Search

Executive function impairment is a key cognitive deficit in schizophrenia. However, traditional neuropsychological tests of executive function may not be sensitive enough to capture the everyday dysexecutive problems experienced by patients. Additionally, existing literature has been inconsistent about longitudinal changes of executive functions in schizophrenia. The present study focuses on examining the longitudinal change of executive functions in schizophrenia using the Modified Six Elements Test (MSET) that was developed based on the Supervisory Attentional System model and shown to be sensitive to everyday dysexecutive problems. In the present study, MSET performance was assessed in 31 medication-naïve first-episode schizophrenic patients at four times over a period of three years, while the 31 normal controls were assessed once. Patients demonstrated impairment in MSET as compared to controls. Importantly, the MSET impairment persisted from the medication-naïve state to clinical stabilization and the three years following the first psychotic episode though patients improved in a conventional executive test (Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test). Performance was not related to intelligence, educational level, symptom changes, age-of-onset, or duration of untreated psychosis. Better MSET performance at medication-naïve state predicted improvement in negative and positive symptoms over the three-year period. These findings may suggest that MSET impairment is a primary deficit in schizophrenia that occurs early in the course of the illness and remains stable irrespective of clinical state for at least three years following the first episode of schizophrenia.

Objective Relapse is common among patients with psychotic disorders. Identification of relapse predictors is important for decision regarding maintenance medication. Naturalistic studies often identify medication non-adherence as a dominant predictor. There are relatively few studies for predictors where adherence is already known. It is this situation i.e., discontinuation of medication that predictors will be most useful. We identify predictors for relapse in situations of (i) discontinuation and (ii) continuation of maintenance medication. Method Analysis of relapse predictors is based on a randomized controlled study ( n = 178) comparing relapse rates between patients who discontinued or continued medication for at least 1 year following first-episode psychosis. Demographic, clinical and neurocognitive variables were assessed at baseline as predictors of relapse within 1 year. Results Risk of relapse was 79% in the discontinuation group and 41% in the maintenance group. Predictors in the discontinuation group were diagnosis of schizophrenia, poorer semantic fluency performance, and higher blink rate. Predictors in the continuation group were disinhibition soft signs and more general psychopathology symptoms. Conclusion Different predictors of relapse were identified for first episode psychosis patients who discontinued and continued maintenance medication. Neurocognitive dysfunctions are important predictors for both groups. While signs of frontal dysfunction and dopamine hyperactivity predict relapse in the discontinuation group, sign of cognitive disinhibition predicts relapse in the continuation group.

Background Ideas and delusions of reference (IOR/DOR) are an important but underrecognized research target. Difficulty in their reliable assessment has been a barrier. A screening and assessment tool incorporating a self-information processing framework, the Ideas of Reference Interview Scale (IRIS), was developed and validated in patients with early psychosis. Methods Comprehensive review of IOR/DOR phenomena in the literature and pilot interviews were conducted for scale item development. Self-referential themes were summarized into 15 items. A consecutive sample of 137 outpatients with early psychosis was interviewed using IRIS. Their IOR/DOR experiences were also rated independently by clinicians on the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) and self-rated using the IOR subscale on the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ). Inter-rater reliability of IRIS was examined in a subsample of 15 participants. Results IRIS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.80), inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.95), and divergent validity with other symptoms. IRIS correlated satisfactorily with the IOR/DOR item or subscale on SAPS and SPQ (Spearman's rho = 0.71 and 0.47, respectively). Discussion IRIS provided a reliable high-resolution tool for progressing single-symptom research into IOR/DOR, a potential target feature of schizophrenia. The scale allows future investigation into self-referential processing and detailed phenomenological comparison in different clinical, subclinical, and healthy populations.

This study aims to explore the relationship between clinical symptoms and cognitive functions with different insight dimensions in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Seventy-nine patients were assessed following six months of treatment. Insight was assessed using the abridged version of Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD). Symptoms were assessed using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Cognitive functions were assessed using the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (MWCST), semantic verbal fluency and the letter-number sequencing (LNS) test from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS). Positive, negative and disorganized symptoms were found to be correlated with overall insight and all three general insight dimensions. Only perseverative errors and categories completed of MWCST were correlated with overall insight. Perseverative errors and non-perseverative errors of MWCST were correlated with the awareness of medication effects; perseverative errors of MWCST were also correlated with the awareness of social consequence of the illness. These support the link between poor insight and impaired executive function particularly measured by MWCST. The specific correlation of cognitive functions and different dimensions of insight suggests different underlying mechanism within each dimension of insight. The combined model of symptomatology and cognitive function explained 20.6% to 36.4% of the variance in the lack of insight within the different dimensions. The modest combined relationship of clinical and cognitive function with insight suggests that the exploration of other models in relationship to different insight dimensions is important.

Background Negative symptoms are a core feature of schizophrenia. The evolution and trajectory of primary negative symptoms were under-studied. We aimed at evaluating the prevalence and stability of primary negative symptoms, and factors associated with persistent primary negative symptoms in a first-episode sample. Method Ninety-three Hong Kong Chinese aged 18 to 55 years presenting with first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorder were studied. Data on premorbid adjustment, socio-demographics, and baseline clinical and cognitive profiles were obtained. Psychopathological and vocational reassessments were conducted at 12, 24 and 36 months. Primary negative symptoms were defined as the presence of clinically significant negative symptoms excluding depression and extra-pyramidal signs. Results At baseline, 25.8% of subjects exhibited primary negative symptoms. A quarter of patients had their initial primary negative symptoms status retained 12 months after treatment initiation. In both Year 2 and Year 3 of study period, around 70% of subjects had their primary negative symptoms status maintained for 12 months. At the end of three-year follow-up, 23.7% were categorized as having persistent primary negative symptoms. Male sex, unemployment at intake, prolonged duration of untreated psychosis, poorer premorbid academic and social functioning, poorer insight and worse vocational outcome were found to be associated with persistent primary negative symptoms. Conclusion Clinical status of primary negative symptoms in first-episode schizophrenia-spectrum disorder was unstable in the initial year of treatment. Baseline symptom assessment may not reliably predict development of persistent primary negative symptoms. Studying negative symptoms should take into account the longitudinal perspective, especially in the early course of psychotic disorders.

used to generate unbiased and efficient estimates, as well as proper standard errors. This modeling takes into account (a) the influence of different sample sizes across counties and (b) the dependence among individual outcomes clustered within the same county. Results: HLM showed both significant individual and contextual effects. Race (i.e. African American), homelessness, and comorbidity of a substance abuse significantly decreased the odds of conforming to standards of continuity of care. Co-morbidity of substance abuse provided the most substantial decrease in rates of conformance. There was very little consistency in odds of conformance rates for contextual level variables. Conformance to standards of quality continuity of care decreased if the community had higher rates of poverty, had fewer community mental health centers, and was classified as rural. Discussion: The overall findings show that basic standards of quality continuity of care are not being met for some adults with schizophrenia in parts of the USA. The results highlight substantial disparities in basic standards of quality continuity of care. Conformance rates are significantly lower for African Americans and the homeless. Particularly striking were the results for those with a cooccurring substance abuse disorder as they had the lowest conformance rate of any individual based factor. Contextual factors significantly associated with lower conformance rates were number of available mental health centers, level of poverty, and whether the community is rural. Such disparities leave certain individuals and communities vulnerable to a host of negative consumer outcomes. The results demonstrate a clear need for quality of care monitoring particularly for specific groups and communities. The results can serve as guidance for future research in disparities in quality of care.