Search

Fraser et al. (Reports, 17 July 2015, p. 302) report a unimodal relationship between productivity and species richness at regional and global scales, which they contrast with the results of Adler et al. (Reports, 23 September 2011, p. 1750). However, both data sets, when analyzed correctly, show clearly and consistently that productivity is a poor predictor of local species richness. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Tredennick, Andrew T. Utah State University. Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Adler, Peter B. Utah State University. Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Grace, James B. U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Harpole, W. Stanley. Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research – UFZ. Department of Physiological Diversity; Alemania Fil: Borer, Elizabeth T. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior; Estados Unidos Fil: Seabloom, Eric W. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior; Estados Unidos Fil: Anderson, T. Michael. Wake Forest University. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Bakker, Jonathan D. University of Washington. School of Environmental and Forest Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Biederman, Lori A. lowa State University Ecology. Evolution and Organismal Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Brown, Cynthia S. Colorado State University. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management; Estados Unidos Fil: Buckley, Yvonne M. University of Dublin. School of Natural Sciences. Trinity College Dublin. Zoology; Irlanda. Fil: Chu, Chengjin. Sun Yat-sen University. School of Life Sciences; China. Fil: Collins, Scott L. University of New Mexico. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Crawley, Michael J. Imperial College London. Department of Biology; Reino Unido Fil: Fay, Philip A. USDA-ARS. Grassland, Soil, and Water Research Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Firn, Jennifer. Queensland University of Technology. School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Gruner, Daniel S. University of Maryland. Department of Entomology. Plant Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Hagenah, Nicole. University of KwaZulu-Natal. School of Life Sciences; Sudáfrica Fil: Hautier, Yann. Utrecht University. Department of Biology, Ecology and Biodiversity group; Países Bajos Fil: Hector, Andy. University of Oxford. Department of Plant Sciences; Reino Unido Fil: Hillebrand, Helmut. Carl-von-Ossietzky University. Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment; Alemania Fil: Kirkman, Kevin. University of KwaZulu-Natal. School of Life Sciences; Sudáfrica Fil: Knops, Johannes M. H. University of Nebraska. School of Biological Sciences; Estados Unidos Fil: Laungani, Ramesh. Doane College. Biology Department; Estados Unidos Fil: Lind, Eric M. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; Estados Unidos. Fil: MacDougall, Andrew S. University of Guelph. Department of Integrative Biology; Canadá. Fil: McCulley, Rebecca L. University of Kentucky. Department of Plant and Soil Science; Estados Unidos Fil: Mitchell, Charles E. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos Fil: Moore, Joslin L. Monash University. School of Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Morgan, John W. La Trobe University. Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution; Australia. Fil: Orrock, John L. University of Wisconsin. Department of Zoology; Estados Unidos Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Prober, Suzanne M. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Land and Water; Australia. Fil: Risch, Anita C. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research. Community Ecology; Suiza Fil: Schütz, Martin. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research. Community Ecology; Suiza Fil: Speziale, Karina L. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente (INIBIOMA). Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Fil: Standish, Rachel J. Murdoch University. School of Veterinary and Life Sciences; Australia. Fil: Sullivan, Lauren L. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; Estados Unidos Fil: Wardle, Glenda M. University of Sydney. School of Biological Sciences; Australia. Fil: Williams, Ryan J. Iowa State University. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; Estados Unidos Fil: Yang, Louie H. University of California. Department of Entomology and Nematology; Estados Unidos

The ecological consequences of biodiversity loss have aroused considerable interest and controversy during the past decade. Major advances have been made in describing the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem processes, in identifying functionally important species, and in revealing underlying mechanisms. There is, however, uncertainty as to how results obtained in recent experiments scale up to landscape and regional levels and generalize across ecosystem types and processes. Larger numbers of species are probably needed to reduce temporal variability in ecosystem processes in changing environments. A major future challenge is to determine how biodiversity dynamics, ecosystem processes, and abiotic factors interact.

At eight European field sites, the impact of loss of plant diversity on primary productivity was simulated by synthesizing grassland communities with different numbers of plant species. Results differed in detail at each location, but there was an overall log-linear reduction of average aboveground biomass with loss of species. For a given number of species, communities with fewer functional groups were less productive. These diversity effects occurred along with differences associated with species composition and geographic location . Niche complementarity and positive species interactions appear to play a role in generating diversity-productivity relationships within sites in addition to sampling from the species pool.

Could the very first ecological experiment have taken place in an English country garden? Apparently so, according to the Perspective by Hector and Hooper. These authors describe an elegant series of ecology experiments carried out during the early 19th century by George Sinclair, head gardener to the Duke of Bedford, in the gardens of Woburn Abbey.