Search

Abstract KRAS mutation is responsible for 40–50% of colorectal cancers (CRCs). RNA-seq data and bioinformatics methods were used to analyze the transcriptional profiles of KRAS mutant (mtKRAS) in comparison with the wild-type (wtKRAS) cell lines, followed by in-silico and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) validations. Gene set enrichment analysis showed overrepresentation of KRAS signaling as an oncogenic signature in mtKRAS. Gene ontology and pathway analyses on 600 differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) indicated their major involvement in the cancer-associated signal transduction pathways. Significant hub genes were identified through analyzing PPI network, with the highest node degree for PTPRC. The evaluation of the interaction between co-expressed DEGs and lncRNAs revealed 12 differentially-expressed lncRNAs which potentially regulate the genes majorly enriched in Rap1 and RAS signaling pathways. The results of the qPCR showed the overexpression of PPARG and PTGS2, and downregulation of PTPRC in mtKRAS cells compared to the wtKRAS one, which confirming the outputs of RNA-seq analysis. Further, significant upregualtion of miR-23b was observed in wtKRAS cells. The comparison between the expression level of hub genes and TFs with expression data of CRC tissue samples deposited in TCGA databank confirmed them as distinct biomarkers for the discrimination of normal and tumor patient samples. Survival analysis revealed the significant prognostic value for some of the hub genes, TFs, and lncRNAs. The results of the present study can extend the vision on the molecular mechanisms involved in KRAS-driven CRC pathogenesis.

Abstract There is a continuing need to prevent the increasing use of common antibiotic and find the replacement to combat the drug/antibiotic resistant bacteria such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as thanatin peptide. In this study, recombinant thanatin peptide was expressed in the HEK293 cell line. Then the antimicrobial properties of this peptide on some poultry and farm animal’s pathogen strains were assessed. The thermal-stability of thanatin was predicted in various temperatures through in silico analysis. Afterwards, according to Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) results, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were chosen to test the hypothesis of LptA/LptD–thanatin interaction, computationally. Relative amino acid sequences and crystallography structures were retrieved and missed tertiary structures were predicted. The interaction of thanatin with LptA and LptD of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were analyzed subsequently. The antibacterial activity of thanatin peptide was evaluated between 6.25 and 100 μg/mL using minimum inhibitory concentration. Also, the amounts of minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) were between 12.5 and 200 μg/mL. The bioinformatics analysis followed by the in vitro assessment, demonstrated that thanatin would be thermally stable in the body temperature of poultry and farm animals. Thanatin could penetrate to the outer membrane domain of LptD in Escherichia coli and it could block the transition path of this protein while the entrance of LptD in Pseudomonas aeruginosa was blocked for thanatin by extra residues in comparison with Escherichia coli LptD. In addition, the quality of interaction, with regard to the number and distance of interactions which leads to higher binding energy for thanatin and LptD of Escherichia coli was much better than Pseudomonas aeruginosa. But the site and quality of interaction for thanatin and LptA was almost the same for Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Accordingly, thanatin can prevent the assembly of LptA periplasmic bridge in both pathogens. The antibacterial and thermal stability of the thanatin peptide suggested that thanatin peptide might serve as a natural alternative instead of common antibiotics in the veterinary medicine. The outcome of this in silico study supports the MIC results. Therefore, a probable reason for different level of activity of thanatin against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa might be the quality of LptA/LptD–thanatin interaction.