Search

Individuals diagnosed with psychotic disorders exhibit abnormalities in the perception of expressive behaviors, which are linked to symptoms and visual information processing domains. Specifically, literature suggests these groups have difficulties perceiving gestures that accompany speech. While our understanding of gesture perception in psychotic disorders is growing, gesture perception abnormalities and clues about potential causes and consequences among individuals meeting criteria for a clinical high-risk (CHR) syndrome is limited. Presently, 29 individuals with a CHR syndrome and 32 healthy controls completed an eye-tracking gesture perception paradigm. In this task, participants viewed an actor using abstract and literal gestures while presenting a story and eye gaze data (eg, fixation counts and total fixation time) was collected. Furthermore, relationships between fixation variables and both symptoms (positive, negative, anxiety, and depression) and measures of visual information processing (working memory and attention) were examined. Findings revealed that the CHR group gazed at abstract gestures fewer times than the control group. When individuals in the CHR group did gaze at abstract gestures, on average, they spent significantly less time fixating compared to controls. Furthermore, reduced fixation (ie, count and time) was related to depression and slower response time on an attentional task. While a similar pattern of group differences in the same direction appeared for literal gestures, the effect was not significant. These data highlight the importance of integrating gesture perception abnormalities into vulnerability models of psychosis and inform the development of targeted treatments for social communicative deficits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Identification of participants at clinical high-risk (CHR) for the development of psychosis is an important objective of current preventive efforts in mental health research. However, the utility of using web-based screening approaches to detect CHR participants at the population level has not been investigated. Methods We tested a web-based screening approach to identify CHR individuals. Potential participants were invited to a website via e-mail invitations, flyers, and invitation letters involving both the general population and mental health services. Two thousand two hundred seventy-nine participants completed the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (PQ-16) and a 9-item questionnaire of perceptual and cognitive aberrations (PCA) for the assessment of basic symptoms (BS) online. 52.3% of participants met a priori cut-off criteria for the PQ and 73.6% for PCA items online. One thousand seven hundred eighty-seven participants were invited for a clinical interview and n = 356 interviews were conducted (response rate: 19.9%) using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State (CAARMS) and the Schizophrenia Proneness Interview, Adult Version (SPI-A). n = 101 CHR participants and n = 8 first-episode psychosis (FEP) were detected. ROC curve analysis revealed good to moderate sensitivity and specificity for predicting CHR status based on online results for both UHR and BS criteria (sensitivity/specificity: PQ-16 = 82%/46%; PCA = 94%/12%). Selection of a subset of 10 items from both PQ-16 and PCA lead to an improved of specificity of 57% while only marginally affecting sensitivity (81%). CHR participants were characterized by similar levels of functioning and neurocognitive deficits as clinically identified CHR groups. Conclusion These data provide evidence for the possibility to identify CHR participants through population-based web screening. This could be an important strategy for early intervention and diagnosis of psychotic disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The corollary discharge mechanism is theorized to dampen sensations resulting from our own actions and distinguish them from environmental events. Deficits in this mechanism in schizophrenia may contribute to misperceptions of self-generated sensations as originating from external stimuli. We previously found attenuated speech-related suppression of auditory cortex in chronic patients, consistent with such deficits. Whether this abnormality precedes psychosis onset, emerges early in the illness, and/or progressively worsens with illness chronicity, is unknown. Methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from schizophrenia patients (SZ; n = 75) and age-matched healthy controls (HC; n = 77). A subsample of early illness schizophrenia patients (ESZ; n = 39) was compared with patients at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR; n = 35) and to a subgroup of age-matched HC (n = 36) during a Talk-Listen paradigm. The N1 ERP component was elicited by vocalizations as subjects talked (Talk) and heard them played back (Listen). Results: As shown previously, SZ showed attenuated speech-related N1 suppression relative to HC. This was also observed in ESZ. N1 suppression values in CHR were intermediate to HC and ESZ and not statistically distinguishable from either comparison group. Age-corrected N1 Talk-Listen difference z scores were not correlated with illness duration in the full SZ sample. Conclusions: Putative dysfunction of the corollary discharge mechanism during speech is evident early in the illness and is stable over its course. The intermediate effects in CHR patients may reflect the heterogeneity of this group, requiring longitudinal follow-up data to address if speech-related N1 suppression abnormalities are a risk marker for conversion to psychosis. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]