1. Influence of instrumentation on the surgical time to implant a total knee prosthesis
- Author
-
Mirian López-López, Vicente J. León-Muñoz, and A.J. Lisón-Almagro
- Subjects
Computer-assisted surgery ,030222 orthopedics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,integumentary system ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Significant difference ,Total knee arthroplasty ,030229 sport sciences ,Prosthesis ,Total knee ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,Surgical time ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Instrumentation (computer programming) ,Implant ,business - Abstract
Objective To demonstrate whether there is a difference in the time that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) takes according to the instrumentation system used. Material and methods Retrospective analysis of the duration of 243 interventions (skin-to-skin time and ischaemia time) performed by the same surgeon. 72 cases operated with conventional instruments (CI), 68 operated with computer assisted surgery (CAS) and 103 with personalized instrumentation system (PSI). Results CI skin-to-skin 87.85 min (SD 11.86). CI ischaemia 94.44 min (SD 11.49). CAS skin-to-skin 123.46 min (SD 11.27). CAS ischaemia 129.63 min (SD 11.37). PSI skin-to-skin 78.69 min (SD 13.06). PSI ischaemia 84.63 (DE 12.06). There is a significant difference between PSI and the other instrumentation systems (p 0.000). Conclusions In our study, the time taken for TKA was significantly lower when we used customized cutting blocks rather than other systems.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF