Search

To verify, via a survey, the experience and needs of patients receiving methotrexate (MTX), their general management and the quality of the information provided by the rheumatologist. We conducted a 51-item online survey between May and July 2020 addressed to persons diagnosed with an immune-mediated disease and treated with MTX (regardless of the route of administration). Recruitment was done via Twitter. We obtained 294 responses, of which 283 were complete and could be analysed. Almost 82% of the respondents were women, 80% resided in Spain, 75% were between 31 and 60 years old, and 57% were active workers. Diseases included psoriasis (41%), lupus, Sjögren's or vasculitides (33%), and rheumatoid arthritis (16%), among others. Eighty per cent had read the leaflet inserted in the package, of whom 62% found it helpful. Only 15% of the respondents reported having been offered additional written material, which was considered barely functional (33 out of 100). Most patients (88%) responded that they had not received advice on any reliable sources to consult on the internet, and those who received it considered it unhelpful (24 out of 100). Patients receiving MTX due to an autoimmune disease demand more and better-quality written or web-based information than what is currently offered at their clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To estimate the agreement level between patient and physician assessment of disease activity and to explore whether agreement is associated with adherence to subcutaneous (SC) biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Cross-sectional study of RA patients who had been prescribed a SC biological drug in the past 12–18 months was performed. Patients and physicians global disease activity on visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected. Disagreement was defined as an absolute difference ≥ 3 points between VAS scores. Adherence was assessed by the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), considering adherence an MPR > 80%. We analysed 360 patients of whom 15.5% presented disagreement with their physicians. The mean patient global VAS was 5.75 ± 1.8 (median 5.5 [5–7]) in the disagreement group versus 2.7 ± 2.2 (median 2 [1–4]) in the agreement group (p < 0.001). There were also differences in physicians global VAS between groups (p = 0.01). The non-adherence to SC biological drugs rate was 10.7% and 14.5% in the disagreement and agreement groups (p = 0.45). No association between adherence and discordance was found. Disagreement in the global disease activity between patients and physicians was detected in 15.5% of patients. In general, patients perceived higher disease activity. No associations between patient-physician disagreement in VAS and adherence were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To establish feasible and practical recommendations for the management of the psychological needs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the moment of diagnosis through the course of the disease.Methods: A nominal group meeting was held with an RA expert team including rheumatologists and psychologists, at which a guided discussion addressed the most important psychological and emotional needs in RA. Based on the comments collected, and a literature review, a matrix document of recommendations for telematics discussion was prepared, as well as a Delphi survey to test agreement with these recommendations. Agreement was defined if at least 80% of participants voted ≥ 7 (from 1, totally disagree to 10, totally agree). For each recommendation, the level of evidence and grading of recommendations was established following the Oxford criteria, and the degree of agreement through the Delphi.Results: Thirteen recommendations were established, addressing several key processes: (1) identification of psychological problems and needs in patients with RA, and a guideline for their management in daily practice; (2) communication with patients; (3) referral criteria to mental health professionals.Conclusions: These recommendations are intended to help health care professionals openly address the psychological aspects of patients in daily practice to follow and treat them properly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study is to benchmark the use and attributed importance of well-established prognostic factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice, and to contrast the use of factors with their ability to predict outcome. Medline was searched (inception-Sep. 2016) for systematic reviews on factors predicting death, disability, structural damage or remission in RA. All factors identified were compiled in a matrix of factors × outcomes, and scoping reviews for each cell were then performed. A survey to 42 rheumatologists randomly selected explored the use of the list of prognostic factors and inquired about the perceived strength of association with poor prognosis. In a second round, participants were exposed to evidence from the matrix and to responses from other participants. Change on perceived strength of association was evaluated. Rheumatologists report using prognostic factors in clinical practice on a daily basis. Very young onset, joint counts at diagnosis, rheumatoid factor, ACPA, and radiographic erosions are used frequently and correctly recognized as strong predictors. Comorbidities and other associated problems, such as obesity, low bone mineral density, cardiovascular disease, or extra-articular manifestations, are perceived as moderately associated to prognosis but, nevertheless, rheumatologists also use them profusely. Genetic and other biomarkers and osteitis by magnetic resonance are less accessible in daily practice and they obtained better results on second round (probably after knowing the strength of association with prognosis). Rheumatologists use widely most prognostic factors with a strong predictive value. However, factors with low evidence of prognostic value are also used and some factors are not used despite good evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the study was to study the clinical utility of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) for the assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, compared to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI). This was a prospective longitudinal observational study in patients with AS (NY-modified criteria) from 23 Spanish centers. Physical and analytical data; global, lumbar, and nocturnal pain; ASDAS, BASDAI and minimally acceptable clinical status (PASS) were collected. Psychometric characteristics of both indexes were analyzed: construct validity (convergent and divergent), discriminant capacity, criterion validity (global physician and patient assessment), and sensitivity to change. The study involved 127 patients (19.7% attrition). Both BASDAI and ASDAS showed a higher correlation with patient's global assessment ( r = 0.76 and 0.70, respectively) than with physician's global assessment ( r = 0.67 and 0.57). Both scores allowed discriminating patients with an acceptable clinical status, although BASDAI to a greater extent than ASDAS (Cohen δ 1.72 vs 0.88 for the medical PASS). Both scores showed sensitivity to change in patients who changed from an unacceptable symptomatic state to acceptable according to PASS criteria (physician and patient) and by BASDAI 50 response criteria (Cohen δ > 0.80). BASDAI showed better criterion validity than ASDAS, both for the patient PASS (AUC 0.85 vs 0.79) and for the physician's (AUC 0.90 vs 0.79). ASDAS shows adequate performance for disease activity in patients with AS; however, in this study, its psychometric properties do not present advantages over BASDAI in terms of criterion validity, sensitivity to change or discriminative capacity; replacement of BASDAI by ASDAS is not supported by the data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective is to establish recommendations, based on evidence and expert opinion, for the identification and management of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The following techniques were applied: discussion group, systematic review, and Delphi survey for agreement. A panel of professionals from four specialties defined the users, the sections of the document, possible recommendations, and what systematic reviews should be performed. A second discussion was held with the results of the systematic reviews. Recommendations were formulated in the second meeting and voted online from 1 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Agreement was considered if at least 70% voted ≥7. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidance. The full document was critically appraised by the experts, and the project was supervised at all times by a methodologist. In a final step, the document was reviewed and commented by a patient and a health management specialist. Fourteen recommendations were produced, together with a checklist to facilitate the implementation. The items with the largest support from evidence were those related to cardiovascular disease and risk factors. The panel recommends paying special attention to obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption, as they are all modifiable factors with an impact on treatment response or complications of PsA. Psychological and organizational aspects were also deemed important. We herein suggest practical recommendations for the management of comorbidities in PsA based on evidence and expert opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]