Search

Objectives To explore patient characteristics associated with response to intramuscular methylprednisolone (MP) therapy in hand OA. Methods We performed an exploratory monocentric retrospective study. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of hand OA who visited our outpatient clinic between July 2016 and June 2021 and received at least once an intramuscular MP injection were included. Clinical data, including laboratory and radiologic results, were retrieved from electronic patient records (EPRs). Patients' reported response to MP and its duration in the first 6 months after injection was based on free text from the EPRs. Response was categorized into three groups: no response or worsening of symptoms, modest response and good response. Duration of response was categorized as short-term (<2 weeks) or long-term (≥2 weeks). Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to determine factors associated with good response to therapy with MP. Results Data from 262 hand OA patients (76% female) were analysed. A good response was experienced by 150 patients (57.2%). Among those with modest–good response, the perceived response of 162 patients (80.6%) lasted ≥2 weeks. Univariate regression analysis indicated that the level of CRP was associated with good response [odds ratio 1.08 (95% CI 1.00, 1.17)]. However, multivariate regression analysis showed no statistically significant associations. Conclusion In this retrospective study, more than half of hand OA patients displayed good response to intramuscular MP administration. The possible relation between the presence of low-grade inflammation and the response to this therapy warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate the experiences, perceived benefits and disadvantages of home monitoring of pulmonary function in SSc patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted among SSc-ILD patients who used the home monitoring application of pulmonary function for at least 3 months. In our program, patients are instructed to perform home spirometry weekly at fixed time points using a mobile application with results being directly visible for patients and physicians. Audiotapes of the interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis after performing a member check. Results A total of 13 patients were interviewed, with a median age of 58 years (range 36–75) and a median experience with home monitoring of 12 months (range 3–12). We identified four major themes, including routine of telemonitoring, impact of telemonitoring, trust in telemonitoring and implementation in regular healthcare. Overall, patients found performing home spirometry to be feasible. Major perceived benefits of performing home spirometry are an increase in patient empowerment, better understanding of the disease course and a reduction in hospital visits, whereas identified disadvantages are an emotional burden of telemonitoring, heightened awareness of illness, doubts about its validity and the need for digital competencies. All patients expressed their willingness to continue, although some patients emphasized the need for face-to-face visits. Conclusion Telemonitoring of pulmonary function is accepted by SSc-ILD patients with the perceived benefits outweighing the disadvantages. Adopting a patient-centred strategy that considers individual factors and addresses concerns proactively is warranted to successfully implement home spirometry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives A successful outcome according to the knee specialist is not a guarantee for treatment success as perceived by patients. In this study, we aimed to explore outcome expectations and experiences of patients with OA before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and knee specialists that might contribute to the negative appraisal of its effect, and differences in views between patients and knee specialists. Methods Semi-structured interviews were held in Belgium and the Netherlands. Twenty-five patients (2 without indications for TKA, 11 on the waiting list for TKA and 12 postoperative TKA) and 15 knee specialists (9 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 physician assistant, 1 nurse practitioner and 4 physiotherapists) were interviewed. Conversations were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis following the grounded theory approach. Separate analyses were conducted for patients and knee specialists. Results Patients were focused on the arduous process of getting used to the prosthesis, lingering pain, awareness of the artificial knee and limitations they experience during valued and daily activities, whereas knee specialists put emphasis on surgical failure, unexplained pain, limited walking ability and impairments that limit the physical functioning of patients. Conclusion This study provides a comprehensive overview of potential adverse consequences from the perspective of both patients and knee specialists. Improving patients' awareness and expectations of adaptation to the knee prosthesis needs to be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]