Search

publishersversion published

Refractory angina is defined as persistent angina (≥3 months) despite optimal medical and interventional therapies. It is increasing in frequency, due to the success of current medical and interventional therapies in improving the prognosis of coronary artery disease. Long-term mortality is similar to that of patients with asymptomatic stable disease, but it affects patients’ quality of life, and has a significant impact on health care resources. Several therapeutic targets have been investigated, most with disappointing results. Many of the techniques have been abandoned because of lack of efficacy, safety issues, or economic and logistic limitations to wider applicability. The primary focus of this review is the coronary sinus Reducer, supporting evidence for which, although scarce, is promising regarding safety and efficacy in improving anginal symptoms and quality of life. It is also accessible to virtually all interventional cardiology departments.

Introduction: Surgical risk scores are widely used to identify patients at high surgical risk who may benefit from transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A multiparametric TAVI mortality risk score based on a French registry (FRANCE-2) has recently been developed. The aim of our study was to compare the 30-day mortality prediction performance of the FRANCE-2, EuroSCORE II and STS scores. Methods: We retrospectively studied 240 patients from a single-center prospective registry who underwent TAVI between January 2008 and December 2015. All scores were assessed for calibration and discrimination using calibration-in-the-large and ROC curve analysis, respectively. Results: The observed mortality was 5.8% (n=14). The median EuroSCORE II, STS and FRANCE-2 scores were 5.0 (IQR 3.2-8.3), 5.1 (IQR 3.6-7.1) and 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0), respectively. Discriminative power was greater for EuroSCORE II (C-statistic 0.67) and STS (C-statistic 0.67) than for FRANCE-2 (C-statistic 0.53), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.26). All scores showed adequate calibration. Conclusions: All scores showed modest performance in early mortality prediction after TAVI. Despite being derived from a TAVI population, FRANCE-2 was no better than surgical risk scores in our population. Resumo: Introdução: Os scores de risco cirúrgico têm sido amplamente usados para identificar doentes com alto risco cirúrgico que podem beneficiar da implantação de válvula aórtica por via percutânea (TAVI). Foi recentemente apresentado um «score de risco» multiparamétrico de mortalidade por TAVI com base num registo francês – FRANCE 2. O objetivo do nosso estudo foi comparar o desempenho do FRANCE 2, EuroSCORE II (ES II) e STS-Prom (STS) em prever a mortalidade a 30 dias nos doentes submetidos a TAVI. Métodos: Foram estudados retrospetivamente 240 doentes de um registo prospetivo de centro único que foram submetidos a TAVI entre janeiro de 2008 e dezembro de 2015. Todos os scores foram avaliados para discriminação e calibração, com o uso da análise de curvas ROC e da análise de calibration-in-the-large, respetivamente. Resultados: A mortalidade observada foi de 5,8% (n = 14). A mediana do ES II, STS II e FRANCE II foi de 5,0 (IQR 3,2-8,3), 5,1 (IQR 3,6-7,1) e 2,0 (IQR 1,0-3,0), respetivamente. O poder discriminatório foi maior para ES II (C-statistic 0,67) e STS (C-statistic 0,67) quando comparado com o FRANCE 2 (C-statistic 0,53), embora não fosse estatisticamente significativo (p = 0,26). Todos os scores apresentaram calibração adequada. Conclusões: Todos os scores apresentaram um desempenho modesto em prever a mortalidade precoce após TAVI. Apesar de ser derivado de uma população de doentes submetidos a TAVI, o FRANCE-2 não mostrou ser melhor do que os scores de risco cirúrgicos na nossa população. Keywords: Aortic stenosis, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, Risk scores, Early mortality, Palavras-chave: Estenose aórtica, TAVI, Scores de risco, Mortalidade precoce

Introduction: Aortic stenosis is the most prevalent type of valvular disease in Europe. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the standard therapy, while transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative in patients at unacceptably high surgical risk. Assessment by a heart team is recommended by the guidelines but there is little published evidence on this subject. The purpose of this paper is to describe the experience of a multidisciplinary TAVI program that began in 2008. Methods: The heart team prospectively assessed 473 patients using a standardized approach. A total of 214 patients were selected for TAVI and 80 for SAVR. Demographic, clinical and procedural characteristics and long-term success rates were compared between the groups. Results: TAVI patients were older than the SAVR group (median 83 vs. 81 years), and had higher surgical risk scores (median EuroSCORE II 5.3 vs. 3.6% and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 5.1 vs. 3.1%), as did the patients under medical treatment only. These scores were unable to assess multiple comorbidities. Patients’ outcomes were different between the three groups (mortality with SAVR 25% vs. TAVI 37.6% vs. conservative therapy 57.6%, p=0.001). Conclusions: The heart team program was able to select candidates appropriately for TAVI, SAVR and conservative treatment, taking into account the risk of both invasive treatments. The use of a prospective standardized heart team approach is recommended, but requires continuous monitoring to ensure effectiveness in a timely manner. Resumo: Introdução: A estenose aórtica é atualmente a doença valvular mais prevalente na Europa. A substituição valvular aórtica cirúrgica (SVAC) é atualmente considerada a terapêutica de primeira linha, a implantação de válvula aórtica percutânea (VAP) é considerada uma opção em doentes com elevado risco cirúrgico. A avaliação dos doentes pelo Heart Team encontra-se preconizada pelas recentes guidelines publicadas de doenças valvulares, contudo existem poucas publicações acerca dessa temática. O objetivo deste manuscrito é descrever a experiência de um programa multidisciplinar VAP, iniciado em 2008. Métodos: O Heart Team avaliou de forma prospetiva e padronizada 473 doentes. Desses, 214 foram selecionados para VAP e 80 para SVAC. Os grupos foram comparados no que respeita às suas características demográficas, clínicas, de procedimento e quanto à sua evolução (mortalidade). Resultados: O grupo VAP apresentou maior idade do que o grupo SVAC (mediana 83 versus 81 anos) e apresentou scores de risco cirúrgico mais elevados (mediana Euroscore II 5,3 versus 3,6% e STS 5,1 versus 3,1%), tal como o grupo de doentes apenas sob terapêutica médica. Esses scores não foram capazes de avaliar múltiplas comorbilidades. A mortalidade entre os três grupos apresentou diferenças com significado estatístico (SVAC 25% versus VAP 37,6% versus terapêutica conservadora 57,6%, p=0,001). Conclusões: O programa Heart Team foi capaz de selecionar de forma adequada os doentes para as diversas estratégias terapêuticas tendo em conta o risco de ambos os procedimentos invasivos. Uma abordagem eficiente e standardizada pela Heart Team deve ser estimulada, necessitando de reavaliação continua. Keywords: Severe aortic stenosis, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, Surgical aortic valve replacement, Heart team, Standardization, Palavras-chave: Estenose aórtica grave, Válvula aórtica percutânea, Substituição valvular aórtica cirúrgica, Heart Team, Standardização

Resumo: Introdução e objetivos: Foi nosso objetivo estudar as tendências da intervenção coronária percutânea entre 2004‐2013 e comparar Portugal com outros países europeus. Métodos: Análise dos procedimentos coronários efetuados entre 2004‐2013 com base num registo prospetivo, multicêntrico, voluntário, doente a doente – Registo Nacional de Cardiologia de Intervenção (RNCI) da Associação Portuguesa de Intervenção Cardiovascular da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia (APIC‐SPC) – e dos dados oficiais publicados pela Direção Geral de Saúde (DGS). Resultados: Em 2013 realizaram‐se 36 810 cateterismos diagnósticos (3529 coronariografias por milhão de habitantes), representando um aumento significativo de 34% relativamente ao ano de 2007 (p

Introduction and Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of drug-eluting stent thrombosis (sirolimus or everolimus) in patients with chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) and to determine its clinical implications and related factors. Methods: Data from the 12-month follow-up of the 207 patients included in the CIBELES trial with CTO were analyzed. Results: Stent thrombosis occurred in three patients, two definite and one probable (overall thrombosis rate: 1.4%). However, there were no cases of death or Q-wave myocardial infarction. In univariate analysis, patients with a higher incidence of stent thrombosis were those in whom the target vessel was the left anterior descending, who had single-vessel disease, were assigned to treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, and those with smaller minimum luminal diameter immediately after the procedure. In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of stent thrombosis was minimal luminal diameter immediately after the procedure. Conclusions: The rate of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in patients with CTO is relatively low (1.4%). The only independent predictor of stent thrombosis in this context was minimal luminal diameter after the procedure and the clinical presentation was in all cases relatively benign. Resumo: Introdução e objetivos: o objetivo do nosso estudo foi analisar a incidência de trombose de stent com eluição de fármaco (sirolimus ou everolimus) em pacientes com oclusões coronárias crónicas e identificar as suas implicações clínicas e fatores relacionados. Métodos: 12 meses de acompanhamento dos 207 pacientes incluídos no ensaio Cibeles com oclusão total coronária crónica. Resultados: a trombose de stent ocorreu em três doentes: duas definitivas e uma provável (taxa global de trombose 1,4%). No entanto, não surgiu nenhum caso de morte ou enfarte do miocárdio com onda Q. Na análise univariada, os doentes com maior incidência de trombose de stent foram aqueles em que o vaso-alvo foi a descendente anterior, os que tinham a doença de um vaso, os que foram considerados para tratamento com stent com sirolimus, e aqueles com diâmetro luminal mínimo menor imediatamente após o procedimento. Na análise multivariada, o único preditor independente de trombose do stent foi o diâmetro luminal mínimo imediatamente após o procedimento. Conclusões: a taxa de trombose de stent farmacológico em pacientes com oclusão coronária crónica foi relativamente baixa (1,4%).O único preditor independente de trombose de stent neste contexto foi o diâmetro luminal mínimo após o procedimento, tendo a apresentação clínica em todos os casos sido relativamente benigna. Keywords: Stent, Thrombosis, Everolimus, Sirolimus, Chronic total coronary occlusion, Palavras-chave: Stent, Trombose, Everolimus, Sirolimus, Oclusão coronária crónica total

© 2020 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)., Introduction: The standard of care for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) includes the activation of a STEMI care network, the administration of adjuvant medical therapy, and reperfusion through primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While primary PCI is nowadays the first option for the treatment of patients with STEMI, antithrombotic therapy, including antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents, is the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment to optimize their clinical outcomes. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe contemporaneous real-world patterns of use of antithrombotic treatments in Portugal for STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Methods: An observational, retrospective cross-sectional study was performed for the year 2016, based on data from two national registries: the Portuguese Registry on Acute Coronary Syndromes (ProACS) and the Portuguese Registry on Interventional Cardiology (PRIC). Data on oral antiplatelet and procedural intravenous antithrombotic drugs were retrieved. Results: In 2016, the ProACS enrolled 534 STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, while the PRIC registry reported data on 2625 STEMI patients. Of these, 99.6% were treated with aspirin and 75.6% with dual antiplatelet therapy (mostly clopidogrel). GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (mostly abciximab) were used in 11.6% of cases. Heparins were used in 80% of cases (78% unfractionated heparin [UFH] and 2% low molecular weight heparin). None of the patients included in the registry were treated with cangrelor, prasugrel or bivalirudin. Missing data are one of the main limitations of the registries. Conclusions: In 2016, according to data from these national registries, almost all patients with STEMI were treated with aspirin and 76% with dual antiplatelet agents, mostly clopidogrel. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in few patients, and UFH was the most prevalent parenteral anticoagulant drug.