Search

AbstractBackgroundObjectiveMethodsFindingsImplications\nKEY POINTSExperience-based knowing in general practice includes advanced interpretation of subjective, complex and particular phenomena in a social context. Enabling different metapositions for reflexivity may provide the accountability needed for such knowing to be recognized as evidence-based practice.To demonstrate and discuss the potential of substantive theories to enhance interpretation of complex challenges in clinical knowing in general practice.We present a fictional case to demonstrate how interdisciplinary substantive theories, with a relevant and specific match to concrete questions, can situate the clinical interaction at an accountable platform. A female patient with Parkinson’s disease consults her GP complaining that the disease is restraining her life and threatening her future. The GP has some new ideas from Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy and introduces the patient to strategies for further action.The case presents an example of how a relevant substantive theory may offer the GP: 1) a sharper focus for achievement: recognising the issues of fear and identity in chronic, progressive illness, 2) a subsequent position for individualized understanding of adequate strategies: encouraging physical and social activity in a well-known context, and 3) an invitation to consider further possibilities: finding ways to alleviate the burden of fear and progressive decline; engaging in joyful living.General practice knowledge embraces a diversity of sources with different evidence power. The transparency mediated to clinical practice when supported by relevant substantive theories may contribute to recognition of experience-based knowing as evidence-based practice.Experience-based knowing is an important capacity for interpretation of complex phenomena in general practice, but support for elaboration and analysis of such strategies is limitedInterdisciplinary substantive theories can enable reflexivity and enhance clinical practiceSubstantive theories may offer sharper focus, individualised understanding and recognition of additional possibilitiesA connection to specific theoretical ideas may augment the transparency of experience-based knowing, thus advancing attitudes for evidence-based practiceExperience-based knowing is an important capacity for interpretation of complex phenomena in general practice, but support for elaboration and analysis of such strategies is limitedInterdisciplinary substantive theories can enable reflexivity and enhance clinical practiceSubstantive theories may offer sharper focus, individualised understanding and recognition of additional possibilitiesA connection to specific theoretical ideas may augment the transparency of experience-based knowing, thus advancing attitudes for evidence-based practice [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. Parents of sick children frequently visit their general practitioners (GPs). The aim was to explore parents' interpretation of their child's incipient signs and symptoms when falling ill and their subsequent unsatisfactory experience with the GP in order to make suggestions for improvements in the medical encounter. Design. Semi-structured interviews. Setting and subjects. Twenty strategically selected families with a child from a birth cohort in Frederiksborg County, Denmark were interviewed. Results. Parents wanted to consult their GP at the right time, i.e. neither too early nor too late. Well-educated parents experienced a discrepancy between their knowledge about their child, the information they had sought about the illness and the consultation with the GP, when they were dismissed with phrases such as ''it will disappear'' or ''it is just a virus''. The parents went along with the GP's advice if the child only occasionally became sick. However, parents of children with recurrent illnesses seemed very frustrated. During the course of several consultations with their GP, they started to question the GP's competence as the child did not regain health. Conclusions. Parents want to be acknowledged as competent collaborators. The GP's failure to acknowledge the parents' knowledge of their child's current illness, and the parents' attempt to identify what is wrong with the child and make the child feel better before the encounter may have consequences for the GP's credibility. It is therefore recommended that parents of children with recurrent illnesses receive extra attention and information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The language of risk has many meanings, and in this article we demonstrate a discrepancy between individually perceived risk and the medical understanding of risk as understood and communicated by general practitioners (GPs). Risk is experienced and interpreted by people in a cultural context, i.e. the same objective risk can be perceived in many different ways and given a different meaning in daily life. GPs' evaluation of risk is made on the basis of our epidemiological knowledge, the medical culture of risk perception and the GP's personal experience and interpretation. The theoretical focus in the article is a synthesis of two theories: patient-centred general practice and theory based in anthropology about risk as culturally and socially constructed. We use empirical data from a qualitative study to illuminate the discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractObjectiveDesign and methodsSubjectsResultsConclusionTo explore how the parents of children with atopic dermatitis and allergic diseases such as food allergy, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and asthma experience interactions with the Danish healthcare system over time.A qualitative design with individual in-depth interviews. The analysis was inspired by Systematic Text Condensation.Eleven parents of children with atopic dermatitis and allergic diseases who received treatment at hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. The families had experiences of cross-sectoral patient care.Despite having the same diseases, the children’s care pathways were very different. Mapping demonstrated the intricacy of care pathways for this group of children. We identified three aspects that impacted interaction with healthcare: responsibility, tasks, and roles. The families experienced care when the distribution of tasks and responsibilities associated with treatment and system navigation were consistent with both their expectations and their actual experiences. At the same time, families frequently experienced limited collaboration between healthcare professionals resulting in perceived fragmented care and an extended role for parents as care coordinators. Families felt cared for when healthcare professionals knew both their biomedical and biographical circumstances, and adjusted the level of support and care in accordance with the families’ particular needs, expectations, and evolving competences.We suggest that a possible pathway to improve care may be through a partnership approach as part of family-centered care, with general practitioners having a key role in helping to articulate the individual needs and expectations of each family. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on the Nordic Congress to be held in May 2009 in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Presents reply to comments by Kristiansen et al. on the problems implicit in risk communication. Issue related to difference in perceptions towards dealing with risk; Effectiveness of quoting numbers and percentages regarding diagnosis to patients; Responsibilities of general practitioners in communicating risk information.

Objective: To explore elderly women's physical activity in relation to their perception of the risk of osteoporosis., Design: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews., Setting: Informants were purposely selected from a Danish population-based, age-specific cohort study conducted in the county of Copenhagen with people born in 1936., Subjects: Women in their sixties., Results: Women who perceived a current risk of osteoporosis tended to reduce their physical activity in an attempt to reduce the risk of bone damage. This behaviour was related to the imagined fragility of the bones (the risk inside the body), and the actual situations (the risk outside the body), including places and activities. Knowledge of a reduced bone mass reinforced the women's uncertainty about what their bones could endure. Experiences managing physical activity without injury resulted in reinterpretations of their risk of bone fractures and increased physical activity., Conclusions: Perceived risk of osteoporosis may lead to decreased physical activity and hence actually increase the risk. When informing individuals about health risk people's images and imaginations of the actual risk have to be acknowledged. When a bone scan is being considered, explicit advice encouraging physical activity - especially the weight-bearing kind - should be stressed.