Search

Background: Previous research has proposed that persons in need of palliative care often have a loss of functions and roles that affects social and existential self‐image. Moreover, these individuals also commonly suffer from complex multisymptoms. This, together with the situation of facing an impending death, can lead to a loss of dignity. Therefore, supporting these persons’ dignity is a crucial challenge for professional nurses. The ‘Dignity Care Intervention’ addresses the multidimensionality of dignity by identifying patients’ dignity‐related concerns and suggests care actions to address them. At the present, the Dignity Care Intervention is adapted for implementation in Swedish care settings. Because expressions of dignity are influenced by culture, and an overview of care actions in a Swedish context is lacking, this integrative review aimed to find suggestions from Swedish research literature on what kind of care actions can preserve dignity. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted using the databases SwePub and SweMed+. Articles published from 2006 to 2015 and theses published from 2000 to 2015 were searched for using the terms ‘dignity’ and ‘palliative care’. Result sections of articles and theses were reviewed for dignity‐conserving care actions synthesised by thematic analysis and categorised under themes and subthemes in Chochinov's model of dignity. Results: Fifteen articles and 18 theses were included together providing suggestions of care actions in all themes and subthemes in the dignity model. Suggested care actions included listening, communication, information, symptom control, facilitating daily living and including patients in decision‐making. Additionally, nurses’ perceptiveness towards the patients was a core approach. Conclusion: The review offers culturally relevant suggestions on how to address specific dignity‐related concerns. The adapted Dignity Care Intervention will be a way for Swedish nurses to provide person‐centred palliative care that will conserve patients’ dignity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to describe parents' reasoning in making decisions about vaccinating their daughters against human papilloma virus (HPV), a part of the Swedish vaccination programme. Method: Twenty parents whose daughter had been offered HPV vaccination participated. Semi‐structured individual interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: The findings reveal that the decision‐making process is complex. The parents trusted the vaccination programme and saw it as beneficial to society. They also described using different resources to decide about HPV vaccination, but they did not include their daughters in making the decision. Discussion: Parents need better vaccine and health literacy to be able to decide, based on evidence and in consultation with their daughters, on HPV vaccination. School nurses can play an important role in evidence‐based decision‐making about HPV vaccination and introducing children to this health‐promoting intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Dignity in older persons is a goal of palliative care. This study aimed to perform a process evaluation of the Swedish Dignity Care Intervention (DCI‐SWE) in municipal palliative care in Sweden, focusing on implementation, context, and mechanism of impact. Methods: This study had a process evaluation design. The Knowledge to Action framework supported the implementation of the DCI‐SWE. The intervention was used by community nurses with older persons (n = 18) in home healthcare and nursing homes. Data were collected by focus groups‐ and individual interviews with community nurses (n = 11), health care professionals (n = 5) and managers (n = 5), reflective diaries, and field notes. Results: Grasping the DCI‐SWE was challenging for some community nurses. Enhanced communication training and increased engagement from managers were requested. However, the DCI‐SWE was perceived to enhance professional pride in nursing. In terms of fidelity, dose and reach the project was not fully achieved. Regarding mechanism of impact the DCI‐SWE contributes to address older persons' loneliness and existential life issues, as it put conversations with older persons on community nurses' agenda. Conclusions: The DCI‐SWE provided opportunities to maintain older persons' dignity and quality of life. However, with refinements of design and the DCI‐SWE, the sustainability in the context may increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study's rationale: The need for home care among older persons is increasing, and mHealth is evolving to help meet the challenge. When developing an app to help maintain their health, it is essential to incorporate older persons' preferences. Aims and objectives: To describe and evaluate the experiences of self‐care support and sense of security among older persons using an interactive app to report health concerns. Methodological design and justification: The study had a descriptive and evaluative design. Qualitative and quantitative methods were applied to achieve a broader understanding. Ethical issues and approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board. The older persons received verbal and oral information about the study and gave written informed consent. Research methods: Questionnaires (n = 17 older persons) answered at baseline, end of the intervention and at a 6‐month follow‐up were analysed with statistical analysis. Interviews (n = 17 older persons) conducted at the end of the intervention were analysed using a qualitative directed approach. Measurements and intervention: The questionnaire included the Appraisal of Self‐care Agency Scale and a question concerning sense of security. For 3 months, the older persons used an app for regular reporting of health concerns. The app included self‐care advice, graphs and a risk assessment model that generated alerts directly to the nurses. Results: The older persons described how self‐care and sense of security increased at the end of intervention, but statistically, it was shown to decrease afterwards. Study limitations: The small sample size for statistical analysis. Conclusions: This study shows that an app can be a complementary tool to conventional home care that can increase older persons' sense of security and self‐care ability. The results mirror the older persons' awareness that the support they received with the app was only temporary. Larger studies are needed for generalisation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]