1. Concurrent validity and reliability of self-selected movement velocity for resistance training monitoring in close grip pull-down and knee extension.
- Author
-
Külkamp, W., Feunteun, Y., and Borges Junior, N.G.
- Subjects
- *
ISOMETRIC exercise , *RESISTANCE training , *KNEE physiology , *GRIP strength , *BODY movement - Abstract
Movement velocity (MV) has been featured as a more accurate and stable variable for resistance exercise (RE) monitoring. However, its application in RE prescription based on self-selected MV (MVss) is not possible because the benefits were evaluated only in the maximal intended MV practice context. Thus, the objective of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of MVss as a performance measure in RE. A group of 41 people (28.75 ± 10.06 years, 77.25 ± 9.04 kg, 1.76 ± 0.06 m for men and 30.25 ± 15.97 years, 62.96 ± 14.31 kg, 1.65 ± 0.06 for women) volunteered to participate in this study, and their performances were evaluated in knee extension and close grip pull-down, using a rotary position transducer. In fact, the results presented evidence of concurrent validity of MVss, although its predictive validity must be questioned (R2 = 0.5; P < 0.05). Moreover, two points of performance transitions seem to exist, which could characterize three distinct zones of effort. Additionally, performances in both RE presented reasonable indicatives of reliability in consecutive evaluations (typical error = 0.05–0.07 m/s), suggesting the existence of minimal MVss thresholds. Despite the positive analyses of validity and reliability, practical applications of the MVss thresholds proposed here should be viewed with caution for RE monitoring in the individual context, taking into account the real capability to discriminate maximal and submaximal performances not supported by average-based comparisons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF