Search

Introduction We analyze how infectious disease physicians perceive and manage invasive candidosis in Brazil, in comparison to intensive care unit specialists. Methods A 38-question survey was administered to 56 participants. Questions involved clinicians' perceptions of the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of invasive candidosis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The perception that candidemia not caused by Candida albicans occurs in less than 10% of patients is more commonly held by intensive care unit specialists (p=0.018). Infectious disease physicians almost always use antifungal drugs in the treatment of patients with candidemia, and antifungal drugs are not as frequently prescribed by intensive care unit specialists (p=0.006). Infectious disease physicians often do not use voriconazole when a patient's antifungal treatment has failed with fluconazole, which also differs from the behavior of intensive care unit specialists (p=0.019). Many intensive care unit specialists use fluconazole to treat candidemia in neutropenic patients previously exposed to fluconazole, in contrast to infectious disease physicians (p=0.024). Infectious disease physicians prefer echinocandins as a first choice in the treatment of unstable neutropenic patients more frequently than intensive care unit specialists (p=0.013). When candidemia is diagnosed, most infectious disease physicians perform fundoscopy (p=0.015), whereas intensive care unit specialists usually perform echocardiograms on all patients (p=0.054). Conclusions This study reveals a need to better educate physicians in Brazil regarding invasive candidosis. The appropriate management of this disease depends on more drug options being available in our country in addition to global coverage in private and public hospitals, thereby improving health care.

Realizou-se um estudo observacional, prospectivo, de base laboratorial, para investigar a incidência de candidemia, distribuição de espécies e condições clínicas entre setembro 2003 e março 2004, em um hospital privado terciário em Recife, Nordeste do Brasil. Um caso de candidemia foi definido como isolamento de Candida spp de hemocultura. A taxa de incidência foi calculada por 1.000 admissões. Um total de 5.532 pacientes foram admitidos no hospital durante o período de estudo, e 1.745 culturas de sangue foram processadas. Foram observados 21 episódios de candidemia em 18 pacientes. A taxa de incidência de candidemia foi de 3,9 episódios por 1.000 admissões. Espécies não-albicans representaram mais de 50% dos casos, predominando Candida parapsilosis (33%) e Candida tropicalis (24%). Onze (61%) pacientes morreram. A incidência de candidemia foi mais alta que aquela observada em estudo multicêntrico brasileiro. Candidemia foi predominantemente causada por espécies não-albicans.We conducted a prospective, observational, laboratory-based study on candidemia to investigate the incidence of candidemia, species distribution and clinical conditions between September 2003 and March 2004 in a private tertiary hospital in Recife, northeastern Brazil. Cases of candidemia were defined as occurrences of isolation of Candida spp from blood cultures. The incidence rate was calculated per 1,000 admissions. A total of 5,532 patients were admitted to the hospital during the study period, and 1,745 blood cultures were processed. Twenty-one episodes of candidemia were observed in 18 patients. The incidence rate of candidemia was 3.9 episodes per 1,000 admissions. Non-albicans species accounted for more than 50% of the cases, and Candida parapsilosis (33%) and Candida tropicalis (24%) predominated. Eleven (61%) patients died. The incidence of candidemia was higher than that observed in a Brazilian multicenter study. Candidemia was caused predominantly by non-albicans species.

O achado laboratorial de candidúria traz dilemas em relação a sua interpretação visto que pode refletir uma amplitude de possibilidades clínicas, incluindo colonização, infecção urinária alta ou doença sistêmica por Candida spp. Neste artigo, abordaremos a epidemiologia, o diagnóstico e a terapêutica da candidúria em diversos cenários clínicos, incluindo pacientes transplantados renais. De forma prática e para efeito de abordagem terapêutica, a interpretação do achado de candidúria é baseada na presença de dados clínicos e epidemiológicos Quando necessária, a terapêutica antifúngica para os casos de candidúria pode ser realizada com: anfotericina B sistêmica, anfotericina B tópica (irrigação vesical) ou fluconazol. A coleta de hemoculturas deve ser indicada em pacientes com candidúria sob risco para desenvolvimento de candidíase hematogênica. A retirada da sonda vesical de demora deve ser considerada sempre que possível, pois reduz a possibilidade de persistência ou recorrência da infecção urinária por Candida spp.Candiduria remains a controversial issue for clinicians once that it may represent a broad variety of possibilities including colonization, local or systemic infection. We will discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of candiduria in different settings of patients, including renal transplant recipients. Definitions on therapy are mostly based on epidemiological and clinical data. Once antifungal therapy is required the following antifungal treatment may be used: intravenous amphotericin B, bladder irrigation with amphotericin B or fluconazole. Blood cultures may be required in patients with candiduria and high risk for developing hematogenous infection. Removal of the urinary catheter must be considered in order to avoid persistent candiduria and recurrence.

Paciente portadora de anemia hemolítica autoimune e púrpura trombocitopênica idiopática (Síndrome de Evans) em uso de terapia imunossupressora (predinisona e azatioprina), desenvolveu quadro de abscesso cerebral não responsivo a 23 dias de terapia antimicrobiana. O diagnóstico de nocardiose foi possível após coleta de material de abscesso peribulbar e observação deste material por período superior há uma semana.

Paracoccidioidomicose é considerada a micose sistêmica endêmica mais prevalente na América Latina. Apesar da maior parte da casuística de paracoccidioidomicose ocorrer entre trabalhadores rurais, há poucos casos documentados de ocorrência dessa micose entre índios brasileiros. São apresentados 2 casos de paracoccidioidomicose em índios Suruí, família linguística Tupi-Mondé, procedentes de Cacoal, Rondônia. Ambos apresentaram sorologia positiva à imunodifusão apenas com antígenos da fase miceliana do P. brasiliensis. Os autores apresentam revisão de literatura sobre a ocorrência dessa micose entre índios brasileiros e discutem a necessidade de futuras investigações buscando caracterizar as diferenças regionais de cepas de P. brasiliensis e seu impacto no diagnóstico sorológico dessa micose.

Foram estudados retrospectivamente os prontuários de 15 pacientes portadores de leishmaniose e 28 pacientes de paracoccidioidomicose, nas formas de acometimento de mucosa oronasofaringolaringeana, atendidos na Escola Paulista de Medicina de 1986 a 1990. Estes pacientes foram comparados com relação às seguintes variáveis: sexo, idade, tempo de evolução da doença, topografia da lesão e queixas clínicas. Sexo, tempo de evolução da doença, topografia de lesão em septo nasal, palatos, língua e lábios, e queixa clínica com relação a dor em cavidade oral, disfagia/odinofagia e obstrução nasal apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significante em sua ocorrência nos dois grupos de pacientes. Os autores consideram estes achados relevantes na diferenciação clínica entre as duas moléstias.We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 15 patients diagnosed with leishmaniasis and of 28 patients diagnosed with paracoccidiodorrcycosis presenting with involvement of the oral-nasal-pharyngeal mucosa seen at Escola Paulista de Medicina from 1986 through 1990. These patients were compared in regard to the following variables: sex, age, time since disease onset, location of lesion, and clinical complaints. Sex, time since disease onset, lesion at the nasal septum, palate, tongue, and lips, and history of oral pain, dysphagia/ odinophagia, and nasal obstruction were significantly different in the two groups of patients. The authors point out to the relevance of these findings in the differential clinical diagnosis of leishmaniasis and paracoccidiodomycosis.

Abstract Paracoccidioidomycosis is a systemic fungal disease occurring in Latin America that is associated with rural environments and agricultural activities. However, the incidence and prevalence of paracoccidiodomycosis is underestimated because of the lack of compulsory notification. If paracoccidiodomycosis is not diagnosed and treated early and adequately, the endemic fungal infection could result in serious sequelae. While the Paracoccidioides brasiliensis ( P. brasiliensis ) complex has been known to be the causal agent of paracoccidiodomycosis, a new species, Paracoccidioides lutzii ( P. lutzii ), has been reported in Rondônia, where the disease has reached epidemic levels, and in the Central West and Pará. Accurate diagnoses and availability of antigens that are reactive with the patients’ sera remain significant challenges. Therefore, the present guidelines aims to update the first Brazilian consensus on paracoccidioidomycosis by providing evidence-based recommendations for bedside patient management. This consensus summarizes etiological, ecoepidemiological, molecular epidemiological, and immunopathological data, with emphasis on clinical, microbiological, and serological diagnosis and management of clinical forms and sequelae, as well as in patients with comorbidities and immunosuppression. The consensus also includes discussion of outpatient treatments, severe disease forms, disease prevalence among special populations and resource-poor settings, a brief review of prevention and control measures, current challenges and recommendations.