Search

AIM: To examine the interchangeability of two methods for distal pressure measurement based on photoplethysmography using a truncated or full display of the arterial inflow curve, respectively.METHODS: Toe and ankle pressures were obtained from 69 patients suspected of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Observer reproducibility of the curve readings was examined by blinded reassessment of the pressure curves in a randomly selected subgroup (60 limbs).RESULTS: There were no significant differences in mean pressures between the two methods (p for all > .455). The limits of agreement for the differences were -15.0-15.4 mmHg for right toe pressures, -16.3-16.2 mmHg for left toe pressures, -14.2-15.7 mmHg for right ankle pressures, and -18.3-17.7 mmHg for left ankle pressures. Correlation analysis revealed intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.960 for all measuring sites. Cohen's Kappa showed excellent agreement in diagnostic classification, with κ = 0.930 for the diagnosis of PAD and perfect agreement in the diagnosis of critical limb ischemia (κ = 1.000). The analysis of intra-observer variation for curve reading showed limits of agreement of -3.9-4.0 for toe pressures and -7.6-7.7 for ankle pressures for the method involving truncated display and -3.1-3.2 for toe pressures and -6.3-8.6 for ankle pressures for the method involving full display of the signal.CONCLUSION: The present study shows minimal differences in diagnostic classification, as well as in ankle and toe pressures, between the full display and the truncated display of the photoplethysmographic pulse signal. Furthermore, the inter-observer variation was low for both of the photoplethysmographic methods investigated.

Mercury-in-silastic strain gauge pletysmography (SGP) is a well-established technique for blood flow and blood pressure measurements. The aim of this study was to examine (i) the possible influence of clinical clues, e.g. the presence of wounds and color changes during blood pressure measurements, and (ii) intra- and inter-observer variation of curve interpretation for segmental blood pressure measurements.A total of 204 patients with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were included in a diagnostic accuracy trial. Toe and ankle pressures were measured in both limbs, and primary observers analyzed a total of 804 pressure curve sets. The SGP curves were later reanalyzed separately by two observers blinded to clinical clues. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was quantified using Cohen's kappa and reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficients, coefficients of variance, and Bland-Altman analysis.There was an overall agreement regarding patient diagnostic classification (PAD/not PAD) in 202/204 (99.0%) for intra-observer (κ = 0.969, p0.001), and 201/204 (98.5%) for inter-observer readings (κ = 0.953, p0.001). Reliability analysis showed excellent correlation between blinded versus non-blinded and inter-observer readings for determination of absolute segmental pressures (all intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.984). The coefficient of variance for determination of absolute segmental blood pressure ranged from 2.9-3.4% for blinded/non-blinded data and from 3.8-5.0% for inter-observer data.This study shows a low inter-observer variation among experienced laboratory technicians for reading strain gauge curves. The low variation between blinded/non-blinded readings indicates that SGP measurements are minimally biased by clinical clues.