Search

Increasing concerns about public health and safety after covid-19 have raised pathogen studies, especially in aquatic environments. However, the extent to how different location and human activities affect geographic occurrence and distribution of pathogens in response to agricultural pollution, boat tourism disturbances and municipal wastewater inflow in a degraded lake remains unclear. Since the surrounding residents depend on the lake for their livelihood, understanding the pathogens reserved in lake sediment and the regulation possibility by environmental factors are challenges with far-reaching significance. Results showed that 187 pathogens were concurrently shared by the nine sediment samples, with Salmonella enterica and Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most abundant. The similar composition of the pathogens suggests that lake sediment may act as reservoirs of generalist pathogens which may pose infection risk to a wide range of host species. Of the four virulence factors (VFs) types analyzed, offensive VFs were dominant (>46 % on average) in all samples, with dominant subtypes including adherence, secretion systems and toxins. Notably, the lake sediments under the impact of agricultural use (g1) showed significantly higher diversity and abundance of pathogen species and VFs than those under the impact of boat tourism (g2) and/or municipal wastewater inflow with reed marshes filtration (g3). From the co-occurrence networks, pathogens and pesticides, aggregate fractions, EC, pH, phosphatase have strong correlations. Strong positive correlations between pathogens and diazinon in g1 and ppDDT in g2 and g3 suggest higher pesticide-pathogen co-exposure risk. These findings highlight the need to explore pathogen - environmental factor interaction mechanisms in the human-impacted water environments where the control of pathogen invasion by environmental factors may accessible., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The occurrence of microplastics (MPs, <5 mm) in drinking water has aroused extensive concerns, whereas our understanding of their presence in groundwater, a major source of drinking water, is still limited. The present study investigated the occurrence of microplastics in groundwater sampled from five sites in Jiaodong Peninsula, China. The abundance, type, and size of MPs in the groundwater samples were determined by Laser Direct Infrared following a well-established and quality-controlled analytical route. Notably, MPs were detected in groundwater across all five sampling sites, with high abundances ranging from 87 to 6832 particles/L and an average abundance of 2103 particles/L. The variation of the abundance of MPs was correlated to the distances between sampling sites and anthropogenic activities, which suggested significant impacts of aboveground industry and agriculture on the abundance of MPs in groundwater. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyurethane (PU) were the dominant polymer types detected in all groundwater samples. The MPs with a size smaller than 100 μm were found to account for >90% of the total MPs detected in four sampling sites, which was likely associated with their migratory routes through surface water runoff and infiltration into the groundwater settings. The results of this study suggest the importance of counting small MPs when determining their abundances in groundwater or their abundances would be considerably underestimated. The present study for the first time demonstrated the occurrence of MPs in groundwater in China, which improves our understanding of the MPs distribution and raises concerns about groundwater safety in terms of MPs pollution., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

By 31 December 2020, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had been prevalent worldwide for one year, and most countries had experienced a complete seasonal cycle. The role of the climate and environment are essential factors to consider in transmission. We explored the association between global meteorological conditions (including mean temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and diurnal temperature range) and new cases of COVID-19 in the whole past year. We assessed the relative risk of meteorological factors to the onset of COVID-19 by using generalized additive models (GAM) and further analyzed the hysteresis effects of meteorological factors using the Distributed Lag Nonlinear Model (DLNM). Our findings revealed that the mean temperature, wind speed and relative humidity were negatively correlated with daily new cases of COVID-19, and the diurnal temperature range was positively correlated with daily new cases of COVID-19. These relationships were more apparent when the temperature and relative humidity were lower than their average value (21.07°Cand 66.83%). The wind speed and diurnal temperature range were higher than the average value(3.07 m/s and 9.53 °C). The maximum RR of mean temperature was 1.30 under -23°C at lag ten days, the minimum RR of wind speed was 0.29 under 12m/s at lag 24 days, the maximum RR of range of temperature was 2.21 under 28 °C at lag 24 days, the maximum RR of relative humidity was 1.35 under 4% at lag 0 days. After a subgroup analysis of the countries included in the study, the results were still robust. As the Northern Hemisphere enters winter, the risk of global covid-19 remains high. Some countries have ushered in a new round of COVID-19 epidemic. Thus, active measures must be taken to control the source of infection, block transmission and prevent further spread of COVID-19 in winter., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the defining global health crisis of our time and the greatest challenge facing the world. Meteorological parameters are reportedly crucial factors affecting respiratory infectious disease epidemics; however, the effect of meteorological parameters on COVID-19 remains controversial. This study investigated the effects of temperature and relative humidity on daily new cases and daily new deaths of COVID-19, which has useful implications for policymakers and the public. Daily data on meteorological conditions, new cases and new deaths of COVID-19 were collected for 166 countries (excluding China) as of March 27, 2020. Log-linear generalized additive model was used to analyze the effects of temperature and relative humidity on daily new cases and daily new deaths of COVID-19, with potential confounders controlled for, including wind speed, median age of the national population, Global Health Security Index, Human Development Index and population density. Our findings revealed that temperature and relative humidity were both negatively related to daily new cases and deaths. A 1 °C increase in temperature was associated with a 3.08% (95% CI: 1.53%, 4.63%) reduction in daily new cases and a 1.19% (95% CI: 0.44%, 1.95%) reduction in daily new deaths, whereas a 1% increase in relative humidity was associated with a 0.85% (95% CI: 0.51%, 1.19%) reduction in daily new cases and a 0.51% (95% CI: 0.34%, 0.67%) reduction in daily new deaths. The results remained robust when different lag structures and the sensitivity analysis were used. These findings provide preliminary evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic may be partially suppressed with temperature and humidity increases. However, active measures must be taken to control the source of infection, block transmission and prevent further spread of COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)