Search

Two recent papers, one from the Staley laboratory (Koodathingal and colleagues) and the other from the Cheng laboratory (Tseng and colleagues), show that the RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16, which is required for the second step of splicing, acts to reject slowly splicing pre-mRNAs immediately before the first catalytic reaction in pre-mRNA splicing. The results answer long-investigated questions about the actions of Prp16 and provide a wealth of molecular details on the proofreading process in pre-mRNA splicing. The discussion here reviews and integrates the results of the two papers and describes the implications for proofreading in splicing.

After the second transesterification step of pre-mRNA splicing, the Prp22 helicase catalyzes release of spliced mRNA by disrupting contacts in the spliceosome that likely involve Prp8. Mutations at Arg1753 in Prp8, which suppress helicase-defective prp22 mutants, elicit temperature-sensitive growth phenotypes, indicating that interactions in the spliceosome involving Prp8-R1753 might be broken prematurely at 37°C. Here we report that mutations in loop I of the U5 snRNA or in Prp18 can suppress the temperature-sensitive prp8-R1753 mutants. The same gain-of-function PRP18 alleles can also alleviate the growth phenotypes of multiple slu7-ts mutants, indicating a functional link between Prp8 and the second step splicing factors Prp18 and Slu7. These findings, together with the demonstration that changes at Arg1753 in Prp8 impair step 2 of pre-mRNA splicing in vitro, are consistent with a model in which (1) Arg1753 plays a role in stabilizing U5/exon interactions prior to exon joining and (2) these contacts persist until they are broken by the helicase Prp22.

Prp18 functions in the second step of pre-mRNA splicing, joining the spliceosome just prior to the transesterification reaction that creates the mature mRNA. Prp18 interacts with Slu7, and the functions of the two proteins are intertwined. Using the X-ray structure of Prp18, we have designed mutants in Prp18 that imply that Prp18 has two distinct roles in splicing. Deletion mutations were used to delineate the surface of Prp18 that interacts with Slu7, and point mutations in Prp18 were used to define amino acids that contact Slu7. Experiments in which Slu7 and mutant Prp18 proteins were expressed at different levels support a model in which interaction between the proteins is needed for stable binding of both proteins to the spliceosome. Mutations in an evolutionarily conserved region show that it is critical for Prp18 function but is not involved in binding Slu7. Alleles with mutations in the conserved region are dominant negative, suggesting that the resulting mutant prp18 proteins make proper contacts with the spliceosome, but fail to carry out a Prp18-specific function. Prp18 thus appears to have two separable roles in splicing, one in stabilizing interaction of Slu7 with the spliceosome, and a second that requires the conserved loop.