Search

This text proposes a reflection on the impact of the pandemic triggered by the coronavirus in students' learning process, mainly in the public school system. The starting point is the analysis of data collected from the work carried out with students assisted by the Project called Believe, developed in a municipal school in Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, before 2020. With the suspension of classroom lessons, students were abruptly removed from schools and began to depend on the infrastructure available in their homes. It is a fact that, the poorer the family, the more precarious the student's participation in emergency remote education has been. Furthermore, many parents and/or guardians do not have enough formal schooling or preparation to help students carry out the activities sent teachers. Thus, we seek to analyze the impacts of the pandemic and consider alternatives that provide learning opportunities for students in a vulnerable situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This text aims to establish a critical dialogue, in view of the context of a pandemic that also affected education, about curricular practice in the remote format of teaching. In this context, the curriculum also seems to have been contaminated by the virus of inaccessibility and social inequality, decharacterizing the democratic rule of law. We understand that managing critical perspective in this format is not easy, but it is possible. Our vision is proclaimed as critical, to the extent that we position ourselves in the group of theories of education and curriculum of the ground close to Marxian thought of explaining the concrete world through dialectical historical materialism. For this, we used as a methodological instrument the bibliographic research to support our reflections, and the semi-structured interview with teachers, students and mothers, in order to understand education/teaching in the context of pandemic, in the range of elementary school of Basic Education. The article outlines an overview of the context of remote teaching during the pandemic and then presents, through the analysis of questionnaires applied to research interlocutors, possible ways to think of a critical curricular organization more humane and emancipatory with a view to the scenario of returning to educational work in the post-covid-19 scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]