Search

Abstract This commentary explores the potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits of combining methotrexate (MTX) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While European guidelines recommend MTX as first-line treatment, concerns about the CV risks associated with JAKis have emerged. This article reviews the existing literature to assess the role of concomitant MTX in reducing CV risk when used with JAKis. Clinical trials confirm the efficacy of JAKis in combination with MTX in terms of treatment outcomes in RA. However, the number of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) reported is too low to draw conclusions on adverse CV outcomes. Indirect evidence does, however, suggest potential protective effects of MTX on CV outcomes, as several mechanisms may contribute to MTX’s cardioprotective effects, including reduced inflammation, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, increased cholesterol efflux, and adenosine accumulation. These mechanisms and the available data may support the case for CV benefits of concomitant MTX when JAKis are used in the treatment of patients with RA, although further research is needed. In particular, the lipid paradox associated with RA highlights the complex relationship between RA treatments (MTX, JAKis, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, and interleukin (IL)-6 receptor inhibitors), inflammation, different lipid profiles, and CV risk. In the absence of contraindications and when MTX is tolerated, this commentary suggests the concomitant use of MTX and JAKis as a preferred option for optimizing CV protection in patients with RA.

Abstract Introduction Baricitinib, an orally available small-molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, is indicated to treat active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective This systematic review described the real-world clinical characteristics of baricitinib-treated patients with RA, prescription patterns, effectiveness, drug persistence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; physical function, pain, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]), patient global assessment (PGA), and safety of baricitinib. Methods A PRISMA systematic review of real-world studies was conducted to identify relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2022 using MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, and evidence-based medicine review databases. Websites or online repositories of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology were searched manually to include relevant abstracts from conferences held between January 2016 and November 2022. Results A total of 11,472 records were identified by searching online databases. Seventy studies were included in the study, of which 40 were abstracts. Most patients were older (51–71 years), female, and with mean RA duration of 4–19 years. Baricitinib was mostly used after the failure of one or more bDMARDs, and 4 mg dosing was prevalent in patients with RA (range 22–100%). Clinical effectiveness of baricitinib was reported in real-world settings regardless of prior biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use. Achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission was reported in 8.7–60% of patients at week 12 and CDAI low disease activity (LDA) in 20.2–81.6% at week 24. The proportion of patients attaining Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission was reported in 12% at week 4 to 45.4% at 24 weeks. Drug persistence was high, similar, or equal to anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion Baricitinib demonstrated effectiveness in the real-world setting with a consistent safety profile observed in clinical studies. Better persistence rates for baricitinib compared to bDMARDs with improvement in PROs were reported, although baricitinib-treated patients had RA with poor prognostic characteristics.