Search

Objective To investigate the association between clinical joint tenderness and intra- and periarticular inflammation as assessed by ultrasound and MRI in patients with active PsA and to explore if the associations differ according to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and structural damage. Methods Forty-one patients with active PsA and hand involvement had 76/78 joints examined for swelling/tenderness and ultrasound and MRI of 24 and 12 finger joints, respectively. Synovitis, tenosynovitis, periarticular inflammation and erosions were assessed using OMERACT definitions and scoring systems. Correlation between imaging inflammation sum-scores (intra-and periarticular) and tender/swollen joint counts were calculated using Spearman’s rho, agreement at joint level was examined using prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK). Subgroup analyses explored the influence of PROs and radiographic erosive disease on these associations. Results No significant correlations were found between tender or swollen joint counts and imaging inflammation sum-scores (rho = −0.31–0.38). In patients with higher level of overall pain, disability and lower self-reported mental health, a tendency towards negative correlations were found. At joint level, intra- and periarticular imaging inflammatory lesions had slight agreement with joint tenderness (PABAK = 0.02–0.19) and slight to moderate with swelling (PABAK = 0.16–0.54). For tender joints, agreement with imaging inflammation was even weaker in patients with either high overall pain scores, high disability scores, and/or non-erosive disease. Conclusion Joint tenderness had low association with imaging signs of inflammation in PsA patients, particularly in patients with high self-reported pain, disability and low mental health, indicating that tenderness is influenced by other parameters than local inflammation.

Objectives To investigate SI joint MRI inflammation, structural and degenerative lesion characteristics in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and various control groups. Methods Patients with axSpA (n = 41) and lumbar disc herniation (n = 25), women with (n = 46) and without (n = 14) post-partum (childbirth within 4–16 months) buttock/pelvic pain, cleaning assistants (n = 26), long-distance runners (n = 23) and healthy men (n = 29) had MRI of the SI joints prospectively performed. MRI lesions were assessed on nine slices covering the cartilaginous compartment by two experienced readers according to the definitions of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada SI joint inflammation and structural scores, and were evaluated according to depth and extent. Other morphological characteristics were also analysed. Results Total depth scores for bone marrow oedema (BME) and fat lesion (FAT) and total extent score for erosion were statistically significantly highest in axSpA, while scores for sclerosis were numerically highest in women with post-partum pain. Maximum BME depth >10 mm was frequently and exclusively found in axSpA and post-partum women (39% vs 14–17%) while FAT depth >5 mm was predominantly found in axSpA (76% vs 0–10%). Erosions were primarily seen in axSpA, especially when extensive (≥4 or confluent; 17% vs 0%). Capsulitis was absent in non-axSpA groups. BME and FAT in the ligamentous compartment were primarily found in axSpA (17/22% vs 0/2% in non-axSpA groups). In non-axSpA, osteophytes (axSpA vs non-axSpA: 0% vs 3–17%) and vacuum phenomenon (7% vs 30–66%) were more frequent, and the joint space was wider [mean (s.d.) 1.5 (0.9) vs 2.2 (0.5) mm]. Conclusions FAT depth >5 mm, but not BME depth >10 mm, could almost differentiate axSpA patients from all other groups. When excluding post-partum women, BME >5 mm and erosion were highly specific for axSpA.

Objectives In a 2-year follow-up study of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in clinical remission who tapered TNF inhibitor (TNFi) treatment according to a clinical guideline, we aimed to investigate the proportion who successfully tapered/discontinued therapy and baseline predictors thereof. The proportion regaining clinical remission after flare and the progression on MRI/radiography were also assessed. Methods One-hundred-and-nine patients (78 [72%]/31 [28%] receiving standard and reduced dose, respectively) in clinical remission (BASDAI < 40, physician global score < 40) and no signs of disease activity the previous year tapered TNFi as follows: to two-thirds of standard dose at baseline, half at week 16, one-third at week 32 and discontinuation at week 48. Patients experiencing clinical, BASDAI or MRI flare (predefined criteria) stopped tapering and escalated to previous dose. Prediction analyses were performed by multivariable regression. Results One hundred and six patients (97%) completed 2 years’ follow-up; 55 patients (52%) had successfully tapered: 23 (22%) receiving two-thirds, 15 (14%) half, 16 (15%) one-third dose and 1 (1%) discontinued. In patients at standard dose at baseline (n = 78), lower physician global score was the only independent predictor of successful tapering (odds ratio [OR] = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.93]; P = 0.003). In the entire patient group lower physician global score (OR = 0.86 [0.75, 0.98]; P = 0.017), lower Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Sacroiliac Joint Erosion score (OR = 0.78 [0.57, 0.98]; P = 0.029) and current smoker (OR = 3.28 [1.15, 10.57]; P = 0.026) were independent predictors of successful tapering. At 2 years, 97% of patients were in clinical remission. Minimal changes in imaging findings were observed. Conclusion After 2 years following a clinical guideline, 52% of patients with axSpA in clinical remission had successfully tapered TNFi, only 1% discontinued. Baseline physician global score was an independent predictor of successful tapering.

In Table 3, in the first row, 'Number of participants', all numbers had accidentally been moved one column to the left. This has now been corrected. The Publisher apologises for the error.

OBJECTIVES By whole-body MRI (WBMRI), we aimed to examine the frequency and distribution of inflammatory and structural lesions in PsA patients, SpA patients and healthy subjects (HSs), to introduce global WBMRI inflammation/damage scores, and to assess WBMRI's reproducibility and correlation with conventional MRI (convMRI). METHODS WBMRI (3.0-T) of patients with peripheral PsA (n = 18) or axial SpA (n = 18) and of HS (n = 12) was examined for proportion of evaluable features (readability) and the presence and pattern of lesions in axial and peripheral joints. Furthermore, global WBMRI scores of inflammation and structural damage were constructed, and WBMRI findings were compared with clinical measures and convMRI (SpA/HS: spine and SI joints; PsA/HS: hand). RESULTS The readability (92-100%) and reproducibility (intrareader intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.62-1.0) were high in spine/SI joint, but lower in the distal peripheral joints. Wrists, shoulders, knees, ankles and MTP joints were most commonly involved, with frequency of synovitis > bone marrow oedema (BMO) > erosion. WBMRI global BMO scores of peripheral and axial joints were higher in PsA {median 7 [interquartile range (IQR) 3-15]} and SpA [8 (IQR 2-14)] than in HSs [2.5 (IQR 1-4.5)], both P < 0.05. WBMRI global structural damage scores (erosion, fat infiltration and ankylosis) were higher in SpA [7 (IQR 3-12)] than HSs [1.5 (IQR 0-4.5)], P = 0.012. Correlations between WBMRI and convMRI spine and SI joint scores were ρ = 0.20-0.78. CONCLUSION WBMRI allows simultaneous assessment of peripheral and axial joints in PsA and SpA, and the distribution of inflammatory and structural lesions and global scores can be determined. The study strongly encourages further development and longitudinal testing of WBMRI techniques and assessment methods in PsA and SpA.