ,Care facility ,030104 developmental biology ,Nasal Swab ,Viral infection ,Medicine ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
We aimed to test the sensitivity of naso-oropharyngeal saliva and self-administered nasal (SN) swab compared to nasopharyngeal (NP) swab for COVID-19 testing in a large cohort of migrant workers in Singapore. We also tested the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for diagnosis of COVID-19. Saliva, NP and SN swabs were collected from subjects who presented with acute respiratory infection, their asymptomatic roommates, and prior confirmed cases who were undergoing isolation at a community care facility in June 2020. All samples were tested using RT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 amplicon-based NGS with phylogenetic analysis was done for 30 samples. We recruited 200 subjects, of which 91 and 46 were tested twice and thrice respectively. In total, 62.0%, 44.5%, and 37.7% of saliva, NP and SN samples were positive. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were lower during the earlier period of infection across all sample types. The percentage of test-positive saliva was higher than NP and SN swabs. We found a strong correlation between viral genome coverage by NGS and Ct values for SARS-CoV-2. Phylogenetic analyses revealed Clade O and lineage B.6 known to be circulating in Singapore. We found saliva to be a sensitive and viable sample for COVID-19 diagnosis.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF