Search

Introduction: Several studies have assessed the impact of surgery on both anterograde and remote memory in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The majority of results have shown an extensive memory deficit in patients after temporal resection (TL). However, few protocols have used a prospective longitudinal design. Moreover, the postoperative delays were variable from one study to the next, instead of regular monitoring to identify the potential effect of time elapsed after surgery on memory performance. In addition, some studies have not used strict inclusion criteria to establish homogeneous patient groups. Finally, the impact of surgery on memory has been often assessed by comparing memory skills between epileptic patients and healthy controls. Our aim was to examine the impact of TL on memory in patients with TLE, recruited according to clear-cut clinical criteria. Moreover, we focused on memory performance progression per se in epileptic patients pre- and postoperatively, rather than on memory performance analysis expressed as "deficient" or "normal"., Methods: We assessed 30 patients with unilateral TLE (17 right TLE and 13 left TLE) on four anterograde memory tests and six remote memory tasks. Patients completed all tests preoperatively, and 5 and 12 months after TL., Results: Five months after surgery, performance was equivalent to the preoperative scores for both groups in anterograde memory tasks and remote memory tests. One year after TL, patients with right TLE showed enhanced performance in the verbal anterograde memory tests and in retrieving recent autobiographical memories. Results for left TL showed improved scores only in a recognition memory test of faces., Conclusions: In the present study, surgical patients were "double winners" gaining seizure freedom and potential of memory stability or recovery. The gain was observed only 12 months after surgery and following temporal resection lateralisation. Our data showed postoperative memory improvement in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy presenting with specific clinical characteristics., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The association semantic dementia-amyotrophic lateral sclerosis has been rarely reported in the literature. We report a case study of a patient with a severe prosopagnosia in relation with semantic dementia associated, 12 months later, with a motor neuron disease.

Semantic dementia (SD) is a syndrome of progressive loss of semantic knowledge for objects and people. International criteria propose that SD be included in the frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes, with progressive non-fluent aphasia and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). However, several related syndromes have been defined that clinically and conceptually share both similarities and differences with SD: fluent progressive aphasia, progressive prosopagnosia, temporal variant of FTD. In order to establish a French consensus for the diagnosis and modalities of evaluation and follow-up of SD, a working group, composed of neurologists, neuropsychologists and speech-therapists, was established by the Groupe de réflexion sur les évaluations cognitives (GRECO). New criteria were elaborated, based on clinical, neuropsychological, and imaging data. They define typical and atypical forms of SD. A diagnosis of typical SD relies on an isolated and progressive loss of semantic knowledge, attested by a deficit of word comprehension and a deficit of objects and/or people identification, with imaging showing temporal atrophy and/or hypometabolism. SD is atypical if the deficit of semantic knowledge is present only within a single modality (verbal versus visual), or if non-semantic deficits (mild and not present at onset) and/or neurological signs, are associated with the semantic loss.

Introduction: The association of prosopagnosia and false recognition of faces is unusual and contributes to our understanding of the generation of facial familiarity., Method: A 67-year-old man with a left prefrontal traumatic lesion, developed a temporal variety of fronto-temporal dementia (semantic dementia) with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cerebral imagery demonstrated a bilateral, temporal anterior atrophy predominating in the right hemisphere. The main cognitive signs consisted in severe difficulties to recognize faces of familiar people (prosopagnosia), associated with systematic false recognition of unfamiliar people., Result: Neuropsychological testing indicated that the prosopagnosia probably resulted from the association of an associative/mnemonic mechanism (inability to activate the Face Recognition Units (FRU) from the visual input) and a semantic mechanism (degradation of semantic/biographical information or deconnexion between FRU and this information). At the early stage of the disease, the patient could activate residual semantic information about individuals from their names, but after a 4-year course, he failed to do so. This worsening could be attributed to the extension of the degenerative lesions to the left temporal lobe. Familiar and unfamiliar faces triggered a marked feeling of knowing. False recognition concerned all the unfamiliar faces, and the patient claimed spontaneously that they corresponded to actors, but he could not provide any additional information about their specific identities. The coexistence of prosopagnosia and false recognition suggests the existence of different interconnected systems processing face recognition, one intended to identification of individuals, and the other producing the sense of familiarity. Dysfunctions at different stages of one or the other of these two processes could result in distortions in the feeling of knowing., Conclusion: From this case and others reported in literature, we propose to complete the classical model of face processing by adding a pathway linked to limbic system and frontal structures. This later pathway could normally emit signals for familiarity, essentially autonomic, in response to the familiar faces. These signals, primitively unconscious, secondly reach consciousness and are then integrated by a central supervisor system which evaluates and verifies identity-specific biographical information in order to make a decision about the sense of familiarity.