Search

Developing new patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) for application in clinical studies can be necessary if an adequate PROM does not exist. For adequate measurement, it is essential that the PROM has face validity (ie, is perceived to be relevant by clinicians and researchers) and has high content validity (ie, content relevance and content coverage for the targeted patient group). The steps needed to create PROMs that possess face and content validity for a specific condition are described in this paper. Face validity is achieved by item identification and generation through literature review. Content validity is confirmed through repetitive cognitive interviews of patients from the targeted patient group in order to generate a consensus‐based pilot‐version of the new PROM. This qualitative process ensures that items are appropriately worded, understandable, and minimizes doubts about how items should be answered. A practical example of this process is presented, which shows the development of the Knee Numeric‐Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES‐ACL), a condition‐specific PROM for patients with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peak fat oxidation rate (PFO) and the intensity that elicits PFO (Fatmax) are commonly determined by a validated graded exercise test (GE) on a cycling ergometer with indirect calorimetry. However, for upper body exercise fat oxidation rates are not well elucidated and no protocol has been validated. Thus, our aim was to test validity and inter‐method reliability for determination of PFO and Fatmax in trained men using a GE protocol applying double poling on a ski‐ergometer. PFO and Fatmax were assessed during two identical GE tests (GE1 and GE2) and validated against separated short continuous exercise bouts (SCE) at 35%, 50%, and 65% of V̇O2peak on the ski‐ergometer in 10 endurance‐trained men (V̇O2peak: 65.1 ± 1.0 mL·min−1·kg−1, mean ± SEM). Between GE tests no differences were found in PFO (GE1: 0.42 ± 0.03; GE2: 0.45 ± 0.03 g·min−1, P = .256) or Fatmax (GE1: 41 ± 2%; GE2: 43 ± 3% of V̇O2peak, P = .457) and the intra‐individual coefficient of variation (CV) was 8 ± 2% and 11 ± 2% for PFO and Fatmax, respectively. Between GE and SCE tests, PFO (GEavg: 0.44 ± 0.03; SCE; 0.47 ± 0.06 g·min−1, P = .510) was not different, whereas a difference in Fatmax (GEavg: 42 ± 2%; SCE: 52 ± 4% of V̇O2peak, P = .030) was observed with a CV of 17 ± 4% and 15 ± 4% for PFO and Fatmax, respectively. In conclusion, GE has a high day‐to‐day reliability in determination of PFO and Fatmax in trained men, whereas it is unclear if PFO and Fatmax determined by GE reflect continuous exercise in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both athletes and coaches should have adequate nutrition knowledge to understand the importance of diet on athletic performance, recovery, and health. Nutrition knowledge can be assessed reliably only by validated knowledge questionnaires. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the nutrition knowledge of young endurance athletes and their coaches. The questionnaire was developed with an expert panel and pilot tested by athletes, coaches, and students. Content, face, and construct validities both as test‐retest reliability and internal consistency reliability were ensured when the current questionnaire was developed. Athletes (n = 16) and coaches (n = 13) pilot tested the 127‐item questionnaire. After item analysis and proposals from the expert panel, 41 items were removed. Internal consistency of the 86‐item questionnaire in the pilot study was 0.87, measured using Cronbach's α. Construct validity was evaluated by the difference in knowledge between nutrition (n = 20) and humanities students (n = 22). Nutrition students had significantly higher knowledge scores (P < .001). Test‐retest reliability for all knowledge sections between those groups was 0.85 measured using Pearson's r. Final adjustments to the questionnaire were made on the grounds of feedback from the respondents and proposals from the experts (n = 6). These adjustments resulted in minor changes in the construct of the items, the layout of the questionnaire, and the removal of 7 items. The final questionnaire had 79 items. The questionnaire can be used to measure the overall nutrition knowledge of endurance athletes and their coaches and to find potential gaps in nutrition knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse Injury Questionnaire ( OSTRC- O) and the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre questionnaire on Health Problems (The OSTRC- H) make it possible to monitor illness and injury at regular intervals capturing prevalence and incidence of acute injury, overuse injury, and illnesses. The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and establish the face validity of the OSTRC- O and the OSTRC- H into a Danish context ( DK) through cognitive interviews and the assessment of test-retest reliability. The OSTRC- O. DK was distributed to 57 heterogenous respondents; response rate was 89%. The OSTRC- H was distributed to 58 heterogenous respondents; response rate was 86%. No major disagreements were observed between the original and translated versions of the questionnaires. The OSTRC- O had high internal consistency ( Cronbach's alpha 0.80-0.93). The primary reliability analyses including all participants, showed reliability ICC: 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42-0.77. The secondary reliability analyses that only included subjects who did not change injury region from the test to the retest showed an ICC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92).The questionnaires were found to be valid, reliable, and acceptable for use in a Danish population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to translate the Foot Function Index ( FFI) for use in Danish-speaking patients with foot complaints. The FFI consists of 23 items scored on a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10. The 23 items are grouped into three subscales: pain (nine items), activity limitation (five items), and disability (nine items). The Danish FFI was developed according to the recommended forward/backward translation protocol. The data analysis included reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC) 2.1] and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha). Excellent internal consistency was shown for the three subscales: pain (0.99), disability (0.98), and activity limitation (0.98), as for the total score (0.97). The test-retest reliability was excellent: pain subscale: ICC 0.98 [95% confidence interval ( CI): 0.97-0.99]; activity limitation subscale: ICC: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98); disability subscale: ICC 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98); total score: ICC: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91 to 0.98). The mean difference between test and retest was below 1 point and P > 0.08. Bland-Altman plots showed no significant or clinically relevant differences from test to retest in any of the subscales or in the total score. The Danish version of the FFI was found to be valid and reliable and therefore acceptable for use in the Danish population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]